Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 GL and other systems of propositional modal logic
- 2 Peano arithmetic
- 3 The box as Bew(x)
- 4 Semantics for GL and other modal logics
- 5 Completeness and decidability of GL and K, K4, T, B, S4, and S5
- 6 Canonical models
- 7 On GL
- 8 The fixed point theorem
- 9 The arithmetical completeness theorems for GL and GLS
- 10 Trees for GL
- 11 An incomplete system of modal logic
- 12 An S4-preserving proof-theoretical treatment of modality
- 13 Modal logic within set theory
- 14 Modal logic within analysis
- 15 The joint provability logic of consistency and ω-consistency
- 16 On GLB: The fixed point theorem, letterless sentences, and analysis
- 17 Quantified provability logic
- 18 Quantified provability logic with one one-place predicate letter
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Notation and symbols
2 - Peano arithmetic
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 GL and other systems of propositional modal logic
- 2 Peano arithmetic
- 3 The box as Bew(x)
- 4 Semantics for GL and other modal logics
- 5 Completeness and decidability of GL and K, K4, T, B, S4, and S5
- 6 Canonical models
- 7 On GL
- 8 The fixed point theorem
- 9 The arithmetical completeness theorems for GL and GLS
- 10 Trees for GL
- 11 An incomplete system of modal logic
- 12 An S4-preserving proof-theoretical treatment of modality
- 13 Modal logic within set theory
- 14 Modal logic within analysis
- 15 The joint provability logic of consistency and ω-consistency
- 16 On GLB: The fixed point theorem, letterless sentences, and analysis
- 17 Quantified provability logic
- 18 Quantified provability logic with one one-place predicate letter
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Notation and symbols
Summary
Peano arithmetic (PA, or arithmetic, for short) is classical first-order arithmetic with induction. The aim of this chapter is to define the concepts mentioned in, and describe the proofs of, five important theorems about Bew(x), the standard “provability” or “theoremhood” predicate of PA:
(i) If ⊢ S, then ⊢ Bew(⌜S⌝),
(ii) ⊢ Bew(⌜(S → T)⌝) → (Bew(⌜S⌝) → Bew(⌜T⌝)),
(iii) ⊢ Bew(⌜S⌝) → Bew(⌜Bew(⌜S⌝)⌝),
(iv) Bew(⌜S⌝) is a Σ sentence, and
(v) if S is a Σ sentence, then ⊢ S → Bew(⌜S⌝)
(for all sentences S, T of Peano arithmetic).
‘⊢’ is, as usual, the sign for theoremhood; in this chapter we write ‘⊢S’ to mean that S is a theorem of PA. ┌S┐ is the numeral in PA for the Gödel number of sentence S, that is, if n is the Gödel number of S, then ┌S┐ is 0 preceded by n occurrences of the successor sign s. Bew(┌S┐) is therefore the result of substituting ┌S┐ for the variable x in Bew(x), and (iii) immediately follows from (iv) and (v). Bew(┌S┐) may be regarded as a sentence asserting that S is a theorem of PA. Σ sentences (often called Σ1 sentences) are, roughly speaking, sentences constructed from atomic formulas and negations of atomic formulas by means of conjunction, disjunction, existential quantification, and bounded universal quantification (“for all x less than y”), but not negation or universal quantification. A precise definition is given below.
Notice the distinction between ‘Bew(x)’ and ‘⊢’. ‘Bew(x)’ denotes a certain formula of the language of PA and thus Bew(x) is that formula; it is a formula that is true of (the Gödel numbers of) those formulas of PA that are provable in PA.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Logic of Provability , pp. 15 - 50Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994