Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T09:18:29.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Hilde Hasselgård
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, Bas. 2001. English Syntax and Argumentation. 2nd edn. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ahlemeyer, Birgit and Kohlhof, Inga. 1999. Bridging the cleft: an analysis of the translation of English it-clefts into German. Languages in Contrast 2:1, 1–26.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam / Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1987. Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. In Monaghan, , ed., 50–64.
Biber, Douglas. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62:2, 384–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1952. Linear modification. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 67, 1117–41, reprinted in Abe, I. and Kanekiyo, T., eds., 1965. Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 279–315.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian and Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buysschaert, Joost. 1982. Criteria for the Classification of English Adverbials. Brussels: Koininklikje Academie voor Wetenschapen, Letteren en schone Kunsten van België.Google Scholar
Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary. 2003. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace and Danielewicz, Jane. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Horowitz, R. and Samuels, S. J., eds., Comprehending Oral and Written Language. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 83–113.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter C. 1991. Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm, ed., 1994. Advances in Written Text Analysis. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneš, František. 1974. Functional Sentence Perspective and the organization of the text. In Daneš, F., ed., Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia, 106–28.Google Scholar
Delin, Judy. 1990. Focus in cleft constructions. Research Series ‘Blue Book Note’ No. 5, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh. www.gem.stir.ac.uk/judys_publications/cleftfocus.pdf. Accessed November 2003.
Delin, Judy. 1992. Properties of it-cleft presupposition. Journal of Semantics 9, 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy and Oberlander, John. 1995. Syntactic constraints on discourse structure: the case of it-clefts. Linguistics 33, 465–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dissel, Holger. 2001. The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: a typological study. Language 77:2, 433–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Monika. 2003. Parametrized beginnings of sentences in English and German. Across Languages and Cultures 4:1, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, Jarle. 2000. Presentative Constructions in English and Norwegian: A Corpus-based Contrastive Study. Acta Humaniora. Oslo: University of Oslo, Unipub.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1976. Notes on valency, semantic scope and thematic perspective as parameters of adverbial placement in English. In Enkvist, N. E. and Kohonen, V., eds., Reports on Text Linguistics: Approaches to Word Order. Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 51–73.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1978. Linearity and text strategy. In Weinstock, J., ed., The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics. Austin, TX:Texas, University, 159–72.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1980. Motives for topicalization. In Thelwall, R., ed., Linguistic Studies in Honour of Paul Christophersen. Occasional Papers in Linguistics and Language Learning No. 7. Coleraine: The New University of Ulster, 1–15.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1981. Experiential iconicism in text strategy. Text 1:1, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1982. Impromptu speech, structure, and process. In Enkvist, N. E., ed., Impromptu Speech: A Symposium. Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 11–32.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1987. Text strategies: single, dual, multiple. In Steele, R. and Threadgold, T., eds., Language Topics. Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 203–11.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1986. On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of Functional Sentence Perspective. In Cooper, C. R. and Greenbaum, S., eds., Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 40–71.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction. Adverbial clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1998. Contrastive discourse markers in English. In Jucker, A. and Ziv, Y., eds., 301–26.
Fries, Peter H. 1981. On the status of Theme in English: arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum 6:1, 1–38.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter H. 1994. On Theme, Rheme and discourse goals. In Coulthard, M., ed., 229–49.
Fries, Peter H. 1995a. A personal view of Theme. In Ghadessy, M., ed., Thematic Development in English Texts. London/New York: Pinter, 1–19.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter H. 1995b. Themes, development and text. In Hasan, R. and Fries, P. H., eds., On Subject and Theme. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 317–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. Orlando, FLA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1995. Coherence in text vs. coherence in mind. In Gernsbacher, M. A. and Givón, T., eds., Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 59–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-González, María Ángeles. 2001. The Theme–Topic Interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia M. 1980. Some wherefores of English inversions. Language 56:3, 582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996. The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K. 2002. Information structure and the use of cleft sentences in English and Norwegian. In Hasselgård, H., S. Johansson, Behrens, B. and Fabricius-Hansen, C., eds., Information Structure in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 113–28.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1991. Corpus studies and probabilistic grammar. In Aijmer, K. and Altenberg, B., eds., English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 30–43.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn, revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985. The texture of a text. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press, 70–96.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 1996. Where and When: Positional and Functional Conventions for Sequences of Time and Space Adverbials in Present-Day English. Acta Humaniora. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 1997. Sentence openings in English and Norwegian. In Ljung, M., ed., Corpus-based studies in English. Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17), Stokholm, May 15–19, 1996. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1–14.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2004a. Temporal and spatial adjuncts as elements of texture. In Banks, D., ed., Text and Texture, Systemic Functional Viewpoints on the Nature and Structure of Text. Paris: L'Harmattan, 141–58.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2004b. Adverbials in it-cleft constructions. In Aijmer, K. and Altenberg, B., eds., Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Papers from the Twenty-third International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), Göteborg 22–26 May, 2002. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 195–211.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2006. ‘Not now’ – on non-correspondence between the cognate adverbs now and nå. In Aijmer, K. and Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., eds., Pragmatic Markers in Contrast. Oxford: Elsevier, 93–113.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Malcolm. 1976. Parameters affecting the position of certain English adjuncts. In Enkvist, N. E. and Kohonen, V. (eds.), Reports on Text Linguistics: Approaches to Word Order. Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 107–24.Google Scholar
Horová, Eva. 1976. On position and function of English local and temporal adverbials. Brno Studies in English 12, 93–123.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1988. Review article: A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, by Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan. Language 64:2, 345–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey, K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Sven. 1964. Adverbial Positions in English. Stockholm: Studentbok.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1949. A Modern English Grammar, Vol. VII. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas and Ziv, Yael, eds. 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRef
König, Ekkehard and Gast, Volker. 2007. Understanding English–German Contrasts. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English. Problems of Control and Interpretation. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kreyer, Rolf. 2007. Inversion in modern written English: syntactic complexity, information status and the creative writer. In Facchinetti, R., ed., Corpus Linguistics 25 Years On. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loe, Erlend. 2001. Fakta om Finland [Facts about Finland]. Oslo: Cappelen.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert. 1979. The paragraph as a grammatical unit. In Givón, T., ed., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 115–34.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert. 2007. Sentences as combinations of clauses. In Shopen, T., ed., 372–420.
Lowe, Ivan. 1987. Two ways of looking at causes and reasons. In Monaghan, J., ed., 37–46.
Martin, J. R. and Rose, David. 2003. Working with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1999. The system of transitivity: an exploratory study of text-based profiles. Functions of Language 6:1, 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2006. Frequency profiles of some basic grammatical systems: an interim report. In Thompson, G. and Hunston, S., eds., System and Corpus: Exploring Connections. London: Equinox, 103–142.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian and Thompson, Sandra. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘Subordination’. In Haiman, J. and Thompson, S., eds., Clause Combining in Discourse and Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 275–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, James (ed.). 1987. Grammar in the Construction of Texts. London: Francis Pinter.
Nelson, Gerald. 1998. The International Corpus of English. The British Component. ICE-GB. Getting Started. Survey of English Usage, University College, London.Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean and Aarts, Bas. 2002. Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Tertu. 1987. Adverbial focusing and intonation. Lingua 73:3, 141–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein. 2000. The Syntax of Circumstantial Adverbials. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed from dictionary.oed.com.
Paradis, Carita. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: expressions of degree. English Language and Linguistics 12:2, 317–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perzanowski, Dennis and Gurney, John. 1997. The functionality of it-clefts in selected discourses: the message in the medium. Word 48:2, 207–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Pam. 2004. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1978. A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language 54:4, 883–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Cole, P., ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223–55.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1986. Words at Work. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin. 2004. Left/right contrasts among English temporal adverbials. In Austin, J., Engelberg, S. and Rauh, G., eds., Adverbials: The Interplay between Meaning, Context and Syntactic Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 289–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shopen, Timothy, ed., 2007. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. II: Complex Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, John. 1993. The computer, the corpus and the theory of language. In Azzaro, G. and Ulrych, M., eds., Transiti Linguistici e culturali. Atti del XVIII Congresso Nazionale dell'A. I. A. Trieste: EUT, 1–15.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Johnet al. 1990. Collins Cobuild English Grammar. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Hickmann, M. and Robert, S., eds., Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1990. Pauses in monologue and dialogue. In Svartvik, J., ed., The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English. Lund: Lund University Press, 211–52.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1998. From sentence to discourse: cos (because) in teenage talk. In Jucker, A. and Ziv, Y., eds., 127–46.CrossRef
Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English: A Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Taglicht, Josef. 1984. Message and Emphasis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. ‘Subordination’ and narrative event structure. In Tomlin, R., ed., 435–54.
Thompson, Sandra A., Longacre, Robert E. and Hwang, Shin Ja J.. 2007. Adverbial clauses. In Shopen, T., ed., 237–300.
Tomlin, Russell, ed., 1987. Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Tottie, Gunnel. 1984. Is there an adverbial in this text? (And if so, what is it doing there?). In Ringbom, H. and Rissanen, M., eds., Proceedings from the Second Nordic Conference for English Studies. Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 299–316.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 1986. The importance of being adverbial. Adverbials of Focusing and Contingency in spoken and written English. In Tottie, G. and Bäcklund, I., eds., English in Speech and Writing. A Symposium. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 93–118.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel and Lehmann, Hans Martin. 1999. The realization of relative adverbials in present-day English. In Hasselgård, H. and Oksefjell, S., eds., Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 137–56.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and König, Ekkehard. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, E. C. and Heine, B., eds., Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. Initial position. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Andrea and Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich. 1988. Syntax der englischen Adverbialien. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 1992. Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English: Clause-initial Adverbials of Time and Place in Narratives and Procedural Place Descriptions. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Vold, Eva Thue. 2006. Epistemic modality markers in research articles: a cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16:1, 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Eugene. 1994. Clause relations as information structure. In Coulthard, M., ed., 46–69.
,International Corpus of English, British component (ICE-GB)
,Oslo Multilingual Corpus (OMC)
,British National Corpus (BNC)
,London-Lund Corpus (LLC)
Doyle, Roddy. 1993. Paddy Clarke Ha Ha Ha. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Rowling, J. K. 2000. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Hilde Hasselgård, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Adjunct Adverbials in English
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676253.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Hilde Hasselgård, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Adjunct Adverbials in English
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676253.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Hilde Hasselgård, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Adjunct Adverbials in English
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676253.016
Available formats
×