Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:03:15.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Muscles and movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

C. Ross Ethier
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Craig A. Simmons
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Together, muscles and bones confer structure and the capacity for motion to the body. Any analysis of locomotion (Ch. 10) must therefore have as a basis an understanding of muscle and bone mechanics.

There are three types of muscle, each having particular characteristics.

  1. Skeletal muscle. Skeletal muscles comprise 40 to 45% of total body weight. They are usually attached to bones via tendons, are responsible for locomotion and body motion, and are usually under voluntary control.

  2. Smooth muscle. Smooth muscle is typically found surrounding the lumen of “tubes” within the body, such as blood vessels, the urinary tract, and the gastrointestinal tract. Smooth muscle is responsible for controlling the caliber (size) of the lumen and also for generating peristaltic waves (e.g., in the gastrointestinal tract). Control of smooth muscle is largely involuntary.

  3. Cardiac muscle. Cardiac muscle makes up the major bulk of the heart mass and is sufficiently unique to be considered a different muscle type. It is under involuntary control.

In this chapter we will concentrate on skeletal muscle only.

There are three types of skeletal muscle, classified according to how the muscles produce ATP, which is used during the contraction process. The two basic ATP-production strategies are:

  1. Aerobic. In aerobic respiration, ATP is produced by the breakdown of precursors in the presence of O2. This is a high efficiency pathway but cannot proceed if O2 is not present.

  2. Anaerobic. In anaerobic respiration (also known as glycolysis), ATP is produced without O2 present. This pathway is less efficient than aerobic respiration and produces the undesirable by-product lactic acid. Accumulation of lactic acid in muscle tissue produces the characteristic ache that follows too strenuous a workout.

Type
Chapter
Information
Introductory Biomechanics
From Cells to Organisms
, pp. 332 - 378
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lehninger, A. L.. Biochemistry, 2nd edn (New York: Worth, 1975).Google Scholar
Vander, A. J., Sherman, J. H. and Luciano, D. S.. Human Physiology: The Mechanisms of Body Function, 4th edn (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985).Google Scholar
Fawcett, D. W.. Bloom and Fawcett: A Textbook of Histology (Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 1986).Google Scholar
Despopolous, A. and Silbernagl, S.. Color Atlas of Physiology (New York: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1986).Google Scholar
Desaki, J. and Uehara, Y.. The overall morphology of neuromuscular junctions as revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Neurocytology, 10 (1981), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jewell, B. R. and Wilkie, D. R.. The mechanical properties of relaxing muscle. Journal of Physiology, 152 (1960), 30–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McComas, A. J.. Skeletal Muscle Form and Function (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1996).Google Scholar
Gordon, A. M., Huxley, A. F. and Julian, F. J.. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibers. Journal of Physiology, 184 (1966), 170–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A. V.. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 126 (1938), 136–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, T. A.. Muscles, Reflexes and Locomotion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Inbar, G. F. and Adam, D.. Estimation of muscle active state. Biological Cybernetics, 23 (1976), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fung, Y. C.. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues (New York: Springer Verlag, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. Z.. The Life of Mammals (London: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Hsu, E. S., Patwardhan, A. G., Meade, K. P., Light, T. R. and Martin, W. R.. Cross- sectional geometrical properties and bone mineral contents of the human radius and ulna. Journal of Biomechanics, 26 (1993), 1307–1318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, W. M., Buchanan, T. S. and Delp, S. L.. Scaling of peak moment arms of elbow muscles with upper extremity bone dimensions. Journal of Biomechanics, 35 (2002), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerbeaux, M., Turpin, E. and Lensel-Corbeil, G.. Musculo-articular modeling of the triceps brachii. Journal of Biomechanics, 29 (1996), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, C. I., Thom, J. M., Reeves, N. D., Birch, K. M. and Narici, M. V.. In vivo physiological cross-sectional area and specific force are reduced in the gastrocnemius of elderly men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99 (2005), 1050–1055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, W. M., Buchanan, T. S. and Delp, S. L.. The isometric functional capacity of muscles that cross the elbow. Journal of Biomechanics, 33 (2000), 943–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, C. S., Rice, C. L. and Marsh, G. D.. Normalized force, activation, and coactivation in the arm muscles of young and old men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 91 (2001), 1341–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubal, M. J., Gordish-Dressman, H., Thompson, P. D., Price, T. B., Hoffman, E. P.et al. Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 37 (2005), 964–972.Google ScholarPubMed
Kent-Braun, J. A. and Ng, A. V.. Specific strength and voluntary muscle activation in young and elderly women and men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 87 (1999), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. T. Prendergast, F. C. T. van der Helm and G. N. Duda. Analysis of muscle and joint loads. In Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, ed. Mow, V. C. and Huiskes, R.. (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2005), pp. 29–90.Google Scholar
Wang, L. and Buchanan, T. S.. Prediction of joint moments using a neural network model of muscle activations from EMG signals. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 10 (2002), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burr, D. B. and Martin, R. B.. The effects of composition, structure and age on the torsional properties of the human radius. Journal of Biomechanics, 16 (1983), 603–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, C. T. and Lanyon, L. E.. Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 107 (1984), 321–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, R. A., Kozin, S. H., Barnes, A. and Kalluri, P.. Changes in strain distribution along the radius and ulna with loading and interosseous membrane section. Journal of Hand Surgery, 27 (2002), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGinley, J. C. and Kozin, S. H.. Interossus membrane anatomy and functional mechanics. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, (2001), 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poitevin, L. A.. Anatomy and biomechanics of the interosseous membrane: its importance in the longitudinal stability of the forearm. Hand Clinics, 17 (2001), 97–110, vii.Google ScholarPubMed
Werner, F. W. and An, K. N.. Biomechanics of the elbow and forearm. Hand Clinics, 10 (1994), 357–373.Google ScholarPubMed
G. Finerman (ed.) Symposium on Sports Medicine: The Knee (St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1985).
Gray, H.. Anatomy of the Human Body, 20th edn: thoroughly reviewed and re-edited by W. H. Lewis (Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger, 1918).Google Scholar
Romanes, G. J.. Cunningham's Manual of Practical Anatomy, 15th edn, Vol. I (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Maquet, P. G. J.. Biomechanics of the Knee, 2nd edn (New York: Springer Verlag, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberti, H. H. and Hayes, W. C.. Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of Q-angle and tendofemoral contact. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume), 66 (1984), 715–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
H. H. Huberti and W. C. Hayes. Determination of patellofemoral contact pressures. In Symposium on Sports Medicine: The Knee, ed. Finerman, G.. (St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1985), pp. 45–53.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×