Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:37:04.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acknowledgements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Simon Roberts
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Michael Palmer
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Dispute Processes
ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-Making
, pp. xiv - xviii
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

, J S Auerbach: Justice Without Law? Resolving Disputes Without Lawyers (1983) Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–21, 96–97, 57–59, 131–135. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
, D Bok:‘A Flawed System of Law and Practice Training’ (1983) 33 Journal of Legal Education 570, pp 582–583. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
, W Brazil:‘Special Masters in Complex Cases: Extending the Judiciary or Reshaping Adjudication?’ (1990) 53 University of Chicago Law Review 394, pp 407–409Google Scholar
, R J Broderick:‘Court-annexed Compulsory Arbitration: It Works’ (1989) 72 Judicature 4, 217, pp 219–222. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
, R A B Bush:‘Efficiency and Protection, or Empowerment and Recognition?: The Mediator's Role and Ethical Standards in Mediation’ (1989) 41 Florida Law Review 253, pp 266–270, 281–282Google Scholar
R A B Bush and J P Folger: The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition (1994) Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 81–;85
, M Cappelletti and , B G Garth: Access to Justice, Volume 1: A World Survey (1978) Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Milan, pp 6–9Google Scholar
G Chornenki:‘Mediating Commercial Disputes: Exchanging “Power Over” for “Power With” ’, in , J Macfarlane (ed) Rethinking Disputes: The Mediation Alternative (1997) Cavendish Publishing, London, 159, pp 163–168Google Scholar
Cole, Sanford D:‘English Borough Courts’ (1902) 18 Law Quarterly Review 376, pp 380–382Google Scholar
, T Colosi:‘Negotiation in the Public and Private Sectors’ (1983) 27 (2) American Behavioural Scientist 229, pp 229–230, 241–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, J L Comaroff and , S Roberts: Rules and Processes (1981) University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 108–110Google Scholar
, M R Damaska: The Faces of Justice and State Authority (1986) Yale University Press, New Haven and London, pp 32–38, 48–50, 58–60Google Scholar
Boaventura De Sousa Santos:‘Law and Democracy:(Mis)trusting the Global Reform of Courts’, in Jenson, Jane and Santos, Boaventura De Sousa (eds) Globalizing Institutions: Case Studies in Regulation and Innovation (2000) Aldershot, Ashgate, pp 253–255, 279–280. © Ashgate. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
, Y Dezalay and , B Garth: Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (1996) University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp 311–317Google Scholar
, C Dickens: Bleak House (1994, originally 1852–1853) Harmondsworth, Middlesex, Penguin Books, pp 2–3Google Scholar
Doo, Leigh-wai:‘Dispute Settlement in Chinese-American Communities’ (1973) 21 American Journal of Comparative Law 627, at pp 652–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, G T Eisele:‘The Case Against Court-annexed ADR Programs’ (1991) 75 Judicature 1, 34, pp 35–37. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
, D C Elliot:‘Med/arb: Fraught with Danger or Ripe with Opportunity’ (1996) 62 Arbitration 3, 175, pp 175–177Google Scholar
, W L F Felstiner:‘Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing’ (1974–1975) 9 Law and Society Review 63, pp 79–80Google Scholar
, W Felstiner, , R Abel and , A Sarat:‘The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming . . .’ (1980–1981) 15 Law and Society Review 631, pp 634–637Google Scholar
, O M Fiss:‘Against Settlement’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Journal 1073, pp 1085–1086Google Scholar
, O M Fiss:‘Out of Eden’ (1985) 94 Yale Law Journal, p 1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, L Fuller:‘Collective Bargaining and the Arbitrator’ (1963) 18 Wisconsin Law Review 3, pp 3–6, 39–42Google Scholar
, M Galanter:‘The Emergence of the Judge as a Mediator in Civil Cases’ (1986) 69 Judicature 5, 257, pp 257, 261–262. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
, M Galanter:‘ “… A Settlement Judge is not a Trial Judge”: Judicial Mediation in the United States’ (1985) 12 Journal of Law and Society 1, 1, pp 12–15Google Scholar
, D Gifford:‘A Context-Based Theory of Selection Strategy in Legal Negotiations’ (1985) 46 Ohio State Law Journal 41, pp 54–58Google Scholar
, S B Goldberg:‘The Mediation of Grievances Under a Collective Bargaining Contract: An Alternative to Arbitration’ (1982) 77 Northwestern University Law Review 270, pp 281–284Google Scholar
