Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T14:50:36.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Twenty-One - Integrating trait-mediated effects and non-trophic interactions in the study of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Alexandra Goudard
Affiliation:
Lycée Champollion, Grenoble
Michel Loreau
Affiliation:
Station d’Ecologie Expérimentale du CNRS
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Oswald Schmitz
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Robert D. Holt
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

The need to consider trait-mediated effects and non-trophic interactions in the study of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning has emerged as a central issue in ecology during the past two decades because of increasing concerns about the potential ecological and societal consequences of current biodiversity loss (Loreau et al. 2001; Naeem et al. 2009; Loreau 2010). Biological invasions are one of the main drivers of this biodiversity loss as human activities contribute to accelerate introductions of exotic species in many of the world’s ecosystems, with considerable economic impacts (Williamson 1996; Mooney and Hobbs 2000). Although the effects of biodiversity loss on ecosystem functioning have now been studied in a wide range of organisms and ecosystems (Hooper et al. 2005; Balvanera et al. 2006; Cardinale et al. 2006; Naeem et al. 2009), most experimental and theoretical studies have considered either competitive communities at a single trophic level or relatively simple food webs (Duffy et al. 2007). The only direct species interactions considered in these studies are trophic interactions, and the only indirect species interactions considered are density-mediated interactions (for instance, exploitation competition). Similarly, the impacts of biological invasions on native ecosystems and the relationship between biodiversity and invasion resistance have been mainly studied in experimental plant communities (e.g., Kennedy et al. 2002) and models that consider a single type of species interactions, either competition (e.g., Case 1990; Byers and Noonburg 2003) or trophic interactions (e.g., Law and Morton 1996).

Type
Chapter
Information
Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 414 - 432
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. A. 1995 Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communitiesAmerican Naturalist 146 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. A. 2007 Defining and measuring the impact of dynamic traits on interspecific interactionsEcology 88 2555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arditi, R.Michalski, J.Hirzel, A. H. 2005 Rheagogies: modeling non-trophic effects in food websEcological Complexity 2 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badano, E. I.Jones, C. G.Cavieres, L. A.Wright, J. P. 2006 Assessing impacts of ecosystem engineers on community organization: a general approach illustrated by effects of a high-Andean cushion plantOikos 115 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balvanera, P.Pfisterer, A. B.Buchmann, N. 2006 Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and servicesEcology Letters 9 1146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolker, B.Holyoak, M.Krivan, V.Rowe, L.Schmitz, O. 2003 Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactionsEcology 84 1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, J. F.Stachowicz, J. J.Bertness, M. D. 2003 Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theoryTrends in Ecology and Evolution 18 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. E.Noonburg, E. G. 2003 Scale dependent effects of biotic resistance to biological invasionEcology 84 1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, R. M.Walker, L. R. 1997 Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communitiesEcology 78 1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, B. J.Harvey, C. T.Gross, K.Ives, A. R. 2002 Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitationNature 415 426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardinale, B. J.Srivastava, D. S.Duffy, J. E. 2006 Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystemsNature 443 989CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Case, T. J. 1990 Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communitiesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 87 9610CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, J. E.Cardinale, B. J.France, K. E. 2007 The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexityEcology Letters 10 522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goudard, A.Loreau, M. 2008 Non-trophic interactions, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: an interaction web modelAmerican Naturalist 171 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, D. U.Chapin, F. S.Ewel, J. J. 2005 Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledgeEcological Monographs 75 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ings, T. C.Montoya, J. M.Bascompte, J. 2009 Ecological networks – beyond food websJournal of Animal Ecology 78 253CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ives, A. R.Cardinale, B. J.Snyder, W. E. 2005 A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator–prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioningEcology Letters 8 102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G.Lawton, J. H.Shachak, M. 1994 Organisms as ecosystem engineersOikos 69 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, T. A.Naeem, S.Howe, K. M. 2002 Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasionNature 417 636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kokkoris, G. D.Jansen, V. A. A.Loreau, M.Troumbis, A. Y. 2002 Variability in interaction strength and implications for biodiversityJournal of Animal Ecology 71 362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokkoris, G. D.Troumbis, A. Y.Lawton, J. H. 1999 Patterns of species interaction strength in assembled theoretical competition communitiesEcology Letters 2 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, R.Blackford, J. C. 1992 Self-assembling food webs: a global viewpoint of coexistence of species in Lotka–Volterra communitiesEcology 73 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, R.Morton, R. D. 1996 Permanence and the assembly of ecological communitiesEcology 77 762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefèvre, T.Labarbenchon, C.Gauthier-Clerc, M. 2009 The ecological significance of manipulative parasitesTrends in Ecology and Evolution 24 41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M. 1998 Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic modelProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95 5632CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M. 2010 From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological SynthesisPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreau, M.Naeem, S.Inchausti, P. 2001 Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challengesScience 294 804CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, N. D. 1992 Constant connectance in community food websAmerican Naturalist 139 1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MayR. M. 1972 Will large complex systems be stable?Nature 238 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, C.Agrawal, A.Bever, J. 2006 Biotic interactions and plant invasionsEcology Letters 9 726CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montoya, J. M.Solé, R. V. 2003 Topological properties of food webs: from real data to community assembly modelsOikos 102 614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, H. A.Hobbs, R. J. 2000 Invasive Species in a Changing WorldWashington DCIsland PressGoogle Scholar
Mulder, C. P. H.Uliassi, D. D.Doak, D. F 2001 Physical stress and diversity-productivity relationships: the role of positive interactionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 6704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeem, S.Bunker, D. E.Hector, A.Loreau, M.Perrings, C. 2009 Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: an Ecological and Economic PerspectiveOxfordOxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuyama, T.Bolker, B. 2007 On quantitative measures of indirect interactionsEcology Letters 10 264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olff, H.Alonso, D.Berg, M. P. 2009 Parallel ecological networks in ecosystemsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 364 1755CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neutel, A. M.Heesterbeek, J. A. P.de Ruiter, P. C. 2002 Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loopsScience 296 1120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfisterer, A. B.Joshi, J.Schmid, B.Fischer, M. 2004 Rapid decay of diversity-productivity relationships after invasion of experimental plant communitiesBasic and Applied Ecology 5 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringel, M. S.Hu, H. H.Anderson, G. 1996 The stability and the persistence of mutualisms embedded in community interactionsTheoretical Population Biology 50 281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rixen, C.Mulder, C. P. H. 2005 Improved water retention links high species richness with increased productivity in Arctic tundra moss communitiesOecologia 146 287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, O. J.Krivan, V.Ovadia, O. 2004 Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactionsEcology Letters 7 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohlgren, T. J.Binkley, D.Chong, G. W. 1999 Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversityEcological Monographs 69 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thébault, E.Loreau, M. 2003 Food-web constraints on biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationshipsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 25 14949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thébault, E.Huber, V.Loreau, M. 2007 Cascading extinctions and ecosystem functioning: contrasting effects of diversity depending on food web structureOikos 116 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E.Peacor, S. D. 2003 A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communitiesEcology 84 1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. 1996 Biological InvasionsNew YorkChapman and HallGoogle Scholar
Wootton, T. 1994 The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communitiesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, B.Fitzgerald, D. G.Mayer, C. M.Rudstam, L. G.Mills, E. L. 2006 Alteration of ecosystem function by zebra mussels in Oneida Lake: impacts on submerged macrophytesEcosystems 9 1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×