Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T01:11:51.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Using pheromones to disrupt mating of moth pests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Marcos Kogan
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Paul Jepson
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Many kinds of insects rely on sex pheromones to locate mates, with attraction often occurring over distances of ten meters or more. The prospect of achieving direct population control of insect pests by applying synthetic copies of these attractants to a crop has long intrigued entomologists and chemists. Because odor communication is mediated by miniscule quantities of pheromone, it was imagined that application of relatively small amounts of synthetic pheromone, perhaps a fraction of a gram of pheromone per ha per day, would readily interfere with mate location by “confusing” the responders. But testing the feasibility of mating disruption requires synthetic copies of these chemical messages, and it was not until the late 1960s and early 1970s that advances in techniques for characterizing pheromone structures facilitated the identification of the pheromones of many of the world's most damaging pest insects. The availability of synthetic pheromones in turn enabled field testing of this method of pest control, beginning with Gaston et al. (1967).

Female-emitted pheromones that induce mate-location behaviors in males are now known for hundreds of moth species (Arn et al., 2000), and for insects in many other groups (Mayer and MacLaughlin, 1991). Although some moth species have pheromones consisting of a single compound, most moth pheromones are blends of two to four components. The majority of compounds utilized are unbranched alkyl chains, 10 to 18 carbons in length, most always with an even number of carbons, one or two double bonds, and with a terminal acetate, alcohol, or aldehyde moiety.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnello, A. M., Reissig, W. H., Spangler, S. M., Charlton, R. E. and Kain, D. P. (1996). Trap response and fruit damage by obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in pheromone-treated apple orchards. Environmental Entomology, 25, 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpizar, D., Fallas, M., Oehlschlager, A. C.et al. (2002). Pheromone mass trapping of the West Indian sugarcane weevil and the American palm weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in palmito palm. Florida Entomologist, 85, 426–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arn, H. and Louis, F. (1996). Mating disruption in European vineyards. In Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research. New Directions. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp. 377–82.Google Scholar
Arn, H., Rauscher, S., Buser, H. R. and Guerin, P. M. (1986). Sex pheromone of Eupoecilia ambiguella female: analysis and male response to ternary blend. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 12, 1417–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arn, H., Tóth, M. and Priesner, E. (2000). The Pherolist. www.nyaes.cornell.edu/pheronet (last updated on 2 September 2000, accessed on September 1, 2003). Superseded by P. Witzgall, T. Lindblom, M. Bengtsson and M. Tóth (2004), The Pherolist. www-pherolist.slu.se
Atterholt, C. A., Delwiche, M. J., Rice, R. E. and Krochta, J. M. (1999). Controlled release of insect pheromones from paraffin wax and emulsions. Journal of Controlled Release, 57, 233–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, T. C. and Cardé, R. T. (1979). Analysis of pheromone-mediated behaviors in male Grapholitha molesta, the oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environmental Entomology, 8, 956–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, T. C., Hansson, B. S., Löfstedt, C. and Löfqvist, J. (1988). Adaptation of antennal neurons is associated with cessation of pheromone-mediated flight. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 85, 9826–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, B. N. and Blomefield, T. L. (1997). Goading growers towards mating disruption: the South African experience with Grapholita molesta and Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). In Witzgall, P. and Arn, H. (eds.), Technology Transfer in Mating Disruption. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 20(1), pp. 45–56.Google Scholar
Barrett, B. A. (1995). Effect of synthetic pheromone permeation on captures of male codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in pheromone and virgin female-baited traps at different tree heights in small orchard blocks. Environmental Entomology, 24, 1201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartell, R. J. (1982). Mechanisms of communication disruption by pheromone in the control of Lepidoptera: a review. Physiological Entomology, 7, 353–64.Google Scholar
Bartell, R. J. and Roelofs, W. L. (1973). Inhibition of sexual response in males of the moth Argyrotaenia velutinana by brief exposures to synthetic pheromone or its geometrical isomer. Journal of Insect Physiology, 19, 655–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengstsson, M., Karg, G., Kirsch, P. A.et al. (1994). Mating disruption of pea moth Cydia nigricana F. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by a repellent blend of sex pheromone and attractant inhibitors. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20, 871–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. H. (1996). Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles. In Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research. New Directions. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp. 421–38.Google Scholar
Brunner, J. F. (2003). Building a pheromone-based pest management system for apple production in Washington State. 3rd International Pheromone Symposium. Bäckaskog, Sweden. Abstracts, p. 51.
