Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T00:26:31.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Quentin Skinner
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, Stanford.Google Scholar
Ågren, Maria (2000). ‘Contracts for the old or gifts for the young? On the use of wills in early modern Sweden’, Scandinavian Journal of History 25:3, pp. 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ågren, Maria (2009). Domestic Secrets. Women and Property in Sweden 1600–1857, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Ågren, Maria and Erickson, Amy L. (eds.) (2005). The Marital Economy in Scandinavia and Britain 1400–1900, Aldershot.
Aguilar, Paloma (2002). Memory and Amnesia: The Role of the Spanish Civil War in the Transition to Democracy, New York.Google Scholar
Alba-Ramírez, Alfonso and Freeman, Richard B. (1990). ‘Jobfinding and wages when long run unemployment is really long: the case of Spain’, NBER Working Paper, 3409.Google Scholar
Alberti, Leon Battista (1969). The Family in Renaissance Florence, ed. Neu Watkins, R., New York.Google Scholar
Amar, Cécile (2009). Fadela Amara: le destin d'une femme, Paris.Google Scholar
Amara, Fadela and Zappi, Sylvia (2003). Ni putes ni soumises, Paris.Google Scholar
Åmark, Klas (2002). ‘Familj, försörjning och livslopp under 1900-talet’, in Bergman, Helena and Johansson, Peter(eds.), Familjeangelägenheter: modern historisk forskning om välfärdsstat, genus och politik, Eslöv, pp. 236–78.Google Scholar
Ancellin, Jacqueline (1997). L'action sociale familiale et les caisses d'allocations familiales. Un siècle d'histoire, Paris.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1958). The Human Condition, Chicago.Google Scholar
Arlacchi, Pino (1992). Gli uomini del disonore, Milan.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, Claudine (ed.) (1995). Les solidarités entre générations. Vieillesse, famille, état, Paris.
Collective, Authors (ed.) (1970). Storefront Day Care Centers. The Radical Berlin Experiment, Boston, Mass., available at www.bpb.de/publikationen/98DK3M.html.
Ayuso Sánchez, Luís (2009). ‘Emergencia y configuración del asociacionismo familiar en España’, Revista Internacional de Sociología 67:1, pp. 107–33.Google Scholar
Baaijens, C., Doorne-Huiskes, A. and Schippers, J. (2005). ‘Do Dutch employees want to work more or fewer hours than. they actually do?’, in Peper, B., Doorne-Huiskes, A. and Dulk, L. (eds.), Flexible Working and Organisational Change. The Integration of Work and Personal Life, Cheltenham, pp. 201–21.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, Arnaldo (2006). ‘Ritorno a Montegrano’, in Banfield, Edward C., Le basi morali di una società arretrata, Bologna, pp. 7–34.Google Scholar
Bairner, A. (ed.) (2005). Sport and the Irish. Histories, Identities, Issues, Dublin.
Banfield, Edward (1958). The Moral Basis of a Backward Society, Glencoe, Ill.Google Scholar
Barbagli, Marzio and Saraceno, Chiara (eds.) (1997). Lo stato delle famiglie in Italia, Bologna.
Barca, Federico et al. (1994). Assetti proprietari e mercato delle imprese, 2 vols., Bologna.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth (1995). The Normal Chaos of Love, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bergman, Barbara (1996). Saving our Children from Poverty: What the United States Can Learn from France, New York.Google Scholar
Berlinguer, Giovanni (1979). Una riforma per la salute, Bari.Google Scholar
Berlusconi, Silvio (2000). L'Italia che ho in mente, Milan.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Ernst (1969). ‘Il complesso della Grande Madre’, in Bernhard, E., Mitobiografia, Milan, pp. 168–79.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil (1971). Class, Codes and Control, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béroud, Sophie and Mouriaux, René (1997). Le souffle de décembre. Le mouvement social de 1995: continuités, singularités, portée, Paris.Google Scholar
Berthoud, R. and Gershuny, J. (eds.) (2000). Seven Years in the Lives of British Families: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey, Abingdon.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William (1942). Social Insurance and Allied Services, London.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William (1944). Full Employment in a Free Society, London.Google Scholar
,BFI (1940). Housewives' Choice. British Women on the ‘Home’ Front (1926–55), British Film Institute, London.Google Scholar
Biraben, J. N. and Dupâquier, J. (1981). Les berceaux vides de Marianne: l'avenir de la population française, Paris.Google Scholar
Birg, Herwig (2001). Die demographische Zeitenwende, Munich.Google Scholar
Blanden, Jo and Gregg, Paul (2004). Family Income and Educational Attainment: A Review of Approaches and Evidence for Britain, Discussion Paper No. 41, Centre for the Economics of Education, London.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto (1987). The Future of Democracy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto (1990). ‘La fine della prima Repubblica’, Europeo 46, 28 December, p. 107.Google Scholar
Bobbitt, Philip (2002). The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace and the Course of History, London.Google Scholar
Boeckenfoerde, Ernst-Wolfgang (1976). Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Bonini, C. and Del Porto, D. (2008). ‘Per una poltrona negata a un fedelissimo Mastella disse: ti faccio il mazzo quadrato’, La Repubblica, 17 January.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C. and Chambaz, C. (2000). ‘Les avantages familiaux dans le calcul des retraites’, Solidarité et santé 3, pp. 47–63.Google Scholar
Borchorst, A. (1994). ‘Welfare state regimes, women's interests and the EC’, in Sainsbury, D. (ed.), Gendering Welfare States, London, pp. 26–44.Google Scholar
Bosmans, J. (1988). ‘Het maatschappelijk-politieke leven in Nederland 1918–1940’, in Tijn, Th., Rooy, P. and Damsma, D. (eds.), Geschiedenis van het moderne Nederland, De Haan, pp. 398–443.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998). Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boverat, Fernand (1924). Une politique gouvernementale de natalité. Étude présentée sur sa demande à M. le président du conseil des ministres par l'alliance nationale pour l'accroissement de la population française, Paris.Google Scholar
Bowlby, John (1951). Child Care and the Growth of Love, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Bradley, David (2000). ‘Family laws and welfare states’, in Kari, Melby, Pylkkänen, Anu, Rosenbeck, Bente and Wetterberg, Christina Carlsson (eds.), The Nordic Model of Marriage and the Welfare State, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Brisson, Dominique (2004). Guide de la famille et de la vie quotidienne, Paris.Google Scholar
Bull, Malcolm (2007). ‘Vectors of the Biopolitica’, New Left Review 45, pp. 7–25.Google Scholar
Bussemaker, J. and Kersbergen, K. (1994). ‘Welfare states: some theoretical reflections’, in Sainsbury, D. (ed.), Gendering Welfare States, London, pp. 8–25.Google Scholar
Caritas/Migrantes, (2009). Dossier statistico 2009. XIX° Rapporto sull'immigrazione, Rome.Google Scholar
Carter, Erica (1997). How German is She? Postwar West German Reconstruction and the Consuming Woman, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Gorasurreta, Caspistegui, Javier, Francisco and Pierola Narvarte, Gemma (1999). ‘Entre la ideología y lo cotidiano: la familia en el carlismo y el tradicionalismo (1940–1975)’, Vasconia 28, pp. 45–56.Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino and Franchini, Claudio (eds.) (1994). L'amministrazione pubblica italiana, Bologna.
Cavalli, Alessandro and Lillo, Antonio (1993). Giovani anni '90, Bologna.Google Scholar
,Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (2008). Statline 2008, Den Haag/Heerlen.Google Scholar
,Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (2010). Nederland langs de Europese meetlat, Den Haag/Heerlen.Google Scholar
Cesareo, Vincenzo et al. (1995). La religiosità in Italia, Milan.Google Scholar
Chaumier, Serge (1999). La Déliaison amoureuse. De la future romantique au désir d'indépendance, Paris.Google Scholar
Chauvel, Louis (2000). ‘Comment se manifeste la solidarité intergénérationnelle?’, in Charpentier, François (ed.), Encyclopédie protection sociale. Quelle refondation?, Paris, pp. 138–59.Google Scholar
Chauvière, Michel and Sassier, Monique (eds.) (2000). Les implicites de la politique familiale, Paris.
Christiansen, , Finn, Niels, Petersen, , Klaus, Edling, Nils and Haave, , Peter, (eds.) (2006). The Nordic Model of Welfare: A Historical Reappraisal, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
,CNAF (2004a). ‘Rétrospectif de la branche famille’, Horizon 2015 2, p. 5.Google Scholar
,CNAF (2004b). ‘Évolution des prestations sociales et familiales sous conditions de ressources, Horizon 2015 2, p. 2.Google Scholar
Cobb, Richard (1998). ‘The experiences of an Anglo-French historian’, in Richard Cobb, Paris and Elsewhere, London.Google Scholar
Colli, Andrea, Fernández Pérez, Paloma and Rose, Mary B. (2003). ‘National determinants of family firm development? Family firms in Britain, Spain, and Italy in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’, Enterprise and Society 4, pp. 28–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comand, Maria Pia and Santucci, Maddalena (1995). ‘Il consume addomesticato’, in Casetti, Francesco (ed.), L'ospite fisso, Milan, pp. 155–82.Google Scholar
Commaille, Jacques (1998). Les enjeux politiques de la famille, Paris.Google Scholar
Commaille, Jacques, Strobel, Pierre and Villac, Michel (2002). La politique de la famille, Paris.Google Scholar
Connolly, Linda (2002). The Irish Women's Movement: From Revolution to Devolution, Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Hera (2004). The Long Sexual Revolution: English Women, Sex and Contraception in England 1800–1975, Oxford.Google Scholar
Coote, Anna and Campbell, Beatrix (1982). Sweet Freedom, Oxford.Google Scholar
Corcoran, Mary, Gray, Jane and Peillon, Michel (2008). ‘Ties that bind? The social fabric of daily life in new suburbs’, in Fahey, T., Russell, H. and Whelan, C. T. (eds.), Quality of Life in Ireland: The Social Effects of Economic Boom, Dordrecht, pp. 175–98.Google Scholar
Correll, S. J., Benard, S. and Paik, In (2007). ‘Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty?’, American Journal of Sociology 112:5 (March), pp. 1297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,CSO (2007). Census 2006. Vol. 11: Disability, Carers and Voluntary Activity, Cork: Central Statistics Office, available at www.cso.ie/census/census2006results/volume_11/Volume11_2006.pdf.Google Scholar
d'Iribarne, Philippe (2006). L'étrangeté française, Paris.Google Scholar
Dalla Zuanna, Gianpiero and Micheli, Giuseppe A. (eds.) (2004). Strong Family and Low Fertility: A Paradox?, Dordrecht.
Damon, Julien (2008). Les politiques familiales, Paris.Google Scholar
Darby, P. (2005). ‘Gaelic games and the Irish immigrant experience in Boston’, in Bairner, A. (ed.), Sport and the Irish. Histories, Identities, Issues, Dublin, pp. 85–101.Google Scholar
Daunton, Martin (2002). Just Taxes, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Búrca, M. (1999). The GAA: A History, 2nd edn, Dublin.Google Scholar
Luna, Giovanni (2009). Le ragioni di un decennio, Milan.Google Scholar
Miguel, Jesús M. (1996). ‘Desarrollo o desigualdad? Análisis de una polémica sociológica de medio siglo en España’, Reis 75, pp. 55–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moor, Tine and Zanden, , Luiten, Jan (2009). ‘Girl power: the European marriage pattern and labour markets in the North Sea region in the late medieval and early modern period’, Economic History Review 63:1, webpublication 2009, final February 2010, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Rita, Giuseppe (1988). ‘L'impresa famiglia’, in Melograni, Paolo and Scaraffia, Lucetta (eds.), La famiglia italiana dall'Ottocento ad oggi, Rome and Bari, pp. 383–416.Google Scholar
Singly, Françoise (1993). Sociologie de la famille contemporaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Delaney, Liam and Fahey, Tony (2005). The Social and Economic Value of Sport in Ireland, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, available at: www.esri.ie/publications/search_for_a_publication.Google Scholar
Deniaux, E. (1993). Clientèles et pouvoir à l'époque de Cicéron, Rome.Google Scholar
Dente, Bruno (1989). ‘La cultura amministrativa italiana negli ultimi 40 anni’, in Dente, B. (ed.), Politiche pubbliche e pubblica amministrazione, Rimini, pp. 139–72.Google Scholar
Diamanti, Ilvo (2009). ‘Italia 2009: un paese che riscopre la protesta’, Il Venerdì di Repubblica, 11 December, pp. 18–25.Google Scholar
Dibos-Lacroux, Sylvie (2007). Pacs. Le guide pratique, Paris.Google Scholar
Diena, L. (1960). Gli uomini e le masse, Turin.Google Scholar
Dolan, F. M. (2005). ‘The paradoxical liberty of bio-power: Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault on modern politics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 31, pp. 369–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donzelot, Jacques (1979). The Policing of Families, trans. Hurley, Robert, New York.Google Scholar
Doorne-Huiskes, J. (1979). Vrouwen en beroepsparticipatie. Een onderzoek onder gehuwde vrouwelijke academici, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Doorne-Huiskes, J. van, Henderikse, W. and van Beek, A. (2009). From Small to Larger Part-Time Jobs: Views from Employers and Employees, Paper presented at the Conference 24orMore, Amsterdam, 5–6 Nov. 2009.Google Scholar
Dortier, Michel (2002). Familles: permanences et métamorphoses, Paris.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. W. B. (1972). The Home and the School, London.Google Scholar
Driessen, M. and Veldman, A. (1997). ‘Inkomenszekerheid’, in Holtmaat, R. and Loenen, T. (eds.), Vrouw en Recht, Nijmegen, pp. 127–39.Google Scholar
Dübeck, Inger (2005). ‘Property and authority in Danish marital law’, in Maria Ågren and Amy L. Erickson (eds.), The Marital Economy in Scandinavia and Britain 1400–1900, Aldershot, pp. 127–40.
Duchen, Claire (1994). Women's Rights and Women's Lives in France, 1944–1968, London.Google Scholar
Dumond, G. F. (1991). Le festin de Kronos, Paris.Google Scholar
Durham, Martin (1991). Sex and Politics. The Family and Morality in the Thatcher Years, Basingstoke.CrossRef
Edling, Nils (1998). ‘När folkhemmet var liberalt’, Tvärsnitt 4, pp. 28–37.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. and Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, Clients and Friends, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgán, Elisabeth (1994). Genus och politik. En jämförelse mellan svensk och fransk abort- och preventivmedelspolitik från sekelskiftet till andra världskriget, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Encarnación, Omar G. (2001). ‘Civil society and the consolidation of democracy in Spain’, Political Science Quarterly 116:1, pp. 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enciclopedia Cattolica (1952). Volume V, Rome, Vatican City.
Enders, Victoria Lorée (1998). ‘Problematic portraits. The ambiguous historical role of the SF of the Falange’, in Enders, Victoria Lorée and Radcliff, Pamela (eds.), Constructing Spanish Womanhood: Female Identity in Modern Spain, New York, pp. 375–97.Google Scholar
Erickson, Amy Louise (1993). Women and Property in Early Modern England, London.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eupen, Th. A. G. (1985). ‘Kerk en gezin in Nederland’, in Kooy, G. A. (ed.), Gezinsgeschiedenis: Vier eeuwen gezin in Nederland, Assen.Google Scholar
Fahey, Tony (1999). ‘Religion and sexual culture in Ireland’, in Eder, F. X., Hall, L. and Hekma, G. (eds.), Sexual Cultures in Europe: National Histories, Manchester, pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
Fahey, Tony, Hayes, Bernadette C. and Sinnott, Richard (2006). Conflict and Consensus: A Study of Values and Attitudes in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Fahey, Tony and Richard, Layte (2008). ‘Family and sexuality’, in Fahey, T., Russell, H. and Whelan, C. T. (eds.) Quality of Life in Ireland. The Social Impact of Economic Boom, Dordrecht.CrossRef
Fahey, Tony, Delaney, Liam and Gannon, Brenda (2005). School Children and Sport in Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
Fenouillet, Dominique (2008). Droit de la famille, Paris.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cordon, Juan Antonio (1997). ‘Youth residential independence and autonomy: a comparative study’, Journal of Family Issues 6, pp. 567–607.Google Scholar
Ferrarella, L. (2003). ‘Previti condannato, ma non per la Sme’, Corriere della Sera, 23 November.Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio (1993). Modelli di solidarietà. Politica e riforme sociali nelle democrazie, Bologna.Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio (1996). ‘The “southern model” of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 1, pp. 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio (2006). Le politiche sociali. L'Italia in prospettiva, Bologna.
Ferriter, Diarmaid (2009). Occasions of Sin. Sex and Society in Modern Ireland, London.Google Scholar
Figgis, J. N. (1913). Churches in the Modern State, London.Google Scholar
Finch, Janet (1989a). Family Obligations and Social Change, Oxford.Google Scholar
Finch, Janet (1989b). ‘Kinship and friendship’, in Jowell, R. et al. (eds.), British Social Attitudes. Special International Report, Aldershot, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
Fine, Agnès and Sangoï, Jean-Claude (1991). La population française au XIXe siècle, Paris.Google Scholar
Finn Heinrich, V. (ed.) (2007). CIVICUS Global Survey of the State of Civil Society, vol. I, Bloomfield.
Finn Heinrich, V. and Fioramonti, L. (eds.) (2008). CIVICUS Global Survey of the State of Civil Society, vol. II, Bloomfield.
Fisher, Kate (2000). ‘“She was quite satisfied with the arrangements I made”: gender and birth control in Britain 1920–1950’, Past and Present 169, pp. 161–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaquer, Lluís and Iglesias de Ussel, Julio (1993). ‘Familia y análisis sociológico: el caso de España’, Reis 61, pp. 57–75.Google Scholar
Flockton, C., Kolinsky, E. and Pritchard, R. (eds.) (2000). The New Germany in the East, London.
Foucault, Michel (2004). La naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France (1978–1979), Paris.
Foucault, Michel (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979, London.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1990). ‘Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy’, Social Text, No. 25/6, Durham, N.C.
,GAA (1971). Report of the Commission of the GAA, Dublin.Google Scholar
,GAA (2002). Strategic Review. Enhancing Community Identity, Dublin.Google Scholar
,GAA (2004). Annual Report, 2004, Dublin (available from www.gaa.ie/about-the-gaa/publications-and-resources/).Google Scholar
,GAA (2005). Annual Report, 2005, Dublin (available from www.gaa.ie/about-the- gaa/publications-and-resources/).Google Scholar
,GAA (2007). Annual Report, 2007, Dublin (available from www.gaa.ie/about-the-gaa/publications-and-resources/).Google Scholar
,GAA (2008). Annual Report, 2008, Dublin (available from www.gaa.ie/about-the-gaa/publications-and-resources/).Google Scholar
,GAA (2009). Inclusion and Integration Strategy, 2009–2015, Dublin (available from www.gaa.ie/about-the-gaa/publications-and-resources/).Google Scholar
Gadd, Carl-Johan (2000). Det svenska jordbrukets historia, vol. III: Den agrara revolutionen 1700–1870, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Gégot, Jean-Claude (1989). La population française aux XIXe et XXe siècles, Paris.Google Scholar
Gerlach, Irene (1996). Familie und staatliches Handeln, Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, Irene (2000a). ‘Generationsgerechtigkeit im politischen Prozess’, in Gerlach, I. and Nitschke, P. (eds.), Metamorphosen des Leviathan? Staatsaufgaben im Umbruch, Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, Irene (2000b). ‘Politikgestaltung durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht am Beispiel der Familienpolitik’, in Politik und Zeitgeschichte (B 3–4/2000), available at www1.bpb.de/publikationen/5VS1I2,3,0,Politikgestaltung_durch_das_Bundesverfassungsgericht_am_Beispiel_der_Familienpolitik.html#art3.
Gerlach, Irene (2004). ‘Die Familienpolitik der Rot-Gruenen Koalition’, WSI: Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte 55, pp. 411–18.Google Scholar
Gershuny, Jonathan and Berthoud, Richard (eds.) (2004). Seven Years in the Lives of British Families: Evidence on the Dynamics of Social Change from the British Household Panel Survey, Bristol.
Gershuny, Jonathan and Sullivan, Oriel (2003). ‘Time use, gender, and public policy regimes’, Social Politics 10:2, pp. 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1998). The Third Way, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gillis, John R. (1999). ‘“A triumph of hope over experience”: chance and choice in the history of marriage’, International Review of Social History 44, pp. 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul (1990). A History of Contemporary Italy: Society and Politics, 1943–1988, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul (1995). ‘Family, civil society and the state in contemporary European history: some methodological considerations’, Contemporary European History 4, pp. 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul (2000). ‘The politics of the family in twentieth-century Europe’, Contemporary European History 9:3, pp. 411–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul (2001). Italy and its Discontents. Family, Civil Society, State, 1980–2001, London.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul (2005). Silvio Berlusconi. Television, Power and Patrimony, London.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul (2006). ‘I due bienni rossi: 1919–1920 e 1968–1969. Comparazione storica e significato politico’, in Associazione Biondi-Bartolini, and Vittorio, Fondazione Giuseppe di (eds.), I due bienni rossi del Novecento: 1919–1920 e 1968–1969, Rome, pp. 13–36.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann (1989). The Transformation of Family Law, Chicago.Google Scholar
Godet, Michel and Sullerot, Évelyne (2009). La famille: une affaire publique, Paris.Google Scholar
Goffi, Tullo (1962). Morale familiare, Brescia.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter and Doughan, David (2001). Dictionary of British Women's Organisations, 1825–1960, London.Google Scholar
Goudsblom, J. (1967). Dutch Society, New York.Google Scholar
Green, David R. and Owens, Alasdair (eds.) (2004). Family Welfare. Gender, Property, and Inheritance since the Seventeenth Century, Westport.
Greenhalgh, S. (2003). ‘Science, modernity and the making of China's one-child policy’, Population and Development Review 29, pp. 163–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guazzini, G. (1987). ‘Dimensione ideale della famiglia e calendario ideale delle nascite’, in Palomba, Rosella (ed.), Vita di coppia e figli, Florence, pp. 39–51.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Harald (1998). ‘The conglomerate state: a perspective on state formation in early modern Europe’, Scandinavian Journal of History 23, pp. 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Domènech, Maria (2005). ‘Employment after motherhood: a European comparison’, Labour Economics 12:1, pp. 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzetti, Linda (2002). ‘Dowries in fourteenth-century Venice’, Renaissance Studies 16:4, pp. 430–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haavet, Inger Elisabeth (2006). ‘Milk, mothers and marriage: family policy formation in Norway and its neighbouring countries in the twentieth century’, in Niels Finn Christiansen, Klaus Petersen, Nils Edling and Peter Haave (eds.), The Nordic Model of Welfare: A Historical Reappraisal, Copenhagen, pp. 189–214.
Habermas, Jürgen (1989) [1962]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hajnal, John (1965). ‘European marriage patterns in perspective’, in Glass, D. V. and Eversley, D. E. C. (eds.), Population in History, London, pp. 101–43.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2001). Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century. Preference Theory, Oxford.Google Scholar
Halsey, A. H., Heath, A. F. and Ridge, J. M. (1980). Origins and Destinations: Family Class and Education in Modern Britain, London.Google Scholar
Hank, K., Tillmann, K. and Wagner, G. G. (2001). ‘Ausserhaeussliche Kinderbetreeuung in Ostdeutschland’, MPIDR Working Paper WP 2001–003, Rostock.
Hardwick, Julie (1998). The Practice of Patriarchy. Gender and the Politics of Household Authority in Early Modern France, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Harris, José (2003). ‘From Richard Hooker to Harold Laski: changing perceptions of civil society in British political thought, late sixteenth to early twentieth centuries’, in Harris, J. (ed.), Civil Society in British History. Ideas, Identities, Institutions, Oxford, pp. 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, D. (2005). ‘Sport, identity and Irish nationalism in Northern Ireland’, in Bairner, A. (ed.), Sport and the Irish. Histories, Identities, Issues, Dublin, pp. 123–39.Google Scholar
Hassenteufel, Patrick and Martin, Claude (1997). ‘La représentation des intérêts familiaux en Europe: Allemagne, Belgique, Grande-Bretagne, France, Portugal’, Rapport de recherche pour la Commission Européenne (DG 5), Brussels.
Hedin, Marika (2002). Ett liberalt dilemma. Ernst Beckman, Emilia Broomé, G H von Koch och den sociala frågan 1880–1930, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991) [1820]. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, A. W., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. C. and Bakker, W. E. (1994). ‘De pendule van perspectief. Convergentie en divergentie in het denken over de verzorgingsstaat’, in Engbersen, G., Hemerijck, A. C. and Bakker, W. E. (eds.), Zorgen in het Europese huis. De grenzen van nationale verzorgingsstaten, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hendrick, Harry (1997). Children, Childhood and English Society, 1880–1990 (New Studies in Economic and Social History), London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessy, Peter (2000). The Prime Minister: The Job and its Holder since 1945, London.Google Scholar
Staatskanzlei, Hessische (2003). Die Familienpolitik muss neue Wegen gehen!, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilliard, Betty (2003). ‘The Catholic church and married women's sexuality: habitus change in late 20th century Ireland’, Irish Journal of Sociology 12:2, pp. 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirigoyen, Marie-France (2006). Femmes sous emprise: les ressorts de la violence dans le couple, Paris.Google Scholar
,HMSO (1948). Making Citizens, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1996) [1651]. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hochard, Jacques (1961). Aspects économiques des prestations familiales, Paris.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, Clare (2000). ‘Leaving home in Britain and Spain’, European Sociological Review 16, pp. 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdsworth, Clare and Irazoqui Solda, Mariana (2002). ‘First housing moves in Spain: an analysis of leaving home and first housing acquisition’, European Journal of Population 18, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghiemstra, B. T. J. and Niphuis-Nell, M. (1993). Sociale Atlas van de vrouw. Deel 2, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Rijswijk.Google Scholar
Houseaux, F. (2003). ‘La famille, pilier d'identités’, INSEE première 937, Paris, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Howard, Sarah (2006). Les images de l'alcool en France, 1915–1942, Paris.Google Scholar
Hug, Chrystel (1999). The Politics of Sexual Morality in Ireland, Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Jane (1990). ‘Enclosures, common rights, and women: the proletarianization of families in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries’, Journal of Economic History 50:1, pp. 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huteau, Serge (2006). Le contrôle des associations subventionnées, Voiron.Google Scholar
Iannelli, Cristina and Paterson, Lindsay (2006). ‘Social mobility in Scotland since the middle of the twentieth century’, Sociological Review 54:3, pp. 520–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias de Ussel, Julio (1990). ‘La familia y el cambio politico en España’, Revista de Estudios Políticos 67, pp. 235–59.Google Scholar
Iglesias de Ussel, Julio (1991). ‘Family ideology and political transition in Spain’, International Journal of Law and the Family 5, pp. 277–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias de Ussel, Julio and Meil Landwerlin, Gerardo (2001). La política familiar en España, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Inglis, Tom (1998). Lessons in Irish Sexuality, Dublin.Google Scholar
Insegnamenti pontifici (1964). Vol. I, Il matrimonio, Rome.
Ipsen, Carl (1996). Dictating Demography. The Problem of Population in Fascist Italy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isnenghi, Mario (1994). L'Italia in piazza: i luoghi della vita pubblica dal 1848 ai nostri giorni, Milan.Google Scholar
,ISTAT (1995). Statistiche giudiziarie penali 1994, Annuario no. 3, Rome.Google Scholar
,ISTAT (2007). Italy in Figures, Rome.Google Scholar
Jackson, Julian (2003). France: The Dark Years, 1940–44, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, Jaime, Antonio, M. (2000). ‘Familia y socialización política. La transmisión de orientaciones ideológicas en el seno de la familia española’, Reis 92, pp. 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, M. (2002). ‘Kein feministisches Projekt’, WSI: Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte 53, pp. 589–96.Google Scholar
Jansson, Torkel (1985). Adertonhundratalets associationer. Forskning och problem kring ett sprängfyllt tomrum eller sammanslutningsprinciper och föreningsformer mellan två samhällsformationer, ca 1800–1870, Uppsala.Google Scholar
,Journal official (1998). Compte-rendu intégrale des séances de vendredi 9 octobre 1998, Paris.
Julliard, Jacques (2005). Le malheur français, Paris.Google Scholar
Jurado Guerrero, Teresa and Naldini, Manuela (1996). ‘Is the south so different? Italian and Spanish families in comparative perspective’, South European Society and Politics 1:3, pp. 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamerman, S. B. et al. (2003). Social Policies, Family Types and Child Outcomes in Selected OECD Countries, OECD working paper, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedward, Rod (2005). La vie en bleu. France and the French since 1900, London.Google Scholar
Keuzenkamp, S., Hillebrink, C., Portegijs, W. and Puwels, B. (2009). Deeltijd (g)een probleem: Mogelijkheden om de arbeidsduur van vrouwen met een kleine deeltijdbaan te vergroten, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, The Hague.
Keynes, J. M. (1937). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London.Google Scholar
Kirchhof, P. (2005). ‘Wollen wir eine im Erwerbsleben sterbende oder im Kind vitale Gesellschaft sein?’, Diözesankomitee der Katholiken im Bistum Münster Neujahrsempfang, Münster.
Kirchhof, P. (2006). Das Gesetz der Hydra, Munich.Google Scholar
Kirchhof, P. and Schmidt, Renate (2004). Familienpolitik fuer eine lebendige Gesellschaft, Berlin.Google Scholar
Knight, Barry (2008). ‘Civil society in western and southern Europe’, in Finn Heinrich, V. and Fioramonti, L. (eds.), CIVICUS Global Survey of the State of Civil Society, vol. II, Bloomfield, pp. 163–80.Google Scholar
Knijn, T. and Verheijen, C. (1991). Kiezen of delen. Veranderingen in de beleving van het moederschap, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kocka, Jürgen (2004). ‘Civil society from a historical perspective’, European Review 12, pp. 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolinsky, E. and Nickel, H. M. (eds.) (2003). Reinventing Gender. Women in East Germany since Unification, London.
Krasensky, Patrick and Zimmer, Patrick (2005). Surtout ne changez rien, Paris.Google Scholar
Kreyenfeld, M. (2002). ‘Crisis or adaptation reconsidered: a comparison of East and West German fertility patterns in the first six years after the “Wende”’, MPIDR Working Paper WP 2002–032, Rostock.
Kreyenfeld, M. (2004). ‘Sozialstruktur und Kinderbetreuung’, MPIDR Working Paper WP 2004–009, Rostock.
Kuller, C. (2004). Familienpolitik im foederativen Sozialstaat. Die Formierung eines Politikfeldes in der Bundesrepublik 1949–1975, Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kynaston, David (2009). Family Britain, 1951–1957 (Tales of a New Jerusalem), London.Google Scholar
Lane, R. E. (1959). ‘Fathers and sons. The foundations of political beliefs’, American Sociological Review 24, pp. 502–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Maurice (1974). Church and State after the Dreyfus Affair: The Separation Issue in France, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson Kraus, Jonas (2009). Att odla ett samhälle. Råby räddningsinstitut och 1840-talets sociala ingenjörskonst, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Bras, Hervé and Todd, Emmanuel (1981). L'invention de la France: atlas anthropologique et politique, Paris.Google Scholar
Lees, Sue (1997). Ruling Passions: Sexual Violence, Reputation and the Law, Buckingham.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Alain and Méda, Dominique (2006). Faut-il brûler le modèle social français?, Paris.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1968). The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1988). Verzuiling, pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek, Haarlem.Google Scholar
Lind, Lars Fr. (1799). Domarens pröfning efter Sweriges lag, eller Sättet, at utröna lagens rätta förstånd, mening och grund, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni (2005). Feminising Politics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lunn, Pete (2007). Fair Play? Sport and Social Disadvantage in Ireland, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, available at www.esri.ie/publications/search_for_a_publication/.Google Scholar
Lunn, Pete and Layte, Richard (2007). Sporting Lives. An Analysis of a Lifetime of Irish Sport, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, available at www.esri.ie/publications/search_for_a_publication/.Google Scholar
Lunn, Pete and Layte, Richard (2008). Irish Sports Monitor. Second Annual Report, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.
Luzzi, S. (2004). Salute e sanità nell'Italia repubblicana, Rome.Google Scholar
McDonald, Peter (2000). ‘Gender equity in theories of fertility transition’, Population and Development Review 26:3, pp. 427–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Peter, Barnes, Samuel and López Pina, Antonio (1998). The Cultural Dynamics of Democratization in Spain, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Mary and Barrett, Michele (1982). The Anti-Social Family, London.Google Scholar
Macnicol, John (1986). ‘The effect of the evacuation of schoolchildren on official attitudes to state intervention’, in Smith, Harold (ed.), War and Social Change, Manchester, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
Maier, F. (2005). ‘Reconciliation of work and private life in German’, EGGSIE – EC's Expert Group on Gender, Social Inclusion and Employment, EWERC Univ. of Manchester, Manchester.
Maino, Franca (2001). La politica sanitaria, Bologna.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter (1997). Party System Change. Approaches and Interpretations, Oxford.Google Scholar
Malena, Carmen (2008). ‘Does civil society exist?’, in V. Finn Heinrich and Lorenzo Fioramonti (eds.), The CIVICUS Global Survey of the State of Civil Society, vol. II: Comparative Perspectives, Bloomfield, pp. 183–200.Google Scholar
Malerba, Giuseppina (1993). ‘La donna nella famiglia e nel lavoro: i risultati di una analisi cross-country’, in Rossi, G. and Malerba, G. (eds.), La donna nella famiglia e nel lavoro, Milan, pp. 49–90.Google Scholar
Arribas, Manrique, Carlos, Juan (2007). ‘La familia como medio de inclusión de la mujer en la sociedad franquista’, Hispania Nova. Revista de Historia Contemporánea 7, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Maravall, José (1978). Dictatorship and Political Dissent. Workers and Students in Franco's Spain, London.Google Scholar
Math, Antoine (2004). ‘Doit-on aider les familles? Les familles nombreuses?’, Informations sociales 108, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Maugeri, Mariano (2009). Tutti gli uomini del viceré, Milan.Google Scholar
Maurin, Louis (2006). ‘Le boom du PACS’, Alternatives économiques 253, pp. 1–55.Google Scholar
Maurin, Louis (2009). Déchiffrer la société française, Paris.Google Scholar
Mayer, Karl Ulrich and Schulze, Eva (2009). Die Wendegeneration. Lebensverlaeufe des Jahrgangs 1971, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Melby, , Kari, , Pylkkänen, , Anu, , Rosenbeck, , Bente, and Wetterberg, Christina Carlsson (eds.) (2006). Inte ett ord om kärlek. Äktenskap och politik i Norden ca 1850–1930, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Melis, Guido (1996). Storia dell'amministrazione italiana, 1861–1993, Bologna.Google Scholar
Merlin, Pierre (1989). Les banlieues des villes françaises, Paris.Google Scholar
Mermet, Gérard (2009). Francoscopie, Paris.Google Scholar
Messu, Michel (1992). Les politiques familiales. Du natalisme à la solidarité, Paris.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1991). The Subjection of Women [1869], in Mill, On Liberty and Other Essays, Oxford.Google Scholar
Millet, Emmanuelle (2005). Pour en finir avec les violences conjugales, Paris.Google Scholar
Minonzio, Jérôme (2006). ‘L'Union nationale des associations familiales (UNAF) et les politiques familiales. Crises et transformations de la représentation des intérêts familiaux en France’, Revue française de science politique 56:2, pp. 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minonzio, Jérôme and Pagis, Julie (2009). Entreaide familiale et solidarités entre générations, Paris.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Allan (1979). The German Influence in France after 1870: The Formation of the French Republic, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Mitterrand, François (1988). Lettre à tous les Français, Paris.Google Scholar
Moeller, R. G. (1993). Protecting Motherhood. Women and the Family in the Politics of Postwar West Germany, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Morée, M. (1992). Mijn kinderen hebben er niets van gemerkt. Buitenshuis werende moeders tussen 1950 en nu, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Moss, P. (ed.) (2009). International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2009, Employment Relation Research Series no. 102, Department for Business Innovation and Skills, London.
Mushaben, Joyce Marie (2004). ‘Girl power: women, politics and leadership in the Berlin Republic’, in Sperling, J. (ed.), Germany at Fifty-Five, Manchester, pp. 183–205.Google Scholar
Naldini, Manuela (2003). The Family in the Mediterranean Welfare States, London.Google Scholar
Nees, Albin (2005). Das Bundesverfassungsgericht und die Familienpolitik in Deutschland, available at www.deutscher-Familienverband.de.Google Scholar
,NESF (2003). The Policy Implications of Social Capital, Forum Report no. 28, National Economic and Social Forum, Dublin.
Newson, John and Newson, Elizabeth (1965). Patterns of Infant Care in an Urban Community, Harmondsworth.
Newson, John and Newson, Elizabeth (1968). Four Years Old in an Urban Community, London.Google Scholar
Nic Ghiolla Phádraig, M. (1976). Survey of Religious Beliefs and Practices in Ireland, vol. III: Moral Attitudes, Dublin.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Tom (1999). ‘The myth of meritocracy: an inquiry into the social origins of Britain's business leaders since 1850’, Working Paper No. 53/99, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics, London.
Nichols, Peter (1973). Italia, Italia, London.Google Scholar
Niephaus, Y. (2003). Der Geburteneinbruch in Ostdeutschland nach 1990, Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gezinsbeleid, Nota 2008 (2008). De kracht van het gezin, Jeugd en Gezin, Programmaministerie, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1992). ‘Nature, function and capability: Artistotle on political distribution’, in Mccarthy, G. E. (ed.), Marx and Aristotle, Maryland, pp. 175–212.Google Scholar
Ofer, Inbal (2005). ‘Historical models – contemporary identities: the sección femenina of the Spanish Falange and its redefinition of the term “femininity”’, Journal of Contemporary History 40:4, pp. 663–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Phillip E. and Huss, Marie-Monique (1982). ‘Demography and pronatalism in France in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’, Journal of Historic Geography 8:3, pp. 283–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller (1989). Justice, Gender and the Family, New York.Google Scholar
Opielka, Michael (2002). ‘Familie und Beruf eine deutsche Geschichte’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 22–3.Google Scholar
Orfei, Ruggero (1976). L'occupazione del potere, Milan.Google Scholar
Paci, Pierella, Tiongson, Erwin R., Walewski, Mateusz, Liwi'nski, Jacek and Stoilkova, Maria M. (2007). ‘Internal labor mobility in central Europe and the Baltic region’, World Bank Working Paper, 105.
Papkostas, Apostolis (2001). ‘Why is there no clientelism in Scandinavia? A comparison of the Swedish and Greek sequences of development’, in Piattoni, Simonetta (ed.), Clientelism, Interests and Democratic Representation, Cambridge, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar
Parquet, Muriel (2009). Droit de la famille, Paris.Google Scholar
Payne, Stanley (1992). Franco. El perfil de la historia, Madrid.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Susan (1993). Family, Dependence and the Origins of the Welfare State, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Penn, Mark J. (2007). Microtrends: The Small Forces Behind Today's Big Changes, London.Google Scholar
Pérez-Díaz, Víctor (1993). The Return of Civil Society. The Emergence of Democratic Spain, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Pérez-Díaz, Víctor (1999). Spain at the Crossroads. Civil Society, Politics, and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Piattoni, Simonetta (ed.) (2001). Clientelism, Interests and Democratic Representation, Cambridge.CrossRef
Pick, Daniel (1989). Faces of Degeneration. A European Disorder c. 1848 – c. 1918, Cambridge.CrossRef
Pietropolli Charmet, Gustavo (1995). Un nuovo padre, Milan.Google Scholar
Pillebout, Jean-François (2007). Le Pacs, Paris.Google Scholar
Pinl, C. (2001). ‘Wieviele Ernaehrer braucht das Land?’, Blaetter for deutsche und international Politik 46, pp. 1123–30.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Howard (1985). The House that Giacomo Built, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl (1944). The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of our Time [1944; Swedish transl. 1989], Lund.Google Scholar
Pollard, Miranda (2000). ‘Vichy, abortion: policing the body and the new moral order in everyday life’, in Fishman, Sarah and Downs, Laura Lee et al. (eds.), France at War. Vichy and the Historians, Oxford, pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
Portegijs, W., Hermans, B. and Lalta, V. (2006). Emancipatiemonitor 2006, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Pritchard, R. (2000). ‘Pre-school education and childcare in East Germany’, in Flockton, C. (ed.), The New Germany in the East: Policy Agendas and Social Developments Since Unification, London, pp. 123–47.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaux, Christophe et al. (2006). Emploi éloge de la stabilité, Paris.Google Scholar
Reher, David (2004). ‘Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts’, in Zuanna, Gianpiero Dalla and Micheli, Giuseppe (eds.), Strong Family and Low Fertility: A Paradox?, Dordrecht, pp. 45–76.Google Scholar
Reher, David S. (1997a). ‘Familia y sociedad en el mundo occidental desarrollado: una lección de contrastes’, Revista de Occidente 199, pp. 112–32.Google Scholar
Reher, David S. (1997b). Perspectives on the Family in Spain, Past and Present, Oxford.Google Scholar
,Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Care of Children (Curtis committee) (1946). Cmnd 6922, HMSO, London.
,Report of the Committee on One-Parent Families (Finer committee) (1974). Cmnd 5629, HMSO, London.
,Report of the Royal Commission on Population (1949). Cmnd 7695, HMSO, London.
Reyer, J. and Kleine, H. (1997). Die Kinderkrippe in Deutschland. Sozialgeschichte einer umstrittenen Einrichtung, Freiburg.Google Scholar
Riley, Denise (1983a). ‘“The serious burdens of love?” Some questions on child-care, feminism and socialism’, in Segal, Lynne (ed.), What Is to Be Done about the Family, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Riley, Denise (1983b). War in the Nursery: Theories of the Child and Mother, London.Google Scholar
Ristau, M. (2005). ‘Der oekonomische Charme der Familie’, Politik und Zeitgeschichte 23/4, Bundeszentrale fuer Politische Bildung, available at www.bpb.de/publikationen/7IWEQ7.html.Google Scholar
Rosci, Elena (1994). ‘Le lunghe adolescenze dell'Italia di oggi’, in Ginsborg, Paul (ed.), Stato d'Italia, Milan, pp. 301–3.Google Scholar
Rosental, Pierre-André (2003). L'intelligence démographique: sciences et politiques des populations en France (1930–1960), Paris.Google Scholar
Rowbotham, Sheila (1973a). Woman's Consciousness, Man's World, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Rowbotham, Sheila (1973b). Hidden from History: 300 years of Women's Oppression and the Fight against it, London.Google Scholar
Ruddle, Helen and Mulvihill, Ray (1999). Reaching Out. Charitable Giving and Volunteering in the Republic of Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
Rugh, A. B. (1984). Family in Contemporary Egypt, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
Runciman, David (2006). The Politics of Good Intentions. History, Fear and Hypocrisy in the New World Order, Princeton.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1996). Gender, Equality and Welfare States, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salido, Olga and Moreno, Luís (2007). ‘Bienestar y políticas familiares en España’, Poíitica y Sociedad 44:2, pp. 101–14.Google Scholar
Sandvik, Hilde (2005). ‘Decision-making on marital property in Norway’, in Maria Ågren and Amy L. Erickson (eds.), The Marital Economy in Scandinavia and Britain 1400–1900, Aldershot, pp. 111–26.
Sans, R. (2004). ‘Das Bundesverfassungsgericht als familienpolitischer Ausfallbürge’, available at www.familienhandbuch.de/cmain/f_Programme/a_Familienpolitik/s_519.html.
Saraceno, Chiara (1994). ‘The ambivalent familism of the Italian welfare state’, Social Politics 1, pp. 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasúa, Carmen and Molinero, Carme (2008). ‘Trabajo y niveles de vida en el franquismo. Un estado de la cuestión desde una perspectiva de género’, in Borderías, Cristina (ed.), La historia de las mujeres: perspectivas actuales, Barcelona, pp. 309–55.Google Scholar
Sardon, Jean-Paul (2005). ‘L’évolution du divorce en France', in Sardon, J. P. et al. La population de la France. Bordeaux, pp. 717–50.Google Scholar
Sarkozy, Nicolas (2004). La République, les religions, l'espérance, Paris.Google Scholar
Sauvy, A. (1980). Vues et illusions sur la France de demain, Paris.Google Scholar
Saviano, Roberto (2006). Gomorra, Milan.Google Scholar
Schizzerotto, Antonio (2007). ‘La casa: ultimo lembo dell'impero maschile italiano?’, in Elena dell ' Agnese and Elisabetta Ruspini (eds.), Mascolinità all'italiana, Turin, pp. 143–66.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Uta (2000/4). ‘Politische Einstellungen Ostdeutscher Frauen’, Berlin, available at www.rosaluxemburgstiftung.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/manuskripte1.pdf.
Sciolla, Loredana (1997). Italiani. Stereotipi di casa nostra, Bologna.
Scoppola, Pietro (1989). La Repubblica dei partiti, Bologna.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as Freedom, Oxford.Google Scholar
Signorelli, Amalia (1986). ‘Patroni e clienti’, in Pasquinelli, C. (ed.), Potere senza stato, Rome, pp. 151–62.Google Scholar
Signorelli, Amalia (2000). ‘Componenti e percorsi dell'emancipazione femminile nell'Italia meridionale’, in Oppo, Anna et al. (eds.), Maternità, identità, scelte. Percorsi dell'emancipazione femminile nel Mezzogiorno, Naples, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Skoglund, Anna Maria (1992). Fattigvården på den svenska landsbygden år 1829, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Smith, Timothy (2004). France in Crisis. Welfare, Inequality and Globalization since 1980, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (1998). Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 1998; 25 jaar sociale verandering, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Sommestad, Lena (1998). ‘Human reproduction and the rise of the welfare states: an economic-demographic approach to welfare state formation in the United States and Sweden’, Scandinavian Economic History Review 46:2, pp. 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Øystein and Stråth, Bo (eds.) (1997). The Cultural Construction of Norden, Oslo.
Souffron, Kathy (2007). Les violences conjugales, Paris.Google Scholar
Souty, G. and Dupont, P. (1999). Destin de mères, destins d'enfants, Paris.Google Scholar
Spencer, Stephanie (2005). Gender, Work and Education in Britain in the 1950s, Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spengler, J. J. (1979). France faces Depopulation: Postlude Edition 1936–1976, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
,Statistics Netherlands (2008). Statline 2008, The Hague and Heerlen.Google Scholar
,Statistics Netherlands (2010). Nederland langs de Europese meetlat, The Hague and Heerlen.Google Scholar
Summerfield, Penny (1998). Reconstructing Women's Wartime Lives: Discourse and Subjectivity in Oral Histories of the Second World War, Manchester.Google Scholar
Szreter, Simon and Fisher, Kate (2003). ‘“They prefer withdrawal”: the choice of birth control in Britain, 1918–1950’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34:2, pp. 263–91.Google Scholar
Szreter, Simon and Fisher, Kate (2010). Sex before the Sexual Revolution: Intimate Life in England 1918–1963, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrier, Jean and Wagner, Peter (2006). ‘Civil society and the problématique of political modernity’, in Wagner, Peter (ed.), The Languages of Civil Society, New York, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Margaret (2010). Online archive of the Margaret Thatcher Foundation, www.margaretthatcher.org/speeches, London.
Thélot, C. and Villac, M. (1998). Politique familiale: bilan et perspectives. Rapport à Mme. la ministre de l'emploi et de la solidarité et au ministre de l'économie, des finances et de l'industrie, Paris.Google Scholar
Therborn, Gøran (2004). Between Sex and Power. Family in the World, 1900–2000, London.Google Scholar
Thom, Deborah (2009), ‘“Beating people is wrong”: domestic life, psychological thinking and the permissive turn’, in Lucy Delap, Ben Griffin and Abigail Willis (eds.), The Politics of Domestic Authority since 1800, Basingstoke.
Thomas, James (2002). Diana's Mourning: A People's History, Cardiff.
Thompson, E. P. (1971). ‘The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century’, Past and Present 50, pp. 76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1984). ‘Demographic origins of the European proletariat’, in Levine, David (ed.), Proletarianization and Family History, Orlando.Google Scholar
Tobío Soler, Constanza (2002). ‘Conciliación o contradicción: cómo hacen las madres trabajadoras’, Reis 97, pp. 155–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis (2000) [1835/40]. Democracy in America, ed. Mansfield, Harvey and Winthrop, Delba, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touraine, Alain et al. (1996). Le grand refus. Réflexions sur la grève de décembre, Paris.Google Scholar
Trägårdh, Lars (ed.) (2007). State and Civil Society in Northern Europe. The Swedish Model Reconsidered, New York.
Trappe, H. (1995). Emazipation oder Zwang? Frauen in der DDR zwischen Beruf, Familie und Sozialpolitik, Berlin.Google Scholar
Trigilia, Carlo (ed.) (1995). Cultura e sviluppo, Rome.
,UNICEF (2008). Global Child Care Transition, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.Google Scholar
Valiente Fernández, Celia (1996). ‘Olvidando el pasado: la política familiar en España (1975–1996)’, GAPP 5–6, pp. 151–62.Google Scholar
Parijs, Philippe (1998). ‘The disfranchisement of the elderly, and other attempts to secure intergenerational justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27, pp. 292–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peer, Christine (2002). ‘Desired and achieved fertility’, in Macura, M. and Beets, G. (eds.), Dynamics of Fertility and Partnership in Europe. Insights and Lessons from Comparative Research, vol. II, New York, pp. 117–44.Google Scholar
Verwey-Jonker, H. (1985). ‘De man/vrouw relatie: een machtsbalans’, in Kooy, G. A. (ed.), Gezinsgeschiedenis. Vier eeuwen gezin in Nederland, Assen and Maastricht, pp. 138–66.Google Scholar
Wallace, Claire and Pichler, Florian (2008). ‘More participation, happier society? A comparative study of civil society and the quality of life’, Social Indicators Research 93:2, pp. 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellings, Kaye et al. (1994). Sexual Behaviour in Britain, The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, London.Google Scholar
Wigforss, Ernst (1951). Skrifter i urval 8. Minnen 1914–1932 (published in 1980), Stockholm.Google Scholar
Williams, Fiona (2004). Rethinking Families, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, London.Google Scholar
Willmott, Peter and Young, Michael (1957). Family and Kinship in East London, London.Google Scholar
Winberg, Christer (1977). Folkökning och proletarisering. Kring den sociala strukturomvandlingen på Sveriges landsbygd under den agrara revolutionen, Lund.Google Scholar
Winter, J. M. (1980). ‘The fear of population decline in Western Europe 1870–1940’, in Hiorns, R. W. (ed.), Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies, London, pp. 171–98.Google Scholar
Wrightson, Keith (2000). Earthly Necessities. Economic Lives in Early Modern Britain, New Haven.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (1985). ‘The fall of marital fidelity in nineteenth-century France: exemplar or exception?’, European Journal of Population 1, pp. 31–60, 131–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Quentin Skinner, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Families and States in Western Europe
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511852039.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Quentin Skinner, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Families and States in Western Europe
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511852039.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Quentin Skinner, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: Families and States in Western Europe
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511852039.010
Available formats
×