Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-lntk7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:22:40.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Basic rules and target discrimination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Get access

Summary

Section I Basic rules

38 In any armed conflict the right of the parties to the conflict to choose methods or means of warfare is not unlimited.

38.1 There are no explicit treaty provisions at the present time which specifically state that the general principles applicable in armed conflict on land are also relevant to the conduct of hostilities at sea. However, it logically follows from the whole body of law that this general principle is firmly rooted in the law of naval armed conflict. Moreover, on 19 December 1968, the United Nations General Assembly, in Resolution 2444 (XXIII), unanimously affirmed certain principles underlying the law of armed conflict, including the requirements stated in paragraphs 38 and 39.

38.2 This basic rule obviously finds its roots in conferences and discussions which took place in the nineteenth century. The principle found its way into documents on the law of armed conflict as early as 1874 at the Brussels Conference (Article 12). The formulation was subsequently developed in the Hague Regulations of 1907 (Article 22). With regard to the wording of the paragraph, it should be noted that it is taken from Article 35(1) of Additional Protocol I. Although that Article falls outside the scope of Article 49(3), of the Protocol and therefore already applies in naval warfare, it was felt appropriate to include it in this document to emphasise the importance of the principle. Additional comments on the rule can therefore be found in existing commentaries. Relevant to the effective implementation of this paragraph is also Article 36 of API regarding new weapons.

Type
Chapter
Information
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea
International Institute of Humanitarian Law
, pp. 113 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×