Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:32:50.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Alan Renwick
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Electoral Reform
Changing the Rules of Democracy
, pp. 261 - 301
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aardal, Bernt 1990. ‘The Norwegian Parliamentary Election of 1989’. Electoral Studies 9: 151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Association of Consumers and Taxpayers or the ACT Party 2008. ‘Constitutional Framework’. Party policy statement. Accessed at www.act.org.nz, 12 December 2008.
Aimer, E. P. 1985. Written submission to the Royal Commission on the Electoral System, no. 641 (untitled). Mimeo. Papers of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System, Archives New Zealand, Agency AAYI (RCES), Accession W3047, Item 1, 4 – Submissions.
Aimer, Peter 1999. ‘From Westminster Plurality to Continental Proportionality: Electoral System Change in New Zealand’. In Milner, Henry (ed.), Making Every Vote Count: Reassessing Canada's Electoral System. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 145–55.Google Scholar
Aimer, Peter 2003. ‘United Future’. In Miller, Raymond (ed.), New Zealand Government and Politics, 3rd edn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 293–302.Google Scholar
Aimer, Peter 2006. Interview. Auckland, 12 August.
Alexander, Gerard 2004. ‘France: Reform-Mongering between Majority Runoff and Proportionality’. In Colomer, 2004b: 209–21.
Alley, R. M., and Robinson, A. D. 1971. ‘A Mechanism for Enlarging the House of Representatives’. Political Science 23: 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allum, P. A. 1973. Italy: Republic without Government?London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1973. ‘Approaches to Developmental Causation’. In Almond, Gabriel A., Flanagan, Scott C., and Mundt, Robert J. (eds.), Crisis, Choice, and Change: Historical Studies of Political Development. Boston: Little, Brown, 1–42.Google Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Cox, Gary W. 1997. ‘Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties’. American Journal of Political Science 41: 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, Rudy B. 1989. ‘Institutional Conservatism in the Netherlands: Proposals for and Resistance to Change’. West European Politics 12: 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, Rudy B. 2005. ‘The Netherlands: The Sanctity of Proportionality’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 491–510.
Andrews, Josephine T., and Jackman, Robert W. 2005. ‘Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choice under Extreme Uncertainty’. Electoral Studies 24: 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, John 1989. ‘Govt to Hold Ballot on 4-Year Term’. New Zealand Herald, 17 April.Google Scholar
Armstrong, John 1990a. ‘National Set to Promise Binding Referendum’. New Zealand Herald, 12 April.Google Scholar
Armstrong, John 1990b. ‘Senate Promoted’. New Zealand Herald, 10 July.Google Scholar
Armstrong, John 1991. ‘Fourth Option in Vote System Poll’. New Zealand Herald, 13 December.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Assemblée Nationale 2008a. ‘Amendements déposés sur le texte no. 820’. Accessed at www.assemblee-nationale.fr, 23 December 2008.
,Assemblée Nationale 2008b. ‘Séance du 21/07/2008: Scrutin public sur le projet de loi constitutionnelle de modernisation des institutions de la Ve République’. Accessed at www.assemblee-nationale.fr, 23 December 2008.
,Atti Parliamentari 1954. ‘Seduta di Mercoledì 9 Giugno 1954’. Atti Parliamentari, Camera dei Deputati, Legislatura II, Discussioni, 8921–75.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey 1988. ‘Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes’. American Political Science Review 82: 405–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babb, James 1996. ‘The Origins and Nature of Japanese Electoral Reform’. Representation 33: 155–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babb, James 2007. ‘The Statics and Dynamics of Socialist Party Ideology’. Paper presented at the Japan Politics Colloquium, Oxford, 11–12 September.
Baerwald, Hans H. 1979. ‘Parties, Factions, and the Diet’. In Murakami, Hyoe and Hirschmeier, Johannes (eds.), Politics and Economics in Contemporary Japan. Tokyo: Japan Culture Institute, 21–63.Google Scholar
Baldini, Gianfranco 2009. ‘Electoral Reforms in Italy: The (Main) Determinants of the (Many) Electoral Reforms’. Paper presented in the workshop ‘Why Electoral Reform? The Determinants, Policy, and Politics of Changing Electoral Systems’ at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Lisbon, 14–19 April.
Balinski, Michel 2008. ‘Redistricting in France under Changing Electoral Rules’. In Handley, Lisa and Grofman, Bernie (eds.), Redistricting in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173–90.Google Scholar
Banting, Keith G., and Simeon, Richard 1985. ‘Introduction: The Politics of Constitutional Change’. In Banting, Keith G. and Simeon, Richard (eds.), The Politics of Constitutional Change in Industrial Nations: Redesigning the State. London: Macmillan, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Tony 2005a. ‘Berlusconi Buoyed by Reforms’. Financial Times, 21 October.Google Scholar
Barber, Tony 2005b. ‘Berlusconi under Fire as He Pushes More Election Reforms’. Financial Times, 12 December.Google Scholar
Barber, Tony 2006. ‘Small Margin of Victory Set to Restrict Prodi Agenda’. Financial Times, 12 April.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano 1982. ‘The Politics of Institutional Reform in Italy’. West European Politics 5: 203–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, Chiaramonte, Alessandro, and D'Alimonte, Roberto 2004. ‘The Italian Party System between Parties and Coalitions’. West European Politics 27: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. 1989. ‘Strategies of Political Leadership in Diverse Settings’. In Jones, Bryan D. (ed.), Leadership and Politics: New Perspectives in Political Science. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 114–34.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen 1993. ‘The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice Outcome’. American Journal of Political Science 37: 965–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayrou, François 2007. ‘Élection Présidentielle 2007: La France de toutes nos forces: Programme d'action de François Bayrou’. Accessed at www.bayrou.fr, 18 December 2008.
Beatty, David 2005. ‘Making Democracy Constitutional’. In Howe, Paul, Johnston, Richard, and Blais, André (eds.), Strengthening Canadian Democracy. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 129–36.Google Scholar
Bell, D. S., and Criddle, Byron 1994. The Communist Party in the Fifth Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellucci, Paolo, and Bull, Martin 2002. ‘Introduction: The Return of Berlusconi’. In Bellucci, Paolo and Bull, Martin (eds.), Italian Politics: The Return of Berlusconi (Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 17). New York: Berghahn Books, 29–47.Google Scholar
Bennis, Warren, and Nanus, Burt 1985. Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth 2004. ‘Models of Electoral System Change’. Electoral Studies 23: 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth 2005. ‘Hungary: Holding Back the Tiers’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 231–52.
Benoit, Kenneth 2007. ‘Electoral Laws as Political Consequences: Explaining the Origins and Change of Electoral Institutions’. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 363–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Michael 2000. ‘Institutional Choice after Communism: A Critique of Theory-Building in an Empirical Wasteland’. East European Politics and Societies 14: 316–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, Bill 1993 [1992]. ‘PR – Taking It Away from the People’. In McRobie, 1993: 131–3. Excerpt from address to the National Executive Meeting of the Young Nationals, Wellington, 26 April 1992.
Birch, Bill 2006. Interview. Auckland, 11 August.
Birch, Sarah, Millard, Frances, Popescu, Marina, and Williams, Kieran 2002. Embodying Democracy: Electoral System Design in Post-Communist Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, T. A. 1949. Prospects for Democracy in Japan. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blais, André (ed.) 2008. To Keep or to Change First Past the Post? The Politics of Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Blais, André, and Massicotte, Louis 1997. ‘Electoral Formulas: A Macroscopic Perspective’. European Journal of Political Research 32: 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Dobrzynska, Agnieszka, and Indridason, Indridi H. 2005. ‘To Adopt or Not to Adopt Proportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice’. British Journal of Political Science 35: 182–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Adrian 2004. ‘Fairness and Electoral Reform’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6: 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Adrian 2008. ‘Electoral Reform in the UK: A Veto-Player Analysis’. In Blais, 2008: 61–89.
Blitz, James 1998. ‘Berlusconi Stirs Reform Pot’. Financial Times, 3 February.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon 1997. Power and the People: A Guide to Constitutional Reform. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon 1999. Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon, and Butler, David (eds.) 1983. Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boissieu, Laurent 2007. ‘Presque tous les candidats sont favorables à un changement du mode de scrutin, ce qui permettrait aux petits partis d'avoir une représentation parlementaire’. La Croix, 18 April.Google Scholar
Bolger, Jim 1998. A View from the Top: My Seven Years as Prime Minister. Auckland: Viking.Google Scholar
Bolger, Jim 2006. Interview. Wellington, 15 August.
Boix, Carles 1999. ‘Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies’. American Political Science Review 93: 609–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, Norman 2003. ‘The Scottish Parliament and Participatory Democracy: Vision and Reality’. Political Quarterly 74: 459–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boscawen, John 2009. Telephone interview, 14 January.
Boston, Jonathan 1987. ‘Electoral Reform in New Zealand: The Report of the Royal Commission’. Electoral Studies 6: 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boston, Jonathan, Church, Stephen, and Bale, Tim 2003. ‘The Impact of Proportional Representation on Government Effectiveness: The New Zealand Experience’. Australian Journal of Public Administration 62: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, Raymond 1986. Theories of Social Change: A Critical Appraisal, trans. Whitehouse, J. C.. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd 2008. ‘Election Reform and (the Lack of) Electoral System Change in the USA’. In Blais, 2008: 90–111.
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A. 2006. ‘Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-Interest, Values, or Ideology?Journal of Politics 68: 434–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, and Mo, Jongryn 1992. ‘Electoral Systems and Institutional Choice: A Case Study of the 1988 Korean Elections’. Comparative Political Studies 24: 405–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform 2004. Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia: Final Report. Vancouver.
Brown, Alice 2000. ‘Designing the Scottish Parliament’. Parliamentary Affairs 53: 542–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Bernard E. 1982. Socialism of a Different Kind: Reshaping the Left in France. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Browne, Eric C., and Hamm, Keith E. 1996. ‘Legislative Politics and the Paradox of Voting: Electoral Reform in Fourth Republic France’. British Journal of Political Science 26: 165–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno De Mesquita, Ethan 2000. ‘Strategic and Nonpolicy Voting: A Coalitional Analysis of Israeli Electoral Reform’. Comparative Politics 33: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Martin, and Newell, James L. 1993. ‘Italian Politics and the 1992 Elections: From “Stable Instability” to Instability and Change’. Parliamentary Affairs 46: 203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Martin J., and Newell, James L. 2005. Italian Politics: Adjustment under Duress. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bull, Martin, and Pasquino, Gianfranco 2007. ‘A Long Quest in Vain: Institutional Reforms in Italy’. West European Politics 30: 670–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Martin, and Rhodes, Martin (eds.) 1997. Crisis and Transition in Italian Politics. London: Frank Cass.
Burns, James MacGregor 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E. 2007. ‘Reform Studies: Political Science on the Firing Line’. PS: Political Science and Politics 40: 635–8.Google Scholar
Cairns, Alan C. 1968. ‘The Electoral System and the Party System in Canada, 1921–1965’. Canadian Journal of Political Science 1: 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calise, Mauro 1993. ‘Remaking the Italian Party System: How Lijphart Got It Wrong by Saying It Right’. West European Politics 16: 545–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Camera dei deputati 2002/3. Legislative proposals C. 2712, C.3304, and C. 2620. Accessed at http://legxiv.camera.it, 8 January 2009.
,Camera dei Deputati 2005. ‘Resoconto della I Commissione Permanente’, 23 June. Accessed at http://legxiv.camera.it, 8 January 2009.
Campbell, John Creighton, and Scheiner, Ethan 2008. ‘Fragmentation and Power: Reconceptualizing Policy Making under Japan's 1955 System’. Japanese Journal of Political Science 9: 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlile, Lonny E. 1994. ‘Party Politics and the Japanese Labor Movement: Rengo's “New Political Force”’. Asian Survey 34: 606–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Matthew 2007. Money Politics in Japan: New Rules, Old Practices. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew McLaren 1980. A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth 2004. ‘Canadians and Electoral Reform: An Impulse to Doing Democracy Differently’. Representation 40: 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth, Blais, André, and Fournier, Patrick 2008. ‘When Citizens Choose to Reform SMP: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform'. In Blais, 2008: 140–62.
