Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction to the fifth edition
- From the introduction to the first edition
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- Table of Security Council resolutions
- Table of General Assembly resolutions
- Abbreviations
- Part I The legal nature of war
- Part II The illegality of war
- 3 A historical perspective of the legal status of war
- 4 The contemporary prohibition of the use of inter-State force
- 5 The crime of aggression
- 6 Controversial consequences of the change in the legal status of war
- Part III Exceptions to the prohibition of the use of inter-State force
- Index of persons
- Index of subjects
- References
4 - The contemporary prohibition of the use of inter-State force
from Part II - The illegality of war
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction to the fifth edition
- From the introduction to the first edition
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- Table of Security Council resolutions
- Table of General Assembly resolutions
- Abbreviations
- Part I The legal nature of war
- Part II The illegality of war
- 3 A historical perspective of the legal status of war
- 4 The contemporary prohibition of the use of inter-State force
- 5 The crime of aggression
- 6 Controversial consequences of the change in the legal status of war
- Part III Exceptions to the prohibition of the use of inter-State force
- Index of persons
- Index of subjects
- References
Summary
The Kellogg-Briand Pact
226. 1928 was a watershed date in the history of the legal regulation of the use of inter-State force. That was when the General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy, known as the Kellogg-Briand Pact (after the American Secretary of State and the French Foreign Minister), was signed in Paris. Before the outbreak of World War II, the Pact had 63 Contracting Parties, a record number for that period.
227. The Kellogg-Briand Pact comprised only three Articles, including one of a technical nature. In Article l, the Contracting Parties solemnly declared that ‘they condemn recourse to war for the solution of international controversies, and renounce it as an instrument of national policy in their relations with one another’. In Article 2, they agreed that the settlement of all disputes with each other ‘shall never be sought except by pacific means’.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- War, Aggression and Self-Defence , pp. 85 - 123Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011