Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T08:52:28.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - An alternative comparison of classical tests: assessing the effects of curvature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Paul Marriott
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Mark Salmon
Affiliation:
City University Business School, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The last two decades have seen a rapid growth in the application of differential geometry in statistics. Efron (1975) stimulated much of this research with his definition of statistical curvature and he showed that curvature has serious consequences for statistical inference.

Many papers on the application of differential geometry in statistics go straight into defining all the necessary tools, such as the metric and an affine connection on a manifold, and show how they can be used in statistical analysis. The emphasis is predominantly on asymptotic theory and applications are mainly in estimation, information loss and higher-order efficiency. Barndorff-Nielsen, Cox and Reid (1986) give a very accessible account of the relevant ideas in differential geometry and also provide a historical overview; see also Amari (1985) and Okamoto, Amari and Takeuchi (1991) provide a brief recent summary of main achievements.

This chapter is concerned with the effects of curvature on hypothesis testing. However, our approach differs from the differential geometrical approach mentioned above in a number of ways. First, we give a global analysis, i.e. for the whole of the sample and parameter space, not merely in a neighbourhood of a fixed point such as the true parameter value. Secondly, the analysis is valid for all sample sizes, not just asymptotically. Finally, we are concerned with hypothesis testing, which is less common, and use the partitioning of the sample space into critical region and acceptance region to illustrate our arguments graphically, rather than solely investigating the (analytic) properties of test statistic(s).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×