Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T01:49:34.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Aphthovirus evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Adrian J. Gibbs
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Charles H. Calisher
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
Fernando García-Arenal
Affiliation:
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Aphthovirus genus, family Picornaviridae, is composed of seven distinct serotypes which cause foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), a severe disease of cloven-hoofed animals. FMD has serious economic consequences (Pereira, 1981) and is enzootic in most South American and African countries, as well as in regions of Asia and the Middle East. Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) usually causes a systemic acute infection with high morbidity and low mortality (Shanan, 1962). In ruminants, the virus may also produce an asymptomatic, persistent infection that involves limited viral amplification (Van Bekkum et al., 1959). This type of infection has been proposed as an epidemiologically important reservoir of FMDV (Hedger & Condy, 1985).

The general structure and molecular features of FMDV are, in general, similar to those of other picornaviruses (Domingo et al., 1990; Stanway, 1990). The capsid is composed of 4 proteins (VP1-4) and includes an RNA molecule of about 8500 nucleotides in length which encodes the structural proteins and at least 11 different, mature, non-structural polypeptides. The antigenic structure of FMDV includes continuous and discontinuous neutralizing epitopes located in exposed regions of the viral capsid, in which one or more of the capsid proteins, particularly VP1, are involved (Domingo et al., 1990).

Aphthoviruses show considerable antigenic diversity; 7 serotypes, more than 65 subtypes and a multitude of variants have been identified mainly by in vitro cross-serum neutralization (Pereira, 1981) and, more recently, by the use of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (Domingo et al., 1990). Immunization with viruses of one type does not confer protection against viruses of other serotypes, whereas cross-protection within serotypes is not always complete (Kitching et al., 1989).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×