, S B Goldberg, , F E A Sander and , N H Rodgers (eds) Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes, 2nd edn (1992) Little, Brown & Co, Boston, Toronto and London, pp 225–226Google Scholar
, L E Graham:‘Implementing Custody Mediation in Family Courts: Some Comments on the Jefferson County Family Court Experience’ (1992–1993) 81 Kentucky Law Journal 1107, pp 1112–1116, 1120–1124Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J: Praying for Justice: Faith, Order, and Community in an American Town (1986) Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp 108, 109, 110, 115, 116, 117 and 118. Used by permission of the publisher, Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
, T Grillo:‘The Mediation Alternative – Process Dangers for Woman’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 1545, pp 1605–1610Google Scholar
, C Harlow and , R Rawlings: Law and Administration, 2nd edn (1997) Butterworths, London, pp 401–404Google Scholar
, J M Haynes:‘Mediation and Therapy: An Alternative View’ (1992) 10 Mediation Quarterly 21, pp 22–24Google Scholar
, J M Kelly: Roman Litigation (1966) Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 21–23, 132, 147, 148, and 150. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
, J B Kelly and , M A Duyree:‘Women's and Men's Views of Mediation in Voluntary and Mandatory Mediation Settings’ (1995) 30 Family and Conciliation Courts Review 1, 35, pp 37, 41–42, 45Google Scholar
, A S Kim:‘Rent-a-Judge and the Cost of Selling Justice’ (1994) 44 Duke Law Journal 166, pp 166–167, 189–195, 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, Kimberlee K and Love, Lela P: ‘Mapping Mediation: The Risks of Riskin's Grid’ (1998) 3 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 71, at 71–75Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert:‘Adjudication to Settlement: Shading in the Grey’ (1986) 70 (3) Judicature 161, pp 161–165. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
, T D Lambros:‘The Summary Trial: An Effective Aid to Settlement’ (1993) 77 Judicature 1, 6, pp 6–8. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
, J K Lieberman and , J F Henry:‘Lessons from the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement’ (1986) 53 University of Chicago Law Review 424, pp 427–428Google Scholar
, G T Lowenthal:‘A General Theory of Negotiation Process, Strategy, and Behaviour’ (1982–1983) 31 Kansas Law Review 69, pp 74–75, 112–114Google Scholar
, S Lubman:‘Judicial Work in T'aihang’ (1973) 6 Chinese Law and Government 3, 7, at pp 12–17. English translation copyright © 1973, by M E Sharpe, Inc. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
, S Lubman:‘Mao and Mediation: Politics and Dispute Resolution in Communist China’ (1967) 55 California Law Review 1284–1359, pp 1285–1286, 1287, 1358Google Scholar
, C A McEwen and , R J Maiman:‘Small Claims Mediation in Maine: An Empirical Assessment’ (1981) 33 Maine Law Review 237, pp 260–264Google Scholar
, A W McThenia and , T L Shaffer:‘For Reconciliation’ (1985) 94 Yale Law Journal 1660, pp 1662–1665Google Scholar
, C Menkel-Meadow:‘Is Mediation the Practice of Law?’ (1996) 14 Alternatives to the High Costs of Litigation 5, 57, pp 57, 60–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, S E Merry and , N Milner (eds) The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States (1993) University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp 10–15Google Scholar
C Morris:‘The Trusted Mediator: Ethics and Interaction in Mediation’ in Macfarlane, Julie (ed) Rethinking Disputes: The Mediation Alternative (1997) Cavendish Publishing, London, 301, pp 307–308Google Scholar
, P Newman:‘Mediation-Arbitration (MedArb): Can it Work Legally?’ (1994) 60 Arbitration 3, 173, pp 174–176Google Scholar
M Palmer:‘The Revival of Mediation in the People's Republic of China:(1) Extra-judicial mediation’, in , W E Butler (ed) Yearbook on Socialist Legal Systems 1987, Transnational Books, New York, Dobbs Ferry, pp 244–252, 265–271. Reprinted with permission
, R Posner:‘The Summary Jury Trial and Other Methods of Alternative Dispute Resolution: Some Cautionary Observations’ (1986) 53 University of Chicago Law Review 366, pp 387–389Google Scholar
, R A Rappaport: Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People (1967) Yale University Press, New Haven and London, pp 119, 121–123, 138–139Google Scholar
, L L Riskin:‘Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques’ (1994) 12 (9) Alternatives 111, pp 111–113Google Scholar
, M Roberts: Mediation in Family Disputes: Principles of Practice, 2nd edn (1997) Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 133–135. © Ashgate. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Marian:‘Family Mediation: The Development of the Regulatory Framework in the United Kingdom’ (2005) 22 Conflict Resolution Quarterly4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Marian:‘Systems or Selves: Some Ethical Issues in Family Mediation’ (1992) 10 Mediation Quarterly 3, pp 4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, S Roberts:‘Mediation in Family Disputes’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Review 537, pp 555–556Google Scholar
, J D Rosenberg and , H J Folberg:‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Empirical Analysis’ (1994) 46 Stanford Law Review 1487, pp 1495–1496Google Scholar
, A Sachs:‘Changing the Terms of the Debate: A Visit to a Popular Tribunal in Mozambique’ (1984) 28 Journal of African Law 99, pp 101–104Google Scholar
, F E A Sander:‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States: An Overview’, in American Bar Association (ed) Justice for a Generation (1985) West Publishing Company, St Paul, Minnesota, pp 260–261Google Scholar
, F E A Sander:‘Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution: An Overview’ (1985) 37 University of Florida Law Review 1, pp 11–13Google Scholar
, F E A Sander:‘Varieties of Dispute Processing’ (1976) 70 Federal Rules Decisions 79, pp 126–127, 130–132Google Scholar
Sarkin, Jeremy:‘The Tension Between Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda: Politics, Human Rights, Due Process and the role of the Gacaca Courts in Dealing with Genocide’ (2001) 45 Journal of African Law 2, 143, pp 157–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah-Kazemi, Sonia Nourin:‘Cross-cultural Mediation: A Critical View of the Dynamics of Culture in Family Disputes’ (2000) 14 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, pp 302–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, M Shapiro: Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (1981) University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp 8–11, 20, 22–24, 49–52, 54Google Scholar
, L Silberman:‘Judicial Adjuncts Revisited: The Proliferation of Ad Hoc Procedure’ (1989) 137 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2131, pp 2134–2137, 2143–2145, 2158–2161Google Scholar
, G Simmel: The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited by , K Wolff (1950, originally 1908) Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, pp 146–151Google Scholar
, J M Spencer and , J P Zammit:‘Mediation-Arbitration: A Proposal for Private Resolution of Disputes between Divorced or Separated Parents’ (1976) Duke Law Journal 911, pp 932–938Google Scholar
B E Stedman:‘Multi-option Justice at the Middlesex Multi-Door Courthouse’, in , R Smith (ed) Achieving Civil Justice: Appropriate Dispute Resolution for the 1990s (1996) Legal Action Group, London, pp 119–127, 133–135, 137–140. Reprinted with permissionGoogle Scholar
Caenegem, R C: The Birth of the English Common Law (1988) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprenkel, Sybille: Legal Institutions in Manchu China (1962) Athlone Press, London, pp 92–94Google Scholar
Katherine, Wezel Stone:‘Dispute Resolution in the Boundaryless Workplace’ (2000–2001) 16 Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution 467, at pp 468–471Google Scholar
, P R Verkuil:‘The Ombudsman and the Limits of the Adversary System’ (1975) 75 Columbia Law Review 845, pp 847, 851–856Google Scholar
, J J White:‘Machiavelli and the Ethical Limitations on Lying in Negotiation’ (1980) American Bar Foundation Research Journal 926, pp 928–931Google Scholar
, S A Wiegand:‘A Just and Lasting Peace: Supplanting Mediation with the Ombuds Model’ (1996) 12 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 1, 95, pp 100–102, 120–122Google Scholar
Woolf, Lord: Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System of England and Wales (1996) HMSO, London, Ch 1, paras 1–17Google Scholar
Woolf, Lord: Access to Justice: Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System of England and Wales (1995) HMSO, London, Ch 3, paras 3–11, 30–39; Ch 4, paras 1–4, 7–12; Ch 5, paras 2–6, 16–17; Ch 18, paras 1–4Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Acknowledgements
  • Simon Roberts, London School of Economics and Political Science, Michael Palmer, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
  • Book: Dispute Processes
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Acknowledgements
  • Simon Roberts, London School of Economics and Political Science, Michael Palmer, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
  • Book: Dispute Processes
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Acknowledgements
  • Simon Roberts, London School of Economics and Political Science, Michael Palmer, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
  • Book: Dispute Processes
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
Available formats
×