Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:02:42.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selected Bibliography of Books on Economic Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Daniel M. Hausman
Daniel M. Hausman
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Philosophy of Economics
An Anthology
 , pp. 511 - 520
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, J., , M. Levi, and Ostrom, E., eds. Competition and Cooperation: Conversations with Nobelists about Economics and Political Science.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
Aulin, A.The Origins of Economic Growth: The Fundamental Interaction between Material and Nonmaterial Values. Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R.Truth and Progress in Economic Knowledge (Advances in Economic Methodology). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R.. Explorations in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R., ed. New Directions in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R.. Methodology of Economics. London: Routledge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R., Hausman, D., and Mäki, U., eds. Economics and Methodology: Crossing Boundaries. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R., and Bateman, B., eds. The Cambridge Companion to Keynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balak, B.McCloskey's Rhetoric: Discourse Ethics in Economics.London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Balzer, W., and Hamminga, B., eds. Philosophy of Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, D., and Kuiper, E., eds. Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Barnes, T.Logics of Dislocation: Models, Metaphors, and Meanings of Economic Space. New York and London: Guilford Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Becker, G.The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Bell, D., and Kristol, I., eds. The Crisis in Economic Theory. New York: Basic Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R., Archer, M., Collier, A., Lawson, T., and Norrie, A., eds. Critical Realism. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Birner, J.Strategies and Programmes in Capital Theory: A Contribution to the Methodology of Theory Development. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, 1990.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.The Cambridge Revolution. Success or Failure?London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1975.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.. A Methodological Appraisal of Marxian Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980a.
Blaug, M.. The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980b; 2nd ed. 1992.Google Scholar
Boehm, S.et al., eds. Is There Progress in Economics? Knowledge, Truth and the History of Economic Thought. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
Boland, L.The Foundations of Economic Method. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
Boland, L.. Methodology for a New Microeconomics. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1986.Google Scholar
Boland, L.. The Methodology of Economic Model Building: Methodology after Samuelson. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Boland, L.. Critical Economic Methodology: A Personal Odyssey. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Bonar, J.Philosophy and Political Economy (1893). rpt. London: Allen & Unwin, 1967.Google Scholar
Boulding, K.Economics as a Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
Boylan, T., and Gorman, P. O'. Beyond Rhetoric and Realism in Economics: Towards a Reformulation of Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G., Kliemt, H., and Tollison, R., eds. Method and Morals in Constitutional Economics: Essays in Honor of James M. Buchanan. New York: Springer, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D.Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J.The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy. 2nd ed. (1875). rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B.Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B., ed. Appraisal and Criticism in Economics. London: Allen & Unwin, 1984.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B.. The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1993.Google Scholar
Caplin, A., and Schotter, A., eds. Perspectives on the Future of Economics: Positive and Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cory, G.The Consilient Brain: The Bioneurological Basis of Economics, Society, and Politics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullenberg, S., Amariglio, J., and Ruccio, F., eds. Postmodernism, Economics, and Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahiya, S., ed. The Current State of Economic Science. Vol. 1. Teaching of Economics, Methodology, Mathematical and Quantitative Methods. Rohtak, India: Spellbound, 1999.Google Scholar
D'Autume, A., and Cartelier, J., eds. Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science?Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Davis, J.Theory of the Individual in Economics. London: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J., ed. Recent Developments in Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Hands, D. W., and Mäki, U., eds. The Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J., Marciano, A., and Runde, J., eds. The Elgar Companion to Economic and Philosophy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delorme, R., and Dopfer, K., eds. The Political Economy of Diversity: Evolutionary Perspectives on Economic Order and Disorder. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1994.Google Scholar
Marchi, N., ed. The Popperian Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, N.. Post-Popperian Methodology of Economics: Recovering Practice. Boston: Kluwer, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, D., and Blaug, M., eds. Appraising Modern Economics: Studies in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1991.Google Scholar
Dennis, K., ed. Rationality in Economics: Alternative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, P.Science and Ideology in the Policy Sciences. New York: Aldine, 1982.Google Scholar
Dolan, E., ed. The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1976.Google Scholar
Dopfer, K., ed. Economics and Philosophy: The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, S.Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodology Approach. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar
Dow, S.. Economic Methodology: An Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Dyke, C.Philosophy of Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
Eichner, A., ed. Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 205–41.
