Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T02:28:44.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Casemix implementation in Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2010

John Kimberly
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Gerard de Pouvourville
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
Thomas d'Aunno
Affiliation:
INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since 1979, the Portuguese health care system has been based on a National Health Service (NHS) structure, with public insurance, universal coverage, almost free access at the point of use, and general taxation financing. The state is committed to providing health protection for the whole population and equity objectives are prominent. This has been reinforced by successive legislation, which also attributed to the Portuguese health care system the objectives of promoting efficiency, quality, and accountability (Assembleia da República 1990). Nonetheless, it should be highlighted that, in reality, the Portuguese NHS has never conformed to the general characteristics of the Beveridge model, mainly because of an incomplete transition from a previously fragmented social insurance system. Occupation-based insurance schemes that existed in 1979 are yet to be integrated into the NHS, meaning additional coverage for the one provided by the NHS for around 20–25 percent of the population (OECD 1998). These occupation-based insurance schemes, which benefit from additional public funding and allow families to enjoy double coverage, contribute to inequalities in access. A large private sector co-exists with the NHS and its role was explicitly recognized in the 1990 NHS law that instituted a mixed health care system involving both the public and private sectors (Assembleia da República 1990). The private sector is mainly responsible for visits to specialists, elective surgery, ancillary tests and kidney dialysis.

Figure 3.1 depicts key institutions and financial/service relationships between the stakeholders in the Portuguese health care sector (Oliveira and Pinto2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

República, Assembleia da. Lei 48/90: Lei de Bases da Saúde. Diário República 1990; 195: 3452–59.Google Scholar
Bentes, M. (1992). DRG-based funding in Portugal: Two years after. Proceedings of the Third EURODRG Workshop, May, Madrid, Spain.
Bentes, M., Dias, C. M., Sakellarides, C., and Bankauskaite, V. (2004). Health Care Systems in Transition: Portugal. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
Bentes, M., Mateus, C., Estevens, S., Valente, M. C. and Veertres, J. (1996). Towards a more comprehensive financing system for the Portuguese NHS hospitals. Proceedings of the 12th International PCS/E Working Conference, September 19–21, Sydney, Australia.
Bentes, M., Urbano, J., Carvalho, C. and Tranquada, S. (1993). Using DRGs to Fund Hospitals in Portugal: An Evaluation of the Experience. In Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe: Uses and Perspectives, Casas, M. and Wiley, M. (eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bentes, M., Valente, M. C., Mateus, C., and Estevens, S. (1997). Feedback and Audit: Ingredients for Quality improvement. Proceedings of the 13th PCS/E International Working Conference, October 1–3, Florence, Italy.
Casas, M. and Wiley, M. (1993). Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe: Uses and Perspectives, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dismuke, C. E. and Guimarães, P. (2002) Has the Caveat of Case-mix Based Payment Influenced the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care in Portugal?Applied Economics, 34(10): 1301–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dismuke, C. E. and Sena, V. (2001). Is there a Trade-off between Quality and Productivity? The Case of Diagnostic Technologies in Portugal. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 107, Issue 1–4: 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimberly, J. R., Pouvourville, G., et al. (1993). Portugal: National Commitment and the Implementation of DRGs. In The Migration of Managerial Innovation: Diagnosis-Related Groups and Health Care Administration in Western Europe, Kimberly, J. R. and Pouvourville, G. (eds.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mateus, C. (2002). O impacto dos grupos de diagnósticos homogéneos no financiamento hospitalar em Portugal entre 1995 e 2001 (The Impact of DRGs in the Funding of Portuguese Hospitals between 1995 and 2001).
Mateus, C. and Valente, M. C. (2000). The impact of ambulatory surgery DRGs. Proceedings of the 16th PCS/E International Working Conference, September 27–30, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Noe, L., Larson, L., and Trotter, J. (2005). Utilizing Patient Registries to Support Health Economics Research: Integrating Observational data with Economic Analyses, Models, and other Applications. ISPOR Connections, Vol. 11, No. 5: October 15.Google Scholar
,OECD (1998). OECD Economic Surveys 1997–1998, Portugal. Paris: OECD.CrossRef
,OECD (2004). OECD Health Data 2004. Paris: OECD
Oliveira, M. D. and Pinto, C. G. (2005). Health Care Reform in Portugal: An Evaluation of the NHS Experience. Health Economics, 14, S1: S203–S220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urbano, J., Bentes, M. and Vertrees, J. C. (1993). Portugal: National Commitment and the Implementation of DRGs. In The Migration of Managerial Innovation: Diagnosis-Related Groups and Health Care Administration in Western Europe, Kimberly, J. R. and Pouvourville, G. (eds.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Valente, M. C., Estevens, S., Costa, C. T., Barardo, A. and Bentes, M. (1998). Portugal: On the Route to APGs. Proceedings of the 14th PCS/E International Working Conference, October 1–3, Manchester, UK.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×