Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T00:32:45.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - “The Kids are Alright”: Cause Lawyering on Television in 1960s America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Thomas M. Hilbink
Affiliation:
Legal Studies, University of Massachusetts-Amherst
Austin Sarat
Affiliation:
Amherst College, Massachusetts
Stuart Scheingold
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

CBS's advertisement in Variety touted that its new series for the fall 1970 season, The Storefront Lawyers, would “capture the whole spirit of an exciting, significant movement.” The ad assumed readers would know what this movement was. It wasn't an unreasonable assumption. The movement – the “exciting, significant” movement – had been building over the course of a decade. Beginning in the early years of the 1960s, when lawyers became involved in large numbers with the direct action phase of the civil rights movement, and growing exponentially with the creation of the Legal Services Program, this movement only continued to expand and grow in the later years of the decade. This cause lawyering “explosion” – as I have elsewhere labeled it – neared its zenith in 1970. As the sixties became the seventies, more and more legal professionals were involved in battles against the war in Vietnam, racism, and sexism, as well as with such issues as civil liberties, consumer rights, the environment, and government accountability.

The explosion was the product of an era in which people were questioning the fundamental assumptions of American life and institutions. Many have noted the ways the sixties constituted a period of inquiry about structures of race, of sexuality, of modernity. But the sixties also marked the period in which assumptions about law, lawyers, and the legal profession – law's role in democratic society, lawyers' relationships with clients and to social change, and the legal profession's definitions of how attorneys should do their work – came up for debate and challenge.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×