Bibliography

Lambert Zuidervaart

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511618970.010

Aesthetic Theory (1970). Translated, edited, and with a translator's introduction by Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997. (GS 7)Google Scholar

Ästhetische Theorie. Gesammelte Schriften 7. Edited by Adorno, Gretel and Tiedemann, Rolf. 2d ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1972.Google Scholar

Against Epistemology: A Metacritique; Studies in Husserl and the Phenomenological Antinomies (1956). Translated by Domingo, Willis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982. (GS 5)Google Scholar

The Authoritarian Personality. By Adorno, T. W. et al. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950. (GS 9.1)Google Scholar

Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords (1963, 1969). Translated by Henry, W. Pickford. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. (GS 10.2)Google Scholar

Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (1947). By Horkheimer, Max and Theodor, W. Adorno. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. (GS 3)Google Scholar

Dialektik der Aufklärung. In Horkheimer, Max, Gesammelte Schriften, Band 5: “Dialektik der Aufklärung” und Schriften 1940–1950. Edited by Noerr, Gunzelin Schmid. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch, 1987.Google Scholar

Hegel: Three Studies (1963). Translated by Nicholsen, Shierry Weber. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993. (GS 5)Google Scholar

In Search of Wagner (1952). Translated by Livingstone, Rodney. London: NLB, 1981. (GS 13)Google Scholar

Introduction to Sociology (1968). Edited by Gödde, Christoph. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000. (NS IV.15)Google Scholar

The Jargon of Authenticity (1964). Translated by Tarnowski, Knut and Will, Frederic. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973. (GS 6)Google Scholar

Jargon der Eigentlichkeit: Zur deutschen Ideologie. Gesammelte Schriften 6. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1973.

Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1959). Edited by Tiedemann, Rolf. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001. (NS IV.4)Google Scholar

Kierkegaard: Construction of the Aesthetic (1933). Translated by Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989. (GS 2)Google Scholar

Kierkegaard: Konstruktion des Ästhetischen. Gesammelte Schriften 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1979.

Metaphysics: Concept and Problems (1965). Edited by Tiedemann, Rolf. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000. (NS IV.14)Google Scholar

Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (1951). Translated by Jephcott, E. F. N.. London: NLB, 1974. (GS 4)Google Scholar

Minima Moralia: Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben. Gesammelte Schriften 4. 2d ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996.

Negative Dialectics (1966). Translated by Ashton, E. B.. New York: Seabury Press, 1973. (GS 6)Google Scholar

Negative Dialektik. Gesammelte Schriften 6. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1973.

Notes to Literature (1958, 1961, 1965, 1974). 2 vols. Edited by Tiedemann, Rolf. Translated by Shierry Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991, 1992. (GS 11)Google Scholar

Philosophy of New Music (1949). Translated, edited, and with an introduction by Hullot-Kentor, Robert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. (GS 12)Google Scholar

The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology (1969). By Theodor, W. Adorno et al. Translated by Glyn Adey and David Frisby. London: Heinemann, 1976. (GS 8)Google Scholar

Prisms (1955). Translated by Weber, Samuel and Weber, Shierry. London: Neville Spearman, 1967; Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981. (GS 10.1)Google Scholar

Probleme der Moralphilosophie (1963). Edited by Schröder, Thomas. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996.Google Scholar

Problems of Moral Philosophy (1963). Edited by Schröder, Thomas. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000. (NS IV.10)Google Scholar

Soziologische Schriften I. Gesammelte Schriften 8. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1972.

Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie: Studien über Husserl und die phänomenologischen Antinomien. Gesammelte Schriften 5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970.

The Adorno Reader. Edited by O'Connor, Brian. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar

“Alienated Masterpiece: The Missa Solemnis (1959).” Telos, no. 28 (1976): 113–24.

Can One Live after Auschwitz? A Philosophical Reader. Edited by Tiedemann, Rolf. Translated by Rodney Livingstone et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. Edited by Bernstein, J. M.. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

“Erinnerungen an Paul Tillich.” In Werk und Wirken Paul Tillichs: Ein Gedenkbuch, pp. 24–38. Stuttgart: Evangelisches Verlagswerk, 1967.

Essays on Music: Theodor W. Adorno. Edited by Richard, D. Leppert. Translated by Susan H. Gillespie et al. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Aho, Kevin. “Why Heidegger Is Not an Existentialist: Interpreting Authenticity and Historicity in Being and Time.” Florida Philosophical Review 3, no. 2 (Winter 2003): 5–22.Google Scholar

Anker, Roy, ed. Dancing in the Dark: Youth, Popular Culture, and the Electronic Media. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar

Baumeister, Thomas, and Kulenkampff, Jens. “Geschichtsphilosophie und philosophische Ästhetik. Zu Adornos ‘Ästhetischer Theorie.’” Neue Hefte für Philosophie, no. 5 (1973): 74–104.Google Scholar

Becker-Schmidt, Regina. “Critical Theory as a Critique of Society: Theodor W. Adorno's Significance for a Feminist Sociology.” In Adorno, Culture and Feminism, edited by O'Neill, Maggie, pp. 104–18. London: Sage, 1999.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Jessica. “The End of Internalization: Adorno's Social Psychology.” Telos, no. 32 (Summer 1977): 42–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. “Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit.” In Illuminationen: Ausgewählte Schriften, pp. 136–69. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1977.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, translated by Harry Zohn, pp. 217–51. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.Google Scholar

Berman, Russell. “Adorno's Politics.” In Adorno: A Critical Reader, edited by Gibson, Nigel and Rubin, Andrew, pp. 110–31. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. M.Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. M. “Negative Dialectic as Fate: Adorno and Hegel.” In The Cambridge Companion to Adorno, edited by Huhn, Tom, pp. 19–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bozzetti, Mauro. “Hegel on Trial.” In Adorno: A Critical Reader, edited by Gibson, Nigel and Rubin, Andrew, pp. 292–311. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Brand, Peggy Zeglin. “Revising the Aesthetic-Nonaesthetic Distinction: The Aesthetic Value of Activist Art.” In Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, edited by Brand, Peggy Zeglin and Korsmeyer, Carolyn, pp. 245–72. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Brantlinger, Patrick. Bread and Circuses: Theories of Mass Culture as Social Decay. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke. Adorno and Critical Theory. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke. Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Translated by Jeffrey Flynn. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Bürger, Peter. “Critique of Autonomy.” In Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, edited by Kelly, Michael, 1:175–8. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bürger, Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Translated by Michael Shaw, with a foreword by Jochen Schulte-Sass. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Carman, Taylor. Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carroll, Noël. “Essence, Expression, and History: Arthur Danto's Philosophy of Art.” In Danto and His Critics, edited by Collins, Mark, pp. 79–106. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar

Carroll, Noël. A Philosophy of Mass Art. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.Google Scholar

Claussen, Detlev. Theodor W. Adorno: Ein letztes Genie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2003.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean, and Arato, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Cook, Deborah. Adorno, Habermas, and the Search for a Rational Society. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Cook, Deborah. “Adorno on Mass Societies.” Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (Spring 2001): 35–52.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cook, Deborah. The Culture Industry Revisited: Theodor W. Adorno on Mass Culture. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996.Google Scholar

Cook, Deborah. “From the Actual to the Possible: Nonidentity Thinking.” Constellations 12 (2005): 21–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cornell, Drucilla. The Philosophy of the Limit. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, Daniel O.Heidegger's Concept of Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur C.After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur C.The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur C.The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur C. The Wake of Art: Criticism, Philosophy, and the Ends of Taste. Edited by Horowitz, Greg and Huhn, Tom. Amsterdam: G + B Arts International, 1998.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority.’ ” In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, edited by Cornell, Drucilla, Rosenfeld, Michael, and Carlson, David Gray, pp. 3–67. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Devereaux, Mary. “Autonomy and Its Feminist Critics.” In Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, edited by Kelly, Michael, 1:178–82. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Devereaux, Mary.“The Philosophical and Political Implications of the Feminist Critique of Aesthetic Autonomy.” In Turning the Century: Feminist Criticism in the 1990s, edited by Carr, Glynis, pp. 164–86. Lewisburg, Pa.: Bucknell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Devereaux, Mary. “Protected Space: Politics, Censorship, and the Arts.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (Spring 1993): 207–15.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. In The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 2: 1925–1927, edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, pp. 235–372. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L.Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Duvenage, Pieter. Habermas and Aesthetics: The Limits of Communicative Reason. Malden, Mass.: Polity Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Felski, Rita. Beyond Feminist Aesthetics: Feminist Literature and Social Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Felski, Rita.“Why Feminism Doesn't Need an Aesthetic (And Why It Can't Ignore Aesthetics).” In Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, edited by Brand, Peggy Zeglin and Korsmeyer, Carolyn, pp. 431–45. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond. Outside Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Gibson, Nigel, and Rubin, Andrew, eds. Adorno: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Goudzwaard, Bob. Capitalism and Progress: A Diagnosis of Western Society. Translated and edited by Nuis Zylstra, Josina. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1979.Google Scholar

Gracyk, Theodore. Rhythm and Noise: An Aesthetics of Rock. London: I. B. Tauris, 1996.Google Scholar

Grenz, Friedemann. Adornos Philosophie in Grundbegriffen. Auflösung einiger Deutungsprobleme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974.Google Scholar

Guignon, Charles. “Philosophy and Authenticity: Heidegger's Search for a Ground for Philosophizing.” In Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume 1, edited by Wrathall, Mark A. and Jeff, Malpas, pp. 79–101. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas. Edited by Dews, Peter. Rev. ed. London: Verso, 1992.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.“Concluding Remarks.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Calhoun, Craig, pp. 462–79. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.“Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Calhoun, Craig, pp. 421–61. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. Translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Introduction by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Philosophical-Political Profiles. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Philosophisch-politische Profile. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1971.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays. Translated by William Mark Hohengarten. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article” (1964). Translated by Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox. New German Critique, no. 1 (Fall 1974): 49–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Burger, Thomas and Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. 2 vols. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984, 1987.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.Truth and Justification. Edited and with translations by Fultner, Barbara. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Hammer, Espen. “Adorno and Extreme Evil.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, no. 4 (2000): 75–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammer, Espen. Adorno and the Political. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Hansen, Miriam. “Mass Culture as Hieroglyphic Writing: Adorno, Derrida, Kracauer.” New German Critique, no. 56 (Spring–Summer 1992): 43–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hare, John E.The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Haskins, Casey. “Autonomy: Historical Overview.” In Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, edited by Kelly, Michael, 1:170–5. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Heberle, Renée J., ed. Feminist Interpretations of Theodor Adorno. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Edited by Wood, Allen W.. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. Sein und Zeit. 15th ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1979.Google Scholar

Held, David, and McGrew, Anthony. Globalization/Anti-Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Communication and Reconciliation: Habermas' Critique of Adorno.” Telos, no. 39 (Spring 1979): 45–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Translated by Kenneth Baynes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel.The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy. Edited by Wright, Charles W.. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “The Possibility of a Disclosing Critique of Society: The Dialectic of Enlightenment in Light of Current Debates in Social Criticism.” Constellations 7, no. 1 (2000): 116–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Huhn, Tom, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Adorno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef Google Scholar

Huhn, Tom, and Zuidervaart, Lambert, eds. The Semblance of Subjectivity: Essays in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Hullot-Kentor, Robert. “Back to Adorno.” Telos, no. 81 (Fall 1989): 5–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jaggar, Alison. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld, 1983.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. Late Marxism: Adorno; or, The Persistence of the Dialectic. London: Verso, 1990.Google Scholar

Jarvis, Simon. Adorno: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Jay, Martin. “Is Experience Still in Crisis? Reflections on a Frankfurt School Lament.” Kriterion, no. 100 (December 1999): 9–25.Google Scholar

Jay, Martin.“Mimesis and Mimetology: Adorno and Lacoue-Labarthe.” In The Semblance of Subjectivity: Essays in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory, edited by Huhn, Tom and Zuidervaart, Lambert, pp. 29–53. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jay, Martin. Songs of Experience: Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Guyer, Paul. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel.Critique of Practical Reason. In Practical Philosophy, translated and edited by Gregor, Mary J., general introduction by Allen Wood, pp. 133–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Keane, John. Global Civil Society?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Keat, Russell. Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market. London: Macmillan, 2000.CrossRef

Klaassen, Matthew J. “The Nature of Critical Theory and Its Fate: Adorno vs. Habermas, Ltd.” Master's thesis, Institute for Christian Studies, Toronto, 2005.

Knoll, Manuel. Theodor W. Adorno: Ethik als erste Philosophie. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2002.Google Scholar

Küng, Hans, and Kuschel, Karl-Josef, eds. A Global Ethic: The Declaration of the Parliament of the World's Religions. New York: Continuum, 1998.Google Scholar

Lacy, Suzanne, ed. Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art. Seattle: Bay Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Landes, Joan B.Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Lee, Lisa Yun. Dialectics of the Body: Corporeality in the Philosophy of T. W. Adorno. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Lunn, Eugene. Marxism and Modernism: An Historical Study of Lukács, Brecht, Benjamin, and Adorno. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Macdonald, Iain. “Ethics and Authenticity: Conscience and Non-Identity in Heidegger and Adorno with a Glance at Hegel.” In Adorno and Heidegger: Philosophical Questions, edited by Macdonald, Iain and Ziarek, Krzysztof. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Margolis, Joseph. “Reconciling Analytic and Feminist Philosophy and Aesthetics.” In Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, edited by Brand, Peggy Zeglin and Korsmeyer, Carolyn, pp. 416–30. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Martinson, Mattias. Perseverance without Doctrine: Adorno, Self-Critique, and the Ends of Academic Theology. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2000.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. Edited by Engels, Frederick. Translated by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. New York: International Publishers, 1967.Google Scholar

Menke, Christoph. Die Souveränität der Kunst: Ästhetische Erfahrung nach Adorno und Derrida. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar

Menke, Christoph. The Sovereignty of Art: Aesthetic Negativity in Adorno and Derrida. Translated by Neil Solomon. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Morris, Martin. Rethinking the Communicative Turn: Adorno, Habermas, and the Problem of Communicative Freedom. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Müller-Doohm, Stefan. Adorno: A Biography. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Nicholsen, Shierry Weber. “Aesthetic Theory's Mimesis of Walter Benjamin.” In The Semblance of Subjectivity: Essays in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory, edited by Huhn, Tom and Zuidervaart, Lambert, pp. 55–91. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Brian. Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Philosophy and the Possibility of Critical Rationality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Paetzold, Heinz. “Adorno's Notion of Natural Beauty: A Reconsideration.” In The Semblance of Subjectivity: Essays in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory, edited by Huhn, Tom and Zuidervaart, Lambert, pp. 213–35. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pensky, Max. “Editor's Introduction: Adorno's Actuality.” In The Actuality of Adorno: Critical Essays on Adorno and the Postmodern, edited by Pensky, Max, pp. 1–21. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pensky, Max.“Globalizing Theory, Theorizing Globalization: Introduction.” In Globalizing Critical Theory, edited by Pensky, Max, pp. 1–15. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.Google Scholar

Peters, Rebecca Todd. In Search of the Good Life: The Ethics of Globalization. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Pickford, Henry. “The Dialectic of Theory and Practice: On Late Adorno.” In Adorno: A Critical Reader, edited by Gibson, Nigel and Rubin, Andrew, pp. 312–40. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Schweppenhäuser, Gerhard. “Adorno's Negative Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Adorno, edited by Huhn, Tom, pp. 328–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef Google Scholar

Seerveld, Calvin. “Imaginativity.” Faith and Philosophy 4 (January 1987): 43–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sherratt, Yvonne. Adorno's Positive Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Taylor, Ronald, ed. Aesthetics and Politics: Debates between Bloch, Lukács, Brecht, Benjamin, Adorno. With an afterword by Fredric Jameson. London: NLB, 1977.Google Scholar

Theunissen, Michael. “Negativität bei Adorno.” In Adorno-Konferenz 1983, edited by Friedeburg, Ludwig and Habermas, Jürgen, pp. 41–65. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1983.Google Scholar

Tong, Rosemarie. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction. 2d ed. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Tugendhat, Ernst. “Heidegger's Idea of Truth.” Translated by Richard Wolin. In The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, edited by Wolin, Richard, pp. 245–63. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Tugendhat, Ernst.“Heideggers Idee von Wahrheit.” In Heidegger: Perspektiven zur Deutung seines Werks, edited by Pöggeler, Otto, pp. 286–97. Cologne: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 1970.Google Scholar

Tugendhat, Ernst. Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger. 2d ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1970.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vogel, Steven. Against Nature: The Concept of Nature in Critical Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Volf, Miroslav, and Katerberg, William, eds. The Future of Hope: Christian Tradition amid Modernity and Postmodernity. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar

Vries, Hent. Minimal Theologies: Critiques of Secular Reason in Adorno and Levinas. Translated by Geoffrey Hale. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Waugh, Joann B. “Analytic Aesthetics and Feminist Aesthetics: Neither/Nor?” In Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, edited by Brand, Peggy Zeglin and Korsmeyer, Carolyn, pp. 399–415. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Wellmer, Albrecht. “Communications and Emancipation: Reflections on the Linguistic Turn in Critical Theory.” In On Critical Theory, edited by O'Neill, John, pp. 231–63. New York: Seabury Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Wellmer, Albrecht. Critical Theory of Society. Translated by John Cumming. New York: Herder and Herder, 1971.Google Scholar

Wellmer, Albrecht. Endgames: The Irreconcilable Nature of Modernity; Essays and Lectures. Translated by David Midgley. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Wellmer, Albrecht. Endspiele: Die unversöhnliche Moderne; Essays und Vorträge. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993.Google Scholar

Wellmer, Albrecht. Kritische Gesellschaftstheorie und Positivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1969.Google Scholar

Wellmer, Albrecht. The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aesthetics, Ethics, and Postmodernism. Translated by David Midgley. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Whitebook, Joel. Perversion and Utopia: A Study in Psychoanalysis and Critical Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Whitebook, Joel. “The Problem of Nature in Habermas.” Telos, no. 40 (Summer 1979): 41–69.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wiggershaus, Rolf. The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance. Translated by Michael Robertson. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Wilke, Sabine, and Heidi Schlipphacke. “Construction of a Gendered Subject: A Feminist Reading of Adorno's Aesthetic Theory.” In The Semblance of Subjectivity: Essays in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory, edited by Huhn, Tom and Zuidervaart, Lambert, pp. 287–308. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Young, Julian. Heidegger's Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael E.Eclipse of the Self: The Development of Heidegger's Concept of Authenticity. Rev. ed. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert. Adorno's Aesthetic Theory: The Redemption of Illusion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert. Artistic Truth: Aesthetics, Discourse, and Imaginative Disclosure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert. “Autonomy, Negativity, and Illusory Transgression: Menke's Deconstruction of Adorno's Aesthetics.” Philosophy Today, SPEP suppl. (1999): 154–68.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert.“Creative Border Crossing in New Public Culture.” In Literature and the Renewal of the Public Sphere, edited by VanZanten, SusanGallagher, and Walhout, Mark D., pp. 206–24. New York: St. Martin's, 2000.Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert. “Cultural Paths and Aesthetic Signs: A Critical Hermeneutics of Aesthetic Validity.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2003): 315–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert.“Feminist Politics and the Culture Industry: Adorno's Critique Revisited.” In Feminist Interpretations of Theodor Adorno, edited by Heberle, Renée, pp. 257–76. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert.“Postmodern Arts and the Birth of a Democratic Culture.” In The Arts, Community and Cultural Democracy, edited by Zuidervaart, Lambert and Luttikhuizen, Henry, pp. 15–39. New York: St. Martin's, 2000.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert. Review of J. M. Bernstein, Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Constellations 10 (2003): 280–3.Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert.“Short Circuits and Market Failure: Theories of the Civic Sector.” Paper presented at the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Boston, 1998. http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Soci/SociZuid.htm.

Zuidervaart, Lambert. “The Social Significance of Autonomous Art: Adorno and Bürger.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (Winter 1990): 61–77.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zuidervaart, Lambert.“Theodor Adorno.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Summer 2003 edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2003/entries/adorno/.