Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T04:28:28.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - False Miracles and Unattested Dead Bodies: Investigations into Popular Cults in Early Modern Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2010

Eve Levin
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
James D. Tracy
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Marguerite Ragnow
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

TheSpiritual Regulation of 1721 embodied Peter the Great's blueprint for the perestroika of the Russian Orthodox Church. Among its many provisions outlining the public purposes of religion and establishing a new administrative structure for the Church, the Spiritual Regulation expressed concern for the problem of “superstitious practices”: wandering holy fools, klikushki (hysterical women), improbable versions of saints' lives, false reports of miracles from icons, and bogus relics. The Spiritual Regulation charged Church authorities – parish priests, local bishops, and its new central ruling body – with investigating such inappropriate popular religious observances and stamping them out. Specifically, the new edict dictated that priests inform the appropriate ecclesiastical and secular authorities if “someone imagined in some way a false miracle, or contrived it hypocritically, and then broadcast it so that the simple and unreasoning people take it for the truth.” Bishops, for their part, were to report to the Ecclesiastical College (or, as it was renamed almost immediately, the “Most Holy Governing Synod”) twice annually about the state of their eparchies, including instances of “false miracles from holy icons” and “unattested dead bodies” – that is, the relics of unofficial saints. After receiving such reports, the Synod then had the obligation to launch formal investigations of all such “apparitions” and “miracles.” Offenders would be subject not only to ecclesiastical penalties, but also to severe civil ones.

Scholars of the Petrinereforms have not previously tried to trace the methods the Russian Church hierarchy used to regulate popular religion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Religion and the Early Modern State
Views from China, Russia, and the West
, pp. 253 - 283
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×