Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T18:59:33.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Andrew Hurrell
Affiliation:
Nuffield College Oxford
Andrew Dobson
Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
Robyn Eckersley
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

‘The view of world order to which we have fallen heir is dominated by the conception of statehood’ (MacCormick 1996: 554). The deeply entrenched statism of both political theory and international relations has many sources. For some, it rests simply on the historical rise of the modern state as the dominant form of social and political order and on its continued strength as both a source of authority and an apparatus of power in the face of would-be challengers and potential competitors, be they transnational firms, international organisations or transnational social movements. For others, it rests on the role of the nation state as the primary focus for human loyalty and communal allegiance. But, whatever its foundations, it is impossible to ignore the immense power of the idea and ideology of the state in the Western political imagination and the way in which this ideology became globalised in the course of European imperial expansion and in the process of decolonisation. The emergence of the modern state was complex, the history of state formation contested, and the variety of actually existing states and the inequalities amongst them have always been hard to square with the ideal-typical character of the ‘modern state’. But, once established, the state came to dominate the ontological landscape of politics, as well as many of the most powerful traditions of political theory, moral reflection and international legal analysis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allier, J. M. (2003). The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2001). The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, H. (1977/2002). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., Downes, D., Hunold, C., and Schlosberg, D. (2003). Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckersely, R. (1992). Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Eckersely, R.(2004). The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. (1999). ‘Social Constructivism and the Evolution of Multilateral Environmental Governance’, in Prakesh, Aseem and Hart, Jeffrey A. (eds.), Globalization and Governance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Litfin, K. T. (ed.) (1998). The Greening of Sovereignty in World Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. (1996). ‘Liberalism, Nationalism and the Post-Sovereign State’, Political Studies, 44, (special issue): 553–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Judith (2001). Mao's War Against Nature: Politics and the Environment in Revolutionary China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, M. (1966). ‘Why Is There No International Theory?’, in Wight, Martin and Butterfield, Herbert (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations. London: Allen and Unwin, 17–34.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The state
  • Edited by Andrew Dobson, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Robyn Eckersley, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617805.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The state
  • Edited by Andrew Dobson, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Robyn Eckersley, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617805.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The state
  • Edited by Andrew Dobson, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Robyn Eckersley, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617805.011
Available formats
×