Chang, Eric C. C., Kayser, Mark Andreas, and Rogowski, Ronald 2008. ‘Electoral Systems and Real Prices: Panel Evidence for the OECD Countries, 1970–2000’. British Journal of Political Science 38: 739–51.Google Scholar
Chapman, Robert 1999 [1979]. ‘On Democracy as Having and Exercising a Clear Choice of Government’. In McLeay, Elizabeth (ed.), New Zealand Politics and Social Patterns: Selected Works by Robert Chapman. Wellington: Victoria University Press, 278–87. First published in J. Stephen Hoadley (ed.), Improving New Zealand's Democracy (Auckland, 1979).Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2003. ‘“Going Native” in Europe? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions’. Comparative Political Studies 36: 209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaramonte, Alessandro, and Di Virgilio, Aldo 2000. ‘Le elezioni regionali del 2000: la frammentazione si consolida, le alleanze si assestano’. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 30: 513–52.Google Scholar
Christensen, Raymond V. 1994. ‘Electoral Reform in Japan: How It Was Enacted and Changes It May Bring’. Asian Survey 34: 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Raymond V. 2006. ‘An Analysis of the 2005 Japanese General Election: Will Koizumi's Political Reforms Endure?Asian Survey 46: 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christofferson, Thomas R. 1991. The French Socialists in Power, 1981–1986: From Autogestion to Cohabitation. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Helen 1993 [1992]. ‘Politics a Sobering Experience for Us All’. In McRobie, 1993: 112–15. First published in New Zealand Herald, 4 January 1992.
Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt 2006. ‘Rehabilitating Duverger's Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws’. Comparative Political Studies 39: 679–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, Kevin P. 1976. ‘The Citizens for Rowling Campaign: An Insider's View’. Political Science 28: 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clogg, Richard 1987. Parties and Elections in Greece: The Search for Legitimacy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Alistair, and Campbell, Peter 1989. French Electoral Systems and Elections since 1789. Gower: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1986. ‘Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action’. American Journal of Sociology 91: 1309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Simon 1989. ‘Referendum Proposal Revived’. New Zealand Herald, 7 December.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. 2004a. ‘The Strategy and History of Electoral System Choice’. In Colomer, 2004b: 3–78.
Colomer, Josep M. (ed.) 2004b. Handbook of Electoral System Choice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Colomer, Josep M. 2005. ‘It's Parties that Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger's Laws Upside Down’. Political Studies 53: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Comité de Réflexion et de Proposition sur la Modernisation et le Rééquilibrage des Institutions de la Ve République 2007. ‘Une Ve République plus démocratique’. Accessed at www.comite-constitutionnel.fr, 18 December 2008.
Connors, Michael Kelly 2002. ‘Framing the “People's Constitution”’. In McCargo, Duncan (ed.), Reforming Thai Politics. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, 37–55.Google Scholar
Conradt, David P. 1996. The German Polity, 6th edn. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
,Conseil Constitutionnel 2003. ‘Observations du Conseil Constitutionnel relatives aux élections législatives des 9 et 16 juin 2002’, 15 May. Accessed at www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr, 16 December 2008.
,Conseil Constitutionnel 2005. ‘Observations du Conseil Constitutionnel sur les échéances électorales de 2007’, 7 June. Accessed at www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr, 16 December 2008.
,Conseil Constitutionnel 2008. ‘Observations du Conseil Constitutionnel relatives aux élections législatives des 10 et 17 juin 2007’, 29 May. Accessed at www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr, 16 December 2008.
Cousins, John Andrew 2004. ‘Prince Edward Island's Cautious Path toward Electoral Reform’. In Milner, 2004: 281–9.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan N. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, and Thies, Michael F. 1999. ‘Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party’. British Journal of Political Science 29: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Keith 2001. ‘A System of Disproportional Representation: The Proposed Electoral Law for the Czech Republic’. Representation 38: 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criddle, Byron 1992. ‘Electoral Systems in France’. Parliamentary Affairs 45: 108–16.Google Scholar
Cronin, Thomas E., and Genovese, Michael A. 2004. The Paradoxes of the American Presidency, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William 2005. ‘The Rush to Electoral Reform in the Canadian Provinces: Why Now?Representation 41: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtice, John 1996. ‘Why the Additional Member System Has Won Out in Scotland’. Representation 33: 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtice, John 2009. ‘Neither Representative Nor Accountable: First-Past-the-Post in Britain’.In Bernard Grofman, André Blais, and Shaun Bowler (eds.), Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States. New York: Springer, 27–46.
Curtis, Gerald L. 1988. The Japanese Way of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald L. 1999. The Logic of Japanese Politics: Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David 2007. ‘Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems’. American Political Science Review 101: 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daimon, Sayuri 1993. ‘Tokyo Success Fuels JNP's Quest in Diet’. Japan Times, 12 July.Google Scholar
D'Alimonte, Roberto 2001. ‘Mixed Electoral Rules, Partisan Realignment, and Party System Change in Italy’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 323–50.
D'Alimonte, Roberto 2004. ‘Sotto il “Nespolo” 73 seggi in più per la Cdl’. Il Sole 24 Ore, 11 December.Google Scholar
D'Alimonte, Roberto 2005. ‘Italy: A Case of Fragmented Bipolarism’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 253–76.
Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniell, Stella 1983. ‘Reform of the New Zealand Political System: How Likely Is It? A Survey of the Attitudes of the Members of the New Zealand Parliament to Reform Proposals’. Political Science 35: 151–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul A. 1985. ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’. American Economic Review 75: 332–7.Google Scholar
Davidson, Ian 1992a. ‘French Far Right's Advance Masks Rise on Another Front’. Financial Times, 21 February.Google Scholar
Davidson, Ian 1992b. ‘A Shock to the Political System’. Financial Times, 20 March.Google Scholar
Davidson, Ian 1992c. ‘France Delivers Stern Message to Mitterrand: The President and His Party Will Struggle to Recover from the Regional Poll Results’. Financial Times, 24 March.Google Scholar
Dawisha, Adeed, and Diamond, Larry 2006. ‘Electoral Systems Today: Iraq's Year of Voting Dangerously’. Journal of Democracy 17: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaulle, Charles 1959a. War Memoirs, Volume 3: Salvation, 1944–1946, trans. Howard, Richard. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Gaulle, Charles 1959b [1946]. ‘Speech Delivered by General de Gaulle at Bayeux, June 16 1946’. In Gaulle, Charles, War Memoirs, Volume 3: Salvation, 1944–1946: Documents, trans. Murchie, Joyce and Erskine, Hamish. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 384–90.Google Scholar
Gaulle, Charles 1960 [1932]. The Edge of the Sword, trans. Hopkins, Gerard. London: Faber & Faber. First published as Le Fil de l'épée, 1932.Google Scholar
Gaulle, Charles 1970 [1950]. ‘Conférence de presse tenue au Palais d'Orsay, 16 mars 1950’. In Gaulle, Charles, Discours et Messages. Paris: Plon, II, 344–58.Google Scholar
Grand, Alexander 1989. The Italian Left in the Twentieth Century: A History of the Socialist and Communist Parties. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, Lieven 2005. ‘Belgium: Empowering Voters and Party Elites?’ In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 417–32.
Debré, Jean-Louis 1974. Les Idées constitutionnelles du Général de Gaulle. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Debré, Michel 1947. La Mort de l'état républicain. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Debré, Michel 1981. ‘The Constitution of 1958, Its Raison d’Être and How It Evolved'. In Andrews, William G. and Hoffmann, Stanley (eds.), The Impact of the Fifth Republic on France. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
,Department of Justice 1993. ‘Electoral Reform Bill: Report of the Department of Justice’. Mimeo. McCully Papers, Archives New Zealand, Agency ABWM, Series 7361, Accession W5295, Box 3, File: ‘Electoral Reform Bill [Briefing reports prepared for Electoral Law Select Committee by Department of Justice]’.
Desmond, Edward W. 1995. ‘Ichiro Ozawa: Reformer at Bay’. Foreign Affairs 74: 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, Eraslan, Hülya, and Merlo, Antonio 2007. ‘Bicameralism and Government Formation’. Penn Institute for Economic Research Working Paper 07-010. Accessed at http://ssrn.com/abstract=962395, 12 February 2008.
Diskin, Hanna, and Diskin, Abraham 1995. ‘The Politics of Electoral Reform in Israel’. International Political Science Review 16: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Mark 1995. ‘The Politics of Electoral Reform in Italy’. International Political Science Review 16: 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Mark 1996. ‘Electoral Reform in Italy’. Representation 33: 141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Mark 2000. ‘The End of Italy's Referendum Anomaly?’ In Gilbert, Mark and Pasquino, Gianfranco (eds.), Italian Politics: The Faltering Transition (Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 15). New York: Berghahn, 51–66.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick 2001. ‘Analysing an Institutional Transition Game in an Established Liberal Democracy: The Introduction of Proportional Representation in the UK’. Paper presented at the Public Choice Conference. San Antonio, Texas, 10 March.
Dunleavy, Patrick, and Margetts, Helen 1995. ‘Understanding the Dynamics of Electoral Reform’. International Political Science Review 16: 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Peter 2008. ‘Referendum Needed on Maori Seats’. Press release issued 30 May. Accessed at www.unitedfuture.org.nz, 24 December 2008.
Duverger, Maurice 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice 1974. La Cinqième République. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Dykes, Ray 1979. ‘Fresh Stirrings over Voting Reform’. New Zealand Herald, 26 May.Google Scholar
East, Paul 2006. Telephone interview. 2 November.
Ebrahim, Hassen 1998. The Soul of a Nation: Constitution-Making in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,ECHR 1980. ‘Decision of the European Commission of Human Rights as to the Admissibility of Application No. 8765/79 by the Liberal Party, Joyce Dora Hester Rose and Roger James Pincham against the United Kingdom’. Accessed at www.echr.coe.int, 12 March 2008.
,Economist Intelligence Unit 1994. Country Profile: New Zealand, 1994/95. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar
Eda, Satsuki 1993. ‘Sirius: A New Beacon of Political Change’. Japan Echo 20(1): 34–9.Google Scholar
Edinger, Lewis J. 1975. ‘The Comparative Analysis of Political Leadership’. Comparative Politics 7: 253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edinger, Lewis J. 1990. ‘Approaches to the Comparative Analysis of Political Leadership’. Review of Politics 52: 509–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C. 2004. Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
,EECR 1992. ‘Constitution Watch’. East European Constitutional Review 1(2): 2–8.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, George 2006. ‘Factional Influence on the 2001 LDP Primaries: A Quantitative Analysis’. Japanese Journal of Political Science 7: 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einaudi, Mario 1946. ‘Political Change in France and Italy’. American Political Science Review 40: 898–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,EISA 2009. EISA Country Profiles. Accessed at www.eisa.org.za, 27 February 2009.
,EJPR 1992–2007. Political Data Yearbook. Published annually in the European Journal of Political Research, nos. 7–8.
,EKA 1999. ‘Az Ellenzéki Kerekasztal ülése 1989. július 10. (Videofelvétel szövege)’. In Bozóki, András, Elbert, Márta, Kalmár, Melinda, Révész, Béla, Ripp, Erzsébet, and Ripp, Zoltán (eds.), A rendszerváltás forgatókönyve: Kerekasztal-tárgyalások 1989-ben, Volume 2. Budapest: Magvető, 336–89.Google Scholar
,Elections BC 2005. ‘Statement of Votes: Referendum on Electoral Reform, May 17, 2005’. Accessed at www.elections.bc.ca, 30 July 2007.
,Elections BC 2009. ‘2009 Official Referendum Results’. Accessed at www.elections.bc.ca, 9 July 2009.
,Elections Ontario 2007. ‘Referendum Statistical Results’. Accessed at www.elections.on.ca, 7 November 2007.
,Elections PEI 2005. ‘Plebiscite on Mixed Member Proportional Representation System – Official Results’. Accessed at www.electionspei.ca, 14 November 2007.
,Electoral Law Select Committee 1988. Report of the Electoral Law Select Committee: Inquiry into the Report of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System. Wellington: House of Representatives.Google Scholar
,Electoral Law Select Committee 1991. Report of the Electoral Law Select Committee on the Electoral Poll Bill, December 1991. Wellington: House of Representatives.Google Scholar
,Electoral Reform Coalition 1993. ‘Bill Comes Back with Mismatched Options’. Electoral Reform Coalition Newsletter 27: 1–2.Google Scholar
,Electoral Studies 2000–2009. ‘Notes on Recent Elections’.
,Electoral System Civic Forum 2007. ‘The Electoral System Civic Forum's Recommendations’. Accessed at www.burgerforumkiesstelsel.nl, 9 August 2007.
Elgie, Robert 2005. ‘France: Stacking the Deck’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 119–36.
Elklit, Jørgen, and Svensson, Palle 1997. ‘What Makes Elections Free and Fair?Journal of Democracy 8(3): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon 1993. Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, and Slagstad, Rune 1988. ‘Introduction’. In Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune (eds.), Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Richard L. 2004. ‘The United States: The Future – Reconsidering Single-Member Districts and the Electoral College’. In Colomer, 2004b: 164–76.
Erdos, David 2009. ‘Ideology, Power Orientation, and Policy Drag: Explaining the Elite Politics of Britain's Bill of Rights Debate’. Government and Opposition 44: 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etō, Jun 1993. ‘Why I Back Ozawa Ichirō’. Japan Echo 20(1): 18–23.Google Scholar
Everson, David H. 1981. ‘The Bullet Bites the Dust: Will the Cutback Amendment Bring Competition and Accountability?Illinois Issues 7(3): 10–15.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, Sergio 2001. ‘Has Italy Rejected the Referendum Path to Change? The Failed Referenda of May 2000’. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 6: 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, Lee W. 1966. ‘Challenges to Factionalism in Japan's Liberal Democratic Party’. Asian Survey 6: 501–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, David M. 2001. ‘The United Kingdom Comes of Age: The British Electoral Reform “Revolution” of the 1990s’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 521–41.
Farrell, David M., and Gallagher, Michael 1999. ‘British Voters and Their Criteria for Evaluating Electoral Systems’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1: 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, David M., and McAllister, Ian 2006. The Australian Electoral System: Origins, Variations and Consequences. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Favier, Pierre, and Martin-Roland, Michel 1991. La Décennie Mitterrand, Volume 2: Les Épreuves (1984–1988). Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
,Fiji Constitution Review Commission 1996. The Fiji Islands: Towards a United Future: Report of the Fiji Constitution Review Commission. Suva: Parliament of Fiji.Google Scholar
Finer, S. E. 1984. ‘The Decline of Party?’ In Bogdanor, Vernon (ed.), Parties and Democracy in Britain and America. New York: Praeger, 1–6.Google Scholar
Fisher, Stephen D. 2006. ‘United Kingdom’. European Journal of Political Research 45: 1282–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, Matthew, and Curry, Dion 2008. ‘Deliberative Democracy, Elite Politics and Electoral Reform’. Policy Studies 29: 371–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridia, Antonio 2007. ‘The Paradoxes of Popular Electoral Reforms and the Italian Party System: A Trade-Off between Bipolarism and Fragmentation’. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Annual Conference. Bath, 11–13 April. Accessed at www.psa.ac.uk, 17 April 2007.
Fouchet, Antoine 2007. ‘Les Candidats veulent tous changer la Constitution’. La Croix, 20 March.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Angela 2006. Interview. Wellington, 14 August.
Fraenkel, Jon 2001. ‘The Alternative Vote System in Fiji: Electoral Engineering or Ballot-Rigging?Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 39: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, Jon 2004. ‘Electoral Engineering in Papua New Guinea: Lessons from Fiji and Elsewhere’. Pacific Economic Bulletin 19: 122–33.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Jon, and Grofman, Bernard 2006. ‘Does the Alternative Vote Foster Moderation in Ethnically Divided Societies? The Case of Fiji’. Comparative Political Studies 39: 623–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frears, John 1977. Political Parties and Elections in the Fifth Republic. London: C. Hurst.Google Scholar
Frears, John 1986. ‘The French Electoral System in 1986: PR by Lists and Highest Average’. Parliamentary Affairs 39: 489–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frears, John 1988. ‘The 1986 Parliamentary Elections’. In Penniman, Howard R. (ed.), France at the Polls, 1981 and 1986: Three National Elections. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 209–27.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. 1949. ‘Rebuilding the German Constitution I’. American Political Science Review 43: 461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukai, Shigeko N., and Fukui, Haruhiro 1992. ‘Elite Recruitment and Political Leadership’. PS: Political Science and Politics 25: 25–36.Google Scholar
Fukui, Haruhiro 1988. ‘Electoral Laws and the Japanese Party System’. In Bernstein, Gail Lee and Fukui, Haruhiro (eds.), Japan and the World: Essays on Japanese History and Politics in Honour of Ishida Takeshi. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuoka, Masayuki 1991. ‘Political Reform Still Not in Sight’. Japan Times, 28 January.Google Scholar
Furlong, Paul 1991. ‘Government Stability and Electoral Systems: The Italian Example’. Parliamentary Affairs 44: 50–9.Google Scholar
Furlong, Paul 2002. ‘The Italian Political System in 2001: Radical Change and Work in Progress’. In Newell, James (ed.), The Italian General Election of 2001: Berlusconi's Victory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 11–28.Google Scholar
Fusaro, Carlo 1998. ‘The Politics of Constitutional Reform in Italy: A Framework for Analysis’. South European Society and Politics 3(2): 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael 1998. ‘The Political Impact of Electoral System Change in Japan and New Zealand, 1996’. Party Politics 4: 203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael 2005. ‘Conclusions’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 535–78.
Gallagher, Michael 2007. ‘Election Indices’. Accessed at www.tcd.ie, 31 January 2008.
Gallagher, Michael, and Mitchell, Paul (eds.) 2005. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Gambetta, Diego, and Warner, Steven 1996. ‘The Rhetoric of Reform Revealed (or: If You Bite the Ballot May Bite Back)’. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 1: 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambetta, Diego, and Warner, Steven 2004. ‘Italy: Lofty Ambitions and Unintended Consequences’. In Colomer, 2004b: 237–52.
Gaunder, Alisa 2007. Political Reform in Japan: Leadership Looming Large. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaxie, Daniel 1990. ‘Les Partis politiques et les modes de scrutin en France (1985–1986), croyances et intérêts’. In Noiret, Serge (ed.), Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 423–50.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Mark 1993. ‘The Great Reform?Conference Group on Italian Politics and Society (CONGRIPS) Newsletter 39: 17–20.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Mark 1994. ‘Italy Turns Rightwards’. Contemporary Review 265(1542): 4–10.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Mark 1995. The Italian Revolution: The End of Politics, Italian Style?Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul 1990. A History of Contemporary Italy: Society and Politics 1943–1988. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1975. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goguel, François 1952. France under the Fourth Republic. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goldey, David 1993. ‘The French General Election of 21–28 March 1993’. Electoral Studies 12: 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldey, David 2007. ‘De Gaulle and the Paradox of Post-War French Politics’. In Knapp, 2007b: 57–74.
Goldey, David, and Williams, Philip 1983. ‘France’. In Bogdanor, and Butler, 1983: 62–83.
Goodin, Robert E. 1996. ‘Institutions and Their Design’. In Goodin, Robert E. (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouws, Amanda, and Mitchell, Paul 2005. ‘South Africa: One-Party Dominance Despite Perfect Proportionality’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 353–73.
Graham, Doug 1988. ‘Memorandum to National Caucus from Douglas Graham Re: “Paper on Electoral Law Reform”’, 21 April. Mimeo. McCully Papers, Archives New Zealand, Agency ABWM, Series 7361, Accession W5295, Box 2, File: ‘Electoral Law [Committee – various papers, including meeting minutes’.
Graham, Doug 2006. Interview. Drury, Auckland, 11 August.
Graham, Robert 1995. ‘Italian MPs Keep Electoral Reform Powers’. Financial Times, 13 January.Google Scholar
Grindrod, Muriel 1955. The Rebuilding of Italy: Politics and Economics, 1945–1955. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard 1982. ‘Alternatives to Single-Member Plurality Districts: Legal and Empirical Issues’. In Grofman, Bernard, Lijphart, Arend, McKay, Robert B., and Scarrow, Howard A. (eds.), Representation and Redistricting Issues. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 107–28.Google Scholar
Grumm, John G. 1958. ‘Theories of Electoral Systems’. Midwest Journal of Political Science 2: 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumbel, Andrew 1996. ‘An Olive Branch to Democracy’. Independent, 23 April.Google Scholar
Gundle, Stephen, and Parker, Simon 1996a. ‘Introduction: The New Italian Republic’. In Gundle, and Parker, 1996b: 1–15.
Stephen, Gundle, and Parker, Simon (eds.) 1996b. The New Italian Republic: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi. London: Routledge.
Gustafson, Barry 2000. His Way: A Biography of Robert Muldoon. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Guyomarch, Alain 1993. ‘The 1993 Parliamentary Election in France’. Parliamentary Affairs 46: 605–26.Google Scholar
Hanley, David 1999. ‘Compromise, Party Management and Fair Shares: The Case of the French UDF’. Party Politics 5: 171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, Erwin C. 1966. Presidential Leadership: Personality and Political Style. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hargrove, Erwin C. 1998. The President as Leader: Appealing to the Better Angels of Our Nature. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Harris, Mary 2002. ‘How Is Parliament Performing under MMP?New Zealand Law Journal: 233–6.Google Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan 1988. The Politics of Coalition Rule in Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayao, Kenji 1993. The Japanese Prime Minister and Public Policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazareesingh, Sudhir 1994. Political Traditions in Modern France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, Donald C. 1979. ‘Case Study: Foreign Policy à la LDP – The 1956 Soviet–Japanese Peace Agreement’. In Murakami, Hyoe and Hirschmeier, Johannes (eds.), Politics and Economics in Contemporary Japan. Tokyo: Japan Culture Institute, 93–108.Google Scholar
Helms, Ludger 2006. ‘The Grand Coalition: Precedents and Prospects’. German Politics and Society 24: 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, Tamar 1995. ‘The Rise of Instrumental Voting: The Campaign for Political Reform’. In Arian, Asher and Shamir, Michal (eds.), The Elections in Israel 1992. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 275–97.Google Scholar
Hill, Russell 1987. ‘First-Past-the-Post Electoral System Difficult to Shake’. New Zealand Herald, 27 June.Google Scholar
Hine, David 1981. ‘Thirty Years of the Italian Republic: Governability and Constitutional Reform’. Parliamentary Affairs 34: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, David 1988. ‘Italy (1948): Condemned by Its Constitution?’ In Bogdanor, Vernon (ed.), Constitutions in Democratic Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 206–28.Google Scholar
Hine, David 1993a. Governing Italy: The Politics of Bargained Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hine, David 1993b. ‘The New Italian Electoral System’. Newsletter of the Association for the Study of Modern Italy 24: 27–33.Google Scholar
Hine, David 1996. ‘Italian Political Reform in Comparative Perspective’. In Gundle, and Parker, 1996b: 311–25.
Hine, David, and Sala, Vincent Della 1992. ‘The Italian General Election of 1992’. Electoral Studies 11: 362–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirczy de Miño, Wolfgang, and Lane, John C. 2000. ‘Malta: STV in a Two-Party System’. In Bowler, Shaun and Grofman, Bernard (eds.), Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote: Reflections on an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 178–204.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Marc, Noppe, Jo, and Maddens, Bart 2003. ‘The Effect of Electoral Reform on the Belgian Election Results of 18 May 2003’. Representation 39: 270–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, John 2005. ‘Prodi's Poisoned Chalice’. Guardian, 25 October.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1991. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald 1997. ‘Encouraging Electoral Accommodation in Divided Societies’. In Lal, Brij V. and Larmour, Peter (eds.), Electoral Systems in Divided Societies: The Fiji Constitution Review. Canberra: National Centre for Development Studies, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, 21–37.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 2000. ‘Constitutional Design: An Oxymoron?NOMOS 42: 253–84.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 2002. ‘Constitutional Design: Proposals versus Processes’. In Reynolds, Andrew (ed.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosokawa, Morihiro 1993. ‘Inaugural Press Conference: Prime Minister Hosokawa Morihiro’. Japan Echo 20(4): 30–2.Google Scholar
Housego, David 1985. ‘France to Switch to PR Voting’. Financial Times, 4 April.Google Scholar
Hrebenar, Ronald J. 1977. ‘The Politics of Electoral Reform in Japan’. Asian Survey 17: 978–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrebenar, Ronald J. 1986. ‘Rules of the Game: The Impact of the Electoral System on Political Parties’. In Hrebenar, Ronald J. with contributions by Berton, Peter, Nakamura, Akira, Stockwin, J. A. A., and Tomita, Nobuo, The Japanese Party System: From One-Party Rule to Coalition Government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 32–54.Google Scholar
Hrebenar, Ronald J. 1992. ‘Rules of the Game: The Impact of the Electoral System on Political Parties’. In Hrebenar, Ronald J. with contributions by Berton, Peter, Nakamura, Akira, Stockwin, J. A. A., and Tomita, Nobuo, The Japanese Party System, 2nd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 32–53.Google Scholar
Hunt, Graeme 1998. Why MMP Must Go: The Case for Ditching the Electoral Disaster of the Century. Auckland: Waddington Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Jonathan 2006. Interview. London, 10 October.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
,IFES 2009. ‘International Foundation for Electoral Systems Election Guide’. Accessed at www.electionguide.org, 27 February 2009.
,Independent Commission on the Voting System 1998. Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System (CM 4090-I). London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ingle, Stephen 1995. ‘Electoral Reform in New Zealand: The Implications for Westminster Systems’. Journal of Legislative Studies 1(4): 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Initiative and Referendum Institute 2008. ‘Statewide Initiatives since 1904–2000’. Accessed at http://www.iandrinstitute.org, 25 January 2008.
Inoguchi, Takashi 1990. ‘The Political Economy of Conservative Resurgence under Recession: Public Policies and Political Support in Japan, 1977–1983’. In Pempel, T. J. (ed.), Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 189–225.Google Scholar
,IPU 2009. ‘Inter-Parliamentary Union Parline Database on National Parliaments’. Accessed at www.ipu.org/parline-e/parlinesearch.asp, 27 February 2009.
Ishiyama, John T. 1997. ‘Transitional Electoral Systems in Post-Communist Eastern Europe’. Political Science Quarterly 112: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David 2006. ‘Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others’. American Political Science Review 100: 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Keith, and McRobie, Alan 1998. New Zealand Adopts Proportional Representation: Accident? Design? Evolution?Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jackson, W. K. 1972. The New Zealand Legislative Council: A Study of the Establishment, Failure and Abolition of an Upper House. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
Jain, Purnendra C. 1993. ‘Is the “Mountain” Back in Its Place? Interpreting Japan's House of Councillors Election of 1992’. Pacific Review 6: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, Purnendra C. 1995. ‘Electoral Reform in Japan: Its Process and Implications for Party Politics’. Journal of East Asian Affairs 9: 402–27.Google Scholar
James, Colin 1990. ‘After the Divide’. In James, Colin and McRobie, Alan (eds.), Changes? The 1990 Election. Wellington: Allen & Unwin, 61–93.Google Scholar
Jesse, Eckhard 1987. ‘The West German Electoral System: The Case for Reform, 1949–1987’. West European Politics 10: 434–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers 1995. Japan: Who Governs? The Rise of the Developmental State. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Johnson, Stephen 2000. Opposition Politics in Japan: Strategies under a One-Party Dominant Regime. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kabashima, Ikuo, and Steel, Gill 2007. ‘How Junichiro Koizumi Seized the Leadership of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party’. Japanese Journal of Political Science 8: 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamiński, Marek M. 1999. ‘How Communism Could Have Been Saved: Formal Analysis of Electoral Bargaining in Poland in 1989’. Public Choice 98: 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, Marek M. 2002. ‘Do Parties Benefit from Electoral Manipulation? Electoral Laws and Heresthetics in Poland, 1989–93’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 14: 325–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn 1986. ‘Petroleum and Political Pacts: The Transition to Democracy in Venezuela’. In O'Donnell, Guillermo A., Schmitter, Philippe C., and Whitehead, Laurence (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 196–219.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1980. A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1996. ‘Electoral Reform and the Transformation of Party Politics in Italy’. Party Politics 2: 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1997. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1999. ‘Electoral Reform and Its Discontents’. In Fisher, Justin, Cowley, Philip, and Denver, David (eds.), British Elections and Parties Review, Volume 9. London: Frank Cass, 1–19.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 2001. ‘Reforming the Italian Electoral Law, 1993’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 96–122.
Katz, Richard S. 2004. ‘Problems in Electoral Reform: Why the Decision to Change Electoral Systems Is Not Simple’. In Milner, 2004: 85–101.
Katz, Richard S. 2005. ‘Why Are There So Many (or So Few) Electoral Reforms?’ In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 57–76.
Katz, Richard S. 2006. ‘Electoral Reform in Italy: Expectations and Results’. Acta Politica 41: 285–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Bruno, and Waters, M. Dane (eds.) 2004. Direct Democracy in Europe: A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in Europe. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Kawato, Sadafumi 2000. ‘Strategic Contexts of the Vote on Political Reform Bills’. Japanese Journal of Political Science 1: 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawato, Sadafumi 2002. ‘The Study of Japan's Medium-Sized District System’. In Loewenberg, Gerhard, Squire, Peverill, and Kiewiet, D. Roderick (eds.), Legislatures: Comparative Perspectives on Representative Assemblies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 178–98.Google Scholar
Keith, Kenneth 2006. Interview. Wellington, 21 August.
Kellerman, Barbara 1984a. ‘Introductory Remarks’. In Kellerman, Barbara (ed.), Leadership: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, ix–xiii.Google Scholar
Kellerman, Barbara 1984b. The Political Presidency: Practice of Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kellner, Peter 1995. ‘Electoral Reform: Principle or Self-Interest’. Representation 33(2) 23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Koichi 1993. ‘Politicians Face Tough Issues as End of Session Nears’. Japan Times, 31 May.Google Scholar
Kitazume, Takashi 1993a. ‘New Faction Aims for Realignment’. Japan Times, 4 January.Google Scholar
Kitazume, Takashi 1993b. ‘New Faction May Lead to Realignment of Party’. Japan Times, 4 January.Google Scholar
Kitazume, Takashi 1993c. ‘LDP, Opposition May Strike Reform Plan Compromise’. Japan Times, 3 May.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven I. 2007. ‘Citizen–Politician Linkages: An Introduction’. In Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I. (eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, Andrew 1987. ‘Proportional but Bipolar: France's Electoral System in 1986’. West European Politics 10: 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, Andrew 2007a. ‘Introduction: France's “Long” Liberation, 1944–47’. In Knapp, 2007b: 1–22.
Knapp, Andrew (ed.) 2007b. The Uncertain Foundation: France at the Liberation, 1944–47. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Kohno, Masaru 1997. Japan's Postwar Party Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kogan, Norman 1966. A Political History of Postwar Italy. London: Pall Mall Press.Google Scholar
Köllner, Patrick 2004. ‘Factionalism in Japanese Political Parties Revisited or How Do Factions in the LDP and the DPJ Differ?Japan Forum 16(1): 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köllner, Patrick 2006. ‘The Liberal Democratic Party at 50: Sources of Dominance and Changes in the Koizumi Era’. Social Science Japan Journal 9: 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, Petr 2004. ‘The Czech Republic: Entrenching Proportional Representation’. In Colomer, 2004b: 347–58.
Köppl, Stefan 2004. ‘Italy: A Transition without Reform? Failed Attempts at Constitutional Reform in Italy in the 1980s and 1990s’. Paper presented at the ASMI Annual Conference. London, 27 November.
Kōsaka, Masataka 1988. ‘The Paradox of Japanese Politics’. Japan Echo 15(4): 57–62.Google Scholar
Kōsaka, Masataka 1993. ‘The Forces at Work in the Political Shakeup’. Japan Echo 20(4): 45–53.Google Scholar
Krauss, Ellis 1982. ‘Japanese Parties and Parliament: Changing Leadership Rules and Role Conflicts’. In MacDougall, Terry Edward (ed.), Political Leadership in Contemporary Japan. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, University of Michigan, 93–114.Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Rein, Taagepera 1979. ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe’. Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffin, Martin 2000. ‘Constitutional Design: A Framework for Analysis’. Parliamentary Affairs 53: 532–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakeman, Enid 1974. How Democracies Vote. A Study of Electoral Systems, 4th edn. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Lal, Brij V. 1998. Another Way: The Politics of Constitutional Reform in Post-Coup Fiji. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press, National Centre for Development Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lal, Brij V. 2000. ‘Rabuka of Fiji: Coups, Constitution and Confusion: Review and Reflections’. Journal of Pacific History 35: 319–26.Google Scholar
Lamare, James W., and Vowles, Jack 1996. ‘Party Interests, Public Opinion and Institutional Preferences: Electoral System Change in New Zealand’. Australian Journal of Political Science 31: 321–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, Peter 1991. ‘Small Parties Fight to Block Reform’. Japan Times, 2 September.Google Scholar
Lange, David 1993 [1992]. ‘A Level Playing Field of Contempt’. In McRobie, 1993: 141–4. First published in Dominion, 9 September 1992.
Lange, David 2005. My Life. Auckland: Viking.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, Joseph G. 1953. ‘The Italian Elections and the Problem of Representation’. American Political Science Review 47: 676–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPalombara, Joseph 1987. Democracy, Italian Style. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Laponce, J. A. 1980. ‘The System of Election to the French National Assembly’. Contemporary French Civilization 4: 369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laugesen, Ruth 1992. ‘How MPs Vote on Electoral Reform’. Dominion, 5 August.Google Scholar
Lavau, Georges, and Mossuz-Lavau, Janine 1980. ‘The Union of the Left's Defeat: Suicide or Congenital Weakness?’ In Penniman, Howard R. (ed.), The French National Assembly Elections of 1978. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 110–43.Google Scholar
,LDP Political Reform Committee 1989. ‘A Proposal for Political Reform’. Japan Echo 16(3): 22–4. Unofficial translation of the report as summarized in Nihon Keizai Shimbun.Google Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Légifrance, 2000. ‘Loi constitutionnelle no. 2000-964 du 2 octobre 2000 relative à la durée du mandat du Président de la République’. Accessed at www.legifrance.gouv.fr, 20 December 2008.
Légifrance, 2001. ‘Loi organique no. 2001-419 du 15 mai 2001 modifiant la date d'expiration des pouvoirs de l'Assemblée Nationale’. Accessed at www.legifrance.gouv.fr, 20 December 2008.
Lehoucq, Fabrice Edouard 1995. ‘Institutional Change and Political Conflict: Evaluating Alternative Explanations of Electoral Reform in Costa Rica’. Electoral Studies 14: 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice Edouard 2000. ‘Institutionalizing Democracy: Constraint and Ambition in the Politics of Electoral Reform’. Comparative Politics 32: 459–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leites, Nathan 1959. On the Game of Politics in France. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel 1985. ‘The Transition to Democracy: Are There Lessons from Venezuela?Bulletin of Latin American Research 4: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Stephen, and Roberts, Nigel S. 1993. ‘The New Zealand Electoral Referendum of 1992’. Electoral Studies 12: 158–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Stephen, and Roberts, Nigel S. 1994. ‘The New Zealand Electoral Referendum and General Election of 1993’. Electoral Studies 13: 240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Stephen, and Roberts, Nigel S. 1997. ‘MMP: The Decision’. In Miller, Raymond (ed.), New Zealand Politics in Transition. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 25–36.Google Scholar
Levy, Jonah D., and Cindy, Skach 2008. ‘The Return to a Strong Presidency’. In Cole, Alistair, Galès, Patrick, and Levy, Jonah D. (eds.), Developments in French Politics 4. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 111–26.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur 1965. Politics in West Africa. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1978. ‘The Dutch Electoral System in Comparative Perspective: Extreme Proportional Representation, Multipartism, and the Failure of Electoral Reform’. Netherlands Journal of Sociology 14: 115–33.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1985. Power-Sharing in South Africa. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1987. ‘The Demise of the Last Westminster System? Comments on the Report of New Zealand's Royal Commission on the Electoral System’. Electoral Studies 6: 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 2002. ‘The Wave of Power-Sharing Democracy’. In Reynolds, Andrew (ed.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Mangagement, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jih-Wen 2006. ‘The Politics of Reform in Japan and Taiwan’. Journal of Democracy 17(2): 118–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1968. The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein 1967. ‘Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction’. In Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1–64.Google Scholar
Lipson, Leslie 1959. ‘Party Systems in the United Kingdom and the Older Commonwealth: Causes, Resemblances and Variations’. Political Studies 7: 12–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeber, Dietrich André 1998. ‘Regaining Independence – Constitutional Aspects: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania’. Review of Central and East European Law 24: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Richard 1990. ‘Teasing the Voters with Dreams of Electoral Reform’. Dominion, 17 April.Google Scholar
Longley, Lawrence D., and Braun, Alan G. 1975. The Politics of Electoral College Reform, 2nd edn. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Longley, Lawrence D., and Peirce, Neal R. 1999. The Electoral College Primer 2000. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lord, Carnes 2003. The Modern Prince: What Leaders Need to Know Now. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Thomas Carl 2007. Proportional Representation and the Constituency Role in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundell, Krister 2005. Contextual Determinants of Electoral System Choice: A Macro-Comparative Study 1945–2003. Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Matsusaka, John G. 2004. ‘Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions’. Annual Review of Political Science 7: 463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Georg 2004. ‘Switzerland: Introducing Proportional Representation from Below’. In Colomer, 2004b: 279–93.
MacArthur, General Douglas 1949 [1945]. ‘Statement to the Japanese Government Concerning Required Reforms’, 11 October 1945. In Government Section, Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, Political Reorientation of Japan, September 1945 to September 1948. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 741.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Patrick 1992. ‘The Referendum of 9 June’. In Hellman, Stephen and Pasquino, Gianfranco (eds.), Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 7. London: Pinter, 11–28.Google Scholar
McCully, Murray 1988. ‘Memo to: D. A. M. Graham MP, John Luxton MP, From: Murray McCully MP, Subject: Proposed Private Member's Bill – Second Chamber of Parliament, Date: 22 March 1988’. Mimeo. McCully Papers, Archives New Zealand, Agency ABWM, Series 7361, Accession W5295, Box 1, File: ‘1988 Inquiry, Electoral Law Committee (2)’.
McCully, Murray 1989a. Letter from McCully to Phil Saxby, dated 1 February 1989. Mimeo. McCully Papers, Archives New Zealand, Agency ABWM, Series 7361, Accession W5295, Box 1, File: ‘1989 Correspondence (Electoral Reform)’.
McCully, Murray 1989b. ‘Speech to the Banks Peninsula Meeting, Selwyn Electorate’, 3 November. Mimeo. McCully Papers, Archives New Zealand, Agency ABWM, Series 7361, Accession W5295, Box 6, File: ‘Media – Speeches and Press Releases, Part 2: 1988–1990’.
McCully, Murray 1990. ‘Address to the Annual General Meeting of the Auckland Division of the Young Nationals by Murray McCully MP’. Mimeo. McCully Papers, Archives New Zealand, Agency ABWM, Series 7361, Accession W5295, Box 6, File: ‘Media – Speeches and Press Releases, Part 1, 1987–1988’.
McCully, Murray 2006. Interview. Wellington, 21 August.
McCully, Murray, and Wayne, Eagleson 1991. ‘Electoral Reform: The 1992 Referendum – An Issues Paper for [the National Party's] National Executive’, 25 June. Mimeo. McCully Papers, Archives New Zealand, Agency ABWM, Series 7361, Accession W5295, Box 1, File: ‘1991 Electoral Law Committee’.
McElwain, Kenneth Mori 2008. ‘Manipulating Electoral Rules to Manufacture Single-Party Dominance’. American Journal of Political Science 52: 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Anthony J., and Teresa, Moran 2005. ‘The Myth of the Disproportionate Influence of Small Parties in Israel’. Center for the Study of Democracy, Paper 05-08. Accessed at http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/05–08, 6 February 2008.
Machiavelli, Niccolò 1979 [1513]. The Prince. In The Portable Machiavelli, ed. and trans. Bondanella, Peter and Musa, Mark. New York: Penguin, 77–166.Google Scholar
Machin, Howard 1993a. ‘How the Socialists Lost the 1993 Elections to the French Parliament’. West European Politics 16: 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, Howard 1993b. ‘Representation and Distortion in the 1993 French Election’. Parliamentary Affairs 46: 627–36.Google Scholar
Mackerras, Malcolm 1994. ‘Reform of New Zealand's Voting System, 1985–1996’. Representation 32(118): 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T., and Richard, Rose 1991. The International Almanac of Electoral History, 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Don 2006. Interview. London, 10 October.
McLean, Iain 1987. Public Choice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain 2001. Rational Choice and British Politics: An Analysis of Rhetoric and Manipulation from Peel to Blair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, Iain 2002. ‘Review Article: William H. Riker and the Invention of Heresthetic(s)’. British Journal of Political Science 32: 535–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeay, Elizabeth 1996. ‘Restructuring the State and the Electoral System in New Zealand: Public Choice Theory and Elite Behaviour’. Paper presented to the Shaping Political Behaviour Workshop, European Consortium of Political Research, Oslo, 29 March–3 April.
McLeay, Elizabeth, Boston, Jonathan, Levine, Stephen, and Roberts, Nigel S. 1996. ‘Contradictions and Compatibility: Electoral System Change and the New Zealand Political Culture’. New Zealand Studies 6 (November): 23–8.Google Scholar
McRobie, Alan 1980. ‘The Electoral System and the 1978 Election’. In Penniman, Howard R. (ed.), New Zealand at the Polls: The General Election of 1978. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 64–98.Google Scholar
McRobie, Alan 1989. ‘Challenging the Elective Dictatorship: Proposals for Reforming New Zealand's Electoral System’. In Gold, Hyam (ed.), New Zealand Politics in Perspective, 2nd edn. Auckland: Longman Paul, 388–408.Google Scholar
McRobie, Alan 1991. ‘The New Zealand General Election of 1990’. Electoral Studies 10: 158–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRobie, Alan (ed.) 1993. Taking It to the People? The New Zealand Electoral Referendum Debate. Christchurch: Hazard Press.
McRobie, Alan 1994. ‘Final and Binding: The 1993 Electoral Referendum’. In Vowles, Jack and Aimer, Peter (eds.), Double Decision: The 1993 Election and Referendum in New Zealand. Wellington: Department of Politics, Victoria University of Wellington, 101–24.Google Scholar
Maeno, J. Rey 1974. ‘Japan 1973: The End of an Era?Asian Survey 14: 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magri, Ugo 2004. ‘Discorso di 25 minuti al Senato e alla Camera per ricomporre il crisis: Federalismo e legge elettorale, il premier apre’. La Stampa, 15 July.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James 2000. ‘Path Dependence in Historical Sociology’. Theory and Society 29: 507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich 2003. ‘Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas’. In Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott 1991. ‘Politicians, Parties, and Electoral Systems: Brazil in Comparative Perspective’. Comparative Political Studies 24: 21–43.Google Scholar
Maisrikrod, Surin 2002. ‘Political Reform and the New Thai Electoral System: Old Habits Die Hard?’ In Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng and Newman, David (eds.), How Asia Votes. New York: Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press, 187–209.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico 1989. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Malone, Ryan 2008. Rebalancing the Constitution: The Challenge of Government Law-Making under MMP. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Mandonnet, Eric, and Vigogne, Ludovic 2008. ‘Institutions: le oui, mais de Morin’. Interview with Hervé Morin. L'Express, 17 April.Google Scholar
Mannheimer, Renato 2005. ‘Il centro-sinistra vince, ma di meno’. Corriere della Sera, 4 October.Google Scholar
,Māori Party 2008. ‘Election Policy’. Accessed at www.maoriparty.org, 12 December 2008.
Marchais, Georges 1973. Le Défi démocratique. Paris: Bernard Grasset.Google Scholar
Marshall, John 1989. Memoirs, Volume 2: 1960 to 1988. Auckland: William Collins.Google Scholar
Masaki, Hisane 1991. ‘Takeshita Faction Backs Miyazawa for Premiership: Patrons Cast Shadow on Candidacy’. Japan Times, 21 October.Google Scholar
Masaki, Hisane 1992. ‘Abe Arrest Another Blow to Miyazawa’. Japan Times, 27 January.Google Scholar
Massetti, Emanuele 2006. ‘Electoral Reform in Italy: From PR to Mixed System and (Almost) Back Again’. Representation 42: 261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massicotte, Louis 2008. ‘Electoral Reform in Canada’. In Blais, 2008: 112–39.
Massicotte, Louis, and Blais, André 1999. ‘Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey’. Electoral Studies 18: 341–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massicotte, Louis, Blais, André, and Yoshinaka, Antoine 2004. Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Masumi, Junnosuke 1985. Postwar Politics in Japan, 1945–1955, trans. Carlile, Lonny E.. Berkeley, CA: Center for Japanese Studies, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Masumi, Junnosuke 1995. Contemporary Politics in Japan, trans. Carlile, Lonny E.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Masuzoe, Yōichi 1991. ‘Tremors in the Political System’. Japan Echo 18 (special issue): 2–5.Google Scholar
Matsuzaki, Tetsuhisa 1989. ‘Electoral Reform: A Flawed LDP Initiative’. Japan Echo 16(3): 7–13.Google Scholar
May, John D. 1973. ‘Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity’. Political Studies 21: 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkl, Peter 1963. The Origin of the West German Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mershon, Carol, and Pasquino, Gianfranco (eds.) 1995. Italian Politics: Ending the First Republic (Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 9). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Merton, Robert K. 1967. ‘On Sociological Theories of the Middle Range’. In Merton, Robert K., On Theoretical Sociology: Five Essays, Old and New. New York: Free Press, 39–72.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert 1962 [1911]. Political Parties: A Sociological Survey of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, trans. Eden, and Paul, Cedar. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Henry (ed.) 2004. Steps toward Making Every Vote Count: Electoral System Reform in Canada and Its Provinces. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
,Ministero dell'Interno 1992. ‘Elezioni della Camera dei Deputati del 5 Aprile 1992’. Accessed at http://elezionistorico.interno.it, 12 March 2008.
,Ministero dell'Interno 2009. ‘Ballotaggi amministrative e referendum del 21 e 22 giugno’. Accessed at www.interno.it, 9 July 2009.
Minogue, Michael J. 1976. ‘Parliamentary Democracy Today’. New Zealand Law Journal 21: 485–9.Google Scholar
Mishima, Ko 2007. ‘Grading Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi's Revolution: How Far Has the LDP's Policymaking Changed?Asian Survey 47: 727–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitterrand, François 1981. ‘Les 110 propositions’. Accessed at http://www.psinfo.net, 19 December 2008.
Moore, Mike 1987. Hard Labour. Auckland: Penguin.Google Scholar
Morin, Hervé 2007. Speech at the National Council of the Nouveau Centre, 16 December. Accessed at www.le-nouveaucentre.org, 18 December 2008.
Morita, Minoru 1991. ‘The Hidden Obstacles to Electoral Reform’. Japan Echo 18 (special issue): 80–4.Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo 1996. ‘Crisis of Parties and Change of Party System in Italy’. Party Politics 2: 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, F. L., and Knopf, Rainer 2000. The Charter Revolution and the Court Party. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Mozaffar, Shaheen 1998. ‘Electoral Systems and Conflict Management in Africa: A Twenty-Eight-State Comparison’. In Sisk, Timothy D. and Reynolds, Andrew (eds.), Elections and Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 81–98.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Aurelia George 2002. Japan's Failed Revolution: Koizumi and the Politics of Economic Reform. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press at the Australian National University.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard 1980. ‘Palmer, Parliament and the Constitution’. Political Science 32: 171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Richard 1984. Democracy and Power in New Zealand: A Study of New Zealand Politics. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard 1989. ‘Recent Writing on New Zealand Politics’. Politics 24: 118–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Richard 1990. ‘Moderates Converted to Radical Electoral Reform’. New Zealand Herald, 22 April.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard 1995. ‘The Democratic Failure of Single-Party Government: The New Zealand Experience’. Australian Journal of Political Science 30 (special issue): 82–96.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Richard 2006. Interview. Canberra, 31 July.
Müller, Wolfgang 2005. ‘Austria: A Complex Electoral System with Subtle Effects’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 397–415.
Muramatsu, Michio, and Krauss, Ellis S. 1990. ‘The Dominant Party and Social Coalitions in Japan’. In Pempel, T. J. (ed.), Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 282–305.Google Scholar
Nagel, Jack H. 1994. ‘What Political Scientists Can Learn from the 1993 Electoral Reform in New Zealand’. PS: Political Science and Politics 27: 525–9.Google Scholar
Nagel, Jack H. 2004. ‘New Zealand: Reform by (Nearly) Immaculate Design’. In Colomer, 2004b: 530–43.
Naoumova, Natalia 2007. ‘Moscow, the Parti Communiste Français and France's Political Recovery’. In Knapp, 2007b: 160–82.
,National Popular Vote 2009. ‘22 Legislative Chambers Have Now Passed Bill’. Accessed at www.nationalpopularvote.com, 9 July 2009.
Neary, Ian 2002. The State and Politics in Japan. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Neumann, Robert G. 1951. ‘The Struggle for Electoral Reform in France’. American Political Science Review 45: 741–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Newell, James L. 2006. ‘The Italian Election of May 2006: Myths and Realities’. West European Politics 29: 802–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, James L., and Bull, Martin J. 1993. ‘The Italian Referenda of April 1993: Real Change at Last?West European Politics 16: 607–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,New Zealand Democratic Party 1985. Written submission to the Royal Commission on the Electoral System, no. 742 (untitled). Mimeo. Papers of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System, Archives New Zealand, Agency AAYI (RCES), Accession W3047, Item 1, 4 – Submissions.
,New Zealand Election Study 1993. ‘1993 New Zealand Election Survey’. Accessed at www.nzes.org/exec/show/1993, 10 February 2008.
,New Zealand Federation of Labour 1979. Minutes and Report of the Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Conference held in the Town Hall, Wellington, on May 1, 2, 3 and 4, 1979. Wellington: New Zealand Federation of Labour.Google Scholar
,New Zealand Federation of Labour 1982. Minutes and Report of the Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual Conference held in the Town Hall, Wellington, on May 4, 5, 6 and 7, 1982. Wellington: New Zealand Federation of Labour.Google Scholar
,New Zealand Government 2008. ‘Speech from the Throne’, 9 December. Accessed at www.beehive.govt.nz, 11 December 2008.
,New Zealand Labour Party 1978. New Zealand Labour Party 1978 Manifesto: To Rebuild the Nation. Wellington: New Zealand Labour Party.Google Scholar
,New Zealand Labour Party 1981. ‘Open Government Policy – 1981’. In Manifesto 1981: Labour … Positive, Practical Solutions. Wellington: New Zealand Labour Party.Google Scholar
,New Zealand Labour Party 1984. ‘Open Government Policy 1984’. In New Zealand Labour Party 1984 Policy Compendium (untitled). Wellington: New Zealand Labour Party.
,New Zealand Labour Party 1985. Submission to the Royal Commission on the Electoral System, 25 July. Mimeo. Papers of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System, Archives New Zealand, Agency AAYI (RCES), Accession W3047, Item 1, 4 – Submissions.
,New Zealand Labour Party 1987. New Zealand Labour Party 1987 Policy Document (untitled). Wellington: New Zealand Labour Party.
,New Zealand National Party 1960. New Zealand National Party 1960 General Election Policy. Wellington: New Zealand National Party.Google Scholar
,New Zealand National Party 1990a. ‘National's Policy on Electoral Reform: Improving New Zealand's Democracy’, 11 September. Mimeo.
,New Zealand National Party 1990b. National Party Policies for the 1990s: Creating a Decent Society. Wellington: New Zealand National Party.Google Scholar
,New Zealand National Party 2008. ‘Electoral Law Policy’. Accessed at www.national.org.nz, 19 November 2008.
,New Zealand National Party Electoral Law Reform Caucus Committee 1990. ‘Report of the Electoral Law Reform Committee to Caucus’, September. Mimeo. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Wellington.Google Scholar
Nicholle, Brian 2009. Telephone interview, 17 January.
Nishibe, Susumu 1991. ‘Challenging the Politics of Expediency’. Japan Echo 18(3): 24–7.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter 1984. ‘Changes and Choices in Electoral Systems’. In Lijphart, Arend and Grofman, Bernard (eds.), Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. Westport, CT: Praeger, 217–24.Google Scholar
,Nordic Research Group 2005. ‘Post Election STV Poll Results’, 13 June. Accessed at www.nrgresearchgroup.com, 19 January 2009.
Norris, Pippa 1995a. ‘Introduction: The Politics of Electoral Reform’. International Political Science Review 16: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa 1995b. ‘May's Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited: Leaders, Officers, Members and Voters in British Political Parties’. Party Politics 1: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northey, Richard 2006. Telephone interview. 19 August.
O'Leary, Cornelius 1979. Irish Elections 1918–77: Parties, Voters and Proportional Representation. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.Google Scholar
,Ontario Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform 2007. One Ballot, Two Votes: A New Way to Vote in Ontario: Recommendation of the Ontario Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform. Toronto.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shvetsova, Olga V. 1994. ‘Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties’. American Journal of Political Science 38: 100–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otake, Hideo 1996. ‘Forces for Political Reform: The Liberal Democratic Party's Young Reformers and Ozawa Ichirō’. Journal of Japanese Studies 22: 269–94.Google Scholar
Ottolenghi, Emanuele 2001. ‘Why Direct Election Failed in Israel’. Journal of Democracy 12(4): 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozawa, Ichirō 1993 [1992]. ‘My Commitment to Political Reform’. Japan Echo 20(1): 8–12. Translated and abridged from ‘Wareware wa naze Kaikaku o mezasu ka’, Bunjei Shunjū, December 1992: 136–49.Google Scholar
Ozawa, Ichirō 1994 [1993]. Blueprint for a New Japan: The Rethinking of a Nation. Tokyo: Kodansha International. First published as Nihon Kaizō Keikaku (Tokyo: Kodansha, 1993).Google Scholar
Palmer, Geoffrey 1979. Unbridled Power? An Interpretation of New Zealand's Constitution and Government. Wellington: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Geoffrey 1992. New Zealand's Constitution in Crisis: Reforming Our Political System. Dunedin: John McIndoe.Google Scholar
Palmer, Geoffrey 2004. ‘Muldoon and the Constitution’. In Clark, Margaret (ed.), Muldoon Revisited. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press, 167–214.Google Scholar
Palmer, Geoffrey 2006. Interview. Wellington, 9 August.
Park, Cheol Hee 2001. ‘Factional Dynamics in Japan's LDP since Political Reform’. Asian Survey 41: 428–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Simon 1996. ‘Electoral Reform and Political Change in Italy, 1991–1994’. In Gundle, and Parker, 1996b: 40–56.
Pasquino, Gianfranco 1986. ‘The Debate on Institutional Reform’. In Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Raffaella Y. (eds.), Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 1. London: Frances Pinter, 117–33.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 1987. ‘La proposta Pasquino’. In Ruffilli, Roberto (ed.), Materiali per la riforma elettorale. Bologna: Il Mulino, 61–76.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 1989. ‘That Obscure Object of Desire: A New Electoral Law for Italy’. West European Politics 12: 280–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 1991. ‘The De Mita Government Crisis and the Powers of the President of the Republic: Which Form of Government?’ In Sabetti, Filippo and Catanzaro, Raimondo (eds.), Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 5. London: Pinter, 40–54.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 1992. ‘The Electoral Reform Referendums’. In Leonardi, Robert and Anderlini, Fausto (eds.), Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 6. London: Pinter, 9–24.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 1994. ‘The Birth of the “Second Republic”’. Journal of Democracy 5(3): 107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 1998. ‘Reforming the Italian Constitution’. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 3: 42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 2000. ‘A Postmortem of the Bicamerale’. In Hine, David and Vassallo, Salvatore (eds.), Italian Politics: The Return of Politics (Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 14). New York: Berghahn, 101–20.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 2001. ‘Premiership and Leadership from D'Alema to Amato and Beyond’. In Caciagli, Mario and Zuckerman, Alan S. (eds.), Italian Politics: Emerging Themes and Institutional Responses (Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 16). New York: Berghahn, 37–51.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco 2007. ‘Tricks and Treats: The 2005 Italian Electoral Law and Its Consequences’. South European Society and Politics 12: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquino, Gianfranco, and Hellman, Stephen 1992. ‘Introduction’. In Hellman, Stephen and Pasquino, Gianfranco (eds.), Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 7. London: Pinter, 1–10.Google Scholar
,Parti Communiste Français (French Communist Party) 1971. Changer de cap: programme pour un gouvernement démocratique d'union populaire. Paris: Éditions Sociales.Google Scholar
Pearse, Hilary 2005. ‘Geographic Representation and Electoral Reform’. Canadian Parliamentary Review 28(3): 26–32.Google Scholar
Peirce, Neal R. 2004. ‘Foreword’. In Edwards 2004: ix–xiii.
Perry, Paul, and Webster, Alan 1999. New Zealand Politics at the Turn of the Millennium: Attitudes and Values about Politics and Government. Auckland: Alpha Publications.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido 2005. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pickles, Dorothy 1958. France: The Fourth Republic, 2nd edn. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul 2000. ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’. American Political Science Review 94: 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilet, Jean-Benoit 2006. ‘Confronting the Influence of Ideas and Interests in Electoral Reforms: Analysis of Two Electoral Reforms in Belgium’. Paper presented at the Annual Congress of the International Political Science Association. Fukuoka, Japan, 9–13 July.
Pilet, Jean-Benoit 2007. ‘Strategies under the Surface: The Determinants of Redistricting in Belgium’. Comparative European Politics 5: 205–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilon, Dennis 2004. ‘The Uncertain Path of Democratic Renewal in Ontario’. In Milner, 2004: 249–65.
Piretti, Maria Serena 2003. La legge truffa: il fallimento dell'ingegneria politica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Plant, Raymond 1995. ‘The Plant Report: A Retrospective’. Representation 33(2): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Preddey, Elspeth 2003. The WEL Herstory: The Women's Electoral Lobby in New Zealand 1975–2002. Wellington: WEL New Zealand.Google Scholar
,Programme Commun de Gouvernement 1972. Programme Commun de Gouvernement du Parti Communiste et du Parti Socialiste (27 juin 1972). Paris: Éditions Sociales.Google Scholar
Pryce, Roy 1952. ‘The New Italian Electoral Law’. Parliamentary Affairs 6: 269–76.Google Scholar
Pryce, Roy 1957. ‘The Italian General Election, 1958’. Parliamentary Affairs 11: 318–27.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Parti Socialiste (French Socialist Party) 1972. Changer la vie: programme de gouvernement du Parti Socialiste. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Pulzer, Peter 1983. ‘Germany’. In Bogdanor, and Butler, 1983: 84–109.
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logics of Two-Level Games’. International Organization 42: 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quagliariello, Gaetano 2003. La legge elettorale del 1953: dibattiti storici in Parlamento. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quigley, Harold S. 1926. ‘The New Japanese Electoral Law’. American Political Science Review 20: 392–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintal, David P. 1970. ‘The Theory of Electoral Systems’. Western Political Quarterly 23: 752–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1971 [1967]. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rahat, Gideon 2001. ‘The Politics of Reform in Israel: How the Israeli Mixed System Came to Be’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 123–51.
Rahat, Gideon 2008. The Politics of Regime Structure Reform in Democracies: Israel in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, and Hazan, Reuven Y. 2005. ‘Israel: The Politics of an Extreme Electoral System’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 333–51.
Rahat, Gideon, and Sznajder, Mario 1998. ‘Electoral Engineering in Chile: The Electoral System and Limited Democracy’. Electoral Studies 17: 429–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances M. 1995. The Politics of Oligarchy: Institutional Choice in Imperial Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1990. ‘Structure and Behaviour: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese Case’. British Journal of Political Science 20: 335–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1997. ‘Providing Clear Cues: Voter Response to the Reform Issue in the 1993 Japanese General Election’. Party Politics 3: 265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1999. ‘Political Reform in Japan: Combining Scientific and Historical Analysis’. Social Science Japan Journal 2: 177–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 2003a. ‘The 1993 Election and the End of LDP One-Party Dominance’. In Reed, Steven R. (ed.), Japanese Electoral Politics: Creating a New Party System. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 7–23.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 2003b. ‘Realignment between the 1993 and 1996 Elections’. In Reed, Steven R. (ed.), Japanese Electoral Politics: Creating a New Party System. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 24–39.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 2005. ‘Japan: Haltingly Towards a Two-Party System’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 277–93.
Reed, Steven R., and Bolland, John M. 1999. ‘The Fragmentation Effect of SNTV in Japan’. In Grofman, Bernard, Lee, Sung-Chull, Winckler, Edwin A., and Woodall, Brian (eds.), Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 211–26.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R., and Thies, Michael F. 2001. ‘The Causes of Electoral Reform in Japan’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 152–72.
Reid, Nicola 2003. ‘Association of Consumers and Taxpayers or the ACT Party’. In Miller, Raymond (ed.), New Zealand Government and Politics, 3rd edn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 274–82.Google Scholar
Reilly, Ben 1996. ‘The Effects of the Electoral System in Papua New Guinea’. In Saffu, Yaw (ed.), The 1992 PNG Election: Change and Continuity in Electoral Politics. Canberra: Department of Political and Social Change, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, 43–76.Google Scholar
Reilly, Ben 1997a. ‘Constitutional Engineering and the Alternative Vote in Fiji: An Assessment’. In Lal, Brij V. and Peter, Larmour (eds.), Electoral Systems in Divided Societies: The Fiji Constitution Review. Canberra: National Centre for Development Studies, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, 73–96.Google Scholar
Reilly, Ben 1997b. ‘Preferential Voting and Political Engineering: A Comparative Study’. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 35: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin 2002. ‘Back to the Future? The Political Consequences of Electoral Reform in Papua New Guinea’. Journal of Pacific History 37: 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin 2004. ‘The Global Spread of Preferential Voting: Australian Institutional Imperialism?Australian Journal of Political Science 39: 253–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin 2006. Democracy and Diversity: Political Engineering in the Asia-Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin 2007. ‘Political Engineering in the Asia Pacific’. Journal of Democracy 18(1): 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejai, Mostafa, and Phillips, Kay 1997. Leaders and Leadership: An Appraisal of Theory and Research. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Remington, Thomas F., and Smith, Steven S. 1998. ‘Theories of Legislative Institutions and the Organization of the Russian Duma’. American Journal of Political Science 42: 545–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, Alan 2005. ‘Modelling Multiple Goals: Electoral System Preferences in Hungary in 1989’. Europe-Asia Studies 57: 995–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, Alan 2007. ‘Why Did National Promise a Referendum on Electoral Reform in 1990?Political Science 59: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin 2009a. ‘How Likely Is Proportional Representation in the House of Commons? Lessons from International Experience’. Government and Opposition 44: 366–84.Google Scholar
Reilly, Benjamin 2009b. ‘Do “Wrong Winner” Elections Trigger Electrol Reform? Lessons from New Zealand’. Representation 45: 357–67.Google Scholar
Renwick, Alan, Hanretty, Chris, and Hine, David 2009. ‘Partisan Self-Interest and Electoral Reform: The New Italian Electoral Law of 2005’. Electoral Studies 28: 437–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew 1995. ‘Constitutional Engineering in Southern Africa’. Journal of Democracy 6(1): 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew 2006. ‘Electoral Systems Today: The Curious Case of Afghanistan’. Journal of Democracy 17(2): 104–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew, and Reilly, Ben 1997. The International IDEA Handbook of Electoral System Design. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew, Reilly, Ben, and Ellis, Andrew 2005. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Rich, Clifford A. L. 1953. ‘Political Trends in Italy’. Western Political Quarterly 6: 469–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richie, Robert, and Hill, Steven 2004. ‘The Fair Elections Movement in the United States: What It Has Done and Why It Is Needed’. In Milner, 2004: 215–32.
Ridet, Philippe 2007. ‘M. Sarkozy transforme son meeting parisien en démonstration de force et de popularité’. Le Monde, 2 May.Google Scholar
Riding, Alan 1992. ‘Socialist Party Is Dealt a Loss in French Vote’. New York Times, 23 March.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. ‘The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science’. American Political Science Review 76: 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1984. ‘Electoral Systems and Constitutional Restraints’. In Lijphart, Arend and Grofman, Bernard (eds.), Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. Westport, CT: Praeger, 103–10.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rioux, Jean-Pierre 1987. The Fourth Republic, 1944–1958, trans. Rogers, Godfrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzo, Alessandra 2005. ‘Italian Legislators Approve Berlusconi-Backed Electoral Reform’. Associated Press, 13 October.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald 1987. ‘Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions’. International Organization 41: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokkan, Stein 1970. ‘Electoral Systems’. In Stein Rokkan with Angus Campbell, Per Torsvik, and Henry Valen, Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 147–68.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard 1983. ‘Elections and Electoral Systems: Choices and Alternatives’. In Bogdanor, and Butler, 1983: 20–45.
,Royal Commission on the Electoral System 1986. Report of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System: Towards a Better Democracy. Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Royal, Ségolène 2007. ‘Le Pacte présidentiel’. Accessed at www.desirsdavenir.org, April 2007.
Ruff, Norman J. 2004. ‘Electoral Reform and Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly'. In Milner, 2004: 235–48.
Ruffilli, Roberto 1987. ‘La quota riservata alle coalizioni’. In Ruffilli, Roberto (ed.), Materiali per la riforma elettorale. Bologna: Il Mulino, 43–60.Google Scholar
Ryan, Louise 2006. Telephone interview, 22 August.
Rydon, Joan 1987. ‘Issues in Electoral Reform with Special Reference to Australia and New Zealand’. Political Science 39: 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto, Takayuki 1999a. Building Policy Legitimacy in Japan: Political Behaviour beyond Rational Choice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto, Takayuki 1999b. ‘Explaining Electoral Reform: Japan versus Italy and New Zealand’. Party Politics 5: 419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David, and Hellwig, Timothy 2008. ‘Electoral Accountability: A Conceptual and Empirical Reassessment’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston, MA, 28–31 August.
Samuels, Richard J. 2003. Machiavelli's Children: Leaders and Their Legacies in Italy and Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sarkozy, Nicolas 2007a. Mon projet: ensemble tout devient possible. Accessed at www.sarkozy.fr, 15 December 2008.
Sarkozy, Nicolas 2007b. Speech delivered at Épinal, 12 July, on the theme of ‘la démocratie irréprochable’. Accessed at www.elysee.fr, 15 December 2008.
Särlvik, Bo 1983. ‘Scandinavia’. In Bogdanor, and Butler, 1983: 122–48.
Sartori, Giovanni 2000. ‘The Party Effects of Electoral Systems’. In Hazan, Reuven Y. and Maor, Moshe (eds.), Parties, Elections and Cleavages: Israel in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective. London: Frank Cass, 13–28.
Sartori, Giovanni 2005. ‘La riforma con il veleno: il sistema elettorale proposto dal Polo’. Corriere della Sera, 15 September 2005.Google Scholar
Satō, Seizaburō 1991. ‘Political Reform Imperatives’. Japan Echo 18(2): 27–8.Google Scholar
Saxby, P. J. 1985. Written submission to the Royal Commission on the Electoral System, no. 687 (untitled). Mimeo. Papers of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System, Archives New Zealand, Agency AAYI (RCES), Accession W3047, Item 1, 4 – Submissions.
Saxby, Phil 2006. Interview. Wellington, 8 August.
Scarrow, Susan 2001. ‘Germany: The Mixed-Member System as a Political Compromise’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 57–69.
Scarrow, Susan E. 2003. ‘Making Elections More Direct? Reducing the Role of Parties in Elections’. In Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E. (eds.), Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1975 [1960]. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan 2007. ‘Clientelism in Japan: The Importance and Limits of Institutional Explanations’. In Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I. (eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 276–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan 2008. ‘Does Electoral System Reform Work? Electoral System Lessons from Reforms of the 1990s’. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 161–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1963. The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiemann, John W. 2001. ‘Hedging against Uncertainty: Regime Change and the Origins of Hungary's Mixed-Member System’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 231–54.
Schlesinger, Jacob M. 1997. Shadow Shoguns: The Rise and Fall of Japan's Postwar Political Machine. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Schonberger, Howard B. 1989. Aftermath of War: Americans and the Remaking of Japan 1945–1952. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Schuller, Philipp A. 1998. ‘Money Politics and the Transformation of the Japanese Political System’. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
Scottish, Elections Review 2007. Scottish Elections 2007: The Independent Review of the Scottish Parliamentary and Local Government Elections. London: Electoral Commission. Accessed at www.electoralcommission.org.uk, 27 October 2007.Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, Christopher 1967. Italy from Liberalism to Fascism, 1870–1925. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, Christopher 1983. ‘Italy’. In Bogdanor, and Butler, 1983: 110–21.
Shennan, Andrew 1989. Rethinking France: Plans for Renewal 1940–1946. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 2001. ‘A Comment on Institutional Change’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 13: 321–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiratori, Rei 1995. ‘The Politics of Electoral Reform in Japan’. International Political Science Review 16: 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg 2001. ‘“Extreme” Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 25–51.
Shugart, Matthew Søberg 2008. ‘Inherent and Contingent Factors in Reform Initiation in Plurality Systems’. In Blais, 2008: 7–60.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Wattenberg, Martin P. 2001a. ‘Introduction: The Electoral Reform of the Twenty-First Century’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 1–6.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Wattenberg, Martin P. 2001b. ‘Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: A Definition and Typology’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 9–24.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Wattenberg, Martin P. 2001c. ‘Conclusion: Are Mixed-Member Electoral Systems the Best of Both Worlds?’ In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 571–96.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.) 2001d. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siaroff, Alan 2003. ‘Spurious Majorities, Electoral Systems and Electoral System Change’. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 41: 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M. 2005. ‘Chile: The Unexpected (and Expected) Consequences of Electoral Engineering’. In Gallagher, and Mitchell, 2005: 433–52.
Sidoti, Franceso 1993. ‘Italy: A Clean-Up after the Cold War’. Government and Opposition 28: 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert, A. 1959. ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science’. American Economic Review 49: 253–83.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1985. ‘Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science’. American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisk, Timothy D. 1995. ‘Electoral System Choice in South Africa: Implications for Intergroup Moderation’. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 1: 178–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Somers, Margaret 1980. ‘The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 174–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kaapua 2006. ‘Māori Party’. In Miller, Raymond (ed.), New Zealand Government and Politics, 4th edn. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 405–16.Google Scholar
Smyth, Howard McGaw 1948. ‘Italy: From Fascism to the Republic’. Western Political Quarterly 1: 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A., Rochford, E. Burke, Jr, Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D. 1986. ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’. American Sociological Review 51: 464–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southall, Roger 2003. ‘An Unlikely Success: South Africa and Lesotho's Election of 2002’. Journal of Modern African Studies 41: 269–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spotts, Frederic, and Wieser, Theodor 1986. Italy: A Difficult Democracy: A Survey of Italian Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standish, Bill 1996. ‘Elections in Simbu: Towards Gunpoint Democracy?’ In Saffu, Yaw (ed.), The 1992 PNG Election: Change and Continuity in Electoral Politics. Canberra: Department of Political and Social Change, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, 277–322.Google Scholar
Stanley, Alessandra 1998. ‘In a First for Italy, Former Communist Is Named Premier’. New York Times, 22 October.Google Scholar
Statistics, New Zealand 2003. ‘Labour Market Statistics 2003’. Accessed at www.stats.govt.nz, 5 March 2008.
Steel, David 1989. Against Goliath: David Steel's Story. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Stepanek, Marcia 1980. ‘Pat Quinn – A Man Politicians Love To Hate’. Illinois Issues 6(1): 4–8.Google Scholar
Stickley, Tony 1990. ‘Peters Suggests Voting Reform’. New Zealand Herald, 30 March.Google Scholar
Stockley, Andrew P. 2004. ‘What Difference Does Proportional Representation Make?Public Law Review 15: 121–36.Google Scholar
Stockwin, J. A. A. 1983. ‘Japan’. In Bogdanor, and Butler, 1983: 209–27.
Stockwin, J. A. A. 1988a. ‘Dynamic and Immobilist Aspects of Japanese Politics’. In Stockwin, J. A. A., Rix, Alan, George, Aurelia, Home, James, Itō, Daiichi, and Collick, Martin, Dynamic and Immobilist Politics in Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwin, J. A. A. 1988b. ‘Parties, Politicians and the Political System’. In Stockwin, J. A. A., Rix, Alan, George, Aurelia, Home, James, Itō, Daiichi, and Collick, Martin, Dynamic and Immobilist Politics in Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 22–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwin, J. A. A. 1991a. ‘Japan's Opposition Parties and the Prospects for Political Change’. Japan Foundation Newsletter 19(2): 1–6 and 17.Google Scholar
Stockwin, J. A. A. 1991b. ‘From JSP to SDPJ: The New Wave Society and the “New” Nihon Shakaitō’. Japan Forum 3(2): 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwin, J. A. A. 1992. ‘The Japan Socialist Party: Resurgence after Long Decline’. In Hrebenar, Ronald J. with contributions by Berton, Peter, Nakamura, Akira, Stockwin, J. A. A. and Tomita, Nobuo, The Japanese Party System, 2nd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 81–115.Google Scholar
Stockwin, J. A. A. 1996. ‘New Directions in Japanese Politics’. In Neary, Ian (ed.), Leaders and Leadership in Japan. Richmond: Japan Library, 265–75.Google Scholar
Stockwin, J. A. A. 2008. Governing Japan: Divided Politics in a Resurgent Economy, 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strand, Per 2000. ‘Decisions on Democracy: The Politics of Constitution-Making in South Africa, 1990–1996’. PhD Thesis, Uppsala University.
Strøm, Kaare, and Müller, Wolfgang C. 1999. ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’. In Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare (eds.), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–35.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein 1994. ‘Estonia's Constitutional Assembly, 1991–1992’. Journal of Baltic Studies 25: 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein 1998. ‘Effective Magnitude and Effective Threshold’. Electoral Studies 17: 393–404.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Takenaka, Harukata 2007. ‘Fukuda's Rise and the Return of the Old LDP’. Japan Echo 34(6): 11–14.Google Scholar
Taylor, Brian 2002. The Road to the Scottish Parliament, revised edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Temple, Philip 1995. ‘Changing the Rules in New Zealand: The Electoral Reform Referenda of 1992 and 1993’. Political Quarterly 66: 234–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Test Case Centre 2006. ‘The “Green Party Case”: Joan Russow v The Attorney General of Canada, The Chief Electoral Officer of Canada and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada’. Accessed at www.law-lib.utoronto.ca/testcase/, 20 January 2007.
Thacher, George A. 1907. ‘The Initiative and Referendum in Oregon’. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 4: 198–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen 1999. ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thies, Michael F. 2002. ‘Changing How the Japanese Vote: The Promise and Pitfalls of the 1994 Electoral Reform’. In Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng and Newman, David (eds.), How Asia Votes. New York: Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press, 92–117.Google Scholar
Tiersky, Ronald 2000. François Mitterrand: The Last French President. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Tokumoto, Teruhito 1990. ‘A Labor Leader Endorses Single-Member Districts’. Japan Echo 17(3): 52–4.Google Scholar
Travett, Claire 2008. ‘Referendum “No” Wouldn't Need to Spell End for Proportionality’. New Zealand Herald, 9 August.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Robert C. 1995. Politics as Leadership, revised edn. Columbia, MS: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Uchida, Kenzō 1987. ‘Japan's Postwar Conservative Parties’. In Ward, Robert E. and Yoshikazu, Sakamoto (eds.), Democratizing Japan: The Allied Occupation. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii University Press, 306–38.Google Scholar
Uchida, Kenzo 1988. ‘Politics’ High Cost'. Japan Times, 18 June.Google Scholar
Uleri, Pier Vincenzo 2002. ‘On Referendum Voting in Italy: YES, NO, or Non-Vote? How Italian Parties Learned to Control Referendums’. European Journal of Political Research 41: 863–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,United Future 2008. ‘Purposeful Democracy’. Constitution policy statement. Wellington. Accessed at www.unitedfuture.org.nz, 12 December 2008.
Upton, Simon 1993 [1992]. ‘Electoral Reform No Answer’. In McRobie, 1993: 115–17. First published in New Zealand Herald, 8 January 1992.
,US Government 1949 [1945]. ‘United States Initial Post-Surrender Policy for Japan’, 29 August 1945. In Government Section, Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, Political Reorientation of Japan, September 1945 to September 1948. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 423–6.Google Scholar
Kolk, Henk, and Thomassen, Jacques 2006. ‘The Dutch Electoral System on Trial’. Acta Politica 41: 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolferen, Karel 1986/1987. ‘The Japan Problem’. Foreign Affairs 65: 288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassallo, Salvatore 2005. ‘The Constitutional Reforms of the Center-Right’. In Guarnieri, Carlo and Newell, James L. (eds.), Italian Politics: Quo Vadis? (Italian Politics: A Review, Volume 20). New York: Berghahn, 117–35.Google Scholar
Verderami, Francesco 2004. ‘Dobbiamo rivedere le nostre promesse: parla il vicepremier Gianfranco Fini’. Corrierre della Sera, 28 October.Google Scholar
Vowles, Jack 1995. ‘The Politics of Electoral Reform in New Zealand’. International Political Science Review 16: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowles, Jack 1997. ‘The New Zealand General Election of 1996’. Electoral Studies 16: 258–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowles, Jack 2000. ‘Introducing Proportional Representation: The New Zealand Experience’. Parliamentary Affairs 53: 680–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowles, Jack 2008a. ‘Systemic Failure, Coordination, and Contingencies: Understanding Electoral System Change in New Zealand’. In Blais, 2008: 163–83.
Vowles, Jack 2008b. ‘Making a Difference? Public Perceptions of Coalition, Single-Party, and Minority Governments’. Paper presented at the Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties Conference. Manchester, 12–14 September.
Vowles, Jack, and Aimer, Peter 1993. Voters' Vengeance: The 1990 Election in New Zealand and the Fate of the Fourth Labour Government. Auckland: Auckland Unversity Press.Google Scholar
Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Catt, Helena, Lamare, Jim, and Miller, Raymond 1995. Towards Consensus? The 1993 Election in New Zealand and the Transition to Proportional Representation. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Wahl, Nicholas 1959a. ‘The French Constitution of 1958: II. The Initial Draft and Its Origins’. American Political Science Review 53: 358–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, Nicholas 1959b. The Fifth Republic: France's New Political System. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Wallace, John 2002. ‘Reflections on Constitutional and Other Issues Concerning Our Electoral System: The Past and the Future’. Political Science 54: 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, John 2006. Interview. Auckland, 12 August.
Ward, Robert E. 1966. ‘Recent Electoral Developments in Japan’. Asian Survey 6: 547–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Alan 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Washio, Akira 1993. ‘Hata Tsutomu: Portrait of a Tenacious Politician’. Japan Echo 20(1): 24–8.Google Scholar
Wasi, Prawase 2002. ‘An Overview of Political Reform’. In McCargo, Duncan (ed.), Reforming Thai Politics. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, 21–7.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent 2001. ‘Electoral Rules and Electoral Reform in Canada’. In Shugart, and Wattenberg, 2001d: 542–69.
Welsh, David, and Spence, Jack 2000. ‘F. W. de Klerk: Enlightened Conservative’. In Westlake, Martin (ed.), Leaders of Transition. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 29–52.Google Scholar
Westlake, Martin 2000. ‘Conclusions: Vision and Will’. In Westlake, Martin (ed.), Leaders of Transition. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 157–71.Google Scholar
Whitney, Courtney 1955. MacArthur: His Rendezvous with History. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Daniel 1996. ‘New Italian Prime Minister Named, Will Oversee Electoral Reform’. Washington Post, 2 February.Google Scholar
Williams, David 1996. ‘Ozawa Ichirō: The Making of a Japanese Kingmaker’. In Neary, Ian (ed.), Leaders and Leadership in Japan. Richmond: Japan Library, 276–97.Google Scholar
Williams, Justin, Sr. 1979. Japan's Political Revolution under MacArthur: A Participant's Account. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Kieran 2005. ‘Judicial Review of Electoral Thresholds in Germany, Russia, and the Czech Republic’. Election Law Journal 4: 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Kieran 2007. ‘The Growing Litigiousness of Czech Elections’. Europe-Asia Studies 59: 937–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Philip 1954. Politics in Post-War France: Parties and the Constitution in the Fourth Republic. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Williams, Philip M. 1964. Crisis and Compromise: Politics in the Fourth Republic. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Williams, Philip M., and Harrison, Martin 1959. ‘France 1958’. In Butler, D. E., Williams, Philip M., Harrison, Martin, Pelczynski, Zbigniew, Chubb, Basil, and Farquharson, R. R., Elections Abroad. London: Macmillan, 11–90.Google Scholar
Williams, Philip M., and Harrison, Martin 1961. De Gaulle's Republic, 2nd edn. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret 1989. Labour in Government 1984–1987. Wellington: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret 2006. Interview. Wellington, 23 August.
Wolfe, Eugene, L. 1992. ‘Japan's LDP Considers Electoral Reform: A Neglected Political Debt’. Asian Survey 32: 773–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Eugene L. 1995. ‘Japanese Electoral and Political Reform: Role of the Young Turks’. Asian Survey 35: 1059–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodall, Brian 1999. ‘The Politics of Reform in Japan's Lower House Electoral System’. In Grofman, Bernard, Lee, Sung-Chull, Winckler, Edwin A., and Woodall, Brian (eds.), Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 23–50.Google Scholar
Woodall, Brian 2007. ‘Campaign Finance on Steroids: The Roots of Change, Inertia, and Corruption in Japanese Political Funding’. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, 30 August–2 September.
Woollaston, Philip 2006. Interview. Wellington, 25 August.
Wriggins, W. Howard 1969. The Ruler's Imperative: Strategies for Political Survival in Asia and Africa. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Gordon 1950. The Reshaping of French Democracy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Wyles, John 1987. ‘Italians Launch Reform Manifesto’. Financial Times, 22 December.Google Scholar
Yayama, Tarō 1991. ‘Following Through on Electoral Reform’. Japan Echo 18(2): 29–34.Google Scholar
,Yomiuri Electoral System Study Group 1990. ‘Estimating the Impact of Reform Scenarios’. Japan Echo 17(3): 36–42.Google Scholar
Zahariadis, Nikolaos 2003. Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision Making in Modern Democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zahariadis, Nikolaos 2007. ‘The Multiple Streams Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects’. In Sabatier, Paul A., Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 65–92.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Alan Renwick, University of Reading
  • Book: The Politics of Electoral Reform
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676390.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Alan Renwick, University of Reading
  • Book: The Politics of Electoral Reform
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676390.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Alan Renwick, University of Reading
  • Book: The Politics of Electoral Reform
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676390.018
Available formats
×