Addison, Joseph. Cato, edited by Henderson, Christine Dunn and Yellin, Mark E.. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2004.Google Scholar

Addison, Joseph, and Steele, Richard. The Spectator, edited by Bond, Donald F., 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Alison, Archibald. Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste, second edition, 2 vols. Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute, 1811.Google Scholar

Alison, ArchibaldSermons, Chiefly on Particular Occasions, third edition. Edinburgh: Constable, 1815.Google Scholar

André, Yves-Marie de L’Isle. The Art of Conversing: Translated from the French. London: T. Lewis and J. Bew, 1777.Google Scholar

André, Yves-Marie de L’IsleEssai sur le Beau, ou l’on examine en quoi consiste précisément le beau dans le physique, dans le moral, dans les ouvrages d’esprit et dans la musique. Paris: Ganeau,1741.Google Scholar

André, Yves-Marie de L’IsleEssai sur le Beau, nouvelle Édition, augmentée de six discours, sur le modus, sur le decorum, sur les graces, sur l’amour de beau, et sur l’amour désintéressé. Paris: Ganeau, 1770.Google Scholar

André, Yves-Marie de L’IsleEssay on Beauty, translated by Cain, Alan J.. Porto: Ebook, 2010.Google Scholar

André, Yves-Marie de L’IsleVersuch von dem Schönen, darinn man untersuchet, worinn das Schöne in der Natur, in den Sitten, in den Werken des Witzes, und in der Musick oder Tonkunst bestehe. Königsberg: Driest, 1753.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by Barnes, Jonathan, 2 vols. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Ashfield, Andrew, and de Bolla, Peter, editors. The Sublime: A Reader in British ighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRef

Babbitt, Irving. The New Laokoon. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1910.Google Scholar

Bacon, Sir Francis. The Advancement of Learning, edited by Kieran, Michael, The Oxford Francis Bacon, vol. IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Baker, Nancy Kovaleff, and Christensen, Thomas. Aesthetics and the Art of Musical Composition in the German Enlightenment: Selected Writings of Johann Georg Sulzer and Heinrich Christoph Koch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Batteux, Charles. Les Beaux-Arts réduit à un même principe, Édition critique par Jean-Remy Mantion. Paris: Aux Amateurs de Livres, 1989.Google Scholar

Batteux, Charles. A course of the belles lettres: or the principles of literature. Translated from the French of the Abbot Batteux, by Mr. Miller. 4 vols. London: B. Law and Co. Caslon, T., Coote, J., Hooper, S., Kearsly, G., and Morley, A., 1761.Google Scholar

Batteux, Charles. Einschränkung der Schönen Künste auf einen einzigen Grundsatz, aus dem Französichen übersetzt, und mit verschiedenen eignen damit verwandten Abhandlungen begleitet von Johann Adolf Schlegel, third edition. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erben und Reich, 1770.Google Scholar

Batteux, CharlesLes quatre poëtiques, d’Aristote, d’Horace, de Vida, de Despréaux: avec les traductions & des remarques. Paris: Chez Saillant & Nyon, 1771.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Aesthetica. Frankfurt an der Oder: Johann Christian Kleyb (1750), and Aestheticorum Pars Altera (1758).Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebAesthetica. Naples: Bruno Laterzi, 1936.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebÄsthetik, translated with introduction, notes, and index by Mirbach, Dagmar, 2 vols. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebAlexander Gottlieb Baumgartens Metaphysik, translated by Meier, Georg Friedrich, with notes by Johann August Eberhard, second edition (1783), edited by Mirbach, Dagmar. Jena: Dietrich Scheglmann Reprints, 2005.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebMeditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus/Philosophische Betrachtungen über einige Bedingungen des Gedichtes, edited by Paetzold, Heinz. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebMetaphysica/Metaphysik: Historisch-critische Ausgabe, translated, introduced, and edited by Gawlick, Günter and Kreimendahl, Lothar. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Fromann-Holzboog, 2011.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebReflections on Poetry: Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus, translated by Aschenbrenner, Karl and Holther, William B.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebDie Vorreden zur Metaphysik, edited, translated and commented upon by Niggli, Ursula. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1998.Google Scholar

(Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb). Poppe, Bernhard, Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten: Seine Bedeutung und Stellung in der Leibniz-Wolffischen Philosophie und seine Beziehungen zu Kant: Nebst Veröffentlichung einer bisher unbekannten Handschrift der Ästhetik Baumgartens. Borna-Leipzig: Robert Noske, 1907.Google Scholar

(Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb). Schweizer, Hans Rudolf, Ästhetik als Philosophie der sinnlichen Erkenntnis: Eine Interpretation der ‘Aesthetica’ A.G. Baumgartens mit teilweiser Wiedergabe des lateinischen Textes und deutscher Übersetzung. Basel: Schwabe, 1973.Google Scholar

Beattie, James. Dissertations Moral and Critical. London: Strahan and Cadell, 1783.Google Scholar

Beattie, JamesElements of Moral Science, 2 vols. Edinburgh: Cadell and Leach, 1790–3.Google Scholar

Beattie, JamesSelected Philosophical Writings, edited by Harris, James A.. Exeter: Imprint Academia, 2004.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J.M., editor. Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Boetius, Henning. Dichtungstheorien der Aufklärung. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bullough, Edward. Æsthetics: Lectures and Essays. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Beautiful and Sublime, edited by Boulton, J.T.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Collingwood, Robin George. The Principles of Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1938.Google Scholar

Crousaz, Jean-Pierre de. A New Treatise of the Art of Thinking, or a Complete System of Reflections. London, 1724.Google Scholar

Crousaz, Jean-Pierre deTraité de Beau (Amsterdam: 1715, 1724); modern edition, Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard, 1985.Google Scholar

D’Alembert, , Rond, Jean Le. Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, translated by Schwab, Richard N., with the collaboration of Walter E. Rex. Indianapolis, Ind.:Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis. On Art and Artists: An Anthology of Diderot’s Aesthetic Thought, edited by Szenec, Jean, translated by Glaus, John S.D.. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diderot, Denis. Diderot on Art I: The Salon of 1765 and Notes on Painting, translated by Goodman, Thomas. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis. Diderot’s Letters to Sophie Volland, translated by France, Peter. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis. Diderot’s Selected Writings, edited by Crocker, Lester G., translated by Coltman, Derek. New York: Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar

Du Bos, Jean-Baptise. Critical Reflections on Poetry, Painting and Music, translated by Nugent, Thomas, 3 vols. London: John Nourse, 1748.Google Scholar

Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Genius. London: W. Strahan, 1774; facsimile reprint with introduction by Bernhard Fabian. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Taste: With Three Dissertations on the Same Subject by Mr. De Voltaire, Mr. D’Alambert, and Mr. De Montesquieu. London: Millar, A., Kincaid, A., and Bell, J., 1759; facsimile reprint, Menton, Yorkshire: Scolar Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Taste, together with Observations concerning the Imitative Nature of Poetry, third edition. Edinburgh: Bell and Creech, 1780; facsimile edition with an introduction by Walter J. Hipple, Jr. Gainesville: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints, 1963.Google Scholar

Gerard, Alexander. Versuch über das Genie, translated by Garve, Christian. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erbe und Reich, 1776; modern reprint with an introduction by Manfred Kuehn. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Gerard, Alexander. Versuch über den Geschmack, translated by Flögel, Karl Friedrich. Breslau: Johann Ernst Meyer, 1766; reprinted with an introduction by Manfred Kuehn. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Gilpin, William. Observations on the River Wye, and Several Parts of South Wales, etc., relative chiefly to Picturesque Beauty. London: R. Blamire, 1782.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Ästhetische Schriften 1771–1805, edited by Apel, Friedmar. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Ästhetische Schriften 1806–1815, edited by Apel, Friedmar, in Goethe, , Sämtliche Werke, edited by Borchmeyer, Dieter et al., vol. 19. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Aus meinem Leben: Dichtung und Wahrheit. In Goethe, Sämtliche Werke, edited by Borchmeyer, Dieter et al., vol. 14. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Goethe on Art, edited by Gage, John. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Goethes Werke, Hamburger Ausgabe, Vol. III, edited by Trunz, Erich, eighth edition. Hamburg: Christian Wegner Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar

Gottsched, Johann Christoph. Schriften zur Literatur, edited by Steinmetz, Horst. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun., 1972.Google Scholar

Harris, James. The Works of James Harris, Esq., in 2 vols. London: F. Wingrave, 1801.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, translated by Knox, T.M., 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Philosophie der Kunst oder Ästhetik. Nach Hegel. Im Sommer 1826, Mitschrift Friedrich Carl Hermann Victor von Kehler, edited by Gethmann-Seifert, Annemarie and Collenberg-Plotnikov, Bernadette. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Vorlesung über Ästhetik (1821), edited by Schneider, Helmut. Berlin: Peter Lang, Main, 1995.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst (1823), edited by Gethmann-Seifert, Annemarie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. Versuch über Kunst und Leben. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar

Herbart, Johann Friedrich. Lehrbuch zur Einleitung in die Philosophie, revised edition, edited by Henckmann, Wolfhart. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Herbart, Johann Friedrich. Sämtliche Werke, edited by Kehrbach, Karl and Flügel, Otto, 19 vols. Langensalza, 1887; reprinted Aalen: Scientia, 1989.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Extract from a Correspondence on Ossian and the Songs of Ancient People, translated by Crick, Joyce P., in Nisbet, H.B., editor, German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: Winckelmann, Lessing, Hamann, Herder, Schiller, and Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Pp. 154–61.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Philosophical Writings, edited by Forster, Michael N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Schriften zur Ästhetik und Literatur 1767–1781, edited by Grimm, Gunter E.. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Schriften zur Literature und Philosophie 1792–1800, edited by Irmscher, Hans Dieter. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Selected Early Works 1764–1767, edited by Menze, Ernest A. and Menges, Karl, translated by Menze, Ernest A. with Palma, Michael. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Selected Writings on Aesthetics, translated and edited by Moore, Gregory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Sculpture: Some Observations on Shape and Form from Pygmalion’s Creative Dream, edited and translated by Gaiger, Jason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Shakespeare, translated by Crick, Joyce, in Nisbet, H.B., editor, German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: Winckelmann, Lessing, Hamann, Herder, Schiller, and Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 161–76.Google Scholar

Herz, Marcus. Betrachtungen aus der spekulativen Weltweisheit (1771), edited with introduction, notes, and bibliography by Conrad, Elfriede, Delfosse, Heinrich P., and Nehren, Birgit. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar

Herz, Marcus. Versuch über den Geschmack und die Ursachen seiner Verschiedenheit. Leipzig Mitau: Hinz, 1776; second, enlarged and improved edition, Berlin: Christian Friedrich Voß, 1790.Google Scholar

Heydenreich, Karl Heinrich. System der Ästhetik, Band I. Leipzig: Georg Joachim Göschen, 1790; edited by Volker Deubel, Hildesheim: Gerstenberg Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar

Hoftstadter, Albert, and Kuhns, Richard, editors. Philosophies of Art and Beauty: Selected Readings in Aesthetics from Plato to Heidegger. New York: Random House Modern Library, 1964.

Hogarth, William. The Analysis of Beauty, edited by Paulson, Ronald. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Hogarth, William. Zergleiderung der Schönheit, die schwankenden Begriffe von dem Geschmacke festzusetzen, translated by Mylius, Christlob. Berlin: Christian Friedrich Voss, 1754; modern reprint with introduction by Manfred Kuehn. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Horace, . The Art of Poetry, translation by Wickham, E.C. (1903). In Critical Theory since Plato, edited by Adams, Hazard. San Diego, New York, etc.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.Google Scholar

Hoyt, Nelly S., and Cassirer, Thomas, translators. Encyclopedia Selections. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.

Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hume, David. Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, edited by Miller, Eugene F., revised edition. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 1987.Google Scholar

Hume, David. The History of England, edited by Todd, William B., 6 vols. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 1983.Google Scholar

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Fate, David and Norton, Mary J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hume, David. Vier Abhandlungen, translated by Resewitz, Friedrich Gabriel. Quedlinburg and Leipzig: Andreas Franz Biesterfeld, 1759; reprinted with introduction by Klemme, Heiner F.. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind, translated by Heath, Peter with an introduction by Aarsleff, Hans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. The Limits of State Action, edited by Burrow, J.W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. Werke in Fünf Bänden, edited by Flitner, Andreas and Giel, Klaus. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1969.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, fourth edition. London: D. Midwinter et al., 1738.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, edited by Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2004.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. The Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, edited by Garrett, Aaron. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2002.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. Philosophiae Moralis Institutio Compendiaria with a Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy, edited by Turco, Luigi. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2007.Google Scholar

Kames, HenryHome, Lord. Elements of Criticism, sixth edition, 1785, edited by Jones, Peter, 2 vols. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar

Kames, HenryHome, Lord. Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion, edited by Moran, Mary Catherine. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar

Kames, HenryHome, Lord. Sketches of the History of Man, edited by Harris, James A., 3 vols. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2007.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology, History, and Education, edited by Louden, Robert B. and Zöller, Günter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by Guyer, Paul, translated by Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, edited and translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998,CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, edited by the Royal Prussian, later German, then Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences. Berlin: Georg Reimer, later Walter de Gruyter, 1900 –.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der Urteilskraft, edited by Klemme, Heiner F.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings, edited by Frierson, Patrick and Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Opus postumum, edited by Förster, Eckart, translated by Förster, Eckart and Rosen, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy, edited and translated by Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Religion and Rational Theology, edited and translated by Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George di. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770, edited by Walford, David with Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Philosophical Papers and Letters, translated and edited by Loemker, Leroy E.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Theodicy, edited and abridged from the 1893 translation by Huggard, E.M. by Diogenes Allen. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry, translated by McCormick, Edward Allen. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962; with a foreword by Michael Fried, Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Wie die Alten den Tod gebildet. Berlin: Christian Friedrich Voß, 1769.Google Scholar

Locke, John. An Essay concerning Human Understanding, edited by Nidditch, P.H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees: or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits, edited by Harth, Phillip. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar

Meier, Georg Friedrich. Anfangsgründe aller schönen Wissenschaften, second edition, 3 vols. Halle: Hemmerde, 1754.Google Scholar

Meier, Georg Friedrich. Frühe Schriften zur ästhetischen Erziehung der Deutschen, edited by Kertscher, Hans-Joachim and Schenk, Günter, 3 vols. Halle: Hallescher Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar

Meier, Georg Friedrich. Theoretische Lehre der Gemüthsbewegungen Überhaupt. Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerde, 1744.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Ästhetische Schriften, edited by Pollock, Anne. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Ästhetische Schriften im Auswahl, edited by Best, Otto F.. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Gesammelte Schriften, begun by Elbogen, J., Guttmann, J., Mittwoch, E., continued by Altmann, Alexander. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann Holzboog, 1929–.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Jerusalem, or on Religious Power and Judaism, translated by Arkush, Allan, introduction and commentary by Altmann, Alexander. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1983.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Morgenstunden, oder Vorlesungen über das Dasein Gottes, edited by Bourel, Dominique. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam Jun., 1979.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Morning Hours: Lectures on God’s Existence, translated by Dahlstrom, Daniel O. and Dyck, Corey. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Phädon oder Über die Unsterblichkeit der Seele, edited by Bourel, Dominique. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings, edited by Dahlstrom, Daniel O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mengs, Anton Raphael. Gedanken über die Schönheit und über den Geschmack in der Malerey. Zürich: 1762.Google Scholar

Mengs, Anton Raphael. The Works of Anthony Raphael Mengs, edited by D’Azara, Joseph Nicholas, 2 vols. London: Faulder and Robinson, 1796.Google Scholar

Moritz, Karl Philipp Moritz. Werke, edited by Günther, Horst, second edition, 3 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Plato, . Complete Works, edited by Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis, Ind.:Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, with an introduction by Brody, Baruch A.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969; reproduced from vols. II and III of The Complete Works of Thomas Reid, 4 vols. Charlestown, Mass.: Samuel Etheridge, Jr., 1813–15.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (1785), edited by Brookes, Derek R.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. Philosophical Works, edited by Hamilton, William, 2 vols. Edinburgh: Machlachlan and Stewart, 1863; reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1983.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. Thomas Reid’s Lectures on the Fine Arts, edited by Kivy, Peter. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. Thomas Reid on Logic, Rhetoric and the Fine Arts: Papers on the Culture of the Mind, edited by Broadie, Alexander. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004; University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Joshua. Discourses on Art, edited by Wark, Robert R.. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Joshua. Discourses on Art with Selections from the Idler, edited by Mitchell, Stephen O.. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Joshua. The Literary Work of Sir Joshua Reynolds, Kt., with Some Account of the Life of the Author by Malone, Edmund, fifth edition, corrected, with A Memoir of the Life of Sir Joshua Reynolds by Farington, Joseph, 3 vols. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1819.Google Scholar

Riedel, Friedrich Justus. Theorie der schönen Künste und Wissenschaften: Ein Auszug aus den Werken verschiedener Schriftsteller. Jena: Cuno, 1767.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Confession and Correspondence, including the Letters to Malesherbes, translated by Kelly, Christopher, The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 5. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1995.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on the Sciences and Arts (First Discourse) and Polemics, translated by Bush, Judith R., Masters, Roger D., and Kelly, Christopher, in The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 2. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1992.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Émile, or Education, translated by Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Essay on the Origin of Languages and Writings Related to Music, translated by Scott, John, in The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 7. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 1998.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Letter to D’Alembert and Writings for the Theater, edited and translated by Bloom, Allan, Butterworth, Charles, and Kelly, Christopher, The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 10. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 2004.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Reveries of the Solitary Walker, in The Collected Writings of Rousseau, edited by Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, vol. 8. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 2000.Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. The Philosophy of Art, translated by Stott, Douglas W.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. On the Aesthetic Education of Man, translated by Wilkinson, Elizabeth M. and Willoughby, L.A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. Essays, edited by Hinderer, Walter and Dahlstrom, Daniel O.. New York: Continuum, 1993.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. National Ausgabe der Werke Schillers, vol. 20, Philosophische Schriften, Teil 1, with cooperation by Koopman, Helmut, edited by Wiese, Benno von. Weimar: Böhlau, 1962.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. Schiller’s “On Grace and Dignity” in Its Cultural Context: Essays and a New Translation, edited by Curran, Jane V. and Fricker, Christopher. Rochester, N.Y.: Camden House, 2005.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich.On the Study of Greek Poetry, translated by Barnett, Stuart. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of. Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, edited by Ayres, Philip. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Second Characters or the Language of Forms, edited by Rand, Benjamin. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar

Sidney, Sir Philip. A Defence of Poetry, edited by Dorsten, J.A. Van. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. Essays on Philosophical Subjects, edited by Ross, I.S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980; Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 1982.Google Scholar

Stewart, Dugald. Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind. Brattleborough: William Fessenden, 1808.Google Scholar

Stewart, DugaldPhilosophical Essays, first American edition. Philadelphia: Anthony Finley, 1811.Google Scholar

Sulzer, Johann Georg. Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste, second edition, 4 vols. plus index volume. Leipzig: Wiedemann, 1792–9; reprinted with introduction by Giorgio Tonelli, Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar

Sulzer, Johann Georg. Aesthetics and the Art of Musical Composition in the German Enlightenment: Selected Writings of Johann Georg Sulzer and Heinrich Christoph Koch, edited and translated by Baker, Nancy Kovaleff and Christensen, Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Sulzer, Johann Georg. Vermischte Philosophische Schriften, vols. I and II. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erben und Reich, 1773, 1781, reprinted in one volume. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar

Turnbull, George. Observations upon Liberal Education, in All Its Branches, edited by Moore, Terrence O., Jr. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 2003.Google Scholar

Turnbull, George. A Treatise of Ancient Painting, containing Observations on the Rise, Progress, and Decline of that Art amongst the Greeks and Romans; the High Opinion which the Great Men of Antiquity had of it; its Connexion with Poetry and Philosophy; and the Use that may be made of it in Education. London: A. Millar, 1740; modern facsimile with introduction by Vincent M. Bevilacqua. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1971.Google Scholar

Vitruvius, . The Ten Books of Architecture, translated by Morgan, Morris Hicky, edited by Warren, Herbert Langford. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar

Walton, Kendall L.Mimesis and Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Essays on the Philosophy and History of Art, with an introduction by Bowman, Curtis, 3 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. History of the Art of Antiquity, translated by Mallgrave, Harry Francis, introduction by Potts, Alex. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2006.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Anfangsgründe aller mathematischen Wissenschaften, new edition. Frankfurt:Renger, 1750–7; reprint Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1999, vols. 12–15.Google Scholar

Wolff, ChristianKleine Philosophische Schriften. Halle: Renger, 1740; modern reprint. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1981.Google Scholar

Wolff, ChristianMetafisica Tedesca, con le Annotazione alla Metafisica Tedesca, edited by Ciafardone, Raffaele. Milan: Bompiani, 2003.Google Scholar

Wolff, ChristianPhilosophia Prima sive Ontologia, new edition. Frankfurt: Renger, 1736; reprint edited by Jean Ecole. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1962.Google Scholar

Wolff, ChristianPreliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General, translated by Blackwell, Richard J.. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar

Wolff, ChristianPsychologia Empirica, new edition. Frankfurt: Renger, 1738; modern reprint. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1968.Google Scholar

