Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T09:04:32.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geometry, Steinberg representations and complexity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2010

C. M. Campbell
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
E. F. Robertson
Affiliation:
University College, Galway
T. C. Hurley
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
S. J. Tobin
Affiliation:
University College, Galway
J. Ward
Affiliation:
University College, Galway
J L Alperin
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.
G Mason
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of California at Santa Cruz, CA 95064, U.S.A.
Get access

Summary

Group representation theory often relates quite different areas of mathematics and we shall give yet another example of this phenomenon. A construction from finite geometries will lead us to a new concept in representation theory which we shall then apply to the representation theory of Lie type groups. This, in turn, will involve ideas from the homological approach to modular representations. We shall, therefore, cover a spectrum of ideas.

One construction of finite projection planes involves the use of spreads. Suppose that V is a 2n-dimensional vector space over a finite field k of characteristic p. A spread S is a collection of n-dimensional subspaces whose (set-theoretic) union is all of V but where the intersection of any two members of the collection is zero. A group of linear transformations of V preserves the spread S if its elements permute the members of S.

Proposition 1.If E is an elementary abelian 2-group of linear transformations of V which preserve S and p = 2 then there is a subgroup F of E with the following two properties:

  1. i) V is free as a kF-module;

  2. ii) The space of fixed-points VF, of V under F, equals VE.

This is the key idea and we shall now formulate it in more generality. If E is an elementary abelian p-group and k is any field of characteristic p then the kE-module M is said to be subfree if there is a subgroup F of E with the two properties of the proposition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×