Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T18:51:59.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Design of Disturbance Rejection Controllers for LPNI Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

ShiNung Ching
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Yongsoon Eun
Affiliation:
Xerox Center for Research and Technology
Cevat Gokcek
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Pierre T. Kabamba
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Semyon M. Meerkov
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access

Summary

Motivation: The LQR and LQG techniques are widely used for designing disturbance rejection controllers for linear systems. In this chapter, quasilinear versions of these techniques are developed and extended to simultaneous design of controllers and instrumentation, that is, actuators and sensors.

Overview: We begin with developing the SLQR/SLQG technique, where the “S” stands for “saturated” (Section 6.1). Then, we extend LQR/LQG to the so-called ILQR/ILQG (where the “I” stands for “instrumented”), which is intended for simultaneous design of controllers, sensors, and actuators (Section 6.2). For each of these methods, we show that the solution is given by the usual Lyapunov and Ricatti equations coupled with additional trancendental equations, which account for the Lagrange multipliers of the associated optimization problems and the quasilinear gains. Bisection algorithms for solving these coupled equations are provided.

Saturated LQR/LQG

Scenario

The LQR/LQG design methodology is one of the main state space techniques for designing linear controllers for linear plants, assuming that the actuators and sensors are also linear. Clearly, this methodology is not applicable to nonlinear systems. Is an extension to LPNI systems possible? A positive answer to this question is provided in this section for systems with saturating actuators. The resulting technique is referred to as SLQR/SLQG, where the “S” stands for “saturated.” Extensions to other nonlinearities and to nonlinearities in actuators and sensors simultaneously are also possible using the approach presented here.

Type
Chapter
Information
Quasilinear Control
Performance Analysis and Design of Feedback Systems with Nonlinear Sensors and Actuators
, pp. 167 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[6.1] R.E., Kalman, “Contributions to the theory of optimal control,” Boletin de la Sociedad Matematica Mexicana, Vol. 5, pp. 102–119, 1960Google Scholar
[6.2] R.E., Kalman, “A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems,” Transactions of the ASME – Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 82 (Series D), pp. 35–45, 1960Google Scholar
[6.3] A.M., Letov, “Analytic construction of regulators, IAutomation and Remote Control, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 436–441, 1960Google Scholar
[6.4] H., Kwakernaak and R., Sivan, Linear Optimal Control Systems, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972Google Scholar
[6.5] B.D.O., Anderson and J.B., Moore, Optimal Control: Linear Quadratic Methods, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989Google Scholar
[6.6] C., Gokcek, P.T., Kabamba, and S.M., Meerkov, “An LQR/LQG theory for systems with saturating actuators,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 1529–1542, 2001Google Scholar
[6.7] R., Bhattacharyya, Dynamics of Marine Vehicles, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978Google Scholar
[6.8] T.I., Fossen, Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1994Google Scholar
[6.9] L., Fortuna and G., Muscato, “A roll stabilization systems for a monohull ship: Modeling, identification and adaptive control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 18–28, 1996Google Scholar
[6.10] S., Ching, P.T., Kabamba, and S.M., Meerkov, “Instrumented LQR/LQG: A method for simultaneous design of controller and instrumentation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 217–221, 2010Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×