Adjémian, C. (1976). On the nature of interlanguage systems. Language Learning 26: 297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aikawa, T. (1999). Reflexives. In N. Tsujimura (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 154–90). Oxford: Blackwell

Aitchison, J. (1976). The articulate mammal. New York: Routledge

Archangeli, D. and T. Langendoen (eds.). (1997). Optimality Theory: an overview. Oxford: Blackwell

Bailey, N., Madden, C. and Krashen, S.. (1974). Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning?Language Learning 24: 235–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, C. L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533–81Google Scholar

Baker, C. L. and J. McCarthy (eds.). (1981). The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Baker, M. (1997). Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax (pp. 73–137). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Balcom, P. (1997). Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research 13: 1st person–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baptista, M. (1997). The morpho-syntax of nominal and verbal categories in Capeverdean Creole. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, Harvard University

Bard, E. G., Robertson, D. and Sorace, A.. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72: 32–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning 37: 385–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Beard, R. (1987). Morpheme order in a lexeme/morpheme-base morphology. Lingua 72: 1st person–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany: SUNY Press

Beck, M.-L. (1997). Viruses, parasites and optionality in L2 performance. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Michigan State University

Beck, M.-L. (1998a). L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 311–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, M.-L. (ed.). (1998b). Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Belletti, A. (1991). Generalized verb movement: aspects of verb syntax. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier

Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L.. (1988). Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, S. (1994). Interpretation of English reflexives by adolescent speakers of Serbo-Croatian. Second Language Research 10: 125–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, S. and L. Progovac. (1998). Morphological status of reflexives in second language acquisition. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 187–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Bernstein, J. (1993). Topics in the syntax of nominal structure across Romance. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, City University of New York

Berwick, R. and A. Weinberg. (1984). The grammatical basis of linguistic performance: language use and acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bialystok, E. (1997). The structure of age: in search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13: 116–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer Verlag

Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language 68: 706–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birdsong, D. (ed.). (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity. Language Learning 33: 1st person–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20: 3rd person–49Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. (1996). Conservative pattern accumulation in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the European Second Language Association, Nijmegen

Bley-Vroman, R. (1997). Features and patterns in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Michigan State University

Bley-Vroman, R. and C. Chaudron. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In E. Tarone, S. Gass and A. Cohen (eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S. and Ioup, G.. (1988). The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research 4: 1st person–32Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. and D. Masterson. (1989). Reaction time as a supplement to grammaticality judgements in the investigation of second language competence. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL 8.2: 207–37

Bley-Vroman, R. and N. Yoshinaga. (1992). Broad and narrow constraints on the English dative alternation: some fundamental differences between native speakers and foreign language learners. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL. 11: 157–99

Bloom, P. (ed.). (1994). Language acquisition: core readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bobaljik, J. (To appear). Realizing Germanic inflection: why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics

Bobaljik, J. and Thráinsson, H.. (1998). Two heads aren't always better than one. Syntax 1st person: 37–71Google Scholar

Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris

Borer, H. (1989). Anaphoric Agr. In O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 69–109). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Borer, H. (1996). Access to Universal Grammar: the real issues. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 718–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borer, H. and B. Rohrbacher. (1997). Features and projections: arguments for the full competence hypothesis. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 24–35). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Borer, H. and K. Wexler. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 123–72). Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRef

Brown, C. (1998). The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research 14: 136–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 4–63). Oxford: Blackwell

Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Bruhn-Garavito, J. (1995). L2 acquisition of verb complementation and Binding Principle B. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileman and R. Rutkowski Weber (eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 79–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Bruhn de Garavito, J. and L. White. (2000). L2 Acquisition of Spanish DPs: the status of grammatical features. In C. Howell, S. Fish and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 164–75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Bruhn de Garavito, J. and L. White. (2002). L2 acquisition of Spanish DPs: the status of grammatical features. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and J. Liceras (eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: the L1/L2 connection (pp. 151–76). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: a government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel

Carroll, S. (1996). Parameter-setting in second language acquisition: explanans and explanandum. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 720–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. (1999). Input and SLA: adults' sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning 49: 37–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: the raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Carroll, S. and Meisel, J.. (1990). Universals and second language acquisition: some comments on the state of current theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 201–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carstens, V. M. (1991). The morphology and syntax of determiner phrases in Kiswahili. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, UCLA

Carstens, V. M. (2000). Concord in Minimalist Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgements: a review of theory, methods and results. Language Learning 33: 343–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheng, L. and Sybesma, R.. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of noun phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behaviour. Language 35: 26–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Books

Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell

Chomsky, N. (1981a). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris

Chomsky, N. (1981b). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 32–75). London: Longman

Chomsky, N. (1986a). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, N. (1986b). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger

Chomsky, N. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 417–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, N. (1999). On the nature, use and acquisition of language. In T. Bhatia and W. Ritchie (eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 33–54). San Diego: Academic Press

Christie, K. (1992). Universal Grammar in the second language: an experimental study of the cross-linguistic properties of reflexives in English, Chinese and Spanish. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Delaware

Christie, K. and J. Lantolf. (1998). Bind me up bind me down: reflexives in L2. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 239–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Cinque, G. (1990). Types of A′ -Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: a crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Clahsen, H. (1988). Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: a study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. In S. Flynn and W. O'Neil (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 47–75). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Clahsen, H. (1990). The comparative study of first and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 135–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H. (1990/1991). Constraints on parameter setting: a grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition 1st person: 361–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H., S. Eisenbeiss and M. Penke. (1996). Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 129–59). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Clahsen, H., S. Eisenbeiss and A. Vainikka. (1994). The seeds of structure: a syntactic analysis of the acquisition of Case marking. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Clahsen, H. and Hong, U.. (1995). Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: new evidence from reaction-time experiments. Second Language Research 11: 57–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clahsen, H., J. Meisel and M. Pienemann. (1983). Deutsch als Zweitsprache: der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Gunther Narr Verlag

Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.. (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: a study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research 2nd person: 93–119Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.. (1989). The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 5: 1st person–29Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. and M. Penke. (1992). The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: new evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus. In J. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement (pp. 181–224). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Clahsen, H., Penke, M. and Parodi, T.. (1993/1994). Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 395–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, R. and Roberts, I.. (1993). A computational approach to language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299–345Google Scholar

Cole, P. (1987). Null objects in Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 597–612Google Scholar

Cole, P., Hermon, G. and Sung, L.-M.. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 1st person–22Google Scholar

Cook, V. (1988). Chomsky's Universal Grammar: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell

Cook, V. (1990). Timed comprehension of binding in advanced L2 learners of English. Language Learning 40: 557–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, V. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research 7: 103–17Google Scholar

Cook, V. (1997). Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 34: 35–49Google Scholar

Cook, V. and M. Newson. (1996). Chomsky's Universal Grammar: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell

Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language 63: 544–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5: 161–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crain, S. and R. Thornton. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: a guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Davies, W. and Kaplan, T.. (1998). Native speaker vs. L2 learner grammaticality judgements. Applied Linguistics 19: 183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeGraff, M. (1999). Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: a prologomenon. In M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. and Anderson, B.. (1997). The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: the process-result distinction in English-French interlanguage grammars. Language Acquisition 6: 297–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. and Anderson, B.. (1998). Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: binding construals, null prepositions and Universal Grammar. Second Language Research 14: 341–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demuth, K. (1994). On the ‘underspecification’ of functional categories. In B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Heads, projections and learnability (pp. 119–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Dresher, E. (1999). Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 27–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dresher, E. and Kaye, J.. (1990). A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34: 137–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

du Plessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L. and White, L.. (1987). UG or not UG, that is the question: a reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Second Language Research 3rd person: 56–75Google Scholar

Duffield, N. and White, L.. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: converging methodologies. Second Language Research 15: 133–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duffield, N., White, L., Bruhn de Garavito, J., Montrul, S. and Prévost, P.. (2002). Clitic placement in L2 French: evidence from sentence matching. Journal of Linguistics38.3Google Scholar

Dulay, H. and Burt, M.. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckman, F. (1994). Local and long-distance anaphora in second-language acquisition. In E. Tarone, S. Gass and A. Cohen (eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 207–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Ellis, R. (1990). Grammaticality judgments and learner variability. In H. Burmeister and P. Rounds (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Second Language Research Forum (pp. 25–60). American English Institute, University of Oregon

Emonds, J. (1978). The verbal complex V′ – V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151–75Google Scholar

Epstein, S., Flynn, S. and Martohardjono, G.. (1996). Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 677–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, S., S. Flynn and G. Martohardjono. (1998). The strong continuity hypothesis: some evidence concerning functional categories in adult L2 acquisition. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 61–77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Eubank, L. (1993). Sentence matching and processing in L2 development. Second Language Research 9: 253–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. (1993/1994). On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 183–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. (1994). Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 369–88). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Eubank, L. (1996). Negation in early German-English interlanguage: more valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research 12: 73–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L., Bischof, J., Huffstutler, A., Leek, P. and West, C.. (1997). ‘Tom eats slowly cooked eggs’: thematic-verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition 6: 171–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubank, L. and S. Grace. (1998). V-to-I and inflection in non-native grammars. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in L2 knowledge (pp. 69–88). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Felix, S. (1986). Cognition and language growth. Dordrecht: Foris

Felix, S. (1988). UG-generated knowledge in adult second language acquisition. In S. Flynn and W. O'Neil (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 277–94). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Felix, S. and Weigl, W.. (1991). Universal Grammar in the classroom: the effects of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Second Language Research 7: 162–80Google Scholar

Ferdinand, A. (1996). The development of functional categories: the acquisition of the subject in French. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics

Fernández, E. (1999). Processing strategies in second language acquisition. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 217–39). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Fernández, E. (To appear). Bilingual sentence processing: relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Fillmore, C. (1968). A case for case. In E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston

Finer, D. (1991). Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 351–74). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Finer, D. and E. Broselow. (1986). Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. In S. Berman, J.-W. Choe and J. McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16 (pp. 154–68). University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Students Association

Flege, J. E. and Liu, S.. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 527–52Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. and Liu, S.. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41: 78–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, S. (1987). A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel

Flynn, S. (1996). A parameter-setting approach to second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 121–58). San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef

Flynn, S. and G. Martohardjono. (1994). Mapping from the initial state to the final state: the separation of universal principles and language-specific principles. In B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Heads, projections and learnability (pp. 319–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Fodor, J. D. (1994). How to obey the Subset Principle: binding and locality. In B. Lust, G. Hermon and J. Kornfilt (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 2: Binding, dependencies and learnability (pp. 429–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Fodor, J. D. (1998). Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 1st person–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. D. (1999). Learnability theory: triggers for parsing with. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 363–403). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Fodor, J., Fodor, J. D. and Garrett, M.. (1975). The psychological unreality of semantic representations. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 515–31Google Scholar

Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research 17: 213–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, S. and Forster, K.. (1985). The psychological status of overgenerated sentences. Cognition 19: 101–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fukuda, M. (1993). Head government and case marker drop in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 168–72Google Scholar

Fukui, N. and Speas, M.. (1986). Specifiers and projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 128–72Google Scholar

Gass, S. (2001). Sentence matching: a reexamination. Second Language Research 17: 421–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gavruseva, L. and D. Lardiere. (1996). The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L1 acquisition. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 225–36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Gerbault, J. (1978). The acquisition of English by a five year old French speaker. Unpublished MA thesis, UCLA

Gess, R. and J. Herschensohn. (2001). Shifting the DP parameter: a study of anglophone French L2ers. In C. R. Wiltshire and J. Camps (eds.), Romance syntax, semantics and their L2 acquisition (pp. 105–19). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Gibson, E. and Wexler, K.. (1994). Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 407–54Google Scholar

Giorgi, A. and F. Pianesi. (1997). Tense and aspect: from semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition 1st person: 3rd person–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodluck, H. (1991). Language acquisition: a linguistic introduction. Oxford: Blackwell

Green, G. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Gregg, K. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–81). San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef

Gregg, K. (2003). SLA theory construction and assessment. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRef

Grimshaw, J. (1981). Form, function and the language acquisition device. In C. L. Baker and J. McCarthy (eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Grimshaw, J. and Rosen, S. T.. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: the developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 187–222Google Scholar

Grondin, N. and White, L.. (1996). Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition 5: 1st person–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R. and Wilson, R.. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65: 205–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruber, J. (1965). Lexical structures in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland

Guasti, M. T. (1994). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: finite and non-finite verbs. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 1st person–40Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell

Haegeman, L. (1995). Root infinitives, tense and truncated structures. Language Acquisition 4: 205–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, K. (1996). Can UG and the L1 be distinguished in L2 acquisition?Brain and Behavioral Sciences 19: 728–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. (1992). The syntactic character of thematic structure. In I. Roca (ed.), Thematic structure: its role in grammar (pp. 107–44). Dordrecht: ForisCrossRef

Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Halle, M. and A. Marantz. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Hamilton, R. (1998). Underdetermined binding of reflexives by adult Japanese-speaking learners of English. Second Language Research 14: 292–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, J. (1991). The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 27–62Google Scholar

Hawkins, R. (1998). The inaccessibility of formal features of functional categories in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Pacific Second Language Research Forum, Tokyo

Hawkins, R. (2000). Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 34: 75–90Google Scholar

Hawkins, R. (2001a). Second language syntax: a generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell

Hawkins, R. (2001b). The theoretical significance of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17: 345–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, R. and Chan, Y.-H. C.. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research 13: 187–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haznedar, B. (1997). L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: evidence for L1 influence. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 245–56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Haznedar, B. (2001). The acquisition of the Inflection Phrase system in child L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 1st person–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haznedar, B. and B. D. Schwartz. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–68). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Herschensohn, J. (2000). The second time round: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Hilles, S. (1991). Access to Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 305–38). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Hirakawa, M. (1990). A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research 6: 60–85Google Scholar

Hirakawa, M. (1995). L2 acquisition of English unaccusative constructions. In D. MacLaughlin and S. McEwen (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 291–302). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Hirakawa, M. (1999). L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs by speakers of English and Chinese. In K. Kanno (ed.), The acquisition of Japanese as a second language (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Hirakawa, M. (2000). Unaccusativity in second language Japanese and English. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, McGill University

Hirakawa, M. (2001). L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 221–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsh-Pasek, K., Treiman, R. and Schneiderman, M.. (1984). Brown and Hanlon revisited: mothers' sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language 11: 81–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekstra, T. and Hyams, N.. (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua 106: 81–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekstra, T., N. Hyams and M. Becker. (1999). The role of the specifier and finiteness in early grammar. In D. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett and G. Tsoulas (eds.), Specifiers: minimalist approaches (pp. 251–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Hornstein, N. and D. Lightfoot (eds.). (1981). Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition. London: Longman

Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74Google Scholar

Hulk, A. (1991). Parameter setting and the acquisition of word order in L2 French. Second Language Research 7: 1st person–34Google Scholar

Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel

Hyams, N. (1992). The genesis of clausal structure. In J. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement (pp. 371–400). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Hyams, N. (1994). V2, null arguments and COMP projections. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 21–55). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Hyams, N. (1996). The underspecification of functional categories in early grammar. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 91–127). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Hyams, N. and K. Safir. (1991). Evidence, analogy and passive knowledge: comments on Lakshmanan. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 411–18). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Hyams, N. and Sigurjonsdottir, S.. (1990). The development of ‘long-distance anaphora’: a cross-linguistic comparison with special reference to Icelandic. Language Acquisition 1st person: 57–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. and N. Abrahamsson. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRef

Iatridou, S. (1990). About Agrpreposition. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 551–7Google Scholar

Inagaki, S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese learners' acquisition of the narrow-range rules for the dative alternation in English. Language Learning 47: 637–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inagaki, S. (2001). Motion verbs with goal prepositional phrases in the L2 acquisition of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 153–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inagaki, S. (2002). Japanese learners' acquisition of English manner-of-motion verbs with locational/directional prepositional phrases. Second Language Research 18: 3rd person–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ionin, T. and Wexler, K.. (2002). Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research 18: 95–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Izumi, S. and Lakshmanan, U.. (1998). Learnability, negative evidence, and the L2 acquisition of the English passive. Second Language Research 14: 62–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Jackendoff, R. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51: 639–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris

Jaeggli, O. and N. Hyams. (1988). Morphological uniformity and the setting of the null subject parameter. Proceedings of NELS 18 (pp. 238–53). University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Students Association

Jaeggli, O. and K. Safir. (1989). The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 1–44). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Johnson, J. and Newport, E.. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition 39: 215–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juffs, A. (1996a). Learnability and the lexicon: theories and second language acquisition research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Juffs, A. (1996b). Semantics-syntax correspondences in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 12: 177–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juffs, A. (2000). An overview of the second language acquisition of links between verb semantics and morpho-syntax. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 187–227). Oxford: Blackwell

Juffs, A. and Harrington, M.. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 483–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juffs, A. and Harrington, M.. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning 46: 283–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanno, K. (1996). The status of a nonparameterized principle in the L2 initial state. Language Acquisition 5: 317–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanno, K. (1997). The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers. Second Language Research 13: 265–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanno, K. (1998a). Consistency and variation in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 14: 376–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanno, K. (1998b). The stability of UG principles in second language acquisition. Linguistics 36: 1125–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanno, K. (1999). Case and the ECP revisited: reply to Kellerman and Yoshioka (1999). Second Language Research 16: 267–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katada, F. (1991). The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 287–313Google Scholar

Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Kellerman, E., J. van Ijzendoorn and H. Takashima. (1999). Retesting a universal: the Empty Category Principle and learners of (pseudo)Japanese. In K. Kanno (ed.), The acquisition of Japanese as a second language (pp. 71–87). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Kellerman, E. and Yoshioka, K.. (1999). Inter- and intra-population consistency: a comment on Kanno (1998). Second Language Research 15: 101–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, M., B. Landau and C. Phillips. (1999). Cross-linguistic differences in children's syntax for locative verbs. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield and C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 337–48). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Klein, E. (1993a). A problem for UG in L2 acquisition. Issues in Applied Linguistics 4: 33–56Google Scholar

Klein, E. (1993b). Toward second language acquisition: a study of null-prep. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Klein, E. (1995a). Evidence for a ‘wild’ L2 grammar: when prepositional phrases rear their empty heads. Applied Linguistics 16: 87–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, E. (1995b). Second versus third language acquisition: is there a difference?Language Learning 45: 419–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, E. (2001). (Mis)construing null prepositions in L2 intergrammars: a commentary and proposal. Second Language Research 17: 37–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, E. and G. Martohardjono. (1999). Investigating second language grammars: some conceptual and methodological issues in generative SLA research. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative perspective (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge

Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Lakshmanan, U. (1993/1994). ‘The boy for the cookie’ – some evidence for the nonviolation of the case filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 55–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakshmanan, U. (2000). Clause structure in child second language grammars. In A. Juffs, T. Talpas, G. Mizera and B. Burtt (eds.), Proceedings of GASLA IV (pp. 15–39). University of Pittsburgh Working Papers in Linguistics

Lakshmanan, U. and Selinker, L.. (1994). The status of Complementizer Phrase and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammars of English. Second Language Research 10: 25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakshmanan, U. and Selinker, L.. (2001). Analysing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know?Second Language Research 17: 393–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landau, B. and L. Gleitman. (1985). Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Lantolf, J. (1990). Reassessing the null-subject parameter in second language acquisition. In H. Burmeister and P. Rounds (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Second Language Research Forum (pp. 429–52). American English Institute, University of Oregon

Lardiere, D. (1998a). Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research 14: 1st person–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lardiere, D. (1998b). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14: 359–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lardiere, D. (1998c). Parameter-resetting in morphology: evidence from compounding. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 283–305). Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Lardiere, D. (1999). Suppletive agreement in second language acquisition. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield and C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 386–96). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–29). Oxford: Blackwell

Lardiere, D. and Schwartz, B. D.. (1997). Feature-marking in the L2 development of deverbal compounds. Journal of Linguistics 33: 327–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, D. and Schachter, J.. (1997). Sensitive period effects in binding theory. Language Acquisition 6: 333–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leung, Y.-K. I. (2001). The initial state of L3A: full transfer and failed features? In X. Bonch-Bruevich, W. Crawford, J. Hellerman, C. Higgins and H. Nguyen (eds.), The past, present and future of second language research: selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 55–75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Levin, B. and M. Rappaport-Hovav. (1995). Unaccusativity: at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Liceras, J. (1986). Linguistic theory and second language acquisition. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag

Liceras, J. (1997). The then and now of L2 growing pains. In L. Díaz and C. Pérez (eds.), Views on the acquisition and use of a second language (pp. 65–85). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Liceras, J. and Díaz, L.. (2000). Triggers in L2 acquisition: the case of Spanish N-N compounds. Studia Linguistica 54: 197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, D. (1989). The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 12: 321–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, D. (1999a). Creoles and cues. In M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 431–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Lightfoot, D. (1999b). The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell

Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 251–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, M. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRef

Lumsden, J. (1992). Underspecification in grammatical and natural gender. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 469–86Google Scholar

Lust, B. (1994). Functional projection of Complementizer Phrase and phrase structure parameterization: an argument for the strong continuity hypothesis. In B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds.), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 1: Heads, projections and learnability (pp. 85–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Lust, B., S. Flynn and C. Foley. (1996). What children know about what they say: elicited imitation as a research tool for assessing children's syntax. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee and H. S. Cairns (eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax (pp. 55–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

MacLaughlin, D. (1996). Second language acquisition of English reflexives: is there hope beyond transfer. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 453–64). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

MacLaughlin, D. (1998). The acquisition of the morphosyntax of English reflexives by non-native speakers. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 195–226). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Manzini, R. and Wexler, K.. (1987). Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 413–44Google Scholar

Marantz, A. (1995). The minimalist program. In G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program (pp. 349–82). Oxford: Blackwell

Martohardjono, G. (1993). Wh-movement in the acquisition of a second language: a crosslinguistic study of three languages with and without movement. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, Cornell University

Martohardjono, G. (1998). Measuring competence in L2 acquisition: commentary on Part II. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 151–7). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Martohardjono, G. and J. Gair. (1993). Apparent UG inaccessibility in second language acquisition: misapplied principles or principled misapplications? In F. Eckman (ed.), Confluence: linguistics, L2 acquisition and speech pathology (pp. 79–103). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Mazurkewich, I. (1984a). Dative questions and markedness. In F. Eckman, L. Bell and D. Nelson (eds.), Universals of second language acquisition (pp. 119–31). Rowley, MA: Newbury House

Mazurkewich, I. (1984b). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning 34: 91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazurkewich, I. and White, L.. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation: unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition 16: 261–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McDaniel, D., Cairns, H. S. and Hsu., J. R. (1990). Binding principle in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition 1st person: 121–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDaniel, D., C. McKee and H. S. Cairns. (1996). Methods for assessing children's syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Meador, D. J. E. Flege and MacKay, I.. (2000). Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3rd person: 55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In K. Hyltenstam and L. Obler (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss (pp. 13–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Meisel, J. (1991). Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language learning: some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 231–76). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Meisel, J. (1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13: 227–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meisel, J., Clahsen, H. and Pienemann, M.. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3rd person: 109–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montalbetti, M. (1984). After binding: on the interpretation of pronouns. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT

Montrul, S. (2000). Transitivity alternations in L2 acquisition: toward a modular view of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 229–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montrul, S. (2001a). Agentive verbs of manner of motion in Spanish and English as second languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 171–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montrul, S. (2001b). First-language-constrained variability in the second-language acquisition of argument-structure-changing morphology with causative verbs. Second Language Research 17: 144–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montrul, S. and R. Slabakova. (2001). Is native-like competence possible in L2 acquisition? Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Montrul, S. and R. Slabakova. (2002). Acquiring morphosyntactic and semantic properties of aspectual tenses in L2 Spanish. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and J. Liceras (eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: the L1/L2 connection (pp. 113–49). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Montrul, S. and Slabakova, R.. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: an investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition25.3Google Scholar

Müller, N. (1998). UG access without parameter setting: a longitudinal study of (L1 Italian) German as a second language. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in L2 knowledge (pp. 115–63). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Müller, N. and Hulk, A.. (2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3rd person: 227–44Google Scholar

Murphy, V. (1997). Level-ordering and dual-mechanisms as explanations of L2 grammars. In M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 410–21). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Neeleman, A. and Weerman, F.. (1997). L1 and L2 word order acquisition. Language Acquisition 6: 125–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systems of foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics 9: 115–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newport, E. and R. Aslin. (2000). Innately constrained learning: blending old and new approaches to language acquisition. In C. Howell, S. Fish and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 1–21). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Noguchi, T. (1997). Two types of pronouns and variable binding. Language 73: 770–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Grady, W. (1987). Principles of grammar and learning. Chicago: Chicago University Press

O'Grady, W. (1996). Language acquisition without Universal Grammar: a general nativist proposal for L2 learning. Second Language Research 12: 374–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Grady, W. (1997). Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

O'Grady, W. (2003). The radical middle: nativism without Universal Grammar. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: BlackwellCrossRef

Oshita, H. (1997). The unaccusative trap: L2 acquisition of English intransitive verbs. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Southern California

Oshita, H. (2000). What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: a corpus study of ‘passive’ unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research 16: 293–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge

Papp, S. (2000). Stable and developmental optionality in native and non-native Hungarian grammars. Second Language Research 16: 173–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paradis, J. and Genesee, F.. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: autonomous or interdependent. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 1st person–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parodi, T., Schwartz, B. D. and Clahsen, H.. (1997). On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 15: 1st person–43Google Scholar

Patkowski, M. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning 30: 440–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pérez-Leroux, A. T. and W. Glass. (1997). OPC effects in the L2 acquisition of Spanish. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and W. Glass (eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish. Vol. 1: Developing grammars (pp. 149–65). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Pérez-Leroux, A. T. and Glass, W.. (1999). Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research 15: 220–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pérez-Leroux, A. T. and X. Li. (1998). Selectivity in the acquisition of complex noun phrase islands. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 148–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Peters, A. (1985). Language segmentation: operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: The theoretical issues (pp. 1029–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Phillips, C. (1995). Syntax at age two: cross-linguistic differences. In C. Schütze, J. Ganger and K. Broihier (eds.), Papers on language processing and acquisition. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 325–82

Phillips, C. (1996). Root infinitives are finite. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Arnitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 588–99). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Pica, P. (1987). On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In J. McDonough and B. Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society (pp. 483–500). University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA

Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow and Co

Platzack, C. (1986). The position of the finite verb in Swedish. In H. Haider and M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 27–47). Dordrecht: ForisCrossRef

Platzack, C. (1996). The initial hypothesis of syntax: a minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 369–414). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Platzack, C. and Holmberg, A.. (1989). The role of AGR and finiteness. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 43: 51–76Google Scholar

Poeppel, D. and Wexler, K.. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69: 1st person–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of Inflection Phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424Google Scholar

Pollock, J.-Y. (1997). Notes on clause structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax (pp. 237–79). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Prévost, P. (1997). Truncation in second language acquisition. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, McGill University

Prévost, P. and L. White. (2000a). Accounting for morphological variation in L2 acquisition: truncation or missing inflection? In M.-A. Friedemann and L. Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax (pp. 202–35). London: Longman

Prévost, P. and White, L.. (2000b). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16: 103–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Progovac, L. (1992). Relativized subject: long-distance reflexives without movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 671–80Google Scholar

Progovac, L. (1993). Long-distance reflexives: movement-to-Infl vs. relativized subject. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 755–72Google Scholar

Progovac, L. and P. Connell. (1991). Long-distance reflexives, Agr-subjects, and acquisition. Paper presented at the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell

Radford, A. (1997). Syntactic theory and the structure of English: a minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Reinhart, T. and Reuland, E.. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720Google Scholar

Rice, K. and P. Avery. (1995). Variability in a deterministic model of language acquisition: a theory of segmental acquisition. In J. Archibald (ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory (pp. 23–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Ritchie, W. and T. Bhatia (eds.). (1999). Handbook of child language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press

Ritter, E. (1991). Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 37–62). San Diego: Academic Press

Ritter, E. (1992). Cross-linguistic evidence for number phrase. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritter, E. (1993). Where's gender?Linguistic Inquiry 24: 795–803Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris

Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–57Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge: MIT Press

Rizzi, L. (1993/1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: the case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 371–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, L. (1994). Early null subjects and root null subjects. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 151–76). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Rizzi, L. (2000). Remarks on early null subjects. In M.-A. Friedemann and L. Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax: studies in comparative developmental linguistics (pp. 269–92). London: Longman

Rizzi, L. and Roberts, I.. (1989). Complex inversion in French. Probus 1st person: 1st person–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research 16: 135–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, D. and A. Sorace. (1999). Losing the V2 constraint. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 317–61). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Rochette, A. (1988). Semantic and syntactic aspects of Romance sentential complementation. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT

Roeper, T. and J. de Villiers. (1992). Ordered decisions in the acquisition of wh-questions. In J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck and T. Roeper (eds.), Theoretical issues in language acquisition: continuity and change in development (pp. 191–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Roeper, T. and J. Weissenborn. (1990). How to make parameters work: comment on Valian. In L. Frazier and J. de Villiers (eds.), Language processing and language acquisition (pp. 147–62). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Rohrbacher, B. (1994). The Germanic VO languages and the full paradigm: a theory of V to I raising. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Rohrbacher, B. (1999). Morphology-driven syntax: a theory of V to I raising and pro-drop. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT

Rumelhart, D. E. and M. J. L. (1987). Learning the past tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 195–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT

Sawyer, M. (1996). L1 and L2 sensitivity to semantic constraints on argument structure. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 646–57). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Schachter, J. (1988). Second language acquisition and its relationship to Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics 9: 219–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, J. (1989). Testing a proposed universal. In S. Gass and J. Schachter (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 73–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Schachter, J. (1990). On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 6: 93–124Google Scholar

Schachter, J. (1996). Maturation and the issue of Universal Grammar in L2 acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 159–93). New York: Academic Press

Schachter, J. and Yip, V.. (1990). Grammaticality judgments: why does anyone object to subject extraction?Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 379–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaeffer, J. (2000). Direct object scrambling and clitic placement: syntax and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Schütze, C. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Schütze, C. and K. Wexler. (1996). Subject case-licensing and English root infinitives. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes and A. Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 670–81). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Schwartz, B. D. (1987). The modular basis of second language acquisition. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Southern California

Schwartz, B. D. (1990). Un-motivating the motivation for the fundamental difference hypothesis. In H. Burmeister and P. Rounds (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Second Language Research Forum (pp. 667–84). American English Institute, University of Oregon

Schwartz, B. D. (1991). Conceptual and empirical evidence: a response to Meisel. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 277–304). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and ‘linguistic behavior’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 147–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. (1997). On the basis of the Basic Variety. Second Language Research 13: 386–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. (1998a). On two hypotheses of ‘Transfer’ in L2A: minimal trees and absolute L1 influence. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 35–59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Schwartz, B. D. (1998b). The second language instinct. Lingua 106: 133–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. and Eubank, L.. (1996). What is the ‘L2 initial state’?Second Language Research 12: 1st person–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. and Gubala-Ryzak, M.. (1992). Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: against negative evidence causing unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research 8: 1st person–38Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. and R. Sprouse. (1994). Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317–68). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Schwartz, B. D. and Sprouse, R.. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. and R. Sprouse. (2000a). The use and abuse of linguistic theory in L2 acquisition research. In A. Juffs, T. Talpas, G. Mizera and B. Burtt (eds.), Proceedings of GASLA IV (pp. 176–87). University of Pittsburgh Working Papers in Linguistics

Schwartz, B. D. and R. Sprouse. (2000b). When syntactic theories evolve: consequences for L2 acquisition research. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 156–86). Oxford: Blackwell

Schwartz, B. D. and A. Tomaselli. (1990). Some implications from an analysis of German word order. In W. Abraham, W. Kosmeijer and E. Reuland (eds.), Issues in Germanic syntax (pp. 251–74). Berlin: Walter de GruyterCrossRef

Schwartz, B. D. and S. Vikner. (1996). The verb always leaves Inflection Phrase in V2 clauses. In A. Belletti and L. Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and functional heads: essays in comparative syntax (pp. 11–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 209–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sells, P. (1984). The syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Slabakova, R. (2000). L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers. Linguistics 38: 739–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2001). Telicity in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Smith, N. and I.-M. Tsimpli. (1995). The mind of a savant. Oxford: Blackwell

Snow, C. and M. Hoefnagel-Hohle. (1978). Age differences in second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (ed.), Second language acquisition: a book of readings. Rowley, MA: Newbury House

Snyder, W. (1995a). Language acquisition and language variation: the role of morphology. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT

Snyder, W. (1995b). A neo-Davidsonian approach to resultatives, particles and datives. In J. Beckman (ed.) Proceedings of NELS 25 (pp. 457–71). University of Massachusetts at Amherst, GLSA

Snyder, W., Senghas, A. and Inman, K.. (2002). Agreement morphology and the acquisition of noun-drop in Spanish. Language Acquisition 9: 157–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, W. and Stromswold, K.. (1997). The structure and acquisition of English dative constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 281–317Google Scholar

Sorace, A. (1993a). Incomplete and divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research 9: 22–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorace, A. (1993b). Unaccusativity and auxiliary choice in non-native grammars of Italian and French: asymmetries and predictable indeterminacy. Journal of French Language Studies 3rd person: 71–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In T. Bhatia and W. Ritchie (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. New York: Academic PressCrossRef

Sorace, A. (1999). Initial states, end-states and residual optionality in L2 acquisition. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield and C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 666–74). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Sorace, A. (2000). Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers. In C. Howell, S. Fish and T. Keith-Lucas (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 719–25). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Sorace, A. (2003). Optimality as a feature of L2 end-state grammars. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell

Sprouse, R. (1997). The acquisition of German and the ‘Initial Hypothesis of Syntax’: a reply to Platzack. In W. Abraham and E. van Gelderen (eds.), German: syntactic problems – problematic syntax (pp. 307–17). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer VerlagCrossRef

Sprouse, R. (1998). Some notes on the relationship between inflectional morphology and parameter setting in first and second language acquisition. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 41–67). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of phrase-structure. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT

Stromswold, K. (1996). Analyzing children's spontaneous speech. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee and H. S. Cairns (eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax (pp. 23–53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Thiersch, C. (1978). Topics in German syntax. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT

Thomas, M. (1991a). Do second language learners have ‘rogue’ grammars of anaphora. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 375–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Thomas, M. (1991b). Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language 67: 211–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, M. (1993). Knowledge of reflexives in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Thomas, M. (1994). Young children's hypotheses about English reflexives. In J. Sokolov and C. Snow (eds.), Handbook of research in language development using CHILDES (pp. 254–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Thomas, M. (1995). Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form. Second Language Research 11: 206–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, M. (1998). Binding and related issues in second language acquisition: commentary on Part III. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 261–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Thráinsson, H. (1996). On the (non-) universality of functional categories. In W. Abraham, S. Epstein, H. Thráinsson and J.-W. Zwart (eds.), Minimal ideas: syntactic studies in the minimalist framework (pp. 253–81). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Tiphine, U. (undated). The acquisition of English negation by four French children. University of Kiel

Trahey, M. (1996). Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long term effects. Second Language Research 12: 111–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trahey, M. and White, L.. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 181–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Travis, L. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order variation. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, MIT

Travis, L. (1988). The syntax of adverbs. Special Issue on Comparative German Syntax. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics: 280–310Google Scholar

Tsimpli, I.-M. and Roussou, A.. (1991). Parameter resetting in L2?, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3rd person: 149–69Google Scholar

Underhill, R. (1976). Turkish Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Vainikka, A. (1993/1994). Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition 3rd person: 257–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vainikka, A. and M. Young-Scholten. (1994). Direct access to X'-theory: evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 265–316). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Vainikka, A. and Young-Scholten, M.. (1996a). The early stages of adult L2 syntax: additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research 12: 140–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vainikka, A. and Young-Scholten, M.. (1996b). Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research 12: 7–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vainikka, A. and M. Young-Scholten. (1998). Morphosyntactic triggers in adult SLA. In M.-L. Beck (ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

Valian, V. (1990). Null subjects: a problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition. Cognition 35: 105–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Valois, D. (1991). The internal syntax of DP. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, UCLA

Verrips, M. and J. Weissenborn. (1992). Verb placement in early German and French: the independence of finiteness and agreement. In J. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition (pp. 283–331). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

Vikner, S. (1995). Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Vikner, S. (1997). V-to-I movement and inflection for person in all tenses. In L. Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax (pp. 189–213). London: Longman

Webelhuth, G. (1995). X-bar theory and case theory. Government and binding theory and the minimalist program (pp. 15–95). Oxford: Blackwell

Weissenborn, J. and B. Höhle (eds.). (2001). Approaches to bootstrapping: phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Werker, J. and Tees, R.. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behaviour and Development 7: 49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein (eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106: 23–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wexler, K. (1999). Maturation and growth of grammar. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 55–109). San Diego: Academic Press

Wexler, K. and R. Manzini. (1987). Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 41–76). Dordrecht: ReidelCrossRef

White, L. (1982). Grammatical theory and language acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris

White, L. (1985a). Is there a logical problem of second language acquisition?TESL Canada 2nd person: 29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. (1985b). The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 35: 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. (1986). Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: an investigation of the ‘pro-drop’ parameter. In V. Cook (ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 55–72). Oxford: Pergamon Press

White, L. (1987a). Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics 8: 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. (1987b). Markedness and second language acquisition: the question of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 261–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. (1988). Island effects in second language acquisition. In S. Flynn and W. O'Neil (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 144–72). Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRef

White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

White, L. (1990). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 121–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. (1990/1991). The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 1st person: 337–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. (1991a). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7: 133–61Google Scholar

White, L. (1991b). Argument structure in second language acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies 1st person: 189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. (1992a). Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 273–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. (1992b). On triggering data in L2 acquisition: a reply to Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak. Second Language Research 8: 120–37Google Scholar

White, L. (1992c). Subjacency violations and empty categories in L2 acquisition. In H. Goodluck and M. Rochemont (eds.), Island Constraints (pp. 445–64). Dordrecht: Kluwer

White, L. (1995a). Chasing after linguistic theory: how minimal should we be? In L. Eubank, L. Selinker and M. Sharwood Smith (eds.), The current state of interlanguage: studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp. 63–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins

White, L. (1995b). Input, triggers and second language acquisition: can binding be taught? In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileman and R. Rutkowski Weber (eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 63–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

White, L. (1996a). Clitics in L2 French. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 335–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins

White, L. (1996b). Universal grammar and second language acquisition: current trends and new directions. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 85–120). New York: Academic Press

White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition: from initial to final state. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 130–55): Blackwell

White, L. (2002). Morphological variability in endstate L2 grammars: the question of L1 influence. In A. Do, S. Fish, and B. Skarabela (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 758–68). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

White, L., C. Brown, J. Bruhn de Garavito, D. Chen, M. Hirakawa and S. Montrul. (1999). Psych verbs in second language acquisition. In G. Martohardjono and E. Klein (eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative approach (pp. 173–99). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRef

White, L., Bruhn-Garavito, J., Kawasaki, T., Pater, J. and Prévost, P.. (1997). The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding. Language Learning 47: 145–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. and Genesee, F.. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research 11: 233–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L., Hirakawa, M. and Kawasaki, T.. (1996). Effects of instruction on second language acquisition of the Japanese long distance reflexive zibun. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 41: 235–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. and A. Juffs. (1998). Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: competence and processing. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 111–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. and Ranta, L.. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics 12: 416–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L., E. Valenzuela, M. Macgregor, Y.-K. I. Leung and H. Ben-Ayed. (2001). The status of abstract features in interlanguage grammars: gender and number in L2 Spanish. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez and A. Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 792–802). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Whong-Barr, M. and Schwartz, B. D.. (2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 579–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, E. (1981). Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1st person: 81–114Google Scholar

Williams, E. (1994). Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Williams, E. (1995). Theta theory. In G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program (pp. 99–124). Oxford: Blackwell

Yip, V. (1995). Interlanguage and learnability: from Chinese to English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Yoo, M., Y. Kayama, M. Mazzotta and L. White. (2001). Case drop in L2 Japanese. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez and A. Johansen (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 825–34). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Yuan, B. (1998). Interpretation of binding and orientation of the Chinese reflexive ziji by English and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research 14: 324–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yuan, B. (2001). The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese. Second Language Research 17: 248–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xu, L. and Langendoen, T.. (1985). Topic structures in Chinese. Language 61: 1st person–27Google Scholar

Zobl, H. (1989). Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In S. Gass and J. Schachter (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 203–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Zobl, H. and Liceras, J.. (1994). Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning 44: 159–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. (1993). Dutch syntax: a minimalist approach. Unpublished prepositionhD thesis, University of Groningen