Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:18:55.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Unresolved issues and challenges in efficiency measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

Rowena Jacobs
Affiliation:
University of York
Peter C. Smith
Affiliation:
University of York
Andrew Street
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter we discuss four of the most important issues that arise when seeking to use efficiency models in the health care sector: the weights used to indicate the values of different outputs; how the efficiency models are constructed; the treatment of environmental influences on performance; and dynamic aspects of efficiency.

Output weights

There are important questions relating to the objectives encompassed by any index of efficiency, particularly when the analysis is to be used for regulatory purposes. Is it legitimate for the central policy maker to attach a uniform set of objectives to all organisations? If so, is it further legitimate to apply a uniform set of weights to these objectives? If so, how should they be chosen? If not, what is the extent of legitimate variation, and who should choose? These are fundamental issues, the answers to which determine whether or not creating a single measure of organisational performance is warranted. In our view, organisations can be ranked on efficiency only if the policy maker may legitimately (i) set objectives and (ii) attach weights to those objectives.

When comparing organizations that are charged with meeting social objectives, the set of output weights ought to reflect societal values. However, it is not a simple matter to derive such weights, particularly when organisations face multiple objectives and there is disagreement as to organisational priorities. Ultimately the selection of objectives in the public services is a job for the politicians charged with reconciling conflicting claims on public resources.

Type
Chapter
Information
Measuring Efficiency in Health Care
Analytic Techniques and Health Policy
, pp. 167 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×