Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T23:37:53.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

Ivar Gaasland
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration (SNF)
Roberto Garcia
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Erling Vårdal
Affiliation:
University of Bergen
David Orden
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
David Blandford
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Tim Josling
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Norway is an economically advanced country in northwestern Europe. The World Bank (2010) has estimated that the country's per capita gross national income was $58,500 in 2008, the second highest in the world. Agriculture's contribution to gross domestic product (GDP) is less than 1 percent and, together with forestry, the sector accounts for roughly 3 percent of employment measured in standard person–years of labor. Less than 3 percent of the land area in Norway is suitable for crops, and of this only one-third is suitable for food grains. Low temperatures and a short growing season produce low yields per hectare. Wheat and potato yields, for example, are only 60 percent of the averages obtained in central Europe. Farmland is scattered around the country. Plots are relatively small and have very steep slopes in some regions. In general, it is difficult for Norwegian agriculture to compete with countries that have a more favorable climate and geography.

Dual objectives of maintaining self-sufficiency in basic products and sustaining small-scale farming throughout the country have long been central to Norwegian agricultural policy. Due to the difficult production conditions, substantial government support is necessary to pursue these objectives. A widely recognized international measure of the support provided to agriculture is the OECD's producer support estimate (PSE). The percentage PSE (value of support divided by the value of farm production) was 62 percent for Norway in 2008, the highest among the Organization's member countries (OECD 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
Seeking a Fair Basis for Trade
, pp. 189 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blandford, D., Gaasland, I., Garcia, R., and Vårdal, E.. 2010. How effective are WTO disciplines on domestic support and market access for agriculture?The World Economy 33(11): 1470–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunstad, R. J., Gaasland, I., and Vårdal, E.. 2005. Multifunctionality of agriculture: An inquiry into the complementarity between landscape preservation and food security. European Review of Agricultural Economics 32(4): 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food), MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and. 2006. Proposition to the Parliament, No. 68 (2005–06), June.
,MGAL (Ministry of Government Administration and Labor). 2004. Proposition to the Parliament. No. 66 (2003–04), May.
,MLSA (Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs). 2005. Proposition to the Parliament No. 69 (2004–05), May.
,NAA (Norwegian Agricultural Authority). 2009. Home page. www.slf.dep.no (accessed January–May 2008).
,NILF (Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute). 2007. Norwegian agriculture: Status and trends. Centre for Food Policy, July.
,NILF (Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute) 2008. Budsjettnemnda for jordbruket: Jordbrukets totalregnskap, 1959–2007 (Budget committee for agriculture: Economic accounts for agriculture, 1959–2007). July.
,OECD. 2009. Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation. Paris.Google Scholar
,SN (Statistics Norway). Various years. Agricultural statistics. www.ssb.no/jordbruk_en/ (accessed January–May 2008).
,World Bank. 2010. Data and statistics – quick reference tables. www.worldbank.org (accessed April 7, 2010).
,WTO. 1995. Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations – The Legal Texts. Geneva.Google Scholar
,WTO 2008. Revised draft modalities for agriculture. TN/AG/W/4/Rev.4. 6 December.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Norway
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Norway
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Norway
  • Edited by David Orden, David Blandford, Pennsylvania State University, Tim Josling, Stanford University, California
  • Book: WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
  • Online publication: 11 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794179.007
Available formats
×