Arrington, Theodore S. and Brenner, Saul. 2004. “Strategic Voting for Damage Control on the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 57:565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrington, Theodore S. and Brenner, Saul. 2008. “Testing Murphy's Strategic Model: Assigning the Majority Opinion to the Marginal Justice in the Conference Coalition on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 36:416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. 2007. The Supreme Court. 9th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence and Hausegger, Lori. 2004. “The Supreme Court and Congress: Reconsidering the Relationship.” In Miller, Mark C. and Barnes, Jeb (Eds.), Making Policy, Making Law: An Interbranch Perspective, pp. 107–122. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Benesh, Sara C. 2003. “Harold J. Spaeth: The Supreme Court Computer.” In Maveety, Nancy (Ed.), The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior, pp. 116–147. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blaustein, Albert P. and Mersky, Roy M.. 1978. The First One Hundred Justices. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar

Bonneau, Chris W. and Hammond, Thomas H.. 2005. “Do We Really Know It Because We See It? Reconceptualizing ‘Strategic Behavior’ on the United States Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, Sept. 1–4.

Bonneau, Chris W., Hammond, Thomas H., Maltzman, Forrest, and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 2007. “Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 51:890–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boucher, Robert L.. and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1995. “Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court.” Journal of Politics 57:824–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braman, Eileen and Nelson, Thomas E. 2007. “Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analytical Perceptions in Discrimination Disputes.” American Journal of Political Science 51:940–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul. 1975. “The Shapley-Shubik Power Index and Supreme Court Behavior.” Jurimetrics Journal 15:194–205.Google Scholar

Brenner, Saul. 1979a. “The New Certiorari Game.” Journal of Politics 412:649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul. 1979b. “Minimum Winning Coalitions on the United States Supreme Court: A Comparison of the Original Vote on the Merits with the Opinion Vote.” American Politics Quarterly 7:384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul. 1989. “Fluidity on the United States Supreme Court: A Reexamination.” In Goldman, Sheldon and Sarat, Austin (Eds.), American Court Systems, 2nd ed., pp. 479–483. New York: Longman Inc.Google Scholar

Brenner, Saul. 2003. “David Rohde: Rational Choice Theorist.” In Maveety, Nancy (Ed.), The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior, pp. 270–288. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Brenner, Saul and Arrington, Theodore S. 1980. “Some Effect of Ideology and Threat Upon the Size of Opinion Coalitions on the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Political Science 8:49–58.Google Scholar

Brenner, Saul and Dorff, Robert. 1992. “The Attitudinal Model and Fluidity Voting on the United States Supreme Court: A Theoretical Perspective.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 4:195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul, Hagle, Timothy, and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1989. “The Defection of the Marginal Justice on the Warren Court.” Western Political Quarterly 42:409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul and Krol, John F.. 1989. “Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 51:824–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul and Spaeth, Harold J. 1988. “Majority Opinion Assignments and the Maintenance of the Original Coalition on the Warren Court.” American Journal of Political Science 32:72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1995. Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court, 1946–1992. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenner, Saul and , Joseph M.Whitmeyer, ND. “At Whose Ideal Point Will the Majority Opinion Be Written on the United States Supreme Court?” Unpublished paper, on file, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, Department of Sociology.

Brenner, Saul, Whitmeyer, Joseph M., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2006. “The Outcome-Prediction Strategy in Cases Denied Review by the U.S. Supreme Court.” Public Choice 130:225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan and Stephenson, Matthew. 2006. “Informative Precedent and Intrajudicial Communication.” In Rogers, James R., Flemming, Roy B., and Bond, Jon R. (Eds.), Institutional Games and the U.S. Supreme Court, pp. 205–229. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Caldiera, Gregory A. and Wright, John R.. 1988. “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82:1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Charles M., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Songer, Donald R.. 2000. “Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions.” American Political Science Review 94:101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Jeremy. 2001. The Liar's Tale. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Collins, Paul M.. 2008. “The Consistency of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 70:861–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, Frank B. 1998. “The Justices of Strategy.” Duke Law Journal 48:511–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickson, Del. 2001. The Supreme Court in Conference (1940–1985): The Private Discussion Behind Nearly 300 Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dorff, Robin H. and Brenner, Saul. 1992. “Conformity Voting on the United States Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 54:762–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Ekeh, Peter P. 1974. Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Segal, Jeffrey A., Spaeth, Harold J., and Walker, Thomas G.. 2007. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments. 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

George, Tracy E. and Epstein, Lee. 1992. “On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 86:323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerhart, Michael J. 2008. The Power of Precedent. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, James L., Caldiera, Gregory A., and Spencer, Lester Kenyatta. 2003. “Measuring Attitudes Toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47:354–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giles, Micheal W., Blackstone, Bethany, and Vining, Richard L.. 2008. “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 70:293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillman, Howard. 1999. “The Court as an Idea, Not a Building (or a Game): Interpretive Institutionalism and the Analysis of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard (Eds.), Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutional Approaches, pp. 65–87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Green, Donald P. and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hagle, Timothy M. and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1991. “Voting Fluidity and the Attitudinal Model of Supreme Court Decision Making.” Western Political Quarterly 44:119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Thomas H., Bonneau, Chris W., and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1999. “Toward a Rational Choice Spatial Model of Supreme Court Decision-Making: Making Sense of Certiorari, the Original Vote on the Merits, Opinion Assignment, Coalition Formation and Maintenance, and the Final Vote on the Choice of Legal Doctrine.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Sept. 2–5.

