Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T23:05:19.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Finding the Implosion Design: August 1944 to February 1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Lillian Hoddeson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Catherine L. Westfall
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

The accelerated implosion effort, which began in August 1944, made rapid progress. By October 1944, James Conant was giving a lensed implosion device a 50–50 chance of working on schedule, if all went smoothly, for a test at Trinity on 1 May 1945 and a “3:1” chance for a test on 1 July. But he added, “In my opinion, the probabilities of success by the gun method (Mark 1) within the next year are very much greater than by the implosion method. Indeed the gun method seems as nearly certain as any untried new procedure can be.”

Overcoming asymmetries remained the outstanding technical problem of the implosion program. By mid-fall 1944, two experimental strands of the implosion program were converging on this problem: research on the explosive lens and on the electric detonator. In addition, in T-Division, Robert Christy put forth a conservative proposal for overcoming the asymmetry: try to implode a solid sphere rather than a spherical shell of active material. However, calculations indicated that the “Christy gadget” was intrinsically far less efficient than the hollow weapon, and that such a device would require a modulated initiator to activate the explosion at the most favorable moment. The call for the development of the implosion initiator added another thorny problem to the program.

As the time approached when sizable quantities of plutonium would become available, gross design features had to be frozen in order to begin final bomb production.

Type
Chapter
Information
Critical Assembly
A Technical History of Los Alamos during the Oppenheimer Years, 1943–1945
, pp. 293 - 314
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×