Elster, J.Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Elster, J.. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J.. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Elster, J., and Roemer, J., eds. Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A.The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.The Logic of Economic Discovery: Neoclassical Economics and the Marginal Revolution. New York: New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S., ed. Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Foldvary, F., ed. Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.Google Scholar
Fox, G.Reason and Reality in the Methodologies of Economics: An Introduction. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, G., and McGoun, E., eds. From Individualism to the Individual: Ideology and Inquiry in Financial Economics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Fraser, L.Economic Thought and Language. A Critique of Some Fundamental Concepts. London: A & C Black, 1937.Google Scholar
Frey, B.Economics as a Science of Human Behaviour: Towards a New Social Science Paradigm. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M.Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, E.A Guide to What's Wrong with Economics. New York: Anthem Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, E., ed. Intersubjectivity in Economics: Agents and Structures. London: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gani, M.Foundations of Economic Science. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Ontario: Scholars, 2003.Google Scholar
Grönkvist, U.Economic Methodology: Patterns of Reasoning and the Structure of Theories. Lund: University of Lund, 1992.Google Scholar
Grossbard-Shechtman, S., and Clague, C., eds. The Expansion of Economics: Toward a More Inclusive Social Science. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2002.Google Scholar
Guala, F.The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, B., Knudsen, C., and Mäki, U., eds. Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Hahn, F., and Hollis, M.. Philosophy and Economic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hamminga, B.Neoclassical Theory Structure and Theory Development: An Empirical-Philosophical Case Study Concerning the Theory of International Trade. Boston: Springer, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamminga, B., and DeMarchi, N., eds. Idealization in Economics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994.Google Scholar
Hanappi, H.Evolutionary Economics: The Evolutionary Revolution in the Social Sciences. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1994.Google Scholar
Hands, D. W.Testing, Rationality and Progress. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992.Google Scholar
Hands, D. W.. Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D.Capital, Profits and Prices: An Essay in the Philosophy of Economics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Hausman, D.. Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D.. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D., and McPherson, M.Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hausman, D., and McPherson, M.. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F.The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Henderson, W., Dudley-Evans, T., and Backhouse, R., eds. Economics and Language. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.Causality in Economics. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A., and Marchi, N.. Milton Friedman: Economics in Theory and Practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, F.The Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, B.Economics as Moral Science. Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G.The Evolution of Institutional Economics. London: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, M., and Nell, E.. Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo-Classical Economics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, W., and Koopmans, T., eds. Studies in Econometric Method. New York: John Wiley, 1953.Google Scholar
Hook, S., ed. Human Values and Economic Policy. New York: New York University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hoover, K.The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Hoover, K.. Causality in Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, K.. The Methodology of Empirical Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, K., and Sheffrin, S., eds. Monetarism and the Methodology of Economics: Essays in Honour of Thomas Mayer. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1995.Google Scholar
Humphries, J., ed. Gender and Economics.Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economics (1938). rpt. with a new Preface. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1960.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. Knowledge and Ignorance in Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians and Austrians. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. The Uses and Abuses of Economics: Contentious Essays on History and Method. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. On the Methodology of Economics and the Formalist Revolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000.Google Scholar
Kamarck, A.Economics and the Real World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamarck, A.. Economics for the Twenty-First Century: The Economics of the Economist-Fox. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.Google Scholar
Katzner, D.Time, Ignorance, and Uncertainty in Economic Models. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Katouzian, H.Ideology and Method in Economics. New York: New York University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, F.Methodology of the Social Sciences. London: Oxford University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Keen, S.Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor of the Social Sciences. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. N.The Scope and Method of Political Economy (4th ed. 1917). rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1955.Google Scholar
Kincaid, H.Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I.The Economic Point of View. 2nd ed. Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1976.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I., ed. Method, Process and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honour of Ludwig von Mises. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1982.Google Scholar
