Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T21:57:52.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2010

Paul Bracken
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Ian Bremmer
Affiliation:
Eurasia Group, New York
David Gordon
Affiliation:
US Department of State
Get access

Summary

The timing couldn't be better for a book on risk management and international affairs. Risks from weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proliferation, terrorism, energy availability, failed states, and from other sources are growing. The failure to anticipate major risks in the Iraq war has had enormous consequences, to say the least. And the continuing debate about how the intelligence community and the executive branch of government assess risk make it central to any discussion of foreign and defense policy.

For all of these reasons it is an opportune time to focus on how risk is assessed and managed in international affairs. But there is a second reason why the timing is right for a book on this subject. Separate from all of the above considerations is the emergence of risk management as a distinctive field of study which has transformed one discipline after another, in finance, business, engineering, environmental protection, and epidemiology. Today, it would be unthinkable for a company to invest money without first putting it through a risk “screen” to see what could go wrong. Assessment of an epidemic, likewise, entails a thorough-going risk analysis to see where interventions to stop it should be made. And analysis of engineering failures like the Columbia shuttle crash make a lot more sense when looked at from a risk management framework than from the customary practice of finding someone to blame it on.

Type
Chapter
Information
Managing Strategic Surprise
Lessons from Risk Management and Risk Assessment
, pp. 1 - 15
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Giddens, A., “Risk and responsibility,” Modern Law Review, 62, No. 1 (1999), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U., Risk society: towards a new modernity, trans. by M. Ritter (London: Sage, 1992), p. 26.Google Scholar
Beck, U., Bons, W. and Lau, C., “The theory of reflexive modernization problematic, hypotheses and research programme,” Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 20(2) (2003), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aradau, C. and Munster, R., “Governing terrorism through risk: taking precautions, (un)knowing the future,” European Journal of International Relations, 13, No. 1 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U., “The terrorist threat: world risk society revisited,” Theory, Culture & Society, 19, No. 4 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, M. V., “Reflexive security: NATO and the international risk society,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30, No. 2 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, K., “World risk society and war against terror,” Political Studies, 53, No. 2 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U., “War is peace: on post-national war,” Security Dialogue, 36, No. 1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M., “Risk-transfer militarism, small massacres and the historic legitimacy of war,” International Relations, 16, No. 3 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M., The new western way of war: risk transfer and its crisis in Iraq (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005);Google Scholar
Heng, Y.-K., “The ‘transformation of war’ debate: through the looking glass of Ulrich Beck's World risk society,” International Relations, 20, No. 1 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, C., Waging war without warriors? the changing culture of military conflict, IISS Studies in International Security (London: Lynne Rienner, 2002)Google Scholar
Jabri, V., “War, security and the liberal state,” Security Dialogue, 37, No. 1 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, C., “NATO as a post-modern alliance,” in Ramet, S. P. and Ingebritsen, C. (eds.) Coming in from the Cold War: changes in US–European interactions since 1980 (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefiend, 2002).Google Scholar
Taleb, N. N., The black swan, the impact of the highly improbable (Random House, 2007)Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Expert political judgment, how good is it? How can we know? (Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×