Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T05:14:26.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Roman Concept of Ownership and the Medieval Doctrine of Dominium Utile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Thomas Rüfner
Affiliation:
University of Trier
John W. Cairns
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Paul J. du Plessis
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

BARTOLUS AND HIS DEFINITION OF OWNERSHIP

Commenting on D 41.2.17.1 – a text from the Digest dealing with the difference between possession and ownership (dominium) – the celebrated jurist Bartolus de Saxoferrato gives the following definition of ownership: “What, then, is ownership? Answer: it is the right of complete disposal over a corporeal thing, as long as it is not prohibited by law.” This definition has influenced conceptions of property law for many centuries. It is, for example, repeated almost verbatim in the French Code civil, article 544:

Ownership is the right to enjoy and to dispose of things in the most absolute manner provided they are not used in a way prohibited by statutes or regulations.

The definition of Bartolus is thus apparently not only an adequate expression of the classical Roman law but also a forerunner of the modern, liberal concept of ownership.

The modern continental concept of ownership is that of an absolute right of use and disposal. There can be only one owner (or group of co-owners). The possibility of a vertical division of ownership is excluded. Article 544 of the French Code was drafted as a clear expression of the legislative will to end all feudal institutions. In feudal law, the right of ownership is vertically split between the feudal lord and the tenant: neither has the full right of disposal, because each has to respect the position of the other. Thus, neither lord nor tenant has the right to dispose de la manière la plus absolue (“in the most absolute manner”).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Creation of the Ius Commune
From Casus to Regula
, pp. 127 - 142
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×