Campion, D. G., Critchley, B. R. and McVeigh, L. J. (1989). Mating disruption. In Justum, A. R. and Gordon, R. F. S. (eds.), Insect Pheromones in Plant Protection. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 89–119.Google Scholar
Cardé, R. T. (1976). Utilization of pheromones in the population management of moth pests. Environmental Health Perspectives, 14, 133–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardé, R. T. (1990). Principles of mating disruption. In Ridway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M. and Inscoe, M. (eds.), Behavior Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 47–91.Google Scholar
Cardé, R. T. (2003). Orientation. In Resh, V. H. and Cardé, R. T. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Insects. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 823–7.Google Scholar
Cardé, R. T. and Hagaman, T. E. (1984). Mate location strategies of gypsy moths in dense populations. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 10, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardé, R. T. and Haynes, K. F. (2004). Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths. In Cardé, R. T. and Millar, J. G. (eds.), Advances in the Chemical Ecology of Insects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 283–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (1995). Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annual Review of Entomology, 40, 559–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R. T., Staten, R. T. and Mafra-Neto, A. (1998). Behaviour of pink bollworm males near high-dose, point sources of pheromone in field wind tunnels: insights into mechanisms of mating disruption. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 89, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R. T., Trammel, K. and Roelofs, W. L. (1975). Disruption of sex attraction of the redbanded leafroller (Argyrotaenia velutinana) with microencapsulated pheromone components. Environmental Entomology, 4, 448–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, R. E. and Cardé, R. T. (1981). Comparing the effectiveness of sexual communication disruption in the oriental fruit moth (Grapholitha molesta) using different combinations and dosages of its pheromone blend. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 7, 501–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlton, R. E. and Cardé, R. T. (1990). Factors mediating copulatory behavior and close-range mate recognition in the male gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 1995–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmillot, P. J. (1990). Mating disruption technique to control codling moth in western Switzerland. In Ridway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M. and Inscoe, M. (eds.), Behavior Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 165–82.Google Scholar
Charmillot, P. J., Hofer, D. and Pasquier, D. (2000). Attract and kill: a new method for control of the codling mothCydia pomonella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 94, 211–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmillot, P. J., Pasquier, D., Scalco, A. and Hofer, D. (1996). Essais de lutte contre le carpocapse Cydia pomonella L. par un procédé attracticide. Mitteilungen der Schwiezerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 69, 431–9.Google Scholar
Collins, R., Rosenblum, S. and Cardé, R. T. (1990). Selection for increased pheromone titre in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Physiological Entomology, 15, 141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlee, J. K. and Staten, R. T. (1987). Device for insect control. U.S. Patent No. 4,671,010.
Cook, B. J., Shelton, W. D. and Staten, R. T. (1978). Antennal responses of the pink bollworm to gossyplure. The Southwestern Entomologist, 3, 141–6.Google Scholar
Cork, A., Alam, S. N., Rouf, F. M. A. and Talekar, N. S. (2003). Female sex pheromone of the brinjal fruit and shoot borer, Leucinodes orbonalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): trap optimization and application in IMP trials. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 93, 107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, C. C. and Brooks, T. W. (1981). Research and development of pheromones for insect control with emphasis on the pink bollworm. In Mitchell, E. R. (ed.), Plenum, Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals. Concepts and Practice. New York. pp. 285–303.Google Scholar
Evenden, M. L., Delury, L. E., Judd, G. J. R. and Borden, J. H. (2003). Assessing the mating status of male obliquebanded leafrollers Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by dissection of male and female moths. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 96, 217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenden, M. L., Judd, G. J. R. and Borden, J. H. (1999 a). Pheromone-mediated mating disruption of Choristoneura rosaceana: is the most attractive blend really the most effective?Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 90, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenden, M. L., Judd, G. J. R. and Borden, J. H. (1999 b). Simultaneous disruption of pheromone communication in Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis limitata with pheromone and antagonist blends. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25, 501–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenden, M. L., Judd, G. J. R. and Borden, J. H. (2000). Investigations of mechanisms of pheromone communication disruption of Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in a wind tunnel. Journal of Insect Behavior, 13, 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadamiro, H. Y. and Baker, T. C. (1999). Reproductive performance and longevity of female European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis: effects of multiple mating, delay in mating, and adult feeding. Journal of Insect Physiology, 45, 385–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadamiro, H. Y., Cossé, A. A. and Baker, T. C. (1999). Mating disruption of European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis by using two types of sex pheromone dispensers deployed in grassy aggregation sites in Iowa cornfields. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2, 121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Färbert, P., Koch, U. T., Färbert, A. and Staten, R. T. (1996). Measuring pheromone concentration in cotton fields with the EAG method. In Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research. New Directions. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp. 347–58.Google Scholar
Färbert, P., Koch, U. T., Färbert, A., Staten, R. T. and Cardé, R. T. (1997). Pheromone concentration measured with EAG in cotton fields treated for mating disruption of Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Environmental Entomology, 26, 1105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueredo, A. J. and Baker, T. C. (1992). Reduction of the response to sex pheromone in the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) following successive pheromone exposures. Journal of Insect Behavior, 5, 347–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, H. M., Yamamoto, A., Parks, N. J. and Nyomura, K. (1990). Aerial concentration of gossyplure, the sex pheromone of the pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), in cotton fields treated with long-lasting dispensers. Environmental Entomology, 19, 1845–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, L. K., Shorey, H. H. and Saario, S. A. (1967). Insect population control by the use of sex pheromones to inhibit orientation between the sexes. Nature, 213, 1155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaston, L. K., Kaae, R. S., Shorey, H. H. and Seller, D. (1977). Controlling the pink bollworm by disrupting sex pheromone communication between adult moths. Science, 196, 904–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gronning, E. K., Borchert, D. M., Pfeiffer, D. G.et al. (2000). Effect of specific and generic sex attractant blends on pheromone trap captures of four leafroller species in mid-Atlantic apple orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93, 157–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gut, L. J. and Brunner, J. F. (1998). Pheromone-based management of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Washington apple orchards. Journal of Agricultural Entomology, 15, 387–406.Google Scholar
Haynes, K. F., Li, W. G. and Baker, T. C. (1986). Control of pink bollworm moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) with insecticide and pheromones (attracticide): lethal and sublethal effects. Journal of Economic Entomology, 79, 1466–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, K. F. and Baker, T. C. (1988). Potential for evolution of resistance to pheromones. Worldwide and local variation in chemical communication system of the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 14, 1547–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howse, P., Stevens, I. and Jones, O. (1998). Insect Pheromones and their Use in Pest Management. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Il'ichev, A. L., Gut, L. J., Williams, D. G., Hossain, M. S. and Jerie, P. H. (2002). Area-wide approach for improved control of oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Torticidae) by mating disruption. General and Applied Entomology, 31, 7–15.Google Scholar
Ioriatti, C. and Angeli, G. (2002). Control of codling moth by attract and kill. In Witzgall, P., Mazomenos, B. and Konstantopoulou, M. (eds.), Pheromones and Other Biological Techniques for Insect Control in Orchards and Vineyards. International Organization for Biological Control, Montpelier, France, Bulletin 25 (9). pp. 129–36.Google Scholar
Issacs, R., Ulczynski, M., Wright, B., Gut, L. J. and Miller, J. R. (1999). Performance of the microsprayer, with application for pheromone-mediated control of insect pests. Journal of Economic Entomology, 92, 1157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. W., Doane, C. C., Schuster, D. J., McLaughlin, J. R. and Jimenez, M. H. (1990). Development and commercial application of sex pheromone for control of the tomato pinworm. In Ridway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M. and Inscroe, M. (eds.), Behavior Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 269–80.Google Scholar
Justum, A. R. and Gordon, R. F. S. (eds.) (1989). Insect Pheromones in Plant Protection. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kaae, R. S. and Shorey, H. H. (1973). Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera. 44. Influence of environmental conditions on the location of pheromones communication and mating in Pectinophora gossypiella. Environmental Entomology, 2, 1081–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karg, G., Suckling, D. M. and Bradley, S. J. (1994). Adsorption and release of pheromone of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by apple leaves. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20, 1825–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, U. T., Cardé, A. M. and Cardé, R. T. (2002). Calibration of an EAG system to measure airborne concentration of pheromone formulated for mating disruption of the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 126, 431–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupke, C. H., Roitberg, B. D. and Judd, G. J. R. (2002). Field and laboratory responses of male codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to a pheromone-based attractant-and-kill strategy. Environmental Entomology, 31, 190–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydonieus, A. F. and Beroza, M. (1982). Insect Suppression with Controlled Release Pheromone Systems. Vols. I and II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, D. S., Reissig, W. H., Agnello, A. M., Nyrop, J. P. and Roelofs, W. L. (1996). Interference with mate-finding communication system of the obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with sex pheromones. Environmental Entomology, 25, 895–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhardt, B. A., Mastro, V. C., Leonard, D. S.et al. (1996). Control of low-density gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymatriidae) populations by mating disruption with pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22, 1255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, D. M., Knight, A. L., Henrick, C. A.et al. (2001). A pear-derived kairomone with pheromonal potency that attracts male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.). Naturwissenschaften, 88, 333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lösel, P. M., Penners, G., Potting, R. P. J.et al. (2000). Laboratory and field experiments towards the development of an attract and kill strategy for control of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 95, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lösel, P. M., Potting, R. P. J., Ebbinghaus, D., Elbert, A. and Scherkenbeck, J. (2002). Factors affecting the performance of an attracticide against of the codling moth Cydia pomonella. Pest Management Science, 58, 1029–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mafra-Neto, A. and Baker, T. C. (1996). Elevation of pheromone response threshold in almond moth males pre-exposed to pheromone spray. Physiological Entomology, 21, 217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mafra-Neto, A. and Habib, M. (1996). Evidence that mass trapping suppresses pink bollworm populations in cotton fields. Entomologia Exerimentalis et Applicata, 81, 315–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M. S. and McLaughlin, J. R. (1991). Handbook of Insect Pheromones and Sex Attractants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Miller, E., Staten, R. T., Nowell, C. and Gourd, J. (1990). Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): point source density and its relationship to efficacy in attracticide formulations of gossyplure. Journal of Economic Entomology, 83, 1321–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minks, A. K. (1996). Mating disruption of the codling moth. In Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.) Insect Pheromone Research. New Directions. New York: Chapman and Hall. pp. 372–82.Google Scholar
Minks, A. K. and Cardé, R. T. (1988). Disruption of pheromone communication in moths: is the natural blend really most efficacious?Entomologia Exerimentalis et Applicata, 49, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E. R. (2002). Promising new technology for managing diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in cabbage with pheromone. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, B37, 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, , , E. R. (ed.) (1981). Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals. Concepts and Practice. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E. R., Jacobson, M. and Baumhover, A. H. (1975). Heliothis spp.: disruption of pheromonal communication with (Z)-9-tetradecen-1-ol formate. Environmental Entomology, 4, 577–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E. R., Tumlinson, J. H. and Baumhover, A. H. (1978). Heliothis virescens: attraction of males to blends of (Z)-9-tetradecen-1-ol formate and (Z)-9-tetradecenal. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 4, 709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, F., Fukumoto, T., Noguchi, H.et al. (2002). Resistance to a mating disruptant composed of (Z)-11-tetraecenyl acetate in the smaller tea tortrix, Adoxophyes honmai (Yasda). Applied Entomology and Zoology, 37, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murlis, J., Elkinton, J. S. and Cardé, R. T. (1992). Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annual Review of Entomology, 37, 505–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, M. A. and Roelofs, W. L. (1983). Behavior of male redbanded leafroller moths, Arygrotaenia velutinana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in small disruption plots. Environmental Entomology, 14, 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehlschlager, A. C., Chinchilla, C., Castillo, G. and Gonzalez, L. (2002). Control of red ring disease by mass trapping of Rhynchophorus palmarum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Florida Entomologist, 85, 507–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, K. (2000). Pest control by pheromone mating disruption and the role of natural enemies. Journal of Pesticide Science, 25, 456–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palanaswamy, P. and Seabrook, W. D. (1978). Behavioral responses of the female eastern spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to the sex pheromone of her own species. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 4, 649–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palanaswamy, P. and Seabrook, W. D. (1985). The alteration of calling behavior by female Choristoneura fumiferana when exposed to synthetic sex pheromone. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 37, 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, G. A. and Schal, C. (1999). Electroantennogram responses of both sexes of grape root borer (Lepidoptera:Sesiidae) to synthetic female sex pheromone. Environmental Entomology, 28, 943–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, D. G., Killian, J. C., Rajotee, E. G., Hull, L. A. and Snow, J. W. (1991). Mating disruption for reduction of damage by lesser peach tree borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) in Virginia and Pennsylvania peach orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology, 84, 218–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimmer, J. R., Leonhardt, B. A., Webb, R. E. and Schwalbe, C. P. (1982). Management of the gypsy moth with its sex attractant pheromone. In Leonhardt, B. A. and Beroza, M. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Technology: Chemistry and Applications. American Chemical Society Sym. Ser. 190. pp. 232–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polavarapu, S., Wicki, M., Vogel, K., Lonergan, G. and Nielsen, K. (2002). Disruption of sexual communication of oriental beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) with a microencapsulated formulation of sex pheromone components in blueberries and ornamental nurseries. Environmental Entomology, 31, 1268–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poullot, D., Beslay, D., Bouvier, J. C. and Sauphanor, B. (2001). Is attract-and-kill technology potent against insecticide-resistant Lepidoptera?Pest Management Science, 57, 729–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reardon, R. C., Leonard, D. S., Mastro, V. C.et al. (1998). Using Mating Disruption to Manage Gypsy Moth: A Review. USDA Forest Service FHTET-98–01, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Renou, M. and Guerrero, A. (2000). Insect parapheromones in olfaction research and semiochemical-based pest control strategies. Annual Review of Entomology, 45, 605–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M. and Inscoe, M. (eds.) (1990). Behavior Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. (ed.) (1979). Establishing Efficacy of Sex Attractants and Disruptants for Insect Control. Lanham, Maryland: Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. and Novak, M. A. (1981). Small-plot disorientation for screening potential disruptants. In Mitchell, E. R. (ed.), Management of Insects Pests with Semiochemicals. Concepts and Practice. New York: Plenum. pp. 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L., Liu, W., Hao, G.et al. (2002). Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 13621–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothschild, G. H. L. and Vickers, R. A. (1991). Biology, ecology and control of the oriental fruit moth. In Geest, L. P. S. and Evenhuis, H. S. (eds.), Tortricid Pests. Their Biology, Ecology and Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 389–412.Google Scholar
Rumbo, E. R. and Vickers, R. A. (1997). Prolonged adaptation as possible mating disruption mechanism in the oriental fruit moth, Cydia (=Grapholita) molesta. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23, 445–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. (1996). Mechanisms of mating disruption in moths. In Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research. New Directions. New York: Chapman and Hall. pp. 333–46.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Lucuik, G. S. (1996). Disruption of oriental fruit moth to calling females in a wind tunnel by different concentrations of synthetic pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22, 1971–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, D., Schulz, S., Priesner, E., Ziesmann, J. and Francke, W. (1998). Autodetection and chemistry of female and male sex pheromone in both sexes of the tiger moth Panaxia quadripunctaria. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 182, 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciarappa, W. J., Polavarapu, S., Holdcraft, R. J. and Barry, J. D. (2005). Disruption of sexual communication of oriental beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in highbush blueberries with retrievable pheromone sources. Environmental Entomology, 34, 54–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, S. B. and Il'ichev, A. L. (2000). Pheromone mating disruption with reference to oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta Busck (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by mating disruption. General and Applied Entomology, 29, 63–8.Google Scholar
Shani, A. and Clearwater, J. (2001). Evasion of mating disruption in Ephestia cautella (Walker) by increased pheromone production relative to that of undisrupted populations. Journal of Stored Products Research, 37, 237–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharov, A. A., Thorpe, K. W. and Tcheslavskaia, K. (2002). Effect of synthetic pheromone on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) trap catch and mating success beyond treated areas. Environmental Entomology, 31, 1119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H. and Gerber, R. G. (1996). Use of puffers for disruption of sex pheromone communication of codling moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in walnut orchards. Environmental Entomology, 25, 1398–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, J. W. (1990). Peachtree borer and lesser peachtree borer control in the United States. In Ridway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M. and Inscoe, M. (eds.), Behavior Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 241–53.Google Scholar
Staten, R. T., El-Lissy, O. and Antilla, L. (1996). Successful area-wide program to control pink bollworm by mating disruption. In Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research. New Directions. New York: Chapman and Hall. pp. 383–96.Google Scholar
Stelinski, L. L., Miller, J. R. and Gut, L. J. (2003 a). Presence of long-lasting peripheral adaptation in oblique-banded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana and absence of such adaptation redbanded leafroller, Argyrotaenia velutinana. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 29, 405–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelinski, L. L., Miller, J. R. and Gut, L. J. (2003 b). Concentration of air-borne pheromone required for long-lasting peripheral adaptation in the obliquebanded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana. Physiological Entomology, 28, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, V. M. (1979). Long and short range dispersal of the pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella over southern California. Environmental Entomology, 8, 524–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suckling, D. M. (2001). Issues affecting the use of pheromones and other semiochemicals in orchards. Crop Protection, 19, 677–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suckling, D. M. and Karg, G. (1996). Mating disruption of the light brown apple moth: portable electroantennogram equipment and other aspects. In Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research. New Directions. New York: Chapman and Hall. pp. 411–20.Google Scholar
Suckling, D. M. and Brockerhoff, E. G. (1999). Control of the light brown apple moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using an atracticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 92, 367–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, K. W., Leonard, D. S., Mastro, V. C.et al. (2000). Effectiveness of gypsy moth mating disruption from aerial applications of plastic laminate flakes with and without a sticking agent. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trammel, K., Roelofs, W. L. and Glass, E. H. (1974). Sex-pheromone trapping of males for control of redbanded leafroller in apple orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology, 67, 159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, R. M., Pree, D. J. and Carter, N. J. (2001). Integrated control of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in peach orchards using insecticide and mating disruption. Journal of Economic Entomology, 94, 476–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trumble, J. T. and Alvarado-Rodriguez, B. (1993). Development and economic evaluation of an IPM program for fresh market tomato production in Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 43, 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeur, P. G. and Löfstedt, C. (1996). Behaviour of male oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta, in overlapping sex pheromone plumes in a wind tunnel. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 79, 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Pers, J. and Minks, A. K. (1996). Measuring pheromone dispersion in the field with single sensillum recording technique. In Cardé, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research. New Directions. New York: Chapman and Hall. pp. 359–71.Google Scholar
Vickers, R. A. (1990). Oriental fruit moth in Australia and Canada. In Ridway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M. and Inscoe, M. (eds.), Behavior Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 183–92.Google Scholar
Vickers, R. A. (1997). Effect of a delayed mating on oviposition pattern, fecundity and fertility in codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L) Lepidoptera, Torticidae). Australian Journal of Entomology, 36, 179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldstein, D. E. and Gut, L. J. (2003). Comparison of microcapsules density with various apple tissues and formulations of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) sprayable pheromone. Journal of Economic Entomology, 96, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, C., Sturgeon, D. M., Greenway, A. R. and Perry, J. N. (1981). Contamination of vegetation with synthetic sex attractant released from traps for pea moths, Cydia nigricana. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 30, 111–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherston, I. (1990). Principles of design of controlled-release formulation. In Ridway, R. L., Silverstein, R. M. and Inscoe, M. (eds.), Behavior Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 93–112.Google Scholar
Weissling, T. J. and Knight, A. L. (1995). Vertical distribution of codling moth adults in pheromone-treated and untreated plots. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 77, 271–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witzgall, P., Bäckman, A. C., Svensson, M.et al. (1999). Behavioral observations of codling moth, Cydia pomonella, in orchards permeated with synthetic pheromone. BioControl, 44, 211–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, G.-F., Meng, A. Z., Han, Y. and Sheng, C. F. (2002). Chinese tortix (Cydia trasias) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae): suppression on street-planting trees by mass trapping with sex pheromone traps. Environmental Entomology, 31, 602–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×