Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T18:31:27.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - MHD stability comparison theorems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Jeffrey P. Freidberg
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Three models have been introduced to investigate the MHD equilibrium and stability properties of a general multidimensional magnetic fusion configuration: ideal MHD, kinetic MHD, and double adiabatic MHD. Ideal MHD is by far the most widely used model although there is concern since the collision dominated assumption used in the derivation is not satisfied in fusion-grade plasmas. The collisionless kinetic MHD model provides the most reliable description of the physics but is difficult to solve in realistic geometries because of the complex kinetic behavior parallel to the magnetic field. Double adiabatic MHD is a collisionless fluid model that is much easier to solve than kinetic MHD but the closure assumptions cannot be justified by any rigorous mathematical or physical arguments.

Based on this assessment one sees that the situation is not very satisfactory from a theoretical point of view. In practice, ideal MHD, because of its mathematical simplicity, is the model that is most widely used to design, predict, and interpret fusion experiments. Many years of experience have shown, perhaps surprisingly, that the model is far more accurate and reliable than one might have anticipated.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ideal MHD , pp. 400 - 427
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, I. B., Frieman, E. A., Kruskal, M. D., and Kulsrud, R. M. (1958). Proc. Royal Society (London) A244, 16.
Kruskal, M. D. and Oberman, C. R. (1958). Phys. Fluids 1, 275.CrossRef
Rosenbluth, M. N. and Rostoker, N. (1959). Phys. Fluids 2, 23.CrossRef
Stix, T. H. (1992). Waves in Plasmas. New York: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Antonsen, T. M. and Lee, Y. C. (1982). Phys. Fluids 25, 132.CrossRef
Cerfon, A. J. and Freidberg, J. P. (2011). Phys. Plasmas 18, 012505.CrossRef
Connor, J. W. and Hastie, R. J. (1974). Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 202.CrossRef
Grad, H. (1966). Phys. Fluids 9, 225.CrossRef
Kulsrud, R. M. (1962). Phys. Fluids 5, 275.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×