Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T09:35:52.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - HLP Restitution Rights

Theory, Law, and Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Scott Leckie  and
Chris Huggins
Scott Leckie
Affiliation:
Displacement Solutions, Geneva
Chris Huggins
Affiliation:
Land Conflict Research, Ottawa
Get access

Summary

[T]he basic principle that wrongfully expropriated property should be restituted (or compensation paid) applies to them all, and their implementation of this principle is a measure of the extent to which they have successfully adopted democratic institutions, the rule of law with respect to property rights, and market economy practices. As these governments seek to join western economic and political organizations, and to integrate their economies more closely with ours, we do expect them to adopt the highest international standards in their treatment of property.…

[R]efugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.

A principled argument in favour of restitution is that no matter how long ago the injustice occurred, its legitimisation only encourages other wrongdoings.

Throughout history, millions upon millions of people have been forced by circumstances beyond their control to flee their homes, lands, and properties. In previous centuries, such displacement and loss of one's habitual residence was often accepted as a tragic but nonetheless inevitable consequence of warfare, military aggression, conquest, arbitrary confiscation of lands, and related gross and systematic violations of human rights.

Type
Chapter
Information
Conflict and Housing, Land and Property Rights
A Handbook on Issues, Frameworks and Solutions
 , pp. 121 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Amnesty International (1997) Who's Living in My House? Obstacles to the Safe Return of Refugees and Internally Displaced People, Report No. EUR/ID, Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar
Bagshaw, Simon (2003) “Property Restitution for Internally Displaced Persons: Developments in the Normative Framework,” in Leckie, Scott (ed.), Returning Home: Housing and Property Restitution Rights of Refugees and Displaced Persons, New York: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elizar (2000) The Guilt of Nations: History and Injustices, New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
,COHRE (2006) The Pinheiro Principles – United Nations Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons, COHRE.Google Scholar
Das, Hans (2004) “Restoring Property Rights in the Aftermath of War” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53: 429–444.Google Scholar
,International Center for Transitional Justice (2007) The Contemporary Right to Property Restitution in the Context of Transitional Justice, ICTJ.Google Scholar
Jackson-Preece, J. (1998) “Ethnic Cleansing as an Instrument of National-State Creation: Changing State Practices and Evolving Legal Norms” Human Rights Quarterly 20, no. 4: 824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leckie, Scott (ed.) (2007) Housing, Land and Property Restitution Rights for Refugees and Displaced Persons: Laws, Cases and Materials, Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Leckie, Scott (2003) Returning Home: Housing and Property Restitution Rights of Refugees and Displaced Persons, New York: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Leckie, Scott (2000) “Housing and Property Issues for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons in the Context of Return: Key Considerations for UNHCR Policy and Practice” Refugee Survey Quarterly 19, no. 3: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Norwegian Refugee Council (2004) ICLA Handbook, Return Facilitation, Information, Counselling and Legal Assistance, NRC.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, Paulo Sergio (2005) “Housing and Property Restitution in the Context of the Return of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons” in Final Report of the Special Rapporteur on Housing and Property Restitution in the Context of the Return of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/17 and UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/17/Add.1.
Pinheiro, Paulo Sergio (2004) “Housing and Property Restitution in the Context of the Return of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons” in Progress Report of the Special Rapportuer, Paulo Sergio Pinheiro. Addendum. Commentary on the Draft Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/22/Add.1.
Pinheiro, Paulo Sergio (2003) “Housing and Property Restitution in the Context of the Return of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons” in Preliminary Report of the Special Rapporteur Mr. Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, submitted in accordance with the Sub-Commission Resolution 2002/7, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/11.
Pinheiro, Paulo Sergio (2002) “The Return of Refugees' or Displaced Persons' Property,” Working paper submitted by Mr. Paulo Sergio Pinheiro pursuant to Sub-Commission decision 2001/122, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2002/17.
Williams, Rhodri C. (2007) “The Contemporary Right to Property Restitution in the Context of Transitional Justice,” Occasional Paper Series, International Center for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
Zieck, M. (1997) UNHCR and Voluntary Repatriation of Refugees: A Legal Analysis, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Zweig, R.W. (1993) “Restitution of Property and Refugee Rehabilitation: Two Case Studies” Journal of Refugee Studies 6, no. ¼: 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×