Klamer, A.Conversations with Economists: New Classical Economists and Opponents Speak Out on the Current Controversy in Macroeconomics. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1984.Google Scholar
Klamer, A., McCloskey, D., and Solow, R., eds. The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Klant, J.The Rules of the Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
Kornai, J.Anti-Equilibrium: On Economic Systems Theory and the Tasks of Research. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1971.Google Scholar
Koslowski, P., ed. Economics and Philosophy. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1985.Google Scholar
Koslowski, P.. Sociobiology and Bioeconomics: The Theory of Evolution in Biological and Economic Theory. Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupp, S., ed. The Structure of Economic Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
Lapavitsas, C.Social Foundations of Markets, Money and Credit.London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Latsis, S., ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, D., ed. Economics and Hermeneutics. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Lawson, T.Economics and Reality. London: Routledge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, T.. Reorienting Economics.London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Lawson, T., and Pesaran, H.. Keynes' Economics: Methodological Issues. Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm, 1985.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, H.Beyond Economic Man: A New Foundation for Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Levine, A., Sober, E., and Wright, E.. Reconstructing Marxism. London: Verso, 1992.Google Scholar
Lewis, P., ed. Transforming Economics. London: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D., ed. On the Reliability of Economic Models: Essays in the Philosophy of Economics. Boston: Kluwer, 1993.Google Scholar
Loasby, B.Choice, Complexity and Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Loasby, B.. The Mind and Method of the Economist: A Critical Appraisal of Major Economists in the 20th Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1989.Google Scholar
Lowe, A.On Economic Knowledge. Toward a Science of Political Economics. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar
McClelland, P.Causal Explanation and Model Building in History, Economics and the New Economic History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
McClennen, E.Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D.The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D.. If You're So Smart: The Narrative of Economic Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D.. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D.. The Vices of Economists – The Virtues of the Bourgeoisie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. Essays on Economic Semantics. Ed. Miller, M.. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
Machlup, F.. Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
MacKay, A.Arrow's Theorem: The Paradox of Social Choice. A Case Study in the Philosophy of Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
McKenzie, R.The Limits of Economic Science. Boston: Kluwer, 1983.Google Scholar
Marr, W., and Raj, B., eds. How Economists Explain: A Reader in Methodology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1983.Google Scholar
Mayer, T.Truth versus Precision in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1993.Google Scholar
Mayer, T., Hoover, K., and Sheffrin, S., eds. Monetarism and the Methodology of Economics: Essays in Honour of Thomas Mayer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Mäki, U.Studies in Realism and Explanation in Economics. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1990.Google Scholar
Mäki, U.. Realism and Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Mäki, U., ed. The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäki, U.. Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Medema, S., ed. Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidinger, C.Science Économique: Questions de Méthode. Paris: Vuibert, 1994.Google Scholar
Menger, C. Problems of Economics and Sociology (1883). Ed. Schneider, L., tr. F. Nock. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.A System of Logic (1843). rpt. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1949.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P.Against Mechanism: Protecting Economics from Science. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1988.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P.. More Heat than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P.. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P.. The Effortless Economy of Science?Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P., ed. The Reconstruction of Economic Theory. Boston: Kluwer, 1986.Google Scholar
Mises, L.. Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Mises, L.. Epistemological Problems of Economics. tr. G. Reisman. New York: New York University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Mises, L.. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method. 2nd ed. Kansas City, MO: Sheed Andrews, 1978.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosini, V. ed. Equilibrium in Economics. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Mulberg, J.Social Limits to Economic Theory. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G.The Political Element in the Development of Economic Thought. Tr. P. Streeten. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G.. Objectivity in Social Research. London: Duckworth, 1970.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.Economics as Religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond. College Station: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., and Winter, S.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Neuberg, L.Conceptual Anomalies in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P.Economic Methodology and Freedom to Choose. London: Allen & Unwin, 1987.Google Scholar
Oakley, A.Reconstructing Economic Theory: The Problem of Human Agency. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
Ochangco, A.Rationality in Economic Thought: Methodological Ideas on the History of Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.Google Scholar
Omerod, P.The Death of Economics. New York: Wiley, 1997.Google Scholar
Pani, N.Inclusive Economics: Gandhian Method and Contemporary Policy. New Delhi and London: Sage Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