Hansford, Thomas G. and Damore, David F.. 2000. “Congressional Preferences, Perceptions of Threat and Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Politics Quarterly 28:490–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansford, Thomas G. and Spriggs, James F.. 2006. The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hausegger, Lori and Baum, Lawrence. 1999. “Inviting Congressional Action: A Study of Supreme Court Motivations in Statutory Interpretations.” American Journal of Political Science 43:162–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, Joseph. 2006. “The Benefits of Cooperation.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 34:313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hettinger, Virginia A. and Zorn, Christopher. 2005. “Explaining the Incidence and Timing of Congressional Responses to the U.S. Supreme Court.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30:5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, J. Woodford. 1968. “On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice.” American Political Science Review 62:43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, Robert M. and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 2002. “An Original Look at Originalism.” Law and Society Review 36:113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Timothy R., Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 2005. “Passing and Strategic Voting on the United States Supreme Court.” Law and Society Review 39:359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Timothy R., Wahlbeck, Paul J., and Spriggs, James F.. 2006. “The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 100:99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. and Richards, Mark J.. 2003. “Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decision Making: The Lemon Regime and Establishment Clause Cases.” Law and Society Review 37:827–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. and Richards, Mark J.. 2005. “The Influence of Law in the Supreme Court's Search-and-Seizure Jurisprudence.” American Politics Research 33:33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lax, Jeffrey R. and Cameron, Charles M.. 2005. “Beyond the Median Voter: Bargaining and Law in the Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 7–10.

Lax, Jeffrey R. and Rader, Kelly T.. 2008. “Bargaining Power in the Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 3–6.

MacDonald, Paul K. 2003. “Useful Fiction or Miracle Worker: The Competing Epistemological Foundations of Rational Choice Theory.” American Political Science Review 97:551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest, Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1999. “Strategy and Judicial Choice: New Institutionalist Approaches to Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Clayton, Cornell W. and Gellman, Howard (Eds.), Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, pp. 45–63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest, Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1996. “Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court.” American Political Science Review 90:581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest and Wahlbeck, Paul J. 2004. “A Conditional Model of Opinion Assignment on the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 57:551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marks, Brian. 1989. “A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policy-Making: Grove City v Bell.” Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

McGuire, Kevin T. and Stimson, James A.. 2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revised: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics 66:1018–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Molm, Linda D. 1997. Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F., Pritchett, C. Herman, Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 2006. Courts, Judges, and Politics: An Introduction to the Judicial Process. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

O'Brien, David M. 2005. Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. 7th ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Perry, H. W.. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1995. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2008. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court: A Study of Judicial Politics and Values, 1937–1947. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Provine, Doris Marie. 1980. Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Richards, Mark J. and Kritzer, Herbert M.. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96:305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1972. “Policy Goals and Opinion Coalitions in the Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 16:208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W. and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Rosen, Jeffrey. 2006. The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Schotter, Andrew. 2006. “Strong and Wrong: The Use of Rational Choice Theory in Experimental Economics.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 18:489–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schubert, Glendon. 1958. “The Study of Judicial Decision Making as an Aspect of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 52:1007–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Law and Courts.” American Political Science Review 91:28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey A., Spaeth, Harold J., and Benesh, Sara C.. 2005. The Supreme Court in the American Legal System. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Songer, Donald R., Cameron, Charles M., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1995. “An Empirical Test of the Rational-Actor Theory of Litigation.” Journal of Politics 37:1119–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiller, Pablo. 2000. “Review of The Choices Justices Make, by Lee Epstein and Jack Knight.” American Political Science Review 94:943–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spriggs, James F., Maltzman, Forrest, and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1996. “We Have a Deal: Strategic Tactics on the Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association, Chicago, April 18–20.

Spriggs, James F., Maltzman, Forrest, and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1999. “Bargaining on the U.S. Supreme Court: Justices' Responses to Majority Opinion Drafts.” Journal of Politics 61:485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stearns, Maxwell L. 2000. Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takahashi, Nobuyuki. 2000. “The Emergence of Generalized Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 105:1105–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Time. 1972. “The Supreme Court: Deciding Whether to Decide.” December 11, 72 and 77.

Toobin, Jeffrey. 2005. “Annals of Law: Breyer's Big Idea.” New Yorker, October 31:36–40, 42–43.Google Scholar

Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1970. “The Use of Power in the Supreme Court: The Opinion Assignments of Earl Warren, 1953–1970.” Journal of Public Law 19:49–67.Google Scholar

Wahlbeck, Paul J., Spriggs, James F., and Maltzman, Forrest. 1996. “Marshalling the Court: Bargaining and Accommodation on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, March 14–16.

Westerland, Chad. 2003. “Who Owns the Majority Opinion?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 28–31.

Westerland, Chad. 2004. “Cooperative Norms on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, Sept. 2–5.

Yamagishi, Toshio and Cook, Karen S. 1993. “Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas.” Social Psychology Quarterly 56:235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zorn, Christopher J. W. 2002. “U.S. Government Litigation Strategies in the Federal Appellate Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 55:145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar