Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:45:12.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Ungulate management in Europe: towards a sustainable future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Robert Kenward
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Rory Putman
Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University
Rory Putman
Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University
Marco Apollonio
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sardinia
Reidar Andersen
Affiliation:
Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Get access

Summary

Management of ungulate populations: resource and conflict

As noted by Apollonio et al. (2010), the management of large ungulates in Europe is no easy task. There are some 20 different species, each living in a great variety of environmental conditions across their full distributional range; populations are increasing in nearly all European countries and, in consequence, they are having a profound effect on the ecological dynamics of both natural and human-created ecosystems of which they are a part.

These ungulates represent in themselves an immense potential resource – in terms of biodiversity and also in economic terms. More than 5.2 million animals harvested each year represents more than 120000 tonnes of meat, and a potential hunting revenue of several hundred million euros (Apollonio et al., 2010); in addition these animals have inestimable aesthetic and cultural value as country-specific carriers of a whole range of cultural and hunting traditions. At the same time, while they may be exploited in this way as sources of food and recreation, they may also have many negative impacts through damage to forests or agricultural crops, damage through heavy impacts on natural habitats (Chapter 6), as vectors of disease (Chapter 7), or through implication in collisions with vehicles (Chapter 8).

Type
Chapter
Information
Ungulate Management in Europe
Problems and Practices
, pp. 376 - 395
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apollonio, M., Andersen, R. and Putman, R. (2010) Present status and future challenges for European ungulate management. In Apollonio, M., Andersen, R. and Putman, R. (eds.) European Ungulates and their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 578–604.Google Scholar
Beddoe, R., Costanza, R., Farley, J., et al. (2009) Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106, 2483–2489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brainerd, S. (2007) European Charter on Hunting and Biodiversity. Bern Convention, Council of Europe, Strasbourg. Online: www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/conventions/Bern/ Recommendations/tpvs07erev_2007.pdf
Brashares, J. S., Arcese, P., Sam, M. K., et al. (2004) Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines, and fish supply in West Africa. Science 306, 1180–1183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. New York: Springer.
Dickson, B., Hutton, J. and Adams, W. M. (2009) Recreational Hunting, Conservation and Rural Livelihoods. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, J. (2007) Sustainable use of wildlife: the view from archaeozoology. Journal for Nature Conservation 15, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenward, R. and Sharp, S. (2008) Use Nationally of Wildlife Resources across Europe (UNWIRE). In Manos, B. and Papathanasiou, J. (eds.) GEMCONBIO: Governance and Ecosystem Management for the Conservation of Biodiversity. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 117–123 (EC Contract FP6 - 028827).Google Scholar
Kenward, R. E, Sharp, R., Manos, B., et al. (2009) Conservation from use of biodiversity and ecosystem services. In Proceedings of the XXIX Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists, held Moscow, 2009, pp. 68–83.Google Scholar
Manos, B. and Papathanasiou, J. (2008) GEMCONBIO: Governance and Ecosystem Management for the Conservation of Biodiversity. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Morellet, N., Gaillard, J. M., Hewison, A. J. M., et al. (2007) Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 634–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. D., Johnson, F. A. and Williams, B. K. (1995) Managing North American waterfowl in the face of uncertainty. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26, 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, R. J. and Watson, P. (2009) Developing an impact assessment methodology for use beyond the site scale. Report to the National Trust, England.Google Scholar
Putman, R. J., Watson, P. and Langbein, J. (in press) Assessing deer densities and impacts at the appropriate level for management: a review of methodologies for use beyond the site scale. Mammal Review, in press.
Shea, K.,and the NCEAS Working group on population management (1998) Management of populations in conservations, harvesting and control. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R., Muir, R., Walpole, M., Balmford, A. and Leader-Williams, N. (2003) Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature 426, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittingham, M. J., Swetnam, R. D., Wilson, J. D., Chamberlain, D. E. and Freckleton, R. P. (2005) Habitat selection by yellowhammers Emberiza citronella on lowland farmland at two spatial scales: implications for conservation management. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D. and Conroy, M. J. (2002) Analysis and Management of Animal Populations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×