Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T08:05:10.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

References

John Gerring
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Case Study Research
Principles and Practices
, pp. 219 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadie, Alberto, and Gardeazabal, Javier. 2003. “The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country.” American Economic Review (March): 113–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abadie, Alberto, Drukker, David, Herr, Jane Leber, and Imbens, Guido W.. 2001. “Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata.” The Stata Journal 1: 1–18.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1990. “Conceptions of Time and Events in Social Science Methods: Causal and Narrative Approaches.” Historical Methods 23:4 (Fall): 140–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1992. “From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism.” Sociological Methods and Research 20:4 (May): 428–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1997. “On the Concept of Turning Point.” Comparative Social Research 16: 85–105.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew, and Forrest, John. 1986. “Optimal Matching Methods for Historical Sequences.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16:3 (Winter): 471–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew, and Tsay, Angela. 2000. “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology.” Sociological Methods and Research 29: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, Peter. 1987. The Syntax of Social Life: The Theory and Method of Comparative Narratives. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Abell, Peter. 2004. “Narrative Explanation: An Alternative to Variable-Centered Explanation?Annual Review of Sociology 30: 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrami, Regina M., and David M. Woodruff. 2004. “Toward a Manifesto: Interpretive Materialist Political Economy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago
Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2003. “An African Success Story: Botswana.” In Gardeazabal, Dani (ed.), In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 80–122.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 2002. “Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 2005. “Let's Put Garbage-Can Regressions and Garbage-Can Probits Where They Belong.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 22: 1–13.
Achen, Christopher H., and Snidal, Duncan. 1989. “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies.” World Politics 41 (January): 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Shively, W. Philips. 1995. Cross-Level Inference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adcock, Robert. 2002. “Determinism and Comparative-Historical Analysis: Clarifying Concepts and Retrieving Past Insights.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29
Adcock, Robert. 2005. “What Is a Concept?” Political Concepts: A Working Paper Series of the Committee on Concepts and Methods, Paper No. 1 (April). http://www.concepts-methods.org/papers.php
Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” American Political Science Review 95:3 (September): 529–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8:2: 155–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Glaeser, Edward. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Glaeser, Edward, and Sacerdote, Bruce. 2001. “Why Doesn't the US Have a European-Style Welfare State?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2: 187–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Ozler, Sule, Roubini, Nouriel, and Swagel, Phillip. 1996. “Political Instability and Economic Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 1:2 (June): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey, Giesen, Bernhard, Munch, Richard, and Smelser, Neil, eds. 1987. The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Allen, William Sheridan. 1965. The Nazi Seizure of Power: The Experience of a Single German Town, 1930–1935. New York: Watts.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1956. “Comparative Political Systems.” Journal of Politics 18 (August): 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar. 1996. The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Alston, Lee J. 2005. “The ‘Case’ for Case Studies in Political Economy.” The Political Economist 12:4 (Spring–Summer): 3–19.Google Scholar
Alston, Lee, Libecap, Gary, and Mueller, Bernardo. 1999. Titles, Conflict and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amenta, Edwin. 1991. “Making the Most of a Case Study: Theories of the Welfare State and the American Experience.” In Ragin, Charles C. (ed.), Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 172–94.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Guillory, Christine A.. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91:1 (March): 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Krueger, Alan B.. 2001. “Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15:4 (Fall): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. “On Brute Facts.” Analysis 18: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, Eliot, Ellsworth, Phoebe, Carlsmith, J. Merrill, and Gonzales, Marti. 1990. Methods of Research in Social Psychology. New York: McGraw- Hill.Google Scholar
Asch, Solomon. 1956. “Opinions and Social Pressure.” Scientific American 193: 31–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athens, L. 1997. Violent Criminal Acts and Actors Revisited. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Back, Hanna, and Patrick Dumont. 2004. “A Combination of Methods: The Way Forward in Coalition Research.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2–5
Bailey, Mary Timney. 1992. “Do Physicists Use Case Studies? Thoughts on Public Administration Research.” Public Administration Review 52:1 (January/February): 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Lakshmi Iyer. 2002. “History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India.” Unpublished paper, Department of Economics, MIT
Banfield, Edward C. 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Christopher B., and Cason, Jeffrey W.. 1997. Overseas Research: A Practical Guide. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J. 1996. “Democracy and Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 1 (March): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. 1999. “Determinants of Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 107:6 (December): 158–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Instrumental and ‘Quasi-Instrumental’ Variables.” American Journal of Political Science 35:3 (August): 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, Fredrik. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Differences. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, , and Weingast, Barry. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1934. “Culture Case Study and Ideal-Typical Method.” Social Forces 12:3: 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1958. “Problems of Inference and Proof in Participant Observation.” American Sociological Review 23:6 (December): 652–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1970. “Life History and the Scientific Mosaic.” In his Sociological Work: Method and Substance.Chicago: Aldine, 63–73.Google Scholar
Belsey, David A., Kuh, Edwin, and Welsch, Roy E.. 2004. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Benbasat, Izak, Goldstein, David K., and Mead, Melissa. 1987. “The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems.” MIT Quarterly 11:3 (September): 369–86.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1963. “Concepts and Generalizations in Comparative Sociological Studies.” American Sociological Review 28:4 (August): 532–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1978. Kings or People: Power and the Mandate to Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bendor, Jonathan, and Hammond, Thomas H.. 1992. “Rethinking Allison's Models.” American Political Science Review 86:2 (June): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. 1999. Condemned to Repetition? The Rise, Fall, and Reprise of Soviet-Russian Military Interventionism, 1973–1996. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Elman, Colin. 2006. “Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods.” Annual Review of Political Science 9 (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, Lepgold, Joseph, and Unger, Danny. 1994. “Burden-Sharing in the Persian Gulf War.” International Organization 48:1 (Winter): 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Arthur. 1908/1967. The Process of Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Bennett M. 1995. An Essay on Culture: Symbolic Structure and Social Structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, and Meur, Gisele. 1997. “Reduction of Complexity for a Small-N Analysis: A Stepwise Multi-Methodological Approach.” Comparative Social Research 16: 133–62.Google Scholar
Bernard, L. L. 1928. “The Development of Method in Sociology.” The Monist 38 (April): 292–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, H. Russell. 2001. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94:4 (September): 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, David, Collier, Paul, and Gunning, Jan Willem. 1999. Nigeria and Indonesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 1995. “Trade Liberalisation and Fair Trade Demands: Addressing the Environmental and Labour Standards Issues.” The World Economy 18:6 (November): 745–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc. 1941/1953. The Historian's Craft. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bock, Edwin A. 1962. Essays on the Case Study Method. New York: Inter-University Case Program.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Luis Garicano. 2002. “Democracy, Inequality and Country-Specific Wealth.” Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, University of Chicago
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2003. “Endogenous Democratization.” World Politics 55:4 (July): 517–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1993. “Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 1207–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Jackman, Robert W.. 1985. “Regression Diagnostics: An Expository Treatment of Outliers and Influential Cases.” Sociological Methods and Research 13: 510–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoma, Thomas V. 1985. “Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process.” Journal of Marketing Research 22:2 (May): 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosk, C. L. 1981. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bound, John, Jaeger, David A., and Baker, Rigina M.. 1995. “Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable Is Weak.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:430 (June): 443–50.Google Scholar
Bowman, Kirk, Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Mahoney, James. 2005. “Measuring Political Democracy: Case Expertise, Data Adequacy, and Central America.” Comparative Political Studies 38:8 (October): 939–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E. 2004. “Data-Set Observations versus Causal-Process Observations: The 2000 U.S. Presidential Election.” In Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 267–72.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Herron, Michael C., Mebane, Walter R. Jr., Sekhon, Jasjeet Singh, Shotts, Kenneth W., and Wand, Jonathan. 2001. “Law and Data: The Butterfly Ballot Episode.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34:1 (March): 59–69.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and John E. McNulty. 2004. “The Costs of Voting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Stanford University, July 29–31
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2003. “Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics.” Political Analysis 11:3: 209–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F., and Goertz, Gary. 2000. “The Methodology of Necessary Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science 44:3 (July): 844–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breman, Anna, and Carolyn Shelton. 2001. “Structural Adjustment and Health: A Literature Review of the Debate, Its Role-Players and Presented Empirical Evidence.” CMH Working Paper Series, Paper No. WG6:6. World Health Organization, Commission on Macroeconomics and Health
Brenner, Robert. 1976. “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe.” Past and Present 70 (February): 30–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, M. 1970. Le Play: Engineer and Social Scientist. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, Christine, and Lloyd, Keith. 2001. “Qualitative Methods in Psychiatric Research.” Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 7: 350–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James Robert. 1991. Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., eds. 1996. Debating the Democratic Peace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Browne, Angela. 1987. When Battered Women Kill. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. 1921. Modern Democracies, 2 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
, Buchbinder S., and Vittinghoff, E.. 1999. “HIV-Infected Long-Term Nonprogressors: Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Delayed Progression, and Clinical and Research Implications.” Microbes and Infection 1:13 (November): 1113–20.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 2000. “Popes, Kings, and Endogenous Institutions: The Concordat of Worms and the Origins of Sovereignty.” International Studies Review 2:2: 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, Martin. 1984. The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity and the Rise of Sociological Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario. 1997. “Mechanism and Explanation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (December): 410–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunzl, Martin. 2004. “Counterfactual History: A User's Guide.” American Historical Review 109:3 (June): 845–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16:1 (March): 4–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, Gamson, Joshua, and Burton, Alice. 1991. Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Ernest W. 1927. “Statistics and Case Studies as Methods of Social Research.” Sociology and Social Research 12: 103–20.Google Scholar
Burgess, Ernest W. 1928. “What Social Case Studies Records Should Contain to Be Useful for Sociological Interpretation.” Social Forces 6: 524–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Ernest W. 1941. “An Experiment in the Standardization of the Case Study Method.” Sociometry 4: 329–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buthe, Tim. 2002. “Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence.” American Political Science Review 96:3 (September): 481–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72:4 (December): 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren P., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1968/1988. “The Connecticut Crackdown on Speeding: Time-Series Data in Quasi-Experimental Analysis.” In Overman, E. Samuel (ed.), Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 222–38.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1975/1988. “‘Degrees of Freedom’ and the Case Study.” In E. Samuel Overman (ed.), Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 377–88.
Campbell, Donald T. 1988. Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science, ed. Overman, E. Samuel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Campoy, Renee. 2004. Case Study Analysis in the Classroom: Becoming a Reflective Teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Card, David, and Krueger, Alan B.. 1994. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.” American Economic Review 84:4 (September): 772–93.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Eric C. C., and Miriam A. Golden. In process. “Electoral Systems, District Magnitude and Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science (forthcoming)
Chatfield, Chris. 1995. “Model Uncertainty, Data Mining and Statistical Inference.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (Statistics in Society) 158:3: 419–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernoff, Brian, and Andrew Warner. 2002. “Sources of Fast Growth in Mauritius: 1960–2000.” Unpublished paper, Center for International Development, Harvard University
Chong, Dennis. 1993. “How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties.” American Journal of Political Science 37:3 (August): 867–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio, and Starr, Harvey. 1995. “Opportunity, Willingness and Political Uncertainty: Theoretical Foundations of Politics.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 7: 447–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission.” The Journal of Law and Economics 2 (October): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 2000. “The Acquisition of Fisher Body by General Motors.” The Journal of Law and Economics 43:1 (April): 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, William G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris R., and Nagel, Ernest. 1934. An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 1993. “The Comparative Method.” In Finifter, Ada W. (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II.Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 105–19.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahon, James E. Jr. 1993. “Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87:4 (December): 845–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahoney, James. 1996. “Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research.” World Politics 49 (October): 56–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991/2002. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. 1991. “Transitions by Agreement: Modeling the Spanish Way.” American Political Science Review 85: 1283–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Dupeux, G.. 1962. “Politicization of the Electorate in France and the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly 16 (Spring): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Thomas, and Campbell, Donald. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cooley, Charles H. 1927. “Case Study of Small Institutions as a Method of Research.” Publications of the American Sociological Society 22: 123–33.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael J. 2002. “Nested Inference: How to Combine the Benefits of Large-Sample Comparisons and Case Studies.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston
Coppedge, Michael J. 2004. “The Conditional Impact of the Economy on Democracy in Latin America.” Paper presented at the conference Democratic Advancements and Setbacks: What Have We Learnt?, Uppsala University, Sweden, June 11–13
Cornell, Svante E. 2002. “Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective.” World Politics 54 (January): 245–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsini, Raymond J. 2004. Case Studies in Psychotherapy. Stanford, CT: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Cottrell, Leonard S. Jr. 1941. “The Case-Study Method in Prediction.” Sociometry 4 (November): 858–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm, ed. 1992. Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cowley, Robert, ed. 2001. What If? 2: Eminent Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., McCall Rosenbluth, Frances, and Gardeazabal, Michael. 2000. “Electoral Rules, Career Ambitions and Party Structure: Comparing Factions in Japan's Upper and Lower House.” American Journal of Political Science 44:1: 115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J. Barton. 1997. “Case Study Principles for Different Types of Cases.” Quality and Quantity 31: 401–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. 1985. Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1963. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60:23 (November): 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P. O., and Costello, C. G., eds. 1969. N=1: Experimental Studies of Single Cases. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Dawid, A. Phillip. 2000. “Causal Inference without Counterfactuals (with Discussion).” Journal of the American Statistical Association 95: 407–24, 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFelice, E. Gene. 1986. “Causal Inference and Comparative Methods.” Comparative Political Studies 19:3 (October): 415–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, Norman K., and Lincoln, Yvonna S., eds. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Desch, Michael C. 2002. “Democracy and Victory: Why Regime Type Hardly Matters.” International Security 27:2 (Fall): 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, Hernando. 1989. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dessler, David. 1991. “Beyond Correlations: Toward a Causal Theory of War.” International Studies Quarterly 35: 337–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deyo, Frederic, ed. 1987. The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 1994. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dion, Douglas. 1998. “Evidence and Inference in the Comparative Case Study.” Comparative Politics 30 (January): 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diprete, Thomas A., and Marcus Gangl. 2004. “Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects: Rosenbaum Bounds on Matching Estimators and Instrumental Variables Estimation with Imperfect Instruments.” Unpublished manuscript
Doherty, Daniel, Green, Donald, and Gerber, Alan. 2006. “Personal Income and Attitudes toward Redistribution: A Study of Lottery Winners.” Political Psychology 27:3: 441–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorenspleet, Renske. 2000. “Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratization.” World Politics 52 (April): 384–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, M. W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12: 205–35.Google Scholar
Drass, Kriss, and Ragin, Charles C.. 1992. QCA: Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Evanston IL: Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Dufour, Stephane, and Fortin, Dominic. 1992. “Annotated Bibliography on Case Study Method.” Current Sociology 40:1: 167–200.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2005. “Improving Causal Inference: Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments.” Unpublished manuscript
Eaton, Kent. 2002. Politicians and Economic Reform in New Democracies. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2003. “Menem and the Governors: Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s.” Unpublished manuscript
Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2005. “When Less Is More: Selection Problems in Large-N and Small-N Cross-National Comparisons.” International Sociology 20:2 (June): 133–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science.” In Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7. Political Science: Scope and Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley 94–137.Google Scholar
Edge, Wayne A., and Lekorwe, Mogopodi H., eds. 1998. Botswana: Politics and Society. Pretoria: J. L. van Schaik.Google Scholar
Efron, Bradley. 1982. “Maximum Likelihood and Decision Theory.” The Annals of Statistics 10:2: 340–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggan, Fred. 1954. “Social Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Comparison.” American Anthropologist 56 (October): 743–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1992. Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Hillel J., and Hogarth, Robin M.. 1986. “Judging Probable Cause.” Psychological Bulletin 99:3: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, G. H. 1985. “Perspectives on the Life Course.” In his Life Course Dynamics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 23–49.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin. 2003. “Lessons from Lakatos.” In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin. 2005. “Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics.” International Organization 59:2 (April): 293–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Miriam, ed. 1997. Paths to Peace: Is Democracy the Answer?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1978. Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1998. “A Plea for Mechanisms.” In Hedstrom, Peter and Swedberg, Richard (eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, G. R. 1970. Political History: Principles and Practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M. 1981. “Observational Field Work.” Annual Review of Sociology 7: 351–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Robert M., ed. 2001. Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Emigh, Rebecca. 1997. “The Power of Negative Thinking: The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory.” Theory and Society 26: 649–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Leon D. 1964. “A Comparative Study of Canadian Parties.” American Political Science Review 58 (March): 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Estroff, S. E. 1985. Making It Crazy: An Ethnography of Psychiatric Clients in an American Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feagin, Joe R., Orum, Anthony M., and Sjoberg, Gideon. 1991. A Case for the Case Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1991. “Counter Factuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.” World Politics 43 (January): 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 1996. “Explaining Interethnic Cooperation.” American Political Science Review 90:4: 715–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Yi . 2003. Democracy, Governance, and Economic Performance: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1986. “Observation, Context, and Sequence in the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 80:1 (March): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1990. Watching Politicians: Essays on Participant Observation. Berkeley, CA: IGS Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 2004. “External and Internal Explanation.” In Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E. (eds.), Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 144–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fisman, Raymond. 2001. “Estimating the Value of Political Connections.” American Economic Review 91:4 (September): 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2004. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” In Gardeazabal, Clive, Gobo, Giampietro, Gubrium, Jaber F., and Silverman, David (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, 420–34.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W. 1992. “Problems in Modeling Complex Dynamic Interactions: The Political Realignment of the 1850s.” Economics and Politics 4:1: 215–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foran, John. 1997. “The Comparative-Historical Sociology of Third World Social Revolutions: Why a Few Succeed, Why Most Fail.” In Foran, John (ed.), Theorizing Revolution. London: Routledge, 227–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreman, Paul. 1948. “The Theory of Case Studies.” Social Forces 26: 408–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Ronald D., Allison, David B., and Gorman, Bernard S., eds. 1997. Design and Analysis of Single-Case Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Freedman, David A. 1991. “Statistical Models and Shoe Leather.” Sociological Methodology 21: 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In his Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3–43.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Jacobson Schwartz, Anna. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg . 1975. Truth and Method, trans. Garrett Barden and John Cumming. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics.” In Stimson, James A. (ed.), Political Analysis, Vol. 2.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In his The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 3–30.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1978. “The Bazaar Economy: Information and Search in Peasant Marketing.” American Economic Review 68:2: 28–32.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1979a. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” In Rabinow, Paul and Sullivan, William M. (eds.), Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press, 195–240.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1979b. “‘From the Native's Point of View’: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.” In Rabinow, Paul and Sullivan, William M. (eds.), Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press, 225–41.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1979. “Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison.” In Lauren, Paul Gordon (ed.), Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy. New York: The Free Press, 43–68.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Smoke, Richard. 1974. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Direct Mail, and Telephone Contact on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94: 653–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2001. “Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? A Field Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 2003. “Interpretations of Interpretivism.” Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 1:2 (Fall 2003): 2–6.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2004. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For?American Political Science Review 98:2 (May): 341–54.CrossRef
Gerring, John. 2005. “Causation: A Unified Framework for the Social Sciences.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 17:2 (April): 163–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 2006a. “Single-Outcome Studies: A Methodological Primer.” International Sociology 21:5 (September): 707–34.CrossRef
Gerring, John. 2006b. “Global Justice as an Empirical Question.” PS: Political Science and Politics (forthcoming)
Gerring, John. 2007a. “The Case Study: What It Is and What It Does.” In Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007b. “Case Selection for Case Study Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques.” In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology.Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007c. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?” Comparative Political Studies (March), forthcoming
Gerring, John, and Barresi, Paul A.. 2003. “Putting Ordinary Language to Work: A Min-Max Strategy of Concept Formation in the Social Sciences.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15:2 (April): 201–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, Bond, Philip, Barndt, William, and Moreno, Carola. 2005. “Democracy and Growth: A Historical Perspective.” World Politics 57:3 (April) 323–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, Allen Hicken, Rob Salmond, and Michael F. Thies. 2005. “Electoral Reform and the Policy Process: An Iterated Natural Experiment.” Research proposal, Department of Political Science, Boston University. <http://www.bu.edu/polisci/JGERRING/electoralreform.pdf>
Gerring, John, and Rose McDermott. 2005. “Experiments and Quasi-Experiments: Toward a Unified Framework for Research Design.” Unpublished manuscript
Gerring, John, and Jason Seawright. 2005. “Selecting Cases in Case Study Research: A Menu of Options.” Unpublished manuscript
Gerring, John, and Strom Thacker. Forthcoming. Good Government: A Centripetal Theory. Unpublished manuscript
Gerring, John, Strom Thacker, and Carola Moreno. 2005a. “Do Neoliberal Policies Save Lives?” Unpublished manuscript
Gerring, John, Thacker, Strom, and Moreno, Carola. 2005b. “A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance: A Global Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 99:4 (November): 567–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, and Craig Thomas. 2005. “What Is ‘Qualitative’ Evidence? When Counting Doesn't Add Up.” Unpublished manuscript
Gibbons, Michael T., ed. 1987. Interpreting Politics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta. 2002. “The Role of Theory in Experimental Design: Experiments without Randomization.” Political Analysis 10:4: 362–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, Franklin Henry. 1924. The Scientific Study of Human Society. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher J., Gabin, Lora, and Schmid, Christopher H.. 2005. “Why Clinicians Are Natural Bayesians.” BMJ 330 (May 7): 1080–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, Jeff. 1999. “The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Testing.” Political Research Quarterly 52:3 (September): 647–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L.. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Glaser, James. 2003. “Social Context and Inter-Group Political Attitudes: Experiments in Group Conflict Theory.” British Journal of Political Science 33 (October): 607–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. 1992. “Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation.” Erkenntnis 44: 49–71.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2003. “The Substantive Importance of Necessary Condition Hypotheses.” In Goertz, Gary and Starr, Harvey (eds.), Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology and Applications. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 65–94.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Jack Levy, eds. Forthcoming. Causal Explanations, Necessary Conditions, and Case Studies: World War I and the End of the Cold War. Unpublished manuscript
Goertz, Gary, and Starr, Harvey, eds. 2003. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology and Applications. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goggin, Malcolm L. 1986. “The ‘Too Few Cases/Too Many Variables’ Problem in Implementation Research.” Western Political Quarterly 39:2 (June): 328–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 1991. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 1997. “Methodological Issues in Comparative Macrosociology.” Comparative Social Research 16: 121–32.
Goldstone, Jack A. 2003. “Comparative Historical Analysis and Knowledge Accumulation in the Study of Revolutions.” In Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A., et al. 2000. “State Failure Task Force Report: Phase III Findings.” Available at <http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/stfail/SFTF%20Phase%20III%20Report%20Final.pdf>
Goldthorpe, John H. 1997. “Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology: A Debate on Methodological Issues.” Comparative Social Research 16: 121–32.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H. 2000. On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gomm, Roger, Hammersley, Martyn, and Foster, Peter. 2000. Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Goode, William J., and Hart, Paul K.. 1952. Methods in Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., and Smitsman, Anneloes. 2000. “Placing Welfare States: The Netherlands as a Crucial Test Case.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 2:1 (April): 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1947. “The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals.” Journal of Philosophy 44:5 (February): 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C., and Smith, Alastair. 2004. “Quantitative Leverage through Qualitative Knowledge: Augmenting the Statistical Analysis of Complex Causes.” Political Analysis 12:3: 233–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosnell, Harold F. 1926. “An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting.” American Political Science Review 20:4 (November): 869–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter Alexis. 1978. “The International System and Regime Formation: A Critical Review of Anderson and Wallerstein.” Comparative Politics 10: 419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2001. “Reclaiming the Experimental Tradition in Political Science.” In Milner, Helen and Katznelson, Ira (eds.), State of the Discipline, vol. III. New York: Norton, 805–32.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 2002. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred. 1982. The Hidden-Hand Presidency: Eisenhower as Leader. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 1998. “Self-Enforcing Political Systems and Economic Growth: Late Medieval Genoa.” In Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, , and Weingast, Barry, Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 23–63.Google Scholar
Grier, Robin M. 1999. “Colonial Legacies and Economic Growth.” Public Choice 98: 317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Larry J. 1992. “Temporality, Events, and Explanation in Historical Sociology: An Introduction.” Sociological Methods and Research 20:4 (May): 403–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Larry J. 1993. “Narrative, Event-Structure Analysis, and Causal Interpretation in Historical Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1094–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubrium, Jaber F., and Holstein, James A., eds. 2002. Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gujarati, Damodar N. 2003. Basic Econometrics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gutting, Gary, ed. 1980. Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Haber, Stephen H., Razo, Armando, and Maurer, Noel. 2003. The Politics of Property Rights: Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Jinyong. 1998. “On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 66:2 (March): 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Politics.” In Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, Jacques. 1993. Case Study Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Gary G. 1977. “Chinese Consumption of Foreign Commodities: A Comparative Perspective.” American Sociological Review 42:6 (December): 877–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James D. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn. 1989. The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn, and Atkinson, Paul. 1983. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn, and Roger Gomm. 2000. “Introduction.” In Gomm, Roger, Hammersley, Martyn, and Foster, Peter (eds.), Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1–32.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig, and Philip Zimbardo. 1977. “The Socialization into Criminality: Becoming a Prisoner and a Guard.” In Trapp, J. and Levine, F. (eds.), Law, Justice and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 198–223.Google Scholar
Harre, Rom. 1970. The Principles of Scientific Thinking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., and Honore, A. M.. 1959. Causality in the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., and A. M. Honore. 1966. “Causal Judgment in History and in the Law.” In Dray, William H. (ed.), Philosophical Analysis and History. New York: Harper and Row, 213–37.Google Scholar
Hart, Paul ‘t. 1994. Groupthink in Government: A Study of Small Groups and Policy Failure. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Roderick P. 1997. DICTION 4.0: The Text-Analysis Program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1991. Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, B. F., Pantaleo, G., and Fauci, A. S.. 1996. “Toward an Understanding of the Correlates of Protective Immunity to HIV Infection.” Science 271: 324–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, William. 1923. “The Contributions of Case Studies to American Sociology.” Publications of the American Sociological Society 18: 147–55.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., Ichimura, Hidehiko, Smith, Jeffrey, and Todd, Petra. 1998. “Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data.” Econometrica 66: 1017–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Smith, Jeffrey A.. 1995. “Assessing the Case for Social Experiments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedstrom, Peter, and Swedberg, Richard, eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidbreder, Edna. 1933. Seven Psychologies. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Helper, Susan. 2000. “Economists and Field Research: ‘You Can Observe a Lot Just by Watching.’American Economic Review 90:2: 228–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1942. “The Function of General Laws in History.” Journal of Philosophy 39: 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Yoshiko M., and Devesh Kapur. 2005. “Improving Data Quality: Actors, Incentives, and Capabilities.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Government, Harvard University
Hersen, Michel, and Barlow, David H.. 1976. Single-Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hexter, J. H. 1971. The History Primer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, Misra, Toya, and Ng, Tang Hah. 1995. “The Programmatic Emergence of the Social Security State.” American Sociological Review 60 (June): 329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. 1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. “The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding.” World Politics 22:3 (March): 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., Kosuke Imai, Gary King, and Elizabeth A. Stuart. 2004. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Unpublished manuscript
Hochschild, Jennifer L. 1981. What's Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Houser, Daniel, and Freeman, John. 2001. “Economic Consequences of Political Approval Management in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Comparative Economics 29: 692–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtzager, Peter P. 2003. “Introduction.” In Houtzager, Peter P. and Moore, Mick (eds.), Changing Paths: International Development and the Politics of Inclusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, Colin, and Urbach, Peter. 1989. Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hoy, David Couzens. 1982. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Christina D. Romer. 2001. “Was the Federal Reserve Fettered? Devaluation Expectations in the 1932 Monetary Expansion.” NBER Working Paper W8113 (February)
Huber, Evelyne, Ragin, Charles, and Stephens, John D.. 1993. “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure and the Welfare State.” American Journal of Sociology 99:3 (November): 711–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Adrian Prentice. 1999. “Comparative Political Science: An Inventory and Assessment since the 1980s.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32: 117–24.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan. 2005. “Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: Uncovering the Mechanisms.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49:4: 508–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1958. “Arms Races: Prerequisites and Results.” Public Policy 8: 41–83.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke. 2005. “Do Get-Out-The-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 99: 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W. 1985. “Cross-National Statistical Research and the Study of Comparative Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 29:1 (February): 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 1991. “Synthetic Strategies in Comparative Sociological Research: Methods and Problems of Internal and External Analysis.” In Ragin, Charles C. (ed.), Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 59–81.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas, and Hicks, Alexander, eds. 1993. Methodological Advances in Comparative Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jenicek, Milos. 2001. Clinical Case Reporting in Evidence-Based Medicine, 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Jason L., and Rodgers, Robert. 2001. “Cumulating the Intellectual Gold of Case Study Research.” Public Administration Review 61:2 (March/April): 235–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1989. “Rational Deterrence: Theory and Evidence.” World Politics 41:2 (January): 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessor, Richard, Colby, Anne, and Shweder, Richard A., eds. 1996. Ethnography and Human Development: Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jocher, Katharine. 1928. “The Case Study Method in Social Research.” Social Forces 7: 512–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1983. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Joireman, Sandra Fullerton. 2000. Property Rights and Political Development in Ethiopia and Eritrea. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Kaarbo, Juliet, and Beasley, Ryan K.. 1999. “A Practical Guide to the Comparative Case Study Method in Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 20:2: 369–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagel, John H., and Roth, Alvin E., eds. 1997. Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jack. 1999. How Emotions Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1997. “Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics.” In Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S. (eds.), Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 1960. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kazancigil, Ali. 1994. “The Deviant Case in Comparative Analysis.” In Dogan, Mattei and Kazancigil, Ali (eds.), Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance. Cambridge: Blackwell, 213–38.Google Scholar
Kazdin, Alan E. 1976. “Statistical Analyses for Single-Case Experimental Designs.” In Hersen, Michel and Barlow, David H. (eds.), Single-Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 265–316.Google Scholar
Kazdin, Alan E. 1982. Single Case Research Designs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keen, Justin, and Tim Packwood. 1995. “Qualitative Research: Case Study Evaluation.” BMJ (August 12): 444–6
Kemp, Kathleen A. 1986. “Race, Ethnicity, Class and Urban Spatial Conflict: Chicago as a Crucial Case.” Urban Studies 23:3 (June): 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Patricia L., and Katherine M. Wolf. 1949/1955. “The Analysis of Deviant Cases in Communications Research.” In Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Stanton, Frank N. (eds.), Communications Research, 1948–1949 (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1949). Reprinted in Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Morris Rosenberg (eds.), The Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press, 1995, 167–70.
Kennedy, Craig H. 2005. Single-Case Designs for Educational Research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Peter. 2003. A Guide to Econometrics, 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong. 1992. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald, and Palfrey, Thomas R., eds. 1993. The Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles. 1973. The World in Depression: 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
King, Charles. 2004. “The Micropolitics of Social Violence.” World Politics 56:3: 431–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95:1 (March): 49–69.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 2004a. “The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals.” Unpublished manuscript
King, Gary, and Langche Zeng. 2004b. “When Can History Be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference.” Unpublished manuscript
Kirschenman, Kathryn M., and Joleen Neckerman. 1991. “‘We'd Love to Hire Them, but …’: The Meaning of Race for Employers.” In Jencks, Christopher and Peterson, Paul E. (eds.), The Urban Underclass. Washington: Brookings, 203–34.Google Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard. 1999. “Sense and Sensitivity in Pooled Analysis of Political Data.” European Journal of Political Research 35: 225–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard. 2005. “A Crazy Methodology? On the Limits of Macroquantitative Social Science Research.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam
Kittel, Bernhard, and Winner, Hannes. 2005. “How Reliable is Pooled Analysis in Political Economy? The Globalization–Welfare State Nexus Revisited.” European Journal of Political Research 44:2 (March): 269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komarovsky, Mirra. 1940. The Unemployed Man and His Family: The Effect of Unemployment upon the Status of the Man in Fifty-nine Families. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwill, T. R., ed. 1978. Single Subject Research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2003. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 1996. “The Data Puzzle: The Nature of Interpretation in Quantitative Research.” American Journal of Political Science 40:1 (February): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutz, G. S., Flesher, R., and Bond, J. R.. 1998. “From Abe Fortas to Zoe Baird: Why Some Presidential Nominations Fail in the Senate.” American Political Science Review 92: 871–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962/1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1998. Identity in Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., and Jean-Laurent Rosenthal. 2004. “Legal Regime and Business's Organizational Choice: A Comparison of France and the United States during the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” NBER Working Paper 10288
Lancaster, Thomas D. 1986. “Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics.” International Political Science Review 7 (January): 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Thomas D., and Patterson, W. David. 1990. “Comparative Pork Barrel Politics: Perceptions from the West German Bundestag.” Comparative Political Studies 22 (January): 458–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert. 1962. Political Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes What He Does. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1998. “Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy 106:6: 1113–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silane s, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Economics, Law and Organization 15:1: 222–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold. 1931. “The Comparative Method of James Bryce.” In Rice, Stuart A. (ed.), Methods in Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 468–79.Google Scholar
Latane, Bibb, and Darley, John. 1970. The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help?New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, Gardeazabal, Kenneth, and Garry, J.. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Text Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97:2 (May): 311–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, Robert W., and Carley, Kathleen M.. 1996. Case Study and Computing: Advanced Qualitative Methods in the Study of Human Behavior. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Robert Z., Devereaux, Charan, and Watkins, Michael. 2005. Making the Rules: Case Studies on US Trade Negotiation. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Allen H. Barton. 1951. “Qualitative Measurement in the Social Sciences: Classification, Typologies, and Indices.” In Lerner, Daniel and Lasswell, Harold D. (eds.), The Policy Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 155–92.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1948. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Robinson, W. S.. 1940. “The Quantification of Case Studies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 24: 817–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamer, Edward E. 1983. “Let's Take the Con out of Econometrics.” American Economic Review 73:1: 31–44.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2000. “What's So Different about a Counterfactual?World Politics 52 (July): 550–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2000–01. “Contingency, Catalysts, and International System Change.” Political Science Quarterly 115:4 (September): 591–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Janice Gross Stein. 2004. “The End of the Cold War as a Non-Linear Confluence.” In Herrmann, Richard K. and Lebow, Richard Ned (eds.), Ending the Cold War. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecroy, Craig Winston. 1998. Case Studies in Social Work Practice. Stanford, CT: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Lee, Allen S. 1989. “Case Studies as Natural Experiments.” Human Relations 42:2: 117–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leplin, Jarrett, ed. 1984. Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Daniel . 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1997. “A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis.” In Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S. (eds.), Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 18–41.Google Scholar
Levine, Ross, and Renelt, David. 1992. “A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions.” American Economic Review 82:4 (September): 942–63.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1983. “Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems.” World Politics 36: 76–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1990–91. “Preferences, Constraints, and Choices in July 1914.” International Security 15:3: 151–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2001. “Explaining Events and Developing Theories: History, Political Science, and the Analysis of International Relations.” In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge: MIT Press, 39–84.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2002a. “Qualitative Methods in International Relations.” In Harvey, Frank P. and Brecher, Michael (eds.), Evaluating Methodology in International Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 432–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2002b. “War and Peace.” In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, 350–68.Google Scholar
Libecap, Gary D. 1993. Contracting for Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005a. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99:3 (August): 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005b. “Politics in Really Hard Times: Ethnicity, Public Goods, and Government Responses to HIV/AIDS in Africa.” Unpublished manuscript
Lieberman, Evan S., Morje Howard, Marc, and Lynch, Julia. 2004. “Symposium: Field Research.” Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 2:1 (Spring): 2–14.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley. 1985. Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley. 1992. “Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases.” In Ragin, Charles S. and Becker, Howard S. (eds.), What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–17.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley. 1994. “More on the Uneasy Case for Using Mill-Type Methods in Small-N Comparative Studies.” Social Forces 72:4 (June): 1225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. “Consociational Democracy.” World Politics 21:2 (January): 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65:3 (September): 682–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. “The Comparable Cases Strategy in Comparative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 8 (July): 158–77.CrossRef
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Development.” American Political Science Review 53 (March): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960/1963. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1963. The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1968. Agrarian Socialism: The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in Saskatchewan. A Study in Political Sociology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Trow, Martin A., and Coleman, James S.. 1956. Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipsey, Mark W., and Wilson, David B.. 2001. Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Little, Daniel. 1995. “Causal Explanation in the Social Sciences.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (supplement): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Daniel. 1998. Microfoundations, Method, and Causation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Lott, John R., Jr. 2000. “Gore Might Lose a Second Round: Media Suppressed the Bush Vote.” Philadelphia Inquirer, November 14, p. 23A
Lucas, W. 1974. The Case Survey Method: Aggregating Case Experience. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
Lundberg, George A. 1941. “Case Studies vs. Statistical Methods: An Issue Based on Misunderstanding.” Sociometry 4: 379–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundervold, Duane A., and Belwood, Marily F.. 2000. “The Best Kept Secret in Counseling: Single-Case (N=1) Experimental Designs.” Journal of Counseling and Development (Winter): 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Strom, Kaare. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 89: 648–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 1996. “History, Historiography, and Political Science.” American Political Science Review 90:3 (September): 605–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynd, Robert Staughton, and Merrell Lynd, Helen. 1929/1956. Middletown: A Study in American Culture. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1971. “Is a Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In his Against the Self-Images of the Age: Essays on Ideology and Philosophy. London: Duckworth, 260–79.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Andrew. 2003. Power of Institutions: Political Architecture and Governance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, John L. 1965/1993. “Causes and Conditions.” In Sosa, Ernest and Tooley, Michael (eds.), Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–55.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 1999. “Nominal, Ordinal, and Narrative Appraisal in Macro-Causal Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 104:4 (January): 1154–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” History and Theory 29:4 (August): 507–48.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2001. “Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method.” Sociological Forum 16:3 (September): 575–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2004. “The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 98:4 (November): 653–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, Julie, Tharam S. Dillon, and Simon C. K. Shiu. 2000. “A Tutorial on Case Based Reasoning.” In Pal, Sankar K., Dillon, Tharam S., and Yeung, Daniel S. (eds.), Soft Computing in Case Based Reasoning. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1–28.Google Scholar
Maisel, L. Sandy. 1986. From Obscurity to Oblivion: Running in the Congressional Primary. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1922/1984. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Maurice. 1977. The Anatomy of Historical Knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Manski, Charles F. 1993. “Identification Problems in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methodology 23: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev. 2002. “Case Study Methodology in International Studies: From Storytelling to Hypothesis Testing.” In Harvey, Frank P. and Brecher, Michael (eds.), Evaluating Methodology in International Studies: Millennial Reflections on International Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 455–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, Mintz, Alex, Morgan, T. Clifton, Palmer, Glenn, and Stoll, Richard J., eds. 2004. Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Politics: Methodology in the Study of Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Ben D. Mor. 1999. “The Strategic Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries: A Comparative Analysis of Case Studies and Quantitative Methods.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Peace Science Society, Ann Arbor, Michigan, October 8–10
Marini, Margaret, and Singer, Burton. 1988. “Causality in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methodology 18: 347–409.CrossRef
Marks, Gary, and Martin Lipset, Seymour. 2000. It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers. 2005. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003.” Web version. www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Swank, Duane. 2004. “Does the Organization of Capital Matter? Employers and Active Labor Market Policy at the National and Firm Levels.” American Political Science Review 98:4 (November): 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mays, Nicolas, and Pope, Catherine. 1995. “Qualitative Research: Observational Methods in Health Care Settings.” BMJ (July 15): 182–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1988. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArdle, J. J. 1982. “Structural Equation Modeling Applied to a Case Study of Alcoholism.” National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, NIAAA No. AA05743
McCullagh, Peter and Nelder, J. A.. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 31–61.CrossRef
McGraw, Kathleen. 1996. “Political Methodology: Research Design and Experimental Methods.” In Goodin, Robert and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 769–86.Google Scholar
McKeown, Timothy J. 1983. “Hegemonic Stability Theory and Nineteenth-Century Tariff Levels.” International Organization 37:1 (Winter): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Timothy J. 1999. “Case Studies and the Statistical World View.” International Organization 53 (Winter): 161–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKim, Vaughn R., and Turner, Stephen P., eds. 1997. Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, William H. 1991. The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckstroth, Theodore. 1975. “‘Most Different Systems’ and ‘Most Similar Systems’: A Study in the Logic of Comparative Inquiry.” Comparative Political Studies 8:2 (July): 133–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Paul E. 1954. Clinical versus Statistical Predictions: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megill, Allan. 1989. “Recounting the Past: ‘Description,’ Explanation and Narrative in Historiography.” American Historical Review 94:3 (June): 627–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. 1997. “Executing Hortons: Racial Crime in the 1988 Presidential Campaign.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61:1 (Spring): 134–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, Sharan B. 1988. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Michels, Roberto. 1911. Political Parties. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Miguel, Edward. 2004. “Tribe or Nation: Nation-Building and Public Goods in Kenya versus Tanzania.” World Politics 56:3: 327–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1843/1872. The System of Logic, 8th ed. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Miron, Jeffrey A. 1994. “Empirical Methodology in Macroeconomics: Explaining the Success of Friedman and Schwartz's ‘A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960.’” Journal of Monetary Economics 34: 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. Clyde. 1983. “Case and Situation Analysis.” Sociological Review 31:2: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, Lawrence B. 1985. “The Reliability of the Case Study as a Source of Information.” In R. F. Coulem and R. A. Smith (eds.), Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 65–97.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1995. “Newspapers and Political Awareness.” American Journal of Political Science 39:2 (May): 513–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, Kristen Renwick. 1996. The Heart of Altruism: Perceptions of a Common Humanity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington, Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moravsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly. 2003. “The Politics of Mothers' Employment: France in Comparative Perspective.” World Politics 55:2 (January): 259–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Stephen L. 2002a. “Instrumental Variables and Counterfactual Causality: An Explanation, Application, and Assessment for Non-Economists.” Unpublished manuscript
Morgan, Stephen L. 2002b. “Should Sociologists Use Instrumental Variables?” Unpublished manuscript
Morgan, Stephen L., and David J. Harding. 2005. “Matching Estimators of Causal Effects: From Stratification and Weighting to Practical Data Analysis Routines.” Unpublished manuscript
Morrow, J. D. 1991. “Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 904–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, Benjamin A., and Starr, Harvey. 1984. “International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Substitutability, and ‘Nice’ Laws.” World Politics 36: 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulder, Frances V. 1977. Japan, China and the Modern World Economy: Toward a Reinterpretation of East Asian Development ca. 1600 to ca. 1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Casey, Ricard Gil, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2002. “Social Security and Democracy.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago and Columbia University.
Munck, Gerardo L. 2004. “Tools for Qualitative Research.” In Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 105–21.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Snyder, Richard, eds. 2006. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.” Comparative Political Studies 35:1: 5–34.Google Scholar
Neta, Ram. 2004. “On the Normative Significance of Brute Facts.” Legal Theory 10:3 (September): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuendorf, Kimberly A. 2001. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1980. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership from FDR to Carter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2002. “Size Doesn't Matter: In Defense of Single-State Studies.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:4 (Winter): 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, Sylke. 1998. “The Case of Case Studies: On the Methodological Discussion in Comparative Political Science.” Quality and Quantity 32: 339–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njolstad, Olav. 1990. “Learning from History? Case Studies and the Limits to Theory-Building.” In Njolstad, Olav (ed.), Arms Races: Technological and Political Dynamics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 220–46.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., Anderson, Terry L., and Hill, Peter J.. 1983. Growth and Welfare in the American Past: A New American History, 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Paul Thomas, Robert. 1973. The Rise of the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49: 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Odell, John S. 2001. “Case Study Methods in International Political Economy.” International Studies Perspectives 2: 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, John S. 2004. “Case Study Methods in International Political Economy.” In Sprinz, Detlef F. and Wolinsky-Nahmias, Yael (eds.), Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orum, Anthony M., Joe R. Feagin, and Gideon Sjoberg. 1991. “Introduction: The Nature of the Case Study.” In Feagin, Joe R., Orum, Anthony M., and Sjoberg, Gideon (eds.), A Case for the Case Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1–21.Google Scholar
Pahre, Robert. 2005. “Formal Theory and Case-Study Methods in EU Studies.” European Union Politics 6:1: 113–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Vivien M. 1928. Field Studies in Sociology: A Student's Manual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Papyrakis, Elissaios, and Gerlagh, Reyer. 2003. “The Resource Curse Hypothesis and Its Transmission Channels.” Journal of Comparative Economics 32: 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Robert E. 1930. “Murder and the Case Study Method.” American Journal of Sociology 36: 447–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Patzelt, Werner J. 2000. “What Can an Individual MP Do in German Parliamentary Politics?” In Longley, Lawrence D. and Hazan, Reuven Y. (eds.), The Uneasy Relationships between Parliamentary Members and Leaders. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Petersen, Roger D. 2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N., and Hardy, C.. 2002. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94:2 (June): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Piore, Michael J. 1979. “Qualitative Research Techniques in Economics.” Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (December): 560–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1972. Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Platt, Jennifer. 1992. “‘Case Study’ in American Methodological Thought.” Current Sociology 40:1: 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1977. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1934/1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry. 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain and Germany Between the World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Daniel. 2004. “The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi.” American Political Science Review 98:4 (November): 529–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteete, Amy R., and Elinor Ostrom. 2005. “Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Strategies for Building Large-N Databases Based on Qualitative Research.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Powell, Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Gardeazabal, Aaron. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Material Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Leonard, Robert, and Nanetti, Raffaella Y.. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Queen, Stuart. 1928. “Round Table on the Case Study in Sociological Research.” Publications of the American Sociological Society, Papers and Proceedings 22: 225–7.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, and Sullivan, William M., eds. 1979. Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1992a. “Cases of ‘What Is a Case?’” In Ragin, Charles C. and Becker, Howard S. (eds.), What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1992b. “‘Casing’ and the Process of Social Inquiry.” In Ragin, Charles C. and Becker, Howard S. (eds.), What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–26.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1997. “Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable-Oriented Research.” Comparative Social Research 16: 27–42.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, Charles C. 2004. “Turning the Tables.” In Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 123–38.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C., and Becker,, Howard S. eds. 1992. What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, Lynn, and Rusk, J. G.. 1993. “Who Are Nonvoters? Profiles from the 1990 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 721–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Ben. 2000/2001. “Democracy, Ethnic Fragmentation, and Internal Conflict: Confused Theories, Faulty Data, and the ‘Crucial Case’ of Papua New Guinea.” International Security 25:3: 162–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Ben. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reilly, Ben and Phillpot, Robert. 2003. “‘Making Democracy Work’ in Papua New Guinea: Social Capital and Provincial Development in an Ethnically Fragmented Society.” Asian Survey 42:6 (November–December): 906–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Julian. 2003. “Practice Ahead of Theory: Instrumental Variables, Natural Experiments and Inductivism in Econometrics.” Unpublished manuscript
Rice, Stuart A. 1928. Quantitative Methods in Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Rice, Stuart A., ed. 1931. Methods in Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. 1969. “Comparative Political Analysis in Montesquieu and Tocqueville.” Comparative Politics 1:2 (January): 129–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Clayton. 1996. The Logic of Historical Explanation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Michael J. 2002. “Developing a Teaching Case.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Robinson, Denise L. 2001. Clinical Decision Making: A Case Study Approach. Philadelphia: LippincottWilliams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1951. “The Logical Structure of Analytic Induction.” American Sociological Review 16:6 (December): 812–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. 1992. “Republicanism: The Career of a Concept.” Journal of American History 79:1 (June): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, ed. 2003. In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2005. “Why We Learn Nothing from Regressing Economic Growth on Policies.” Unpublished manuscript
Rogowski, Ronald. 1995. “The Role of Theory and Anomaly in Social-Scientific Inference.” American Political Science Review 89:2 (June): 467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfing, Ingo. 2004. “Have You Chosen the Right Case? Uncertainty in Case Selection for Single Case Studies.” Working paper, International University, Bremen, Germany
Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2004. “Matching in Observational Studies.” In Gelman, A. and Meng, X-L. (eds.), Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives.New York: Wiley, B-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R. and Rubin, Donald B.. 1985. “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score.” The American Statistician 39:1 (February): 33–38.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R. and Silber, Jeffrey H.. 2001. “Matching and Thick Description in an Observational Study of Mortality after Surgery.” Biostatistics 2: 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, Mark R., and Wolpin, Kenneth I.. 2000. “Natural ‘Natural Experiments’ in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 38: 827–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Frank Alexander. 1931. “On Generalisation from Limited Social Data.” Social Forces 10: 32–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?World Politics 53 (April): 325–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Paul A. 1994. “Narrative Explanations: The Case of History.” In Martin, Michael and McIntyre, Lee C. (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 701–12.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2003. “Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains?” In Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Stephens, John D.. 1997. “Comparing Historical Sequences: A Powerful Tool for Causal Analysis.” Comparative Social Research 16: 55–72.Google Scholar
Rumsfeld, Donald H. 2002. News transcript, United States Department of Defense. On the web: http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/2002/t05222002_t522sdma.html
Runkel, Philip J., and McGrath, Joseph E.. 1972. Research on Human Behavior: A Systematic Guide to Method. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1970. “International Behavior Research: Case Studies and Cumulation.” In Haas, Michael and Kariel, Henry S. (eds.), Approaches to the Study of Political Science. San Francisco: Chandler, 1–15.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott. 1995. The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sala-I-Martin, , , Xavier X. 1997. “I Just Ran Two Million Regressions.” American Economic Review 87:2: 178–83.Google Scholar
Sarbin, Theodore R. 1943. “A Contribution to the Study of Actuarial and Individual Methods of Prediction.” American Journal of Sociology 48: 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarbin, Theodore R. 1944. “The Logic of Prediction in Psychology.” Psychological Review 51: 210–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1975. “The Tower of Babble.” In Giovanni Sartori, Fred W. Riggs, and Henry Teune (eds.), Tower of Babel: On the Definition and Analysis of Concepts in the Social Sciences. International Studies, Occasional Paper No. 6, 7–38
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1984. “Guidelines for Concept Analysis.” In Sartori, Giovanni (ed.), Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 15–48.Google Scholar
Sayer, R. Andrew. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2d ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1992. Death without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schmeidler, David. 2001. A Theory of Case-Based Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Steffen W., et al., eds. 1977. Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, and Bobo, Lawrence. 1988. “Survey-Based Experiments on White Racial Attitudes toward Residential Integration.” American Journal of Sociology 94:2 (September): 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwandt, Thomas A. 1997. Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scriven, Michael. 1976. “Maximizing the Power of Causal Investigations: The Modus Operandi Method.” In Glass, G. V. (ed.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 101–18.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and David Collier. 2004. “Glossary.” In Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 273–313.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and John Gerring. 2005. “Case Selection: Quantitative Techniques Reviewed.” Unpublished manuscript
Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2004. “Quality Meets Quantity: Case Studies, Conditional Probability and Counterfactuals.” Perspectives in Politics 2:2 (June): 281–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, Somini. 2005. “Where Maoists Still Matter.” New York Times Magazine, web version, October 30, pp. 1–7. Accessed: 10/30/2005
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Shafer, Michael D. 1988. Deadly Paradigms: The Failure of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shalev, Michael. 1998. “Limits of and Alternatives to Multiple Regression in Macro-Comparative Research.” Paper presented at the second conference on The Welfare State at the Crossroads, Stockholm, June 12–14
Shaw, Clifford R. 1927. “Case Study Method.” Publications of the American Sociological Society 21: 149–57.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 2001. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, 2d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 1994. Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the Interwar Years. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. L. 1969. Basic Research Methods in Social Science. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1994. Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, Theda, and Somers, Margaret. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22:2 (April): 147–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. 1973. “The Methodology of Comparative Analysis.” In Warwick, D. P. and Osherson, S. (eds.), Comparative Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 42–86.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. 1976. Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Smith, C. D., and Kornblum, W., eds. 1989. In the Field: Research on the Field Research Experience. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, T. V., and White, L. D., eds. 1921. Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Snow, John. 1855. On the Mode of Communication of Cholera. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1993. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2001. “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36:1 (Spring): 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperle, Diane H. 1933. Case Method Technique in Professional Training: A Survey of the Use of Case Studies as a Method of Instruction in Selected Fields, and a Study of It. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Sprinz, Detlef F., and Wolinsky-Nahmias, Yael, eds. 2004. Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, T. N., and Jagdish Bhagwati. 1999. “Outward-Orientation and Development: Are Revisionists Right?” Discussion Paper No. 806, Economic Growth Center, Yale University
Staiger, Douglas, and Stock, James H.. 1997. “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments.” Econometrica 65: 557–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stake, Robert E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Steadman, Dawnie Wolfe. 2002. Hard Evidence: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. 1994. “American Exceptionalism Reconsidered: Culture or Institutions?” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Jillson, Calvin (eds.), The Dynamics of American Politics: Approaches and Interpretations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 106–31.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. 1995. “Why Is Government So Small in America?Governance 8: 303–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2005. “The Overselling of Globalization.” In Weinstein, Michael M. (ed.), Globalization: What's New?New York: Columbia University Press, 228–61.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Stoecker, Randy. 1991. “Evaluating and Rethinking the Case Study.” The Sociological Review 39 (February): 88–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Laura. 2003. “Is It Possible to Do Quantitative Survey Research in an Interpretive Way?Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 1:2 (Fall): 13–16.Google Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1931. “Experimental Comparison of a Statistical and a Case History Technique of Attitude Research.” Publications of the American Sociological Society 25: 154–6.Google Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1941. “Notes on the Case-Study and the Unique Case.” Sociometry 4: 349–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1950. “Some Observations on Study Design.” American Journal of Sociology 55:4 (January): 355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas, and Baur, Martin. 2002. “Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 46:3 (July): 506–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Robin. 1996. “Beyond History versus Theory: Strategic Narrative and Sociological Explanation.” Sociological Methods and Research 24:3: 304–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1992. Constitutional Reform and Effective Government. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane H. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symposium: Discourse and Content Analysis.” 2004. Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 2:1 (Spring): 15–39.
Symposium: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).” 2004. Qualitative Methods: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 2:2 (Fall): 2–25.
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1995. “Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 89:2 (June): 471–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2004. “Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide.” In Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 171–9.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1970. “The Explanation of Purposive Behavior.” In Borger, Robert and Cioffi, Frank (eds.), Explanation in the Behavioral Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1971. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.” Review of Metaphysics 25: 3–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory, 2d ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Teggart, Frederick J. 1939/1967. Rome and China: A Study of Correlations in Historical Events. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Temple, Jonathan. 1999. “The New Growth Evidence.” Journal of Economic Literature (March): 112–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tendler, Judith. 1997. Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., and Belkin, Aaron, eds. 1996. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. 2003. New York: Norton.
Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Fried, Amy, Sullivan, John L., and Dietz, Mary. 1991. “Mixing Methods: A Multistage Strategy for Studying Patriotism and Citizen Participation.” Political Analysis 3: 89–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thies, Cameron G. 2002. “A Pragmatic Guide to Qualitative Historical Analysis in the Study of International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 3: 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thies, Michael F. 2001. “Keeping Tabs on Partners: The Logic of Delegation in Coalition Governments.” American Journal of Political Science 45:3 (July): 580–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. 1963. The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. 1978. The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2001. “Mechanisms in Political Processes.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1997. Recollections: The French Revolution of 1848, ed. Mayer, J. P. and Kerr, A. P.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Tooley, Michael. 1988. Causation: A Realist Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc. 2005. Historical Method in the Study of International Relations. Unpublished manuscript
Treier, Shawn, and Simon Jackman. 2005. “Democracy as a Latent Variable.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, Stanford University
Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Tsai, Lily. 2007. Accountability without Democracy: How Solidary Groups Provide Public Goods in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Frederick Jackson. 1893/1972. The Turner Thesis Concerning the Role of the Frontier in American History. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Udry, Christopher. 2003. “Fieldwork, Economic Theory, and Research on Institutions in Developing Countries.” American Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings 93:2 (May): 107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenbroucke, Jan P. 2001. “In Defense of Case Reports and Case Series.” Annals of Internal Medicine 134:4: 330–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Maanen, J. 1988. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2002. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney. 1967. “Some Dilemmas in Comparative Research.” World Politics 20:1 (October): 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, Bertjan. 1994. “Do Individual and Group Beliefs Matter? British Decision-Making during the 1956 Suez Crisis.” Cooperation and Conflict 29:4: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschuren, Piet J. M. 2001. “Case Study as a Research Strategy: Some Ambiguities and Opportunities.” Social Research Methodology 6:2: 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, W. Paul. 1993. Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wright, Georg Henrik. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Voss, Kim. 1993. The Making of American Exceptionalism: The Knights of Labor and Class Formation in the Nineteenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahlke, John C. 1979. “Pre-Behavioralism in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 73:1 (March): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldner, David. 2002. “Anti Anti-Determinism: Or What Happens When Schrodinger's Cat and Lorenz's Butterfly Meet Laplace's Demon in the Study of Political and Economic Development.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Waller, Willard. 1934. “Insight and Scientific Method.” American Journal of Sociology 40:3 (November): 285–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin.” World Politics (April): 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Michael D., and Kristin Bakke. 2005. “Predicting Civil Conflicts: On the Utility of Empirical Research.” Paper presented at the Conference on Disaggregating the Study of Civil War and Transnational Violence, University of California Institute of Global Conflict and Cooperation, San Diego, March 7–8
Warner, W. Lloyd, and Lunt, Paul S.. 1941. Yankee City, 4 vols. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent, and Rockman, Bert A., eds. 1993. Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1905/1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1998. “Political Stability and Civil War: Institutions, Commitment, and American Democracy.” In Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, , and Weingast, Barry (eds.), Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 148–93.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1998. “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 24: 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, Bruce, and Jackman, Simon. 1994. “Bayesian Inference for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 88:2: 412–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, William Foote. 1943/1955. Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1992. Political Organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science, and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Winks, Robin W., ed. 1969. The Historian as Detective: Essays on Evidence. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Winship, Christopher, and David J. Harding. 2004. “A General Strategy for the Identification of Age, Period, Cohort Models: A Mechanism Based Approach.” Unpublished manuscript
Winship, Christopher, and Morgan, Stephen L.. 1999. “The Estimation of Causal Effects of Observational Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 659–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winship, Christopher, and Michael Sobel. 2004. “Causal Inference in Sociological Studies.” In Hardy, Melissa and Bryman, Alan (eds.), Handbook of Data Analysis.London: Sage, 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. Alan, McCulloch, Neil, and McKay, Andrew. 2004. “Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence So Far.” Journal of Economic Literature 42 (March): 72–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1968. “Paradigms and Political Theories.” In King, Preston and Parekh, B. C. (eds.), Politics and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–49.Google Scholar
Wong, Wilson. 2002. “Did How We Learn Affect What We Learn? Methodological Bias, Multimethod Research and the Case of Economic Development.” Social Science Journal 39:2: 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2003. World Development Indicators 2003. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yanow, Dvora, and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, eds. 2006. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Robert K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3d ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yin, Robert K. 2004. Case Study Anthology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R., ed. 1999. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, Pauline. 1939. Scientific Social Surveys and Research. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Znaniecki, Florian. 1934. The Method of Sociology. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • John Gerring, Boston University
  • Book: Case Study Research
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803123.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • John Gerring, Boston University
  • Book: Case Study Research
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803123.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • John Gerring, Boston University
  • Book: Case Study Research
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803123.013
Available formats
×