Papandreou, A.Economics as a Science. Chicago: Lippincott, 1958.Google Scholar
Parson, T.The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Pheby, J.Methodology and Economics: A Critical Introduction. London: Macmillan, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, J., ed. Philosophy in Economics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, S.Models and Reality in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998.Google Scholar
Reder, M.Economics: The Culture of a Controversial Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Redman, D.Economic Methodology: A Bibliography with References to Works in the Philosophy of Science, 1860–1988. New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Redman, D.. Economics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Redman, D.. The Rise of Political Economy as a Science: Methodology and the Classical Economists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Reiss, J.Error in Economics: Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology. London: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L.An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1935. 3rd ed. 1983.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.Economic Philosophy. Chicago: Aldine, 1962.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A.Microeconomic Laws: A Philosophical Analysis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A.. Economics – Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Ross, D.Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M.The Logic of Action I: Method, Money, and the Austrian School. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Rothschild, K.Ethics and Economic Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1993.Google Scholar
Rothschild, K. Economic Method, Theory and Policy: Selected Essays of Kurt W. Rothschild. Ed. King, J.. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1995.Google Scholar
Roy, S.Philosophy of Economics: On the Scope of Reason in Economic Inquiry. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Ruccio, D., and Amariglio, J.. Postmodern Moments in Modern Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Runde, J., and Mizuhara, S., eds. The Philosophy of Keynes's Economics: Probability, Uncertainty and Convention. London: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanti, A., and Screpanti, E., eds. Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Samuels, W., ed. The Methodology of Economic Thought: Critical Papers from the Journal of Economic Thought [Issues]. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Samuels, W.. History and Methodology of Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Samuels, W.. Economics as Discourse. Boston: Kluwer, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, W., and Biddle, J., eds. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. Vol. 16. London: JAI Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Sassower, R.Philosophy of Economics: A Critique of Demarcation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985.Google Scholar
Schoeffler, S.The Failures of Economics: A Diagnostic Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrader, D.The Corporation as Anomaly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Sen, A.On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Senior, N.Outline of the Science of Political Economy (1836). rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Shackle, G.Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.Science Policy, Ethics, and Economic Methodology: Some Problems of Technology Assessment and Environmental-Impact Analysis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, H.The Scope and Method of Economic Science (1885). rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1968.Google Scholar
Simon, H.Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley, 1957.Google Scholar
Simon, H.. An Empirically Based Microeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Smyth, R., ed. Essays in Economic Method. London: Duckworth, 1962.Google Scholar
Sowell, T.Knowledge and Decisions. New York: Basic Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Staveren, I.. Values of Economics. London: Taylor and Francis, 2005.Google Scholar
Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W., eds. Philosophy of Economics: Proceedings, Munich, July 1981. New York: Springer, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, I.Reasoning and Method in Economics. An Introduction to Economic Methodology. London: McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
Stigum, B.Econometrics and the Philosophy of Economics: Theory – Data Confrontations in Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, R.Economics and Sociology – Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Verdon, M.Keynes and the “Classics”: A Study in Language, Epistemology and Mistaken Identities. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Vickers, D.The Tyranny of the Market: A Critique of Theoretical Foundations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Vickers, D.. Economics and Ethics: An Introduction to Theory, Institutions, and Policy. London: Greenwood, Praeger, 1997.Google Scholar
Vromen, J.Economic Evolution. London: Routledge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, B.What's Wrong with Economics?New York: Basic Books, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Tr. and ed. Shils, E. and Finch, H.. New York: Macmillan, 1949.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E.General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E.. Stabilizing Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E.. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wible, J.The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as if Economics Really Mattered. London: Routledge, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, P., and Routh, G., eds. What is Political Economy? Eight Perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
Winston, G., and Teichgraeber, R., eds. The Boundaries of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, J., ed. Beyond Positive Economics?London: British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, S.The Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory. London: Routledge, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuengert, A.The Boundaries of Technique: Ordering Positive and Normative Concerns in Economic Research. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Zein-Elabdin, E., and Charusheela, S., eds. Postcolonialism Meets Economics. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Alt, J., , M. Levi, and Ostrom, E., eds. Competition and Cooperation: Conversations with Nobelists about Economics and Political Science.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
Aulin, A.The Origins of Economic Growth: The Fundamental Interaction between Material and Nonmaterial Values. Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R.Truth and Progress in Economic Knowledge (Advances in Economic Methodology). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R.. Explorations in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R., ed. New Directions in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R.. Methodology of Economics. London: Routledge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R., Hausman, D., and Mäki, U., eds. Economics and Methodology: Crossing Boundaries. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R., and Bateman, B., eds. The Cambridge Companion to Keynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balak, B.McCloskey's Rhetoric: Discourse Ethics in Economics.London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Balzer, W., and Hamminga, B., eds. Philosophy of Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, D., and Kuiper, E., eds. Toward a Feminist Philosophy of Economics. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Barnes, T.Logics of Dislocation: Models, Metaphors, and Meanings of Economic Space. New York and London: Guilford Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Becker, G.The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Bell, D., and Kristol, I., eds. The Crisis in Economic Theory. New York: Basic Books, 1981.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R., Archer, M., Collier, A., Lawson, T., and Norrie, A., eds. Critical Realism. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Birner, J.Strategies and Programmes in Capital Theory: A Contribution to the Methodology of Theory Development. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, 1990.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.The Cambridge Revolution. Success or Failure?London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1975.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Blaug, M.. A Methodological Appraisal of Marxian Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980a.
Blaug, M.. The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980b; 2nd ed. 1992.Google Scholar
Boehm, S.et al., eds. Is There Progress in Economics? Knowledge, Truth and the History of Economic Thought. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
Boland, L.The Foundations of Economic Method. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
Boland, L.. Methodology for a New Microeconomics. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1986.Google Scholar
Boland, L.. The Methodology of Economic Model Building: Methodology after Samuelson. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Boland, L.. Critical Economic Methodology: A Personal Odyssey. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Bonar, J.Philosophy and Political Economy (1893). rpt. London: Allen & Unwin, 1967.Google Scholar
Boulding, K.Economics as a Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
Boylan, T., and Gorman, P. O'. Beyond Rhetoric and Realism in Economics: Towards a Reformulation of Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G., Kliemt, H., and Tollison, R., eds. Method and Morals in Constitutional Economics: Essays in Honor of James M. Buchanan. New York: Springer, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D.Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J.The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy. 2nd ed. (1875). rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B.Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B., ed. Appraisal and Criticism in Economics. London: Allen & Unwin, 1984.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B.. The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1993.Google Scholar
Caplin, A., and Schotter, A., eds. Perspectives on the Future of Economics: Positive and Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cory, G.The Consilient Brain: The Bioneurological Basis of Economics, Society, and Politics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullenberg, S., Amariglio, J., and Ruccio, F., eds. Postmodernism, Economics, and Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahiya, S., ed. The Current State of Economic Science. Vol. 1. Teaching of Economics, Methodology, Mathematical and Quantitative Methods. Rohtak, India: Spellbound, 1999.Google Scholar
D'Autume, A., and Cartelier, J., eds. Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science?Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Davis, J.Theory of the Individual in Economics. London: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J., ed. Recent Developments in Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Hands, D. W., and Mäki, U., eds. The Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J., Marciano, A., and Runde, J., eds. The Elgar Companion to Economic and Philosophy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delorme, R., and Dopfer, K., eds. The Political Economy of Diversity: Evolutionary Perspectives on Economic Order and Disorder. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1994.Google Scholar
Marchi, N., ed. The Popperian Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, N.. Post-Popperian Methodology of Economics: Recovering Practice. Boston: Kluwer, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, D., and Blaug, M., eds. Appraising Modern Economics: Studies in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1991.Google Scholar
Dennis, K., ed. Rationality in Economics: Alternative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, P.Science and Ideology in the Policy Sciences. New York: Aldine, 1982.Google Scholar
Dolan, E., ed. The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1976.Google Scholar
Dopfer, K., ed. Economics and Philosophy: The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, S.Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodology Approach. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar
Dow, S.. Economic Methodology: An Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Dyke, C.Philosophy of Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
Eichner, A., ed. Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 205–41.
Elster, J.Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Elster, J.. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J.. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Elster, J., and Roemer, J., eds. Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A.The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.The Logic of Economic Discovery: Neoclassical Economics and the Marginal Revolution. New York: New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S., ed. Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Foldvary, F., ed. Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.Google Scholar
Fox, G.Reason and Reality in the Methodologies of Economics: An Introduction. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, G., and McGoun, E., eds. From Individualism to the Individual: Ideology and Inquiry in Financial Economics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Fraser, L.Economic Thought and Language. A Critique of Some Fundamental Concepts. London: A & C Black, 1937.Google Scholar
Frey, B.Economics as a Science of Human Behaviour: Towards a New Social Science Paradigm. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M.Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, E.A Guide to What's Wrong with Economics. New York: Anthem Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fullbrook, E., ed. Intersubjectivity in Economics: Agents and Structures. London: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gani, M.Foundations of Economic Science. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Ontario: Scholars, 2003.Google Scholar
Grönkvist, U.Economic Methodology: Patterns of Reasoning and the Structure of Theories. Lund: University of Lund, 1992.Google Scholar
Grossbard-Shechtman, S., and Clague, C., eds. The Expansion of Economics: Toward a More Inclusive Social Science. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2002.Google Scholar
Guala, F.The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, B., Knudsen, C., and Mäki, U., eds. Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Hahn, F., and Hollis, M.. Philosophy and Economic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hamminga, B.Neoclassical Theory Structure and Theory Development: An Empirical-Philosophical Case Study Concerning the Theory of International Trade. Boston: Springer, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamminga, B., and DeMarchi, N., eds. Idealization in Economics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994.Google Scholar
Hanappi, H.Evolutionary Economics: The Evolutionary Revolution in the Social Sciences. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1994.Google Scholar
Hands, D. W.Testing, Rationality and Progress. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1992.Google Scholar
Hands, D. W.. Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D.Capital, Profits and Prices: An Essay in the Philosophy of Economics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Hausman, D.. Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D.. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D., and McPherson, M.Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hausman, D., and McPherson, M.. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F.The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Henderson, W., Dudley-Evans, T., and Backhouse, R., eds. Economics and Language. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.Causality in Economics. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A., and Marchi, N.. Milton Friedman: Economics in Theory and Practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, F.The Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, B.Economics as Moral Science. Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G.The Evolution of Institutional Economics. London: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, M., and Nell, E.. Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo-Classical Economics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, W., and Koopmans, T., eds. Studies in Econometric Method. New York: John Wiley, 1953.Google Scholar
Hook, S., ed. Human Values and Economic Policy. New York: New York University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hoover, K.The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Hoover, K.. Causality in Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, K.. The Methodology of Empirical Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, K., and Sheffrin, S., eds. Monetarism and the Methodology of Economics: Essays in Honour of Thomas Mayer. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1995.Google Scholar
Humphries, J., ed. Gender and Economics.Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economics (1938). rpt. with a new Preface. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1960.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. Knowledge and Ignorance in Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians and Austrians. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. The Uses and Abuses of Economics: Contentious Essays on History and Method. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.. On the Methodology of Economics and the Formalist Revolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000.Google Scholar
Kamarck, A.Economics and the Real World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamarck, A.. Economics for the Twenty-First Century: The Economics of the Economist-Fox. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.Google Scholar
Katzner, D.Time, Ignorance, and Uncertainty in Economic Models. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Katouzian, H.Ideology and Method in Economics. New York: New York University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, F.Methodology of the Social Sciences. London: Oxford University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Keen, S.Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor of the Social Sciences. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. N.The Scope and Method of Political Economy (4th ed. 1917). rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1955.Google Scholar
Kincaid, H.Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I.The Economic Point of View. 2nd ed. Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1976.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I., ed. Method, Process and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honour of Ludwig von Mises. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1982.Google Scholar
Klamer, A.Conversations with Economists: New Classical Economists and Opponents Speak Out on the Current Controversy in Macroeconomics. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1984.Google Scholar
Klamer, A., McCloskey, D., and Solow, R., eds. The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Klant, J.The Rules of the Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
Kornai, J.Anti-Equilibrium: On Economic Systems Theory and the Tasks of Research. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1971.Google Scholar
Koslowski, P., ed. Economics and Philosophy. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1985.Google Scholar
Koslowski, P.. Sociobiology and Bioeconomics: The Theory of Evolution in Biological and Economic Theory. Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupp, S., ed. The Structure of Economic Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
Lapavitsas, C.Social Foundations of Markets, Money and Credit.London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Latsis, S., ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, D., ed. Economics and Hermeneutics. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Lawson, T.Economics and Reality. London: Routledge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, T.. Reorienting Economics.London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Lawson, T., and Pesaran, H.. Keynes' Economics: Methodological Issues. Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm, 1985.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, H.Beyond Economic Man: A New Foundation for Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Levine, A., Sober, E., and Wright, E.. Reconstructing Marxism. London: Verso, 1992.Google Scholar
Lewis, P., ed. Transforming Economics. London: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D., ed. On the Reliability of Economic Models: Essays in the Philosophy of Economics. Boston: Kluwer, 1993.Google Scholar
Loasby, B.Choice, Complexity and Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Loasby, B.. The Mind and Method of the Economist: A Critical Appraisal of Major Economists in the 20th Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1989.Google Scholar
Lowe, A.On Economic Knowledge. Toward a Science of Political Economics. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar
McClelland, P.Causal Explanation and Model Building in History, Economics and the New Economic History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
McClennen, E.Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D.The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D.. If You're So Smart: The Narrative of Economic Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D.. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D.. The Vices of Economists – The Virtues of the Bourgeoisie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. Essays on Economic Semantics. Ed. Miller, M.. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
Machlup, F.. Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
MacKay, A.Arrow's Theorem: The Paradox of Social Choice. A Case Study in the Philosophy of Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
McKenzie, R.The Limits of Economic Science. Boston: Kluwer, 1983.Google Scholar
Marr, W., and Raj, B., eds. How Economists Explain: A Reader in Methodology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1983.Google Scholar
Mayer, T.Truth versus Precision in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1993.Google Scholar
Mayer, T., Hoover, K., and Sheffrin, S., eds. Monetarism and the Methodology of Economics: Essays in Honour of Thomas Mayer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Mäki, U.Studies in Realism and Explanation in Economics. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1990.Google Scholar
Mäki, U.. Realism and Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Mäki, U., ed. The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäki, U.. Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Medema, S., ed. Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidinger, C.Science Économique: Questions de Méthode. Paris: Vuibert, 1994.Google Scholar
Menger, C. Problems of Economics and Sociology (1883). Ed. Schneider, L., tr. F. Nock. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.A System of Logic (1843). rpt. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1949.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P.Against Mechanism: Protecting Economics from Science. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1988.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P.. More Heat than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P.. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P.. The Effortless Economy of Science?Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P., ed. The Reconstruction of Economic Theory. Boston: Kluwer, 1986.Google Scholar
Mises, L.. Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Mises, L.. Epistemological Problems of Economics. tr. G. Reisman. New York: New York University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Mises, L.. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method. 2nd ed. Kansas City, MO: Sheed Andrews, 1978.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosini, V. ed. Equilibrium in Economics. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Mulberg, J.Social Limits to Economic Theory. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G.The Political Element in the Development of Economic Thought. Tr. P. Streeten. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G.. Objectivity in Social Research. London: Duckworth, 1970.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.Economics as Religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond. College Station: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., and Winter, S.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Neuberg, L.Conceptual Anomalies in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P.Economic Methodology and Freedom to Choose. London: Allen & Unwin, 1987.Google Scholar
Oakley, A.Reconstructing Economic Theory: The Problem of Human Agency. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
Ochangco, A.Rationality in Economic Thought: Methodological Ideas on the History of Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999.Google Scholar
Omerod, P.The Death of Economics. New York: Wiley, 1997.Google Scholar
Pani, N.Inclusive Economics: Gandhian Method and Contemporary Policy. New Delhi and London: Sage Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
Papandreou, A.Economics as a Science. Chicago: Lippincott, 1958.Google Scholar
