Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T09:30:46.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Stage for Final Status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2010

Henry H. Perritt, Jr.
Affiliation:
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Get access

Summary

As Ahtisaari's appointment was being finalized in November 2005, the members of the Contact Group (France, Germany, Italy, Russian Federation, the UK, and the United States) issued ten “Guiding Principles for a settlement of the Status of Kosovo” to support Ahtisaari's efforts. These principles stated that any settlement should strengthen regional security and stability, ensure Kosovo's multiethnicity, provide for protection of the cultural and religious heritage in Kosovo, and enable Kosovo to cooperate effectively with international organizations and international financial institutions. They declared partition of Kosovo or its annexation to any other state unacceptable. The Contact Group position was popularly characterized as expressing “three no's”: no partitioning of Kosovo, no going back to the status before 1999, and no merging with other states.

In recruiting Ahtisaari for the special envoy position, the Quint had not yet officially committed itself to the goal of independence for Kosovo – and Russia, as the sixth member of the Contact Group, certainly had not. On the other hand, everyone including Ahtisaari agreed that there was no way that Kosovo could be folded back under Serbian control, and they also agreed that the status quo of international administration was not viable. Within the Contact Group, Britain and the United States were pushing hardest for some clear resolution of Kosovo's status and knew that independence would be the outcome.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Road to Independence for Kosovo
A Chronicle of the Ahtisaari Plan
, pp. 119 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Joyner, Christopher C., “‘The Responsibility to Protect': Humanitarian Concern and the Lawfulness of Armed Intervention,” 47 Va. J. Int'l L. 693, 703–10 (2007)Google Scholar
Wangsgard, Stephan A., “Secession, Humanitarian Intervention, and Clear Objectives: When to Commit United States Military Forces,” 3 Tulsa J. Comp. and Int'l Law313 (1996)Google Scholar
Massa, Salvatore, “Secession by Mutual Assent: A Comparative Analysis of the Dissolution of Czechoslovakia and the Separatist Movement in Canada,” 14 Wis. Int'l L. J. 183, 212–13 (1995)Google Scholar
Joyner, Christopher C., “‘The Responsibility to Protect': Humanitarian Concern and the Lawfulness of Armed Intervention,” 47 Va. J. Int'l Law693, 704–5 (2007)Google Scholar
Evens, Gareth, “From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect,” 24 Wis. Int'l L. J. 703, 704 (2006)Google Scholar
Hamilton, Rebecca J., “The Responsibility to Protect: From Document to Doctrine – But What of Implementation?19 Harv. Hum. Rts J. 289, 293 (2006)Google Scholar
Bannon, Alicia L., “The Responsbility to Protect: The UN World Summit and the Question of Unilateralism,” 115 Yale L. J. 1157, 1158 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahn, Carsten, “Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm?,” 101 Am. J. Int'l L. 99, 102 (2007)Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain, “The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee: A Second Breath for the Self-Determination of Peoples,” 3 E. J. I. L. 178 (1992)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×