Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 1998. “Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(1): 3–32 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrego, Lisandro, Raymond Riezman, and John Whalley. 2004. “Computation and the Theory of Customs Unions.” Unpublished Manuscript.

Accominotti, Olivier and Marc Flandreau. 2006. “Does Bilateralism Promote Trade? Nineteenth Century Liberalization Revisited.” London: Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 5423.

Aggarwal, Vinod K. 1985. Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Free Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Alapuro, Risto. 1988. State and Revolution in Finland.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Allen, Deborah L., Lewis, Leslie, and Tower, Edward. 1980. “U.S. Concessions in the Kennedy Round and Short-run Labor Adjustment Costs: Still Further Evidence.”Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 20: 108–10 (Autumn).Google Scholar

Anderson, Gary M. and Tollison, Robert D.. 1985. “Ideology, Interest Groups, and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.”Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 141(2): 197–212.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kym. 1980. “The Political Market for Government Assistance to Australian Manufacturing Industries.”The Economic Record 56(153): 132–44 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angell, James B. 1901. “The Turkish Capitulations.”American Historical Review 6(2): 254–59 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ankli, Robert E. 1971. “The Reciprocity Treaty of 1854.”Canadian Journal of Economics 4(1): 1–20 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonescu, Cornelius G. 1915. Die Rumänische Handelspolitik von 1875–1910. Leipzig: Wilhelm Schunke Verlag.Google Scholar

Arend, Anthony Clark. 1999. Legal Rules and International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ashley, Percy. 1926. Modern Tariff History. Germany – United States – France (3rd ed.). New York: E. P. Dutton & Company.Google Scholar

Augier, Charles. 1906. La France et les traités de commerce: Étude sur les tarifs des douanes de la France et de l'étranger. Paris: Librairie Chevalier et Riviere.Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, David. 1981. “Voluntary Pressure Groups.”Economica 48(190): 143–53 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avery, William P., ed. 1993. World Agriculture and the GATT. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert and Robert O. Keohane. 1986. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” in Oye, ed. 1986: 226–54.

Bac, Mehmet, and Raff, Horst. 1997. “A Theory of Trade Concessions.”Journal of International Economics 42(3): 483–504 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W.. 1990. “A Theory of Managed Trade.”American Economic Review 80(4): 779–95 (September).Google Scholar

Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger. 1999. “Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral Opportunism and the Rules of GATT.” Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7071.

Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W.. 2005. “Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral Opportunism and the Rules of GATT/WTO.”Journal of International Economics 67(2): 268–94 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bairoch, Paul. 1972. “Free Trade and European Economic Development in the 19th Century.”European Economic Review 3(3): 211–45 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bairoch, Paul. 1989. “European Trade Policy 1815–1914.” in Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. 13, edited by Peter, Mathias and Sidney, Pollard. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–160.Google Scholar

Bairoch, Paul. 1993. Economics and World History: Myths and Paradoxes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert E. 1976. “Trade and Employment Effects in the United States of Multilateral Tariff Reductions.”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 66: 142–48 (May).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert E. 1985. The Political Economy of U.S. Import Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard E. 1990. “Optimal Tariff Retaliation Rules.” In The Political Economy of International Trade, ed. Jones, R. and Krueger, A.. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 108–21.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard. 1993. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism.” NBER Working Paper No. 4465, September.

Bale, Malcolm D. 1977. “United States Concessions in the Kennedy Round and Short-Run Labour Adjustment Costs: Further Evidence.”Journal of International Economics 7(2): 145–48 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkin, Kenneth D. 1970. The Controversy over German Industrialization 1890–1902. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Basevi, Giorgio. 1966. “The United States Tariff Structure: Estimates of Effective Rates of Protection of United States Industries and Industrial Labor.”Review of Economics and Statistics 48(2): 147–60 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bastiat, Frédéric. 1862. “Démocratie et libre-échange.” In Œuvres complètes de Fréderic Bastiat, mises en ordre, rev. et annotées d'après les manuscrits de l'auteur. 2nd ed., vol. 2, Le Libre-Échange. Paris: Guillaumin, 1862–64.Google Scholar

Bazant, Johann. 1894. Die Handelspolitik Österreich-Ungarns 1875 bis 1892 in ihrem Verhältnis zum Deutschem Reiche und zu dem westlichen Europa. Leipzig: Verlag von Dunker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. “What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 634–47 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Nathaniel, King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2000. “Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict: A Conjecture.” American Political Science Review 94(1): 21–35 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1983. “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(3): 371–400 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1985. “Public Policies, Pressure Groups, and Dead Weight Costs.”Journal of Public Economics 28(3): 329–47 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckett, Grace Louis. 1941. The Reciprocal Trade Agreements Program. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Beer, Adolf. 1891. Österreichische Handelspolitik im neunzehnten Jahrhundert. Vienna: Manz'sche k.u.k. Hof-Verlags und Universitäts-Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Bergstrom, Theodore, Blume, Lawrence, and Varian, Hal. 1986. “On the Private Provision of Public Goods.”Journal of Public Economics 29(1): 25–49 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1990. “Departures from Multilateralism: Regionalism and Aggressive Unilateralism.”Economic Journal 100 (403): 1304–17 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, Greenaway, David, and Panagariya, Arvind. 1998. “Trading Preferentially: Theory and Policy.”Economic Journal 108(449): 1128–48 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, D. E. 1943. The Establishment of Constitutional Government in Bulgaria. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bordo, Michael D., Barry Eichengreen, and Douglas A. Irwin. 1999. “Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hundred Years Ago?” Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper 7195. http:/www.nber.org/papers/w7195 (June).

Lael, Brainard S. and Verdier, Thierry. 1997. “The Political Economy of Declining Industries: Senescent Industry Collapse Revisited.”Journal of International Economics 42(1): 221–37 (Febraury).Google Scholar

Brander, James A. 1996. “Rationales for Strategic Trade and Industrial Policy.” In Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, ed. Paul R. Krugman, pp. 23–46.

Braumoeller, Bear F. and Goertz, Gary. 2000. “The Methodology of Necessary Conditions.”American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 844–58 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brauneder, Wilhelm and Lachmayer, Friedrich. 1980. Österreichische Verfassungsgeschichte (2d ed.). Wien: Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Brawley, Mark R. 1993. Liberal Leadership: Great Powers and Their Challengers in Peace and War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Bruce, Bueno de Mesquita and Lalman, David. 1992. War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bruce, Bueno de Mesquita, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bulmer-Thomas, Victor. 1994. The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heinrich August Ernst, Bülow. 1902. Österreich-Ungarns Handels- und Industrie-Politik. Berlin: Wilhelm Süsserott.Google Scholar

Busch, Mark L. 2000. “Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(4): 425–46 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2000a. “Geography, International Trade, and Political Mobilization in U.S. Industries.”American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 703–19 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2000b. “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes.”Fordham International Law Journal 24(1–2): 158–72 (November-December).Google Scholar

Busch, Marc L. and Eric Reinhardt. 2001. “Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement.” In The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, ed. Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cahan, Steven F. and Kaempfer, William H.. 1992. “Industry Income and Congressional Regulatory Legislation: Interest Groups vs. Median Voter.”Economic Inquiry 30(1): 47–57 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvo, Carlos. 1862. Recueil Complet des Traités, Conventions, … de Tous les Etats d'Amérique Latine (1493–1862). Paris: A. Durand.Google Scholar

Caplin, A. and Krishna, K.. 1988. “Tariffs and the Most-Favored-Nation Clause: A Game Theoretic Approach,”Seoul Journal of Economics 1(3): 267–89.Google Scholar

Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America, trans. Marjory Mattingly Urquidi. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Oliveira, Cardoso, José Manuel, . 1912. Actos diplomáticos do Brasil: Tratados do periodo colonial e varios documentos desde 1493. Río de Janeiro: Typografía do Jornal do Commercio, de Rodrígues.Google Scholar

Cariola, Carmen and Osvaldo Sunkel. 1985. “The Growth of the Nitrate Industry and Socioeconomic change in Chile, 1880–1930.” In The Latin American Economies: Growth and the Export Sector, 1880–1930, ed. Conde, Roberto Cortés and Hunt, Shane J.. New York: Holmes and Meier, pp. 237–54.Google Scholar