Parson, T.The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Pheby, J.Methodology and Economics: A Critical Introduction. London: Macmillan, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, J., ed. Philosophy in Economics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, S.Models and Reality in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998.Google Scholar
Reder, M.Economics: The Culture of a Controversial Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Redman, D.Economic Methodology: A Bibliography with References to Works in the Philosophy of Science, 1860–1988. New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Redman, D.. Economics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Redman, D.. The Rise of Political Economy as a Science: Methodology and the Classical Economists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Reiss, J.Error in Economics: Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology. London: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L.An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1935. 3rd ed. 1983.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.Economic Philosophy. Chicago: Aldine, 1962.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A.Microeconomic Laws: A Philosophical Analysis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A.. Economics – Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Ross, D.Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M.The Logic of Action I: Method, Money, and the Austrian School. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Rothschild, K.Ethics and Economic Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1993.Google Scholar
Rothschild, K. Economic Method, Theory and Policy: Selected Essays of Kurt W. Rothschild. Ed. King, J.. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1995.Google Scholar
Roy, S.Philosophy of Economics: On the Scope of Reason in Economic Inquiry. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Ruccio, D., and Amariglio, J.. Postmodern Moments in Modern Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Runde, J., and Mizuhara, S., eds. The Philosophy of Keynes's Economics: Probability, Uncertainty and Convention. London: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salanti, A., and Screpanti, E., eds. Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997.Google Scholar
Samuels, W., ed. The Methodology of Economic Thought: Critical Papers from the Journal of Economic Thought [Issues]. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Samuels, W.. History and Methodology of Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Samuels, W.. Economics as Discourse. Boston: Kluwer, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, W., and Biddle, J., eds. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. Vol. 16. London: JAI Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Sassower, R.Philosophy of Economics: A Critique of Demarcation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985.Google Scholar
Schoeffler, S.The Failures of Economics: A Diagnostic Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrader, D.The Corporation as Anomaly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Sen, A.On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Senior, N.Outline of the Science of Political Economy (1836). rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Shackle, G.Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K.Science Policy, Ethics, and Economic Methodology: Some Problems of Technology Assessment and Environmental-Impact Analysis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, H.The Scope and Method of Economic Science (1885). rpt. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1968.Google Scholar
Simon, H.Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley, 1957.Google Scholar
Simon, H.. An Empirically Based Microeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Smyth, R., ed. Essays in Economic Method. London: Duckworth, 1962.Google Scholar
Sowell, T.Knowledge and Decisions. New York: Basic Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Staveren, I.. Values of Economics. London: Taylor and Francis, 2005.Google Scholar
Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., and Spohn, W., eds. Philosophy of Economics: Proceedings, Munich, July 1981. New York: Springer, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, I.Reasoning and Method in Economics. An Introduction to Economic Methodology. London: McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
Stigum, B.Econometrics and the Philosophy of Economics: Theory – Data Confrontations in Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, R.Economics and Sociology – Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Verdon, M.Keynes and the “Classics”: A Study in Language, Epistemology and Mistaken Identities. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Vickers, D.The Tyranny of the Market: A Critique of Theoretical Foundations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Vickers, D.. Economics and Ethics: An Introduction to Theory, Institutions, and Policy. London: Greenwood, Praeger, 1997.Google Scholar
Vromen, J.Economic Evolution. London: Routledge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, B.What's Wrong with Economics?New York: Basic Books, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Tr. and ed. Shils, E. and Finch, H.. New York: Macmillan, 1949.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E.General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E.. Stabilizing Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E.. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wible, J.The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as if Economics Really Mattered. London: Routledge, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, P., and Routh, G., eds. What is Political Economy? Eight Perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
Winston, G., and Teichgraeber, R., eds. The Boundaries of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, J., ed. Beyond Positive Economics?London: British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, S.The Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory. London: Routledge, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuengert, A.The Boundaries of Technique: Ordering Positive and Normative Concerns in Economic Research. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Zein-Elabdin, E., and Charusheela, S., eds. Postcolonialism Meets Economics. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×