Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:16:39.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Development, verification, and maintenance of computational software in geodynamics

from Part II - Modeling software and community codes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

Michael Gurnis
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Walter Landry
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Eh Tan
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Luis Armendariz
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Leif Strand
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Michael Aivazis
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
G. Randy Keller
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Chaitanya Baru
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Research on dynamical processes within the Earth and planets increasingly relies upon sophisticated, large-scale computational models. Improved understanding of fundamental physical processes such as mantle convection and the geodynamo, magma dynamics, crustal and lithospheric deformation, earthquake nucleation, and seismic wave propagation, are heavily dependent upon better numerical modeling. Surprisingly, the rate-limiting factor for progress in these areas is not just computing hardware, as was once the case. Rather, advances in software are not keeping pace with the recent improvements in hardware. Modeling tools in geophysics are usually developed and maintained by individual scientists, or by small groups. But it is difficult for any individual, or even a small group, to keep up with sweeping advances in computing hardware, parallel processing software, and numerical modeling methodology.

We will focus on the challenges faced by computational geophysics and the response of a community initiative in the United States called the Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics (CIG). Instead of reviewing all of the activities CIG has been involved with, we will focus on just a few so as to describe the multiple ways that a virtual organization developed and used software within the rapidly evolving backdrop of computational science. We will focus on the scientific topics of mantle convection, tectonics, and computational seismology, although CIG has also been deeply involved with magma dynamics and the geodynamo.

Mantle convection is at the heart of understanding how the Earth works, but the process remains poorly understood at best.

Type
Chapter
Information
Geoinformatics
Cyberinfrastructure for the Solid Earth Sciences
, pp. 49 - 67
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aagaard, B., Heaton, T., and Hall, J. (2001). Dynamic earthquake ruptures in the presence of lithostatic normal stresses, implications for friction models and heat production. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91: 1765–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,ANN (2010). www.cs.umd.edu/~mount/ANN/.
Bercovici, B., Ricard, Y., and Richards, M. A. (2000). The relation between mantle dynamics and plate tectonics: A primer. In History and Dynamics of Global Plate Motions, ed. Richards, M. A., Gordon, R. G. and Hilst, R. D.. Geophysical Monograph 121. American Geophysical Union, pp. 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstedde, C., Ghattas, O., Gurnis, M.et al. (2008). Scalable adaptive mantle convection simulation on petascale supercomputers. International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage, and Analysis, ACM/IEEE Supercomputing.CrossRef
Conrad, C. P. and Gurnis, M. (2003). Seismic tomography surface uplift, and the breakup of Gondwanaland: Integrating mantle convection backwards in time. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 4: 1031, doi:1010.1029/2001GC000299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J., Aivazis, M., Samtaney, R.et al. (2002). A virtual test facility for the simulation of dynamic response in materials. Journal of Supercomputing, 23: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G. F. (1999). Dynamic Earth: Plates, Plumes and Mantle Convection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,FIAT (2010). www.fenics.org/wiki/FIAT.
Gurnis, M.et al. (2009). Expanding Computational Infrastructure: The First 5 Years of CIG. Pasadena, CA: Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics, http://geodynamics.org/cig/proposalsndocs/documents/cig-first-5-years.Google Scholar
Karner, G. D., Taylor, B., Driscoll, N. W., and Kohlstedt, D. L. (2004). Rheology and Deformation of the Lithosphere at Continental Margins. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komatitsch, D., Ritsema, J., and Tromp, J. (2002). The spectral-element method: Beowulf computing and global seismology. Science, 298: 1737–1742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, A. K. and Zhong, S. (2004). Thermochemical structures within a spherical mantle: Superplumes or piles?Journal of Geophysical Research, 109: doi:10.1029/2003JB002847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melosh, H. J. and Raefsky, A. (1980). The dynamical origin of subduction zone topography. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 60: 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melosh, H. J., and Raefsky, A. (1981). A simple and efficient method for introducing faults into finite element computations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 71: 1391–1400.Google Scholar
Moresi, L. N. and Gurnis, M. (1996). Constraints on the lateral strength of slabs from three-dimensional dynamic flow models. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 138: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moresi, L. N. and Solomatov, V. S. (1995). Numerical investigation of 2D convection with extremely large viscosity variations. Physics of Fluids, 7: 2154–2162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moresi, L. N., Dufour, F., and Muhlhaus, H.-B. (2003). A Lagrangian integration point finite element method for large deformation modeling of viscoelastic geomaterials. Journal of Computational Physics, 184: 476–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moresi, L., Gurnis, M., and Zhong, S. (2000). Plate tectonics and convection in the Earth's mantle: Toward a numerical simulation. Computing in Science and Engineering, 2: 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, G. (1995). Rheology of the Earth. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Romanowicz, B. (2008). Using seismic waves to image Earth's internal structure. Nature, 447: 198–201.Google Scholar
Schubert, G., Turcotte, D. L., and Olson, P. (2001). Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, E., Choi, C., Thoutireddy, P., Gurnis, M., and Aivazis, M. (2006). GeoFramework: Coupling multiple models of mantle convection within a computational framework. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 7, Q06001, doi:10.1029/2005GC001155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, S., Gurnis, M., and Moresi, L. (1998). The role of faults, nonlinear rheology, and viscosity structure in generating plates from instantaneous mantle flow models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103: 15,255–15 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, S., McNamara, A., Tan, E., Moresi, L., and Gurnis, M. (2008). A benchmark study on mantle convection in a 3-D spherical shell using CitcomS. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 9, Q10017, doi:10.1029/2008GC002048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, S., Zuber, M. T., Moresi, L. N., and Gurnis, M. (2000). The role of temperature-dependent viscosity and surface plates in spherical shell models of mantle convection. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105: 11 063–11 082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×