Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T05:22:09.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - C-minimal structures without density assumption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Françoise Delon
Affiliation:
Université Paris
Raf Cluckers
Affiliation:
Université de Lille
Johannes Nicaise
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Julien Sebag
Affiliation:
Université de Rennes I, France
Get access

Summary

A C-relation is the ternary relation induced by a meet-semi-lattice tree on the set of its branches, namely: C(x; y, z) if the intersection of x and z is strictly contained in the intersection of y and z. An ultrametric distance, in particular a valuation on a field, defines a C-relation: C(x; y, z) iff d(x, y) < d(y, z). A C-structure is a set equipped with a C-relation and possibly additional structure. Automorphism groups were the original motivation, in the middle of the 80's, of model theorists who considered C-structures, as C-relations provide natural examples of 2-homogeneous structures. Initially there was no connection with stability theory, another area from model theory, which can be considered to have started with an article of Michael Morley published in 1965, and has developed vigorously and continuously since then.

At the same time (around 1985), it was noticed by several people, including van den Dries, Knight, Pillay, Steinhorn, that some techniques from stability theory could be carried out in structures which are definitely not stable, namely certain linearly ordered (infinite) structures, that they called o-minimal (“o” for “order”). About ten more years were needed before Haskell, Macpherson and Steinhorn introduced dense C-minimal structures and described a common framework which comprised both strongly minimal structures (the simplest among stable structures), o-minimal structures and C-minimal structures. These are all structures which are characterized by the fact that definable sets in one-space (in one variable) are very simple.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[AN] Samson A., Adeleke and Peter M., Neumann, Relations Related to Betweenness: Their Structure and Automorphisms, Mem. AMS 623, 1998.Google Scholar
[Adl] Hans, Adler, Theories controlled by formulas of Vapnik-Chervonenkis codimension 1, manuscript, 2008.
[C] Zoé, Chatzidakis, Introductory notes on the model theory of valued fields, this volume.
[ClLoe1] Raf, Cluckers and François, Loeser, b-minimality, JML 7 (2007), 195–227.Google Scholar
[ClLoe2] Raf, Cluckers and François, Loeser, Integration through cell decomposition and b-minimality, this volume.
[D] Françoise, Delon, Geometries of pure C-minimal structures, submitted, 2009.
[DMo] Françoise, Delon and Marie-Hélène, Mourgues, Classification of ℵ0- categorical pure C-minimal structures, manuscript.
[DSi] Françoise, Delon and Patrick, Simonetta, Classification of C-minimal valued Abelian groups, manuscript.
[HHrMac] Deirdre, Haskell, Ehud, Hrushovski and Dugald, Macpherson, Stable Domination and Independence in Algebraically Closed Valued Fields, LNL 30, ASL, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.Google Scholar
[HMac1] Deirdre, Haskell and Dugald, Macpherson, Cell decompositions of C- minimal structures, APAL 66 (1994), 113–162.Google Scholar
[HMac2] Deirdre, Haskell and Dugald, Macpherson, A version of o-minimality for the p-adics, JSL 62 (1997), 1075–1092.Google Scholar
[Ho] Jan, Élise Holly, Canonical forms for definable subsets of algebraically closed and real closed valued fields. JSL 60 (1995), 843–860.Google Scholar
[Hr] Ehud, Hrushovski, Locally, ModularRegular Types, in Classification theory (Ed J.T., Baldwin), 132–164, LNM 1292, Springer, Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar
[HrK] Ehud, Hrushovski and David, Kazhdan, Integration in valued fields, in Algebraic geometry and number theory, 261–405, Progr. Math. 253, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston (2006).Google Scholar
[HrPi1] Ehud, Hrushovski and Anand, Pillay, Groups definable in local fields and pseudo-finite fields, Israel J. of M. 85 (1994), 203–262.Google Scholar
[HrPi2] Ehud, Hrushovski and Anand, Pillay, On NIP and invariant measures, ArXiv.
[HrZ] Ehud, Hrushovski and Boris, Zilber, Zariski geometries, Journal of the AMS 9 (1996), 1–56.Google Scholar
[KiPi] Byunghan, Kim and Anand, Pillay, From stability to simplicity, BSL 4 (1998), 17–36.Google Scholar
[LR] Leonard, Lipshitz and Zacharie, Robinson, One dimensional fibers of rigid subanalytic sets, JSL 63 (1998), 83–88.Google Scholar
[Maa1] Fares, Maalouf, Construction d'un groupe dans les structures C- minimales, JSL 73 (2008), 957–968.Google Scholar
[Maa2] Fares, Maalouf, Type-definable groups in C-minimal structures, CRAS, 1348 (2010), 709–712.Google Scholar
[Maa3] Fares, Maalouf, Espaces vectoriels C-minimaux, JSL, 75 (2010), 741–758.Google Scholar
[Maa4] Fares, Maalouf, Additive reducts of algebraically closed valued fields, preprint.
[Mac] Dugald, Macpherson, Notes on o-minimality and variations, in Model Theory, Algebra, and Geometry, Haskell, Pillay Steinhorn (editors), MSRI Publications 39, Cambridge University Press (2000), 97–130.Google Scholar
[MacSte] Dugald, Macpherson and Charlie, Steinhorn, On variants of ominimality, APAL 79 (1996), 165–209.Google Scholar
[Mar] David, Marker, Model Theory: An Introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer (2002).Google Scholar
[PeSta] Ya'acov, Peterzil and Sergei, Starchenko, Geometry, Calculus and Zil'ber Conjecture, BSL 2 (1996), 77–83.Google Scholar
[Pi] Anand, Pillay, An introduction to Stability Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1983).Google Scholar
[PiSte1] Anand, Pillay and Charlie, Steinhorn, Discrete o-minimal structures, APAL 34 (1987), 275–290.Google Scholar
[PiSte2] Anand, Pillay and Charlie, Steinhorn, Definable sets in ordered structures 3, TAMS 309 (1988), 469–476.Google Scholar
[S] Saharon, Shelah, Classification Theory and the number of non-isomorphic models, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978).Google Scholar
[Si1] Patrick, Simonetta, An example of a C-minimal group which is not abelian-by-finite, Proceedings of the AMS 131 (2003), 3913–3917.Google Scholar
[Si2] Patrick, Simonetta, On non-abelian C-minimal groups, APAL 122 (2003), 263–287.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×