Wolff, ChristianVernünfftige Gedancken über die Absichten der natürlichen Dinge, second edition. Frankfurt, 1726; modern reprint. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1980.Google Scholar

Abacı, Uygar. “Kant’s Justified Dismissal of Artistic Sublimity.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2008): 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alkemper, Alo. Ästhetische Lösungen: Studien zu Karl Philipp Moritz. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1990.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E.Lessing and the Enlightenment: His Philosophy of Religion and Its Relation to Eighteenth-century Thought. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E.Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmann, Alexander. Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Study. University (Tuscaloosa): University of Alabama Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Altmann, AlexanderMoses Mendelssohns Frühschriften zur Metaphysik. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1969.Google Scholar

Altmann, AlexanderTrostvolle Aufklärung: Studien zur Metaphysik und politischen Theorie Moses Mendelssohns. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Fromann-Holzboog, 1982.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, edited by Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Arkush, Alan. Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Baeumler, Alfred. Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft (originally 1923), second edition. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar

Andrew, Ballantyne. “The Picturesque and Its Development.” In Smith, Paul and Wilde, Carolyn, editors, A Companion to Art Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 116–24.Google Scholar

Barasch, Moshe. Modern Theories of Art I: From Winckelmann to Baudelaire. New York: New York University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Barkan, Leonard. Unearthing the Past: Archaeology and Aesthetics in the Making of Renaissance Culture. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Barnard, Frederick M.Herder’s Social and Political Thought: From Enlightenment to Nationalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Barrell, John. The Political Theory of Painting from Reynolds to Hazlitt: “The Body of the Public.” New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Becq, Annie. Genèse de l’esthétique française moderne 1680–1814. Paris: Albin Michel, 1994.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C.Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C.The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C.The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C.Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought 1790–1800. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, Frederick C.Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belaval, Yvon. L’Esthétique sans paradoxe de Diderot. Paris: Gallimard, 1950.Google Scholar

Berg, Maxine. Luxury and Pleasure in Eighteenth-century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. The Roots of Romanticism, Mellon, A.W. Lectures in the Fine Arts 45. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas. London: Hogarth Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Berry, Christopher J.The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bindman, David, Ogée, Frédéric, and Wagner, Peter, editors. Hogarth: Representing Nature’s Machines. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001.

Borsche, Tilmann. Wilhelm von Humboldt. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck, 1990.Google Scholar

Boulby, Mark. Karl Philipp Moritz: At the Fringe of Genius. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Nicholas. Goethe: The Poet and the Age, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991–2000.Google Scholar

Bruford, W.H.Culture and Society in Classical Weimar 1775–1806. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Brunius, Teddy. David Hume on Criticism. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1952.Google Scholar

Buchan, James. Crowded with Genius – The Scottish Enlightenment: Edinburgh’s Moment of the Mind. New York: HarperCollins, 2003.Google Scholar

Budd, Malcolm. The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature: Essays on the Aesthetics of Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Budick, Sanford. Kant and Milton. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Carroll, Noël. “Hume’s Standard of Taste.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (1984): 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. Freiheit und Form: Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1916.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, translated by Koelln, Fritz C.A. and Pettegrove, James A.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. The Question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, translated by Gay, Peter. New York: Columbia University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. Rousseau, Kant, and Goethe, translated by Gutmann, James, Kristeller, Paul Oskar, and Randall, John Herman, Jr. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caygill, Howard. Art of Judgment. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Clark, Robert T., Jr. Herder: His Life and Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Cohen, Ted, and Guyer, Paul, editors. Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Costazza, Alessandro. Genie und tragische Kunst: Karl Philipp Moritz und die Ästhetik des 18. Jahrunderts. Bern: Peter Lang, 1999.Google Scholar

Costelloe, Timothy M.Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Costelloe, Timothy M. “Hume’s Aesthetics: The Literature and Directions for Research.” Hume Studies 30 (2004): 87–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cranston, Maurice. Jean-Jacques: The Early Life and Works of Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712–1754. New York: W.W. Norton, 1982.Google Scholar

Cranston, MauriceThe Noble Savage: Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1754–62. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Cranston, MauriceThe Solitary Self: Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Exile and Adversity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Crawford, Donald W.Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Croce, Benedetto. Goethe. London: Methuen, 1923.Google Scholar

Crocker, Lester G.Diderot: The Embattled Philosopher. New York: Free Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Crocker, Lester G.Two Diderot Studies: Ethics and Esthetics, The Johns Hopkins Studies in Romance Literatures and Languages, extra volume 27. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Crowther, Paul. The Kantian Aesthetic: From Knowledge to the Avant-Garde. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dadlez, Eva M. “Ideal Presence: How Kames Solved the Problem of Fiction and Emotion.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (2011): 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dadlez, Eva M.What Is Hecuba to Him? Fictional Events and Actual Emotions. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Danzel, Theodor Wilhelm. Theodor Wilhelm Danzel, Gotthold Ephraim Lessing: Sein Leben und seine Werke. Leipzig: Dyk, 1850.Google Scholar

Danzel, Theodor Wilhelm.Zur Literatur und Philosophie der Goethezeit: Gesammelte Aufsätze zut Literaturwissenschaft, edited by Mayer, Hans. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. The British Moralists and the Internal “Ought”: 1640–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Martin L.Identity or History? Marcus Herz and the End of the Enlightenment. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Décultot, Élisabeth. Johann Joachim Winckelmann: Enquête sur la genèse de l’histoire de l’art. Paris: PUF, 2000.Google Scholar

Dent, Nicholas. Rousseau. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

Dickie, George. The Century of Taste: The Philosophical Odyssey of Taste in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dietzsch, Steffen. Immanuel Kant: Eine Biographie. Leipzig: Reclam Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar

Dugan, C.N. and Strong, Tracy B.. “Music, Politics, Theater, and Representation in Rousseau.” In Riley, Patrick, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 329–64.Google Scholar

Dumouchel, Daniel. Kant et le Genèse de la Subjectivité esthétique. Paris: Vrin, 1999.Google Scholar

Dürbeck, Gabriele. Einbildungskraft und Aufklärung: Perspektiven der Philosophie, Anthropologie, und Ästhetik um 1750. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

Ehrenspeck, Yvonne. Versprechungen des Ästhetischen: Die Entstehung eines modernen Bildungsprojekts. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, John M.Schiller’s Kalliasbrief and the Study of His Aesthetic Theory. The Hague: Mouton, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engell, James. The Creative Imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feiner, Shmuel. Moses Mendelssohn: Sage of Modernity, translated by Berris, Anthony. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Frances. Solitude and the Sublime: Romanticism and the Aesthetics of Individuation. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Ferry, Luc. Homo aestheticus: The Invention of Taste in the Democratic Age, translated by de Loaiza, Robert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Fischer, Luke. “Goethe contra Hegel: The Question of the End of Art.” In Goethe Yearbook: Publications of the Goethe Society of North America XVIII (2011): 127–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forbes, Duncan. Hume’s Philosophical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N.After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Fort, Bernadette, and Rosenthal, Angela. The Other Hogarth: Aesthetics of Difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Franke, Ursula. Kunst als Erkenntnis: die Rolle der Sinnlichkeit in der Ästhetik des Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1972.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, Gideon. No Religion without Idolatry: Mendelssohn’s Jewish Enlightenment. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Fricke, Christel. Kants Theorie des reinen Geschmacksurteils. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fried, Michael. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, second, revised edition, translated by Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. London: Sheed & Ward, 1989; reset, London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Gallie, Roger D.Thomas Reid: Ethics, Aesthetics and the Anatomy of the Self. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W.B. “Art as an Essentially Contested Concept.” Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1956): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W.B. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1956): 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garland, Henry Burnand. Schiller. London: Harrap, 1949.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie. Einführung in die Ästhetik. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Katherine Everett, and Kuhn, Helmut. A History of Esthetics, second edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Gill, Michael B.The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland, 1990.Google Scholar

Glauser, Richard. “Aesthetic Experience in Shaftesbury.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 76 (2002): 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetschel, Willi. Spinoza’s Modernity: Mendelssohn, Lessing, and Heine. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, M.M.Private Vices, Public Benefits: Bernard Mandeville’s Social and Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Gombrich, E.H. “Reynolds’s Theory and Practice of Imitation.” Burlington Magazine 80 (1942): 40–5.Google Scholar

Goodman, Katherine. “Gottsched’s Literary Reforms: The Beginning of Modern German Literature.” In Becker-Cantarino, Barbara, editor, German Literature of the Eighteenth Century: Enlightenment and Sensibility. Rochester: Camden House, 2005, pp. 55–78.Google Scholar

Grean, Stanley. Shaftesbury’s Philosophy of Religion and Ethics. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Gregor, Mary J. “Baumgarten’s Aesthetica.” Review of Metaphysics 37 (1983): 357–85.Google Scholar