Carr, Edward Hallett. 1961. What is History?New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassing, James H. and Hillman, Arye L.. 1985. “Political Influence Motives and the Choice Between Tariffs and Quotas.”Journal of International Economics 19(3): 279–90 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassing, James, McKeown, Timothy J., and Ochs, Jack. 1986. “The Political Economy of the Tariff Cycle.”American Political Science Review 80(3): 843–62 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caves, Richard E. 1976. “Economic Models of Political Choice: Canada's Tariff Structure.”Canadian Journal of Economics 9(2): 278–300 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheh, John H. 1974. “United States Concessions in the Kennedy Round and Short-Run Labor Adjustment Costs.”Journal of International Economics 4(4): 323–40 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheh, John H. 1976. “A Note on Tariffs, Nontariff Barriers, and Labor Protection in United States Manufacturing Industries.”Journal of Political Economy 84(2): 389–94 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choi, J. P. 1995. “Optimal Tariffs and the Choice of Technology: Discriminatory Tariffs, v. the ‘Most Favored Nation’ Clause.”Journal of International Economics 38(3): 143–60 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, Clive H. 1983. Europe in 1830: Revolution and Political Change. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Clark, Don P. 1980. “Protection of Unskilled Labour in the United States Manufacturing Industries: Further Evidence.”Journal of Political Economy 88(6): 1249–54 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Martin. 1996. Modern Italy 1871–1995 (2d ed.). London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Clarke, Kevin A. 2005. “The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research.”Conflict Management and Peace Science 22(4): 341–52 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clogg, Richard. 1992. A Short History of Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coates, Daniel E. and Ludema, Rodney D.. 2001. “A Theory of Trade Policy Leadership.”Journal of Development Economics 65(1): 1–29 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Club, Cobden. 1875. Free Trade and the European Treaties of Commerce. London: Cassell Petter & Galpin.Google Scholar

Cochrane, D. and Orcutt, G. H.. 1949. “Application of Least Squares Regression to Relationships Containing Auto-Correlated Error Terms.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 44(245): 32–61 (March).Google Scholar

Coddington, George Arthur, Jr. 1961. The Federal Government of Switzerland. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Collier, David. 1978. “Industrial Modernization and Political Change.”World Politics 30(4): 593–614 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conybeare, John A. C. 1984. “Politicians and Protection: Tariffs and Elections in Australia.” Public Choice 43(2): 203–09 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conybeare, John A. C. 1987. Trade Wars: The Theory and Practice of International Commercial Rivalry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Conybeare, John A. C. 1991. “Voting for Protection: An Electoral Model of Tariff Policy.”International Organization 45(1): 57–82 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppa, Frank J. 1970. “The Italian Tariff and the Conflict Between Agriculture and Industry: The Commercial Policy of Liberal Italy, 1860–1922.”Journal of Economic History 30(4): 742–69 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppa, Frank J. 1971. Planning, Protectionism, and Politics in Liberal Italy: Economics and Politics in the Giolittian Age. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Cornes, Richard and Sandler, Todd. 1986. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cortés Conde, Roberto. 1985. “The Export Economy ofArgentina, 1880–1920.” In Cortés Conde and Hunt, ed., pp. 319–81.

Cortés Conde, Roberto and Hunt, Shane J., ed. 1985. The Latin American Economies: Growth and the Export Sector, 1880–1930. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar

Cowhey, Peter F. and Long, Edward. 1983. “Testing Theories of Regime Change: Hegemonic Decline or Surplus Capacity?” International Organization 37(2): 157–83 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, Gordon A. 1978. Germany 1866–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crampton, R. J. 1997. A Concise History of Bulgaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crosby, Travis L. 1976. Sir Robert Peel's Administration, 1841–1846. Newton Abbot, Devon: David and Charles Ltd.Google Scholar

Crouzet, F. 1964. “Wars, Blockade, and Economic Change in Europe, 1792–1815.”Journal of Economic History 24(4): 567–88 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culbertson, William S. 1937. Reciprocity: A National Policy for Foreign Trade. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Curzon, Gerard and Victoria Curzon. 1976. “The Management of Trade Relations in the, GATT.” In International Economic Relations of the Western World 1959–1971, vol. 1: Politics and Trade, ed. Shonfield, Andrew et al. London: Oxford University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, pp. 143–286.Google Scholar

Dai, Xinyuan. 2002. “Political Regimes and International Trade: The Democratic Difference Revisited.”American Political Science Review 96(1): 159–66 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, S. P. 1990. “Foreign Lobbying and the Political Economy of Protection.”Japan and the World Economy 2(2): 169–79 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Christina L. 2004. “International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization.”American Political Science Review 98(1): 153–69 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, John R. 1997. Britain and the German Zollverein, 1848–66. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Macmillan Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, William Harbutt. 1904. Protection in Germany: A History of German Fiscal Policy During the Nineteenth Century. London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar

Deardorff, Alan V. 1984. “Testing Trade Theories and Predicting Trade Flows.” In Handbook of International Economics, vol. 1, ed. Jones, R. W. and Kenen, P. B.. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 467–517.Google Scholar

Deardorff, Alan V. and Robert M. Stern. 1992. “Multilateral Trade Negotiations and Preferential Trading Arrangements.” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute of Public Policy Studies Discussion Paper No. 344.

Destler, I. M. and Odell, John. 1987. Antiprotection: Changing Forces in United States Trade Politics. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

Dietzel, H. 1903. “The German Tariff Controversy.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 17(3): 365–416 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, Douglas. 1998. “Evidence and Inference and the Comparative Case Study.”Comparative Politics 30(2): 127–45 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, Peter. 1976. Canning: Politician and Statesman. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

D'Lugo, David and Ronald Rogowski. 1993. “The Anglo-German Naval Race and Comparative Constitutional ‘Fitness.’” In The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy, ed. Rosecrance, Richard and Stein, Arthur A.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 65–95.Google Scholar

Donnenfeld, S. and Weber, S.. 1985. “Lobbying for Tariffs and the Cost of Protection.”Recherches economiques de Louvain 51(1): 21–27 (March).Google Scholar

Downs, George W. and Rocke, David M.. 1995. Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1998. “Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism.”International Organization 52(2): 397–419 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dumke, Rolf H. 1978. “The Political Economy of German Economic Unification: Tariffs, Trade and Politics of the Zollverein Era.”Journal of Economic History 38(1): 277–78 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunham, Arthur Louis . 1930. The Anglo-French Treaty of Commerce of 1860 and the Progress of the Industrial Revolution in France. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Dunlop, Kathleen Edith. 1946. “The Policy of the Canadian Protective Tariff 1859–1914.” Urbana, Illinois: MA Thesis.

East, Maurice. 1973. “Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models.”World Politics 25(4): 556–76 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eddie, Scott M. 1968. “Agricultural Production and Output per Worker in Hungary, 1870–1913.”Journal of Economic History 28(2): 197–222 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eddie, Scott M. 1972. “The Terms of Trade as a Tax on Agriculture: Hungary's Trade with Austria, 1883–1913.”Journal of Economic History 32(1): 298–315 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eddie, Scott M. 1977. “The Terms and Pattern of Hungarian Foreign Trade, 1882–1913.”Journal of Economic History 37(2): 329–58 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Richard C. 1970. “Economic Sophistication in Nineteenth Century Congressional Tariff Debates.”Journal of Economic History 30(4): 802–38 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eicher, Theo and Osang, Thomas. 2002. “Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation: Comment.”American Economic Review 92(5): 1702–10 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elman, Colin, Elman, Miriam Fendius, and Schroeder, Paul W.. 1995. “History vs. Neo-Realism: A Second Look.”International Security 20(1): 182–95 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1989. “Social Norms and Economic Theory.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 99–117 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ethier, Wilfred. 2001. “Theoretical Problems in Negotiating Trade Liberalization.”European Journal of Political Economy 17(2): 209–32 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evangelista, Matthew. 1990. “Cooperation Theory and Disarmament Negotiations in the 1950s.”World Politics 42(4): 502–28 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, ed. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Peter J., Jacobson, Harold K., and Putnam, Robert D., ed. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Fabella, Raul V. 1991. “The Bias in Favor of Pro-Tariff Lobbies.”Journal of Public Economics 44(1): 87–93 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fay, H. Van V. 1927. “Commercial Policy in Post-War Europe: Reciprocity Versus Most-Favored Nation Treatment.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 41(3): 441–70 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearon, James D. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.”International Organization 52(2): 269–305 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finger, J. M. and DeRosa, Dean A. 1979. “Trade Overlap, Comparative Advantage and Protection.” In On the Economics of Intra-Industry Trade, ed. Giersch, H.. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, pp. 213–40.Google Scholar

Finger, J. M., Hall, H. Keith, and Nelson, Douglas R.. 1982. “The Political Economy of Administered Protection.”American Economic Review 72(3): 452–66 (June).Google Scholar

Finger, J. M. and Laird, S.. 1987. “Protection in Developed and Developing Countries: An Overview.”Journal of World Trade Law 21(1): 9–23.Google Scholar

Finlayson, Jock A. and Zacher, Mark W.. 1981. “The GATT and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Functions.”International Organization 35(4): 561–602 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

First International American Conference. 1889–1890. Reports and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Fischer, Ronald D. 1992. “Endogenous Probability of Protection and Firm Behavior.”Journal of International Economics 32(1–2): 149–63 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisk, George M. 1903. “German-American ‘Most Favored Nation’ Relations.”Journal of Political Economy 11(2): 220–36 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, R. A. 1983. “Cobden as Educator: The Free-Trade Internationalism of Eduard Bernstein, 1899–1914.”American Historical Review 88(3): 561–78 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankel, Jeffrey A. and Shang-Jin Wei. 1997. “Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies: Economics and Politics.” In The Regionalization of the World Economy, ed. Frankel, Jeffrey A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, Worthington Chauncey. 1902. “The Economy of Russia.”Political Science Quarterly 17(1): 99–124 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedberg, Aaron L. 1988. The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895–1905. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frieden, Jeffry A. and Ronald Rogowski. 1996. “The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview.” In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, ed. Milner, Helen V. and Keohane, Robert O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar

Friedman, Philip. 1978. “An Econometric Model of National Income, Commercial Policy and the Level of International Trade: The Open Economies of Europe, 1924–1938.” Journal of Economic History 38(1): 148–80 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richard, Friman H.. 1993. “Side-Payments Versus Security Cards: Domestic Bargaining Tactics in International Economic Negotiations.”International Organization 47(3): 387–410 (Summer).Google Scholar

Fry, Michael G. and Gilbert, Arthur N.. 1982. “A Historian and Linkage Politics: Arno Mayer.”International Studies Quarterly 26(3): 425–44 (September).Google Scholar

Fudenberg, Drew and Maskin, Eric. 1986. “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information.”Econometrica 54(3): 533–54 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, Steve. 1988. Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Gall, Lothar. 1976. “Bismarck und der Bonapartismus.”Historische Zeitschrift 223: 618–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, John and Robinson, Ronald. 1953. “The Imperialism of Free Trade.”Economic History Review, 2nd series, 6(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey. 1992. “International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: The European Community's Internal Market.”International Organization 46(2): 533–60 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey and Tsebelis, George. 1996. “An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism.”International Organization 50(2): 269–99 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gash, Norman. 1972. Sir Robert Peel. The Life of Sir Robert Peel After 1830. London: Longman Group Limited.Google Scholar

Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1943/1989. Bread and Democracy in Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gilligan, Michael J. 1997. Empowering Exporters: Reciprocity, Delegation, and Collective Action in American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godek, Paul E. 1985. “Industry Structure and Redistribution Through Trade Restrictions.”Journal of Law and Economics 28(4): 687–703 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goertz, Gary and Diehl, Paul F.. 1992. “Toward a Theory of International Norms: Some Conceptual and Measurement Issues.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(4): 634–64 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou, and Maggi, Giovanni. 1999. “Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation.”American Economic Review 89(5): 1135–55 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and American Foreign Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, Heinz. 1952. “Der Cäserismus Napoleons III. Im Widerhall der öffentlichen Meinung Deutschlands.”Historische Zeitschrift 173: 23–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, David F. 1981. “Economic Integration and Regional Development in Austria-Hungary, 1867–1913.” In Disparities in Economic Development since the Industrial Revolution, ed. Bairoch, Paul and Lévy-Leboyer, Maurice. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 137–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Barry J. 1979. Economic Doctrine and Tory Liberalism, 1824–1830. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gourevitch, Peter Alexis. 1977. “International Trade, Domestic Coalitions, and Liberty: Comparative Responses to the Crisis of 1873–1896.”Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8(2): 281–313 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gowa, Joanne. 1989. “Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and Free Trade.”American Political Science Review 83(4): 1245–56 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowa, Joanne. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gowa, Joanne and Mansfield, Edward D.. 1993. “Power Politics and International Trade.”American Political Science Review 87(2): 408–20 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowa, Joanne and Mansfield, Edward D.. 2004. “Alliances, Imperfect Markets, and Major-Power Trade.”International Organization 58(4): 775–805 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grieco, Joseph. 1988. “Realist Theory and the Problem of International Cooperation. Analysis with an Amended Prisoner's Dilemma Model.”Journal of Politics 50(3): 600–24 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grieco, Joseph M. 1990. Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene and Helpman, Elhanan. 1994. “Protection for Sale.”American Economic Review 84(4): 833–50 (September).Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan. 1995. “Trade Wars and Trade Talks.”Journal of Political Economy 103(4): 675–707 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan. 2002. Interest Groups and Trade Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M. and Levinsohn, James A.. 1989. “Import Competition and the Stock Market Return to Capital.”American Economic Review 79(5): 1065–87 (December).Google Scholar

Grossman, Herschel I. and Han, Taejoon. 1993. “A Theory of War Finance.”Defence Economics 4(1): 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gstöhl, Sieglinde. 2002. Reluctant Europeans: Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland in the Process of Integration. Boulder: Lynne Riemer.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan and Simmons, Beth A.. 1987. “Theories of International Regimes.”International Organization 41(3): 491–517 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, Hans-Werner. 1982. Wirtschaftliche Integration im 19. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Number 52 in the series Kritische Studien zur Geschichtswissenschaft, ed. Berding, Helmut, Jürgen Kocka, , and Hans-Ulrich Wehler, .Google Scholar

Haight, Frank Arnold. 1941. A History of French Commercial Policies. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L. 1995. “Empiricism and Progress in Positive Theories of Legislative Institutions.” In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, ed. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallerberg, Mark. 1996. “Tax Competition in Wilhelmine Germany and its Implications for the European Union.”World Politics 48(3): 324–57 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, Bob and Whalley, John. 1985. “Geographically Discriminatory Trade Arrangements.”Review of Economics and Statistics 67(3): 446–55 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Thomas H. and Brandon Prins. 1998. “Domestic Veto Institutions, International Negotiations, and the Status Quo: A Spatial Model of Two-Level Games with Complete Information.” Political Institutions and Public Choice Working Paper 98-05. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Public Policy and Social Resarch.

Hammond, Thomas H. and Brandon C. Prins. 2006. “Domestic Veto Institutions, Divided Government, and the Status Quo: A Spatial Model of Two-Level Games with Complete Information.” In Pahre 2006a: 21–82.

Hansen, Wendy L. 1990. “The International Trade Commission and the Politics of Trade Protectionism.”American Political Science Review 84(1): 21–46 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardach, Karl W. 1967. Die Bedeutung wirtschaftlicher Faktoren bei der Weidereinführung der Eisen- und Getreidezölle in Deutschland 1879. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Knick, Harley C.. 1982. “The Antebellum American Tariff: Food Exports and Manufacturing.”Explorations in Economic History 29(4): 375–400 (October).Google Scholar

Hartung, Fritz. 1923. Das Großherzogtum Sachsen unter der Regierung Karl Augusts 1775–1828. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar

Harvey, Walter Bennett. 1938. Tariffs and International Relations in Europe. University of Chicago: PhD Dissertation.

Heckscher, Eli F. 1922. The Continental System: An Economic Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Heckscher, Eli F. 1954. An Economic History of Sweden, trans. Goran Ohlin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Heckscher, Gunnar. 1966. “The Role of Small Nations – Today and Tomorrow.” (Fiftieth Anniversary Lecture of the School of Slavonic and East European Studies of the University of London, given on October, 19, 1965.) London: University of Athlone Press.

Helleiner, G. K. 1973. “Manufactured Exports from Less-Developed Countries and Multinational Firms.”Economic Journal 83(329): 21–47 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helleiner, G. K. 1977. “The Political Economy of Canada's Tariff Structure: An Alternative Model.”Canadian Journal of Economics 10(2): 318–26 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, William O. 1939/1984. The Zollverein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hertslet, Sir Edward. 1875–. Treaties and Tariffs Regulating the Trade Between Great Britain and Foreign Nations. London: Butterworth's.Google Scholar

Hillman, Arye L. 1982. “Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Motives.”American Economic Review 72(5): 1180–87.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. 1945/1989. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hiscox, Michael J. 2001. “Class Versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade.”International Organization 55(1): 1–46 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiscox, Michael J. 2002. “Commerce, Coalitions, and Factor Mobility: Evidence from Congressional Votes on Trade Legislation.”American Political Science Review 96(3): 593–608 (September).Google Scholar

Hobson, John M. 1997. The Wealth of States: A Comparative Sociology of International Economic and Political Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hodne, Fritz. 1983. The Norwegian Economy 1920–1980. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2001. “Economic and Legal Aspects of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause.”European Journal of Political Economy 17(2): 233–79 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornbeck, Stanley K. 1910. The Most-Favored-Nation Clause in Commercial Treaties. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Howe, Anthony. 1997. Free Trade and Liberal England 1846–1946. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hueckel, Glenn. 1981. “Agriculture During Industrialization.” In The Economic History of Britain Since 1700. vol. I: 1700–1860, ed. Floud, R. C. and McCloskey, D. N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–92.Google Scholar

Huertas, Thomas F. 1977. Economic Growth and Economic Policy in a Multinational Setting. The Habsburg Monarchy, 1841–1865. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar

Hug, Simon and Thomas König. 2002. “The Dimensionality of European Integration in the Ratification Stage.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

Hug, Simon and Thomas König. 2006. “Divided Government and the Ratification of the Amsterdam Treaty.” In Pahre, ed. 2006a: 133–50.

Hunt, James C. 1974. “Peasants, Grain Tariffs, and Meat Quotas: Imperial German Protectionism Reexamined.”Central European History 7(4): 311–31 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huth, Paul K. 1988. “Extended Deterrence and the Outbreak of War.”American Political Science Review 82(2): 423–43 (June)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huth, Paul K. 1996. Standing Your Ground. Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Iida, Keisuke. 1993. “When and How Do Domestic Constraints Matter? Two-Level Games with Uncertainty.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 34(3): 403–26 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iliasu, Asaana. 1971. “The Cobden-Chevalier Commercial Treaty of 1860.”Historical Journal 14(1): 67–98 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imlah, Albert H. 1958. Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica. Studies in British Foreign Trade in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imlah, Ann G. 1966. Britain and Switzerland 1845–1860. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A. 1988. “Welfare Effects of British Free Trade: Debate and Evidence from the 1840s.”Journal of Political Economy 96(6): 1142–64 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Douglas. 1989a. “Political Economy and Peel's Repeal of the Corn Laws.”Economics and Politics 1: 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Douglas. 1989b. “The Political Economy of Free Trade: Voting in the British General Election of 1906.”Journal of Law and Economics, 37(1): 75–108 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A. 1991. “Challenges to Free Trade.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(2): 201–08 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A. 1993. “Free Trade and Protection in Nineteenth-Century Britain and France Revisited: A Comment on Nye.”Journal of Economic History 53(1): 146–52 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A. 1995. “Industry or Class Cleavages over Trade Policy? Evidence from the British General Election of 1923.” Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5170.

Irwin, Douglas A. 1996. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

James, John A. 1981. “The Optimal Tariff in the Antebellum United States.”American Economic Review 71(4): 726–34 (September).Google Scholar

Jelavich, Barbara. 1983. History of the Balkans. Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. 1983. “Security Regimes.” In Krasner, ed. 1983: 173–94.

Johnson, Harry G. 1965. “An Economic Theory of Protectionism, Tariff Bargaining, and the Formation of Customs Unions.”Journal of Political Economy 73(3): 256–83 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Kent. 1984. “The Political Economy of Voluntary Export Restraints.”Kyklos 37(1): 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kadar, Bela. 1970. Small States in the World EconomyBudapest: Center for Afro-Asian Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Kaempfer, William H., McClure, J. Harold Jr., and Willett, Thomas D.. 1989. “Incremental Protection and Efficient Political Choice Between Tariffs and Quotas.”Canadian Journal of Economics 22: 228–36 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kann, Robert A. 1974. A History of the Habsburg Empire, 1526–1918. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. 1976. Disjoined Partners: Austria and Germany Since 1815. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Keegan, John. 1999. The First World War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Kehr, Eckart. 1965. Der Primat der Innenpolitik, ed. Hans-Ulrich Wehler. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Paul M. 1980. The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism 1860–1914. London: The Ashfield Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1980. “The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967–1977.” In Change in the International System, ed. Holsti, Ole et al. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 131–62.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1986. “Reciprocity in International Relations.”International Organization 40(1): 1–27 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1990. “Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research.” International Journal 45: 731–64 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P. 1951. “Group Behavior and International Trade.”Journal of Political Economy 59(1): 30–46 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression 1929–1939. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P. 1975. “The Rise of Free Trade in Western Europe, 1820–1875.”Journal of Economic History 35(1): 20–55 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary. 1989. “Event Count Models for International Relations: Generalizations and Applications.”International Studies Quarterly 33(2): 123–47 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Kitson G. S. R. 1951. “The Electorate and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.”Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, I: 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiyono, Kazuharu, Okuno-Fujiwara, Masahiro, and Ueda, Kaoru. 1991. “Industry Specific Interests and Trade Protection: A Game Theoretic Analysis.”Economic Studies Quarterly 42(4): 347–59 (December).Google Scholar

Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Mulkay, Michael, ed. 1983. Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Komlos, John. 1983. The Habsburg Monarchy as a Customs Union. Economic Development in Austria-Hungary in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Komorita, S. S. and Esser, James K.. 1975. “Frequency of Reciprocated Concessions in Bargaining.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(4): 699–705 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara. 2001. “Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility.” International Organization 55(2): 289–325 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.”International Organization 55(4): 761–800 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade.”World Politics 28(3): 317–413 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. 1977. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investment and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier.”World Politics 43(3): 336–66 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauze, Enrique. 1997. Mexico: Biography of Power. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Kreider, Carl. 1943. The Anglo-American Trade Agreement. A Study of British and American Commercial Policies, 1934–1939. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kreps, David, Milgrom, Paul, Roberts, John, and Wilson, Robert. 1982. “Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma.”Journal of Economic Theory 27(2): 245–52 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krishna, Pravin, and Mitra, Devashish. 2005. “Reciprocated Unilateralism in Trade Policy.”Journal of International Economics 65(2): 461–87 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, Paul R. 1986. “Introduction: New Thinking About Trade Policy.” In Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, ed. Krugman, Paul R.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Laird, Sam and Yeats, Alexander. 1990. Quantitative Methods for Trade-Barrier Analysis. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David A. 1988. Power, Protection, and Free Trade. International Sources of U.S. Commercial Strategy, 1887–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lamborn, Alan C. 1983. “Power and the Politics of Extraction.”International Studies Quarterly 27(2): 125–46 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lampe, John R. and Jackson, Marvin R.. 1982. Balkan Economic History, 1550–1950: From Imperial Borderlands to Developing Nations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Landes, David. 1998. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Láng, Ludwig. 1906. Hundert Jahre Zollpolitik, trans. Alexander Rosen. Vienna: Kaiserliche und königliche Hof-Buchdruckerei und Hof-Verlags-Buchhandlung Carl Fromme.Google Scholar

LaPalombara, Joseph. 1971. “Penetration: A Crisis of Government Capacity.” In Crisis and Sequence in Political Development, ed. Binder, Leonard et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 205–32.Google Scholar

Jett, Lauck W.. 1904. “The Political Significance of Reciprocity.”Journal of Political Economy 12(4): 495–524 (September).Google Scholar

Laurence, Laughlin J. and Willis, H. Parker. 1903. Reciprocity. New York: Baker & Taylor Co.Google Scholar

Lavergne, Réal P. 1983. The Political Economy of U.S. Tariffs: An Empirical Analysis. Toronto: Academic Press Canada.Google Scholar

Lazer, David. 1999. “The Free Trade Epidemic of the 1860s and Other Outbreaks of Economic Discrimination.”World Politics 51(4): 447–83 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leamer, Edward E. 1990. “Latin America as a Target of Trade Barriers Erected by the Major Developed Countries in 1983.”Journal of Development Economics 32(2): 337–68 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross. 1990. “Deterrence: The Elusive Dependent Variable.”World Politics 42(3): 336–69 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leff, Nathaniel H. 1982. Underdevelopment and Development in Brazil. Vol. I: Economic Structure and Change, 1822–1947. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Levasseur, Emile. 1892. “The Recent Commercial Policy of France.”Journal of Political Economy 1(1): 20–49 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinsohn, James A. 1989. “Strategic Trade Policy When Firms Can Invest Abroad: When Are Tariffs and Quotas Equivalent?” Journal of International Economics 27(1–2): 129–46 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévy-Leboyer, Maurice and François Bourguignon, . 1985. L'économie française au ⅪXe siècle: Analyse macro-économique. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Lewin, Leif. 1988. Ideology and Strategy: A Century of Swedish Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Li, Chien-pin. 1994. “Trade Negotiation Between the United States and Taiwan: Interest Structure in Two-Level Games.”Asian Survey 34(8): 692–705 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Quan. 2000. “Institutional Rules of Regional Trade Blocs and Their Impact on Trade,” in The Political Consequences of Regional Trade Blocks, edited by R. Switky and B. Kerremans. London: Ashgate, pp. 85–118.Google Scholar

Lindberg, Anders. 1983. Småstat mot Stormakt. Beslutssystemet vid tillkomsten av 1911 års svensk-tyska handels- och sjöfartstraktat. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar

Lindgren, Raymond E. 1959. Norway-Sweden: Union, Disunion, and Scandinavian Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipson, Charles. 1984. “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs.”World Politics 37(1): 1–23 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipson, Charles. 1985. “Bankers' Dilemmas: Private Cooperation in Rescheduling Sovereign Debts.”World Politics 38(1): 200–25 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipson, Charles. 1991. “Why are Some International Agreements Informal?” International Organization 45(4): 495–538 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, Friedrich. 1844/1966. The National System of Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar

Lohmann, Susanne. 1997. “Linkage Politics.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 38–68 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lohmann, Susanne and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. “Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Theory and Evidence.”International Organization 48(4): 595–632 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, Ngo and Vousden, Neil. 1991. “Protectionist Responses and Declining Industries.”Journal of International Economics 30(1–2): 87–103 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, William O. 1989. U.S. Export Control Policy: Executive Autonomy vs. Congressional Reform. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Long, William J. 1996. “Trade and Technology Incentives and Bilateral Cooperation.”International Studies Quarterly 40(1): 77–106 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lotz, Walther. 1907. “The Commercial Policy of Germany.”Journal of Political Economy 15(5): 257–83 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macgregor, John. 1846. Commercial Tariffs and Regulations, Resources, and Trade of the Several States of Europe and America, Together with the Commercial Treaties Between England and Foreign Countries (Part XVI: States of Mexico). London: Charles Whiting, Beaufort House, Strand.Google Scholar

Magee, Christopher. 2003. “Endogenous Tariffs and Trade Adjustment Assistance.”Journal of International Economics 60(1): 203–22 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magee, Stephen. 1971. “Three Simple Tests of the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem.” In Magee et al. 1999: Chapter 7.

Magee, Stephen P. 1997. “Endogenous Protection: The Empirical Evidence.” In Perspectives on Public Choice, ed. Mueller, Dennis E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 526–61.Google Scholar

Magee, Stephen, Brock, William, and Young, Leslie. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Magnusson, Lars. 2000. An Economic History of Sweden. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahaim, E. 1892. “La politique commerciale de la Belgique.”Handelpolitik 1: 197–238.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. 1998. “The Proliferation of Preferential Trading Arrangements.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(5): 523–43 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. 1994. Power, Trade, and War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. and Bronson, Rachel. 1997. “Alliances, Preferential Trade Arrangements, and International Trade.”American Political Science Review 91(1): 94–107 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. and Busch, Marc L.. 1995. “The Political Economy of Nontariff Barriers: A Cross-National Analysis.” International Organization 49 (3): 723–49 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. and Milner, Helen V., ed. 1997. The Political Economy of Regionalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. and Milner, Helen V.. 1999. “The New Wave of Regionalism.”International Organization 53(3): 589–627 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2000. “Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade.”American Political Science Review 94(2): 305–21 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2002a. “Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements.”International Organization 56(3): 477–513 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2002b. “Replication, Realism, and Robustness: Analyzing Political Regimes and International Trade.”American Political Science Review 96(1): 167–69 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2003. “Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism: The Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trading Arrangements.”International Organization 57(4): 829–62 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcy, G. 1960. “How Far Can Foreign Trade and Customs Agreements Confer upon Small Nations the Advantages of Large Nations?” In Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations. Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association, ed. Robinson, E. A. G.. London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd., pp. 265–81.Google Scholar

Marks, Stephen V. and John MacArthur. 1990. “Empirical Analyses of the Determinants of Protection: A Survey of Empirical Studies and Some New Results.” In International Trade Policy: Gains from Exchange Between Economics and Political Science, ed. Odell, John S. and Willett, Thomas D.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 105–40.Google Scholar

Marsh, Peter T. 1999. Bargaining on Europe: Britain and the First Common Market, 1860–1892. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Lisa L. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marvel, Howard P. and Ray, Edward J.. 1983. “The Kennedy Round: Evidence on the Regulation of International Trade in the United States.”American Economic Review 73(1): 190–97 (March).Google Scholar

Marvel, Howard P. and Ray, Edward John. 1987. “Intraindustry Trade: Sources and Effects on Protection.”Journal of Political Economy 95(6): 1278–91 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1854/1963. The Class Struggles in France, 1848–1850. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Mastanduno, Michael. 1988. “Trade as a Strategic Weapon: American and Alliance Export Control Policy in the Early Postwar Period.” In The State and American Foreign Economic Policy, ed. Ikenberry, G. John, Lake, David A., and Mastanduno, Michael. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 121–50.Google Scholar

Mastanduno, Michael, Lake, David A., and Ikenberry, John G.. 1989. “Toward a Realist Theory of State Action.”International Studies Quarterly 33(4): 457–74 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matis, Herbert. 1973. “Leitlinien der österreichischen Wirtschaftspolitik.” In Die Habsburgermonarchie, 1848–1918. Im Auftragen der Kommission für die Geschichte der Österreichisch-Ungarischen Monarchie, ed. Urbanitsch, Peter and Wandruszka, Adam. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, I: 29–67.Google Scholar

Matis, Herbert. 1984. “Österreichs Wirtschaft im Zeitalter Franz Josephs I.” In Das Zeitalter Kaiser Franz Josephs. 1. Teil: Von der Revolution zur Gründerzeit, ed. Kühnel, Harry and Wandruszka, Adam. St. Pölten: Kulturabteilung der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, pp. 113–20.Google Scholar

May, Arthur J. 1951. The Habsburg Monarchy 1867–1914. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mayer, Arno. 1969. “Internal Causes and Purposes of War in Europe, 1870–1956: A Research Assignment.”Journal of Modern History 41(3): 291–303 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Frederick W. 1992. “Managing Domestic Differences in International Negotiations: The Strategic Use of Internal Side-Payments.”International Organization 46(4): 793–818 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Wolfgang. 1981. “Theoretical Considerations on Negotiated Tariff Settlements.”Oxford Economic Papers 33(1): 135–53 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Wolfgang. 1984. “Endogenous Tariff Formation.”American Economic Review 74(5): 970–85 (December).Google Scholar

Mayer, Wolfgang and Li, Jun. 1994. “Interest Groups, Electoral Competition, and Probabilistic Voting for Trade Policies.”Economics and Politics 6(1): 59–77 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Wolfgang and Riezman, Raymond. 1987. “Endogenous Choice of Trade Policy Instruments.”Journal of International Economics 23(3–4): 377–81 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGillivray, Fiona. 1997. “Party Discipline as a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of Tariffs.”American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 584–607 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGillivray, Fiona. 2004. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McGillivray, Fiona, McLean, Iain, Pahre, Robert, and Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl, eds. 2001. International Trade and Political Institutions. Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGillivray, Fiona and Smith, Alastair. 1997. “Institutional Determinants of Trade Policy.”International Interactions 23(2): 119–43 (April-June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinnis, Michael. 1986. “Issue Linkage and the Evolution of Cooperation.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 30(1): 141–70 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGreevey, William Paul. 1985. “The Transition to Economic Growth in Colombia.” In The Latin American Economies: Growth and the Export Sector, 1880–1930, ed. Conde, Roberto Cortés and Hunt, Shane J.. New York: Holmes and Meier, pp. 23–81.Google Scholar

McKeown, Timothy J. 1983. “Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe.”International Organization 37(1): 73–92 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKeown, Timothy J. 1984. “Firms and Tariff Regime Change: Explaining the Demand for Protection.”World Politics 36(2): 215–33 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKeown, Timothy J. 1989. “The Politics of Corn Law Repeal and Theories of Commercial Policy.”British Journal of Political Science 19(3): 353–80 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKeown, Timothy J. 1991. “The Foreign Policy of a Declining Power.”International Organization 45(2): 257–79 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLean, Iain. 1995. “Railway Regulation as a Test-bed of Rational Choice.” In Preferences, Institutions, and Rational Choice, ed. Dowding, Keith and King, Desmond. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 134–61.Google Scholar

McLean, Iain. 1998. ‘Irish Potatoes, Indian Corn, and British Politics: Interests, Ideology, Heresthetics, and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.’ In Contemporary Political Studies 1998, ed. Dobson, A. and Stanyer, J.. Nottingham: PSA, vol. 1, pp. 124–41.Google Scholar

McLean, Iain. 2001. “Irish Potatoes, Indian Corn, and British Politics: Interests, Ideology, Heresthetics, and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.” In McGillivray et al. 2001: 99–145.

McLean, Iain and Bustani, Camilla. 1999. “Irish Potatoes and British Politics: Interests, Ideology, Heresthetics and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.”Political Studies 47(5): 817–36 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLean, Iain and Foster, Christopher. 1992. “The Political Economy of Regulation: Interests, Ideology, Voters, and the UK Regulation of Railways Act 1844.”Public Administration 70(3): 313–31 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPherson, Charles P. 1972. “Tariff Structures and Political Exchange.” University of Chicago: PhD Dissertation.

Messerlin, Patrick A. 1996. “France and Trade Policy: Is the ‘French Exception’ Passée?” International Affairs 72(2): 293–309 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meunier, Sophie. 2000. “What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU-U.S. Trade Negotiations.”International Organization 54(1): 103–35 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millbourn, Ingrid. 1992. “Swedish Social Democracy, Crises and Tariffs Before 1900.”Scandinavian Journal of History 17(4): 271–93 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Milner, Helen. 1992. “International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations.”World Politics 44(3): 466–96 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Helen V. 1997a. Interests, Institutions, and Information. Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Milner, Helen V. 1997b. “Industries, Governments, and the Creation of Regional Trading Blocs.” In Mansfield and Milner, 1997: 77–106.

Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Milner, Helen V. and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 1996. “Trade Negotiations, Information, and Domestic Politics.”Economics and Politics 8(2): 145–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Helen V. and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 1997. “Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 117–46 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milner, Helen V. and Yoffie, David B.. 1989. “Between Free Trade and Protectionism: Strategic Trade Policy and a Theory of Corporate Trade Demands.”International Organization 43(2): 239–72 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milward, Alan S. 1984. The Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945–51. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milward, Alan S. 1992. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Esteri, Ministerio degli Affari. 1865–99. Trattati e convenzioni fra il Regno d'Italia ed i governi esteri. Roma: Tipografia Bencini.Google Scholar

Mitra, Devashish. 1999. “Endogenous Lobby Foundation and Endogenous Protection: A Long-Run Model of Trade Policy Determination.”American Economic Review 89(5): 1116–34 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Brian R. 1975. European Historical Statistics 1750–1970. (Abridged ed.) New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Brian R. 1979. European Historical Statistics 1750–1950. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mj⊘set, Lars, ed. 1986. Norden dagen derpå: De nordiska ⊘konomisk-politiske modellene og deres problemer på 70- og 80- tallet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Mj⊘set, Lars. 1987. “Nordic Economic Policies.”International Organization 41(3): 403–56 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mo, Jongryn. 1994. “The Logic of Two-Level Games with Endogenous Domestic Coalitions.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 38(3): 402–22 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mo, Jongryn. 1995. “Domestic Institutions and International Bargaining: The Role of Agent Veto in Two-Level Games.”American Political Science Review 89(4): 914–24 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Modelski, George. 1978. “The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State.”Comparative Studies in Society and History 20(2): 214–35 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Modelski, George. 1982. “Long Cycles and the Strategy of U.S. International Economic Policy.” In America in a Changing World Political Economy, ed. Avery, William P. and Rapkin, David P.. New York: Longman, pp. 97–118.Google Scholar

Modelski, George. 1987. Long Cycles in World Politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Molina Enríquez, Andrés. 1909. Los grandes problemas nacionales. México: Carranza.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang J. 1995. Imperial Germany 1867–1918. Politics, Culture, and Society in an Authoritarian State, trans. Richard Deveson. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Moneta, Carmellah. 1959. “The Estimation of Transportation Costs in International Trade.”Journal of Political Economy 67(1): 41–58 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Morrow, James D. 1997. “When do ‘Relative Gains’ Impede Trade?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 12–37 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Tabares, Tressa E.. 1998. “The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–90.”American Political Science Review 92(3): 649–61 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Tabares, Tressa E.. 1999. “Correction to ‘The Political Determinants of International Trade.’” American Political Science Review 93(4): 931–33 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moser, Peter, Hillman, Arye L., and Long, Ngo. 1995. “Modelling Reciprocal Trade Liberalization: The Political-Economy and National-Welfare Perspectives.”Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 131(3): 503–15.Google Scholar

Mouzelis, Nicos P. 1986. Politics in the Semi-Periphery. Early Parliamentarism and Late Industrialisation in the Balkans and Latin America. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mueller, John E. 1999. Capitalism, Democracy, and Ralph's Pretty Good Grocery. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mugomba, Agrippah T. 1979. “Small Developing States and the External Operating Environment.”Yearbook for World Affairs 33: 201–16.Google Scholar

Munck, Gerardo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.”Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34.Google Scholar

Mussa, Michael. 1974. “Tariffs and the Distribution of Income: The Importance of Factor Specificity, Substitutability, and Intensity in the Short and Long Run.”Journal of Political Economy 82(6): 1191–203 (November/December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mussa, Michael. 1982. “Imperfect Factor Mobility and the Distribution of Income.”Journal of International Economics 12(1–2): 125–41 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, John F. Jr. 1950. “The Bargaining Problem.”Econometrica 18(2): 155–62 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Douglas. 1988. “Endogenous Tariff Theory: A Critical Survey.”American Journal of Political Science 32(3): 796–837 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordlinger, Eric A. 1981. On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. London: Norton.Google Scholar

Nye, John Vincent. 1990. “Revisionist Tariff History and the Theory of Hegemonic Stability.” St. Louis: Washington University Political Economy Working Paper, April.

Nye, John Vincent. 1991. “Changing French Trade Conditions, National Welfare, and the 1860 Anglo-French Treaty of Commerce.”Explorations in Economic History 28(4): 460–77 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oatley, Thomas and Nabors, Robert. 1998. “Redistributive Cooperation: Market Failure, Wealth Transfers, and the Basle Accord.”International Organization 52(1): 35–54 (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ocampo, José-Antonio. 1981. “Export Growth and Capitalist Development in Colombia in the Nineteenth Century.” In Disparities in Economic Development since the Industrial Revolution, ed. Bairoch, Paul and Lévy-Leboyer, Maurice. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odell, John S. 2000. Negotiating the World Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, , Guillermo, A. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus and Helmut Wiesenthal. 1980. “Two Logics of Collective Action: Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form.” In Political Power and Social Theory, ed. Zeittin, . New York: Elsevier, vol. I: 67–115.Google Scholar

O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. Politics, Process, and American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olarreaga, Marcelo and Soloaga, Isidro. 1998. “Endogenous Tariff Formation: The Case of Mercosur.”World Bank Economic Review 12(2): 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olarreaga, Marcelo, Isidro Soloaga, and L. Alan Winters. 1999. “What's Behind Mercosur's Common External Tariff?” Unpublished manuscript.

Olson, Mancur Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

O'Rourke, Kevins H. and Williamson, Jeffrey G.. 1999. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Owen, Thomas C. 1985. “The Russian Industrial Society and Tsarist Economic Policy, 1867–1905.”Journal of Economic History 45(3): 587–606 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oye, Kenneth A., ed. 1986. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Oye, Kenneth A. 1993. Economic Discrimination and Political Exchange: World Political Economy in the 1930s and 1980s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Paarlberg, Robert L. 1993. “Why Agriculture Blocked the Uruguay Round: Evolving Strategies in a Two-Level Game.” In World Agriculture and the GATT, ed. Avery, William P.. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 1994. “Multilateral Cooperation in an Iterated Prisoners' Dilemma.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 38(2): 326–52 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 1995a. “Wider and Deeper: The Links Between Expansion and Enlargement in the European Communities.” In Towards a New Europe: Stops and Starts in Regional Integration, ed. Schneider, Gerald, Weitsman, Patricia A., and Bernauer, Thomas. Boulder: Praeger/Greenwood, pp. 111–36.Google Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 1995b. “Positivist Discourse and Social Scientific Communities: Towards an Epistemological Sociology of Science.”Social Epistemology 9(3): 233–55 (July-September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 1996. “Mathematical Discourse and Crossdisciplinary Communities: The Case of Political Economy.”Social Epistemology 10(1): 55–73 (January-March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 1997. “Endogenous Ratification in Two-Level Games and Parliamentary Oversight of the European Union.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 147–74 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 1998. “Reactions and Reciprocity: Tariffs and Trade Liberalization in 1815–1914.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(4): 467–92 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 1999. Leading Questions: How Hegemony Affects the International Political Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 2001a. “Divided Government and International Cooperation in Austria-Hungary, Sweden-Norway, and the European Union.”European Union Politics 2(2): 131–62 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 2001b. “Most-Favored-Nation Clauses, Domestic Politics, and Clustered Negotiations.”International Organization 55(4): 861–92 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 2004. “House Rules: Institutional Choice and United States Trade Negotiations.”Conflict Management and Peace Sciences 21(3): 195–213 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert and Papayoanou, Paul. 1997. “Using Formal Theory to Link International and Domestic Politics.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 4–11 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 2005. “Formal Theory and Case-Study Methods in EU Studies.” European Union Politics 6(1): 113–46 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert, ed. 2006a. Democratic Foreign Policy Making: Problems of Divided Government and International Cooperation, Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, Robert. 2006b. “Divided Government and International Cooperation: An Overview.” In Pahre 2006: 1–20.

Palairet, Michael. 1979. “Fiscal Pressure and Peasant Impoverishment in Serbia Before World War I.”Journal of Economic History 3(3): 719–40 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palairet, Michael. 1997. The Balkan Economies c. 1800–1914. Evolution without Development. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar

Pamuk, Şevket. 1987. “Commodity Production for World-Markets and Relations of Production in Ottoman Agriculture, 1840–1913.” in The Ottoman Empire and the World-Economy, ed. Huri İslamoğlu-İnan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–202.Google Scholar

Patterson, G. D. 1968. The Tariff in the Australian Colonies 1856–1900. Melbourne: P. W. Cheshire.Google Scholar

Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.”Journal of Law and Economics 19(2): 211–39 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perez-Brignoli, Hector. 1989. A Brief History of Central America, trans. Ricardo B. Sawrey A. and Susana Stettri de Sawrey. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Pincus, Jonathan J. 1975. “Pressure Groups and the Pattern of Tariffs.”Journal of Political Economy 83(4): 757–78 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pincus, Jonathan J. 1977. Pressure Groups and Politics in Antebellum Tariffs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Platt, D. C. M. 1968. Finance, Trade, and Politics in British Foreign Policy 1815–1914. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Pollard, Sidney. 1997. “The Integration of European Business in the ‘Long’ Nineteenth Century.”Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 84(2): 156–170.Google Scholar

Pollins, Brian M. 1989. “Does Trade Still Follow the Flag?” American Political Science Review 83(2): 465–80 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prest, John. 1996. “A Large Amount or a Small? Revenue and the Nineteenth-Century Corn Laws.”The Historical Journal 39(2): 467–78 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Arnold H. 1949. The Evolution of the Zollverein. A Study of the Ideas and Institutions Leading to German Economic Unification between 1815 and 1833. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.”International Organization 42(3): 427–60 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ránki, György. 1964. “Problems of the Development of Hungarian Industry.”Journal of Economic History 24(2): 204–28 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ránki, György. 1981. “On the Economic Development of the Habsburg Monarchy.” In Disparities in Economic Development since the Industrial Revolution, ed. Bairoch, Paul and Lévy-Leboyer, Maurice. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 165–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ratcliffe, Barry M. 1978. “The Tariff Reform Campaign in France, 1831–1836.”Journal of European Economic History 7(1): 61–138 (Spring).Google Scholar

Ray, Edward John. 1974. “The Optimum Commodity Tariff and Tariff Rates in Developed and Less Developed Countries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 56(3): 369–377 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, Edward John. 1981a. “The Determinants of Tariff and Nontariff Trade Restrictions in the United States.”Journal of Political Economy 89(1): 105–21 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, Edward John. 1981b. “Tariff and Nontariff Barriers to Trade in the United States and Abroad.”Review of Economics and Statistics 63(2): 161–68 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, Edward John. 1987. “The Impact of Special Interests on Preferential Tariff Concessions by the United States.”Review of Economics and Statistics 69(2): 187–93 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, Edward J. and Marvel, Howard P.. 1984. “The Pattern of Protection in the Industrialized World.”Review of Economics and Statistics 66(3): 452–58 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Razin, Assaf and Andrew Rose. 1994. “Business Cycle Volatility and Openness: An Exploratory Cross-Section Analysis.” NBER Working Paper No. 4208, August.

Recueil des Traités et Conventions Conclus par le Royaume des Pays-Bas avec les Puissances Etrangères, depuis 1813 jusqu'a nos jours. Amsterdam: Belinfante Frères, 1858–.

Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. “Adjudication Without Enforcement in GATT Disputes.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(2): 174–95 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Remmer, Karen. 1998. “Does Democracy Promote Interstate Cooperation? Lessons from the Mercosur Region.”International Studies Quarterly 42(1): 25–51 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, Carolyn. 1993. Reciprocity, U.S. Trade Policy, and the GATT Regime. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Richardson, Martin. 1993. “Endogenous Protection and Trade Diversion.”Journal of International Economics 34(3–4): 309–24 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth M. 1995. “Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case.”World Politics 48(1): 82–116 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, ed., E. A. G. 1960. The Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 1986. “Tariffs, Subsidies and Welfare with Endogenous Policy.”Journal of International Economics 21(3–4): 285–99 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far?Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. “Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions.”International Organization 41(2): 203–23 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald and Kayser, Mark Andreas. 2002. “Majoritarian Electoral Systems and Consumer Power: Price-Level Evidence from the OECD Countries.”American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 526–39 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rokkan, Stein. 1975. “Dimensions of State Formation and Nation-Building: A Possible Paradigm for Research on Variations Within Europe.” In The Formation of the National States in Western Europe, ed. Tilly, Charles. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 562–600.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Hans. 1978. “Wirtschaftskonjunktur, Gesellschaft und Politik in Mitteleuropa, 1873–1918.” In Machteliten und Wirtschaftskonjunkturen: Studien zur neueren deutschen Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, pp. 173–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosendorff, B. Peter. 1996. “Voluntary Export Restraints, Antidumping Procedure, and Domestic Politics.” American Economic Review 86(3): 544–561 (June).Google Scholar

Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2005. “Stability and Rigidity: Politics and Design of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Procedure.”American Political Science Review 99(3): 389–400 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2006. “Do Democracies Trade More Freely?” In Pahre, ed. 2006a: 83–106.

Rosendorff, B. Peter and Milner, Helen. 2001. “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape.”International Organization 55(4): 829–57 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruffin, Roy J. 1969. “Tariffs, Intermediate Goods, and Domestic Protection.”American Economic Review 59(3): 261–69 (June).Google Scholar

Ruffin, Roy and Jones, Ronald. 1977. “Protection and Real Wages: The Neoclassical Ambiguity.”Journal of Economic Theory 14(2): 337–48 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, ed. 1993a. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Practice of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993b. “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution.” In Ruggie 1930a:3–47.

Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Russett, Bruce and Slemrod, Joel. 1993. “Diminished Expectations of Nuclear War and Increased Personal Savings: Evidence from Individual Survey Data.”American Economic Review 83(4): 1022–33 (September).Google Scholar

Sapir, André . 2000. “Trade Regionalism in Europe: Towards an Integrated Approach.”Journal of Common Market Studies 38(1): 151–62 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saunders, Ronald S. 1980. “The Political Economy of Effective Tariff Protection in Canada's Manufacturing Sector.”Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Economique 13(2): 340–48 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayre, Francis B. 1939. “The Most-Favored-Nation Policy in Relation to Trade Agreements.” American Political Science Review 33(3): 411–23 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1935. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Jochen. 1973. Bayern und das Zollparlament: Politik und Wirtschaft in den letzten Jahren vor der Reichsgründung (1866/67–1870). Munich: Kommissionsbuchhandlung R. Wölfle.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Manfred G. 1981. “Politische Steuerung der Ökonomie in Kleinstaaten: Eine vergleichende Analyse.”Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 1981(1): 77–89.Google Scholar

Schmoller, Gustav. 1900. “Die Wandlungen in der europäischen Handelspolitik des 19en Jahrhunderts. Eine Säkularbetrachtung.”Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reiche 24: 373–82.Google Scholar

Schneider, Gerald. 2000. “The Two-Level Dilemma of European Politics: The Empirical Relevance of Threats and Promises in Interstate Negotiations.” Universität Konstanz, unpublished manuscript, October.

Schneider, Gerald and Lars-Erik Cederman, . 1993. “The Change in Tide in Political Cooperation: A Limited Information Model of European Integration.”International Organization 48(4): 633–62 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, C. 1991a. “Specific Factors, Capital Markets, Portfolio Diversification, and Free Trade: Domestic Determinants of the Repeal of the Corn Laws.”World Politics 43(4): 545–69 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, C. 1991b. “Lobbying for Free Trade in 19th Century Britain: To Concentrate or Not.”American Political Science Review 85(1): 37–58 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 1994. “Linking Constituency Interests to Legislative Voting Behavior: The Role of District Economic and Electoral Composition in the Repeal of the Corn Laws.”Parliamentary History 13: 86–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl, ed. 1997. Free Trade: The Repeal of the Corn Laws. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 1998a. “Parties and Interests in the ‘Marriage of Iron and Rye.’”British Journal of Political Science 28(2): 291–330 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 1998b. “Interests, Ideology and Politics: Agricultural Trade Policy in Nineteenth-Century Britain and Germany.” In Free Trade and Its Reception, 1815–1960, Freedom and Trade, ed. Marrison, Andrew. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2001. “The Strategic Use of Ideas: Nationalizing the Interest in the Nineteenth Century.” In International Trade and Political Institutions: Instituting Trade in the Long Nineteenth Century, edited by McGillivray, Fiona, McLean, Iain, Pahre, Robert, and Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2006. From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl and Andrew Bailey. 1995. “The Buck in Your Bank is not a Vote for Free Trade: Financial Intermediation and Trade Preferences in the United States and Germany.” In Preferences, Institutions, and Rational Choice, ed. Dowding, Keith and King, Desmond. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 179–210.Google Scholar

Schoppa, Leonard J. 1993. “Two-Level Games and Bargaining Outcomes: Why Gaiatsu Succeeds in Japan in Some Cases but Not Others.”International Organization 47(3): 353–86 (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. 1995. “Correspondence: History vs. Neo-realism: A Second Look.”International Security 20(1): 193–95 (Summer).Google Scholar

Schuyler, Robert Livingston. 1945. The Fall of the Old Colonial System: A Study in British Free Trade, 1770–1870. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Herman. 1994. “Small States in Big Trouble: State Reorganization in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand, and Sweden in the 1980s.”World Politics 46(4): 527–55 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sebenius, James K. 1983. “Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties.”International Organization 37(2): 281–316 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Semmel, Bernard. 1970. The Rise of Free Trade Imperialism: Classical Political Economy, the Empire of Free Trade and Imperialism, 1750–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Setser, Vernon G. 1933. “Did Americans Originate the Most-Favored-Nation Clause?” Journal of Modern History 5(3): 319–23 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shonfield, Andrew. 1976. “International Relations of the Western World: An Overall View.” In International Economic Relations of the Western World 1959–1971, ed. Shonfield, Andrew Gerard and Curzon, Victoria, Warley, T. K., and Ray, George. London: Oxford University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, vol. 1, pp. 1–142.Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth A. 1994. Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy During the Interwar Years. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth A., and Elkins, Zachary. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy.”American Political Science Review 98(1): 171–89 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Michael Stephen. 1980. Tariff Reform in France 1860–1900: The Politics of Economic Interest. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Snidal, Duncan. 1985a. “Coordination Versus Prisoners' Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes.”American Political Science Review 79(4): 923–42 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snidal, Duncan. 1985b. “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory.”International Organization 39(4): 579–614 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snidal, Duncan. 1986. “The Game Theory of International Politics.” In Oye 1986: 25–57.

Snidal, Duncan. 1991. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation.”American Political Science Review 85(3): 701–26 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Richard C. 1940. “The Most Favored Nation Clause and Recent Trade Practices.”Political Science Quarterly 55(1): 77–97 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Somogyi, Éva. 1984. “Ungarn in der Habsburgmonarchie.” In Das Zeitalter Kaiser Franz Josephs. 1. Teil: Von der Revolution zur Gründerzeit, ed. Kühnel, Harry and Wandruszka, Adam. St. Pölten: Kulturabteilung der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, pp. 269–276.Google Scholar

Spencer, Barbara J. 1986. “What Should Trade Policy Target?” In Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, ed. Krugman, Paul R., Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, pp. 69–89.Google Scholar

Stein, Arthur A. 1983. “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World.” In Krasner, ed., 1983: 115–40.

Stein, Arthur A. 1984. “The Hegemon's Dilemma: Great Britain, the United States, and the International Economic Order.”International Organization 38(2): 355–86 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, Arthur A. 1991. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Stern, Robert. 1973. “Tariff and Other Measures of Trade Control: A Survey of Recent Developments.”Journal of Economic Literature 11(3): 857–88 (September).Google Scholar

Stewart, Robert. 1969. “The Ten Hours and Sugar Crises of 1844: Government and the House of Commons in the Age of Reform.”Historical Journal 12(1): 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.”Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science 2(1): 3–21 (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, George J. 1974. “Free Riders and Collective Action: An Appendix to Theories of Economic Regulation.”The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5(2): 359–65 (Autumn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stimson, James A. 1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay.”American Journal of Political Science 29(4): 914–47 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Joe A. 1978. “A Comment on Tariffs, Nontariff Barriers, and Labor Protection in United States Manufacturing Industries.”Journal of Political Economy 86(5): 969–62 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storing, James A. 1963. Norwegian Democracy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan. 1979. Tariff Reform in British Politics 1903–1913. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Szijártó, István M. 1994. “Playing Second Fiddle: The Role of Hungary and Norway in the Foreign Policies of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy and the Swedish-Norwegian Union: A Comparison.”Scandinavian Journal of History 19(2): 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takacs, Wendy E. 1981. “Pressures for Protection: An Empirical Analysis.”Economic Inquiry 19: 687–93 (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takacs, Wendy E. 1985. “More on Protectionist Pressure and Aggregate Economic Conditions: A Reply.”Economic Inquiry 23(1): 183–84 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarar, Ahmer. 2005. “Constituencies and Preferences in International Bargaining.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(3): 383–407 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. 1996. “Social Movements in Contentious Politics: A Review Article.”American Political Science Review 90(4): 874–83 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tasca, Henry J. 1938/1967. The Reciprocal Trade Policy of the United States: A Study in Trade Philosophy.

Taylor, A. J. P. 1964. The Habsburg Monarchy 1809–1918. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Taylor, Michael. 1976/1987. The Possibility of Cooperation (revised edition of Anarchy and Cooperation.) Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. M. 1983. Louis Napoleon and the Second Empire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Tollison, Robert D. and Willett, Thomas D.. 1979. “An Economic Theory of Mutually Advantageous Issue Linkages in International Negotiations.”International Organization 33(4): 425–49 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar