Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T19:07:17.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Neuronal interactions and their role in solving the stereo correspondence problem

from Part I - Depth processing and stereopsis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Jason M. Samonds
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
Tai Sing Lee
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
Laurence R. Harris
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Michael R. M. Jenkin
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Binocular vision provides important information about depth to help us navigate in a three-dimensional environment and allow us to identify and manipulate 3D objects. The relative depth of any feature with respect to the fixation point can be determined by triangulating the horizontal shift, or disparity, between the images of that feature projected onto the left and right eyes. The computation is difficult because, in any given visual scene, there are many similar features, which create ambiguity in the matching of corresponding features registered by the two eyes. This is called the stereo correspondence problem. An extreme example of such ambiguity is demonstrated by Julesz's (1964) random-dot stereogram (RDS). In an RDS (Figure 7.1a), there are no distinct monocular patterns. Each dot in the left-eye image can be matched to several dots in the right-eye image. Yet when the images are fused between the two eyes, we readily perceive the hidden 3D structure.

In this chapter, we will review neurophysiological data that suggest how the brain might solve this stereo correspondence problem. Early studies took a mostly bottom-up approach. An extensive amount of detailed neurophysiological work has resulted in the disparity energy model (Ohzawa et al., 1990; Prince et al., 2002). Since the disparity energy model is insufficient for solving the stereo correspondence problem on its own, recent neurophysiological studies have taken a more top-down approach by testing hypotheses generated by computational models that can improve on the disparity energy model (Menz and Freeman, 2003; Samonds et al., 2009a; Tanabe and Cumming, 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×