Gross, Steffen W.Felix aestheticus: die Ästhetik als Lehre vom Menschen. Würzburg: Königshaus & Neumann, 2001.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “The Difficulty of the Sublime.” In Madelein, C., Pieters, J., and Vandenabeele, B., editors, Histories of the Sublime. Brussels: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belgie voor Wetenschapen en Kunsten: 2005, pp. 33–43.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. “Disinterestedness and Desire in Kant’s Aesthetics.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (1978): 449–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul “Gerard and Kant: Influence and Opposition.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (2011): 59–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul “History of Modern Aesthetics.” In Levinson, Jerrold, The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 25–60,Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul “Humean Critics, Imaginative Fluency, and Emotional Responsiveness: A Follow-up to Stephanie Ross.” British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2008): 445–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul “The Ideal of Beauty and the Necessity of Grace: Kant and Schiller on Ethics and Aesthetics.” In Hinderer, Walter, editor, Friedrich Schiller und der Weg in die Moderne. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2006, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar

Guyer, PaulKant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979; second, enlarged edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Guyer, PaulKant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul “Kant and the Philosophy of Architecture.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2011): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul “Kant’s Deductions of the Principles of Right.” In Timmons, Mark, editor, Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 23–64.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul “Moral Feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Denis, Lara, editor, Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 130–51.Google Scholar

Guyer, PaulValues of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul editor. Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.Google Scholar

Hamilton, James F.Rousseau’s Theory of Literature: The Poetics of Nature. York, S.C.: French Literature Publications, 1979.Google Scholar

Hammermeister, Kai. The German Aesthetic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haym, Rudolf. Herder nach seinem Leben und seinen Werken, 2 vols. Berlin: R. Gaertner, 1880–5.Google Scholar

Haym, RudolfWilhelm von Humboldt: Lebensbild und Charakteristik. Berlin: R. Gaertner, 1856.Google Scholar

Hipple, Walter John, Jr. The Beautiful, the Sublime, and the Picturesque in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetic Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried, editor. Immanuel Kant: Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2008.CrossRef

Huhn, Tom. Imitation and Society: The Persistence of Mimesis in the Aesthetics of Burke, Hogarth, and Kant. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Jäger, Michael. Kommentierende Einführung in Baumgarten’s Aesthetica. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar

Jauss, Steven, “Associationism and Taste Theory in Archibald Alison’s Essays.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2006): 415–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Peter. “The Aesthetics of Adam Smith.” In Jones, Peter and Skinner, Andrew S., editors, Adam Smith Reviewed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1992, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter. Hume’s Sentiments: Their Ciceronian and French Context. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Jones, Richard Foster Jones. Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Scientific Movement in Seventeenth-Century England, second edition. St. Louis: Washington University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Juchem, Hans-Georg. Die Entwicklung des Begriffs des Schönen bei Kant: Unter besonderen Berücksichtugung des Begriffs der verworrenen Erkenntnis. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar

Justi, Carl. Winckelmann und seine Zeitgenossen, third edition (originally 1866), 3 vols. Leipzig: Vogel, 1923.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles H.Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kelly, Christopher. “Rousseau and the Case against (and for) the Arts.” In Orwin, Clifford and Tarcov, Nathan, editors, The Legacy of Rousseau. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997, pp. 20–42.Google Scholar

Kelly, Christopher. Rousseau as Author: Consecrating One’s Life to the Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kern, Andrea. Schöne Lust: Eine Theorie der ästhetischen Erfahrung nach Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar

Kerry, S.S.Schiller’s Writings on Aesthetics. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Kirwan, James. The Aesthetic in Kant: A Critique. London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar

Kivy, Peter. “Hume’s Standard of Taste: Breaking the Circle.” British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (1967): 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kivy, Peter. “Reid’s Philosophy of Art.” In Cuneo, Terence and Woudenberg, René van, editors, The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 267–88.Google Scholar

Kivy, Peter. The Seventh Sense: Francis Hutcheson and Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics. New York: Burt Franklin, 1976; second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Klein, Lawrence E.Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline. “Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb.” In Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred, editors, The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers, 3 vols. London: Continuum, 2010, vol. I, pp. 66–73.Google Scholar

Klemme, Heiner F., editor, Die Schule Immanuel Kants: Mit dem Text von Christian Schiffer über das Königsberger Collegium Fridericianum, Kant-Forