Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T08:17:11.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Ecology, nutrition and physiologic adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2010

Francisco M. Salzano
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Maria C. Bortolini
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Get access

Summary

Life histories lie at the heart of biology

Stephen C. Stearns

Personal and evolutionary destinies

Inevitably and normally, we all are born, develop, mature, age and die. This simple fact, however, has important evolutionary consequences, since survival and reproduction are the key factors which determine individual and species fitnesses. The main life history traits, as indicated by Stearns (1992), are: (a) size at birth; (b) growth pattern; (c) age at maturity; (d) size at maturity; (e) number, size and sex ratio of offspring; (f) age and size-specific reproductive investments; (g) age and size-specific mortality schedules; and (h) length of life. All of them are interrelated, so that disturbance in a given stage of the life cycle may affect the other components in multiple ways.

In humans, culture acts as a buffering system between ourselves and the environment, and the ensuing cultural–biologic interactions often make the interpretation of a given process difficult. The environment has to be partitioned in its physical, biotic and social components; humans' resources, constraints, and specific stressors may lead to short- or long-term responses, at different (individual, populational) levels. These responses can be classified into seven categories: avoid, modify, buffer, distribute, resist, conform, or change. In its most simple characterization, what happens is energy flow (Thomas et al., 1979; Thomas, 1998).

As examples, let us consider the extremes of the cycle. Humans are different from most mammals (including nonhuman primates) by the fact that significant quantities of fat are deposited in the fetus in utero. Consequently, Homo sapiens babies have a fat mass approximately four times that predicted for a mammal of their body size at birth.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×