Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T22:48:23.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Group-based Emotions and Intergroup Behavior

The Case of Relative Deprivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

By
Heather J. Smith  and
Thomas Kessler
Edited by
Larissa Z. Tiedens  and
Colin Wayne Leach
Heather J. Smith
Affiliation:
Sonoma State University
Thomas Kessler
Affiliation:
University of Jena
Larissa Z. Tiedens
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Colin Wayne Leach
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

When researchers discuss relative deprivation (RD), they refer to the perception of an undeserved disadvantage, the accompanying emotions, and associated action tendencies. People who notice an unfair relative disadvantage might feel a variety of emotions, including disappointment, depression, surprise, envy, anger, resentment and outrage (Corning, 2000; Folger, 1986, 1987; Mikula, Petri, & Tanzer, 1990). This list of possible emotions raises two questions. First, are some of these emotions more typical than others as a reaction to a perceived unfair disadvantage? Second, what conditions determine which of these emotions are felt? According to cognitive appraisal theories of emotion (Frijda, 1993; Ellsworth, 1994; Roseman, Spindel, & Jose, 1990), people's perceptions or cognitive appraisals of the situation shape how they will feel. The purpose of this chapter is to explore a variety of appraisal dimensions that may distinguish among the various RD emotions. We believe that a closer examination of the specific emotions elicited by perceptions of unfair disadvantages will clarify the relationship between perceptions of RD and subsequent behavioral reactions. We describe the important complexities that emerge as we consider five appraisal dimensions proposed by RD theorists as antecedents of RD: (1) the legitimacy of the intergroup context, (2) who is responsible for the disadvantage, (3) feasibility of any change, (4) social support, and (5) social comparisons. Finally, we discuss whether the cognitive appraisals we describe: (1) cause feelings of deprivation, (2) are the cognitive components of the deprivation experience, or (3) are the consequence of feeling deprived.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Social Life of Emotions , pp. 292 - 313
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D. (1990). Political identity: Relative deprivation, social identity and the case of Scottish nationalism. WSRC 16–19 Initiative – Occasional Papers
Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azzi, A. (1995). From competitive interests, perceived injustice, and identity needs to collective action: Psychology mechanisms in ethnic nationalism. In C. Dandeleer (Ed.), Nationalism and violence (p. 104). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: “getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: SageCrossRef
Boen, F., & Vanbeselaere, N. (2002). The relative impact of socio-structural characteristics on behavioral reactions against membership in a low status group. Group Processes / Intergroup Relations, 5, 299–318–CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. J. (1984). The effects of intergroup similarity and cooperative vs. competitive orientation on intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, B., Collins, R., Taylor, S., VanYperon, N., & Dakof, G. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparisons: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1238–1249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corning, A. F. (2000). Assessing perceived social inequity: A relative deprivation framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 463–477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crocker, J. (1999). Social stigma and self-esteem: Situational construction of self-worth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egotistical deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press
Davis, J. A. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry, 22, 280–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, U. (1981). Socially shared deprivation and the approval of violence: Another look at the experience of American Blacks during the 1960s. Ethnicity, 8, 149–169Google Scholar
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity and relative deprivation. In I. Walker, & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers
Ellsworth, P. C. (1994). Sense, culture, and sensibility. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 23–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, Schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 953–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, S., & Rule, J. (1987). Relative deprivation and related psychological theories of civil violence: A critical review. Research in Social Movements: Conflicts and Change, 9, 47–69Google Scholar
Folger, R. (1986). A referent cognitions theory of relative deprivation. In J. Olson, C. P. Herman, and M. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentments: A referent cognitions model. In J. Masters & W. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice and relative deprivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Foster, M. D. (2000). Positive and negative responses to personal discrimination: Does coping make a difference?Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1993). The place of appraisal in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 357–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Guyll, M., Matthews, K. A., & Bromberger, J. T. (2001). Discrimination and unfair treatment: Relationship to cardiovascular reactivity among African American and European American women. Health Psychology, 20, 315–325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogg, M. A., & Grieve, P. (1999). Social identity theory and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollbach, S., & Kessler, T. (2002). Emotions in intergroup context: Group-based emotions as determinants of ingroup identification. Poster presented at the 13th General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Society, San Sebastian, Spain, June 26–29
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Availability and the simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRef
Kawakami, K., & Dion, K. (1992). The impact of salient self-identities on relative deprivation and action intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 525–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action. London, UK: Taylor and Francis
Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2002). Sequential or parallel processing? A longitudinal field study concerning determinants of identity-management strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 75–88CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., & Leisse, U.-K. (2000). The personal-group discrepancy: Is there a common information basis of personal and group judgment?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1997). Principles of movement participation. Basil Blackwell: Oxford
Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russon, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Lalonde, R. N., & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pederson, A. (2003). The politics of emotion: The role of intergroup guilt and anger in apology to Aboriginal Australians. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz
Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Lewis, M. D. (1996). Self-organising cognitive appraisals. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 251–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2001). Social appraisal: The social world as object and influence on appraisal processes. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Mark, M., & Folger, R. (1984). Response to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Emotion, Relationship and Health, 5, 192–218–Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1986). The psychology of injustice. In J. Olson, C. P. Herman, and M. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Messe, L. A., & Watts, B. L. (1983). The complex nature of the sense of fairness: Internal standards and social comparisons as bases for reward evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 480–500Google Scholar
Mikula, G., Petri, B., & Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummendey, A., & Kessler, T. (2000). Deutsch-deutsche Fusion und sozial Identität: Sozialpsychologische Perspektiven auf das Verhältnis von Ost-zu Westdeutschen. [German-German fusion and social identity: Social psychological perspectives on the relations between East and West Germans.] In H. Esser (Hrsg.), Der Wandel nach der Wende. Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft, Politik in Ostdeutschland (pp. 277–307). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag
Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229–245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3 (2), 158–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J. M., & Roese, N. J. (2002). Relative deprivation and counterfactual thinking. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Ellemers, N. (2002). The benefits of being disadvantaged: Performance-related circumstances and consequences of intergroup comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32 (1), 73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1992). Appraisal as a cause of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion. Review of the personality and social psychology (Vol. 13; pp. 122–149). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Pettigrew, T. F. (1978). Three issues in ethnicity: Boundaries, deprivations and perceptions. In J. M. Yinger & S. J. Cutler (Eds.), Major social issues (pp. 25–49). New York: Free Press
Pettigrew, T. F. (2002). Summing up: Relative deprivation as a key social psychology concept. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Postmes, T., Young, H., Branscombe, N. R., & Spears, R. (1999). Personal and group motivational determinants of perceived discrimination and privilege discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 320–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J., & Reicher, S. (1987). Discourses of community and conflict: The organization of social categories in accounts of a “riot.”British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. R. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press
Russell, J. A. (1987). Comment in articles by Frijda and by Conway and Bekerian. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 193–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M., & Maes, J. (2002). Stereotypic ingroup bias as self-defense against relative deprivation: Evidence from a longitudinal study of the German unification process. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York: Guilford Press
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shklar, J. (1992). The faces of injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American-Psychologist, 56 (4), 319–331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Towards new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. Mackie & D. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef
Smith, H. J., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2002). Relative deprivation. A conceptual critique and meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley
Smith, H. J., Spears, R., & Oyen, M. (1994). People like us: The influence of personal deprivation and salience of group membership on justice evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 277–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: How group membership shapes self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Starr, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment to army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Swim, J., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me – What did you just say?!: Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. M., Moghaddam, F. M., & Bellerose, J. (1989). Social comparison in an intergroup context. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 89–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tougas, F., & Beaton, A. M. (2002). Personal and group relative deprivation: Connecting the I to the we. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 119–135). New York: Cambridge University Press
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers
Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Denver, CO: Westview Press
Vanneman, R. D., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1972). Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race, 13, 461–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, I. (1999). Effects of personal and group relative deprivation on personal and collective self-esteem. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 365–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Walker, I., Wong, N. K., & Kretzschmar, K. (2002). Relative deprivation and attribution: From grievance to action. In I. Walker, & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: specification, development and integration (pp. 288–312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Weiner, B. (1995). Inferences of responsibility and social motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27; pp. 1–47). San Diego: Academic PressCrossRef
Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., Weber, U., & Waldzus, S. (2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 461–473CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. M. (1975). Relative deprivation. In L. A. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure: papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (p. 356). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Wood, J. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagishi, T., & Sato, K. (1986). Motivational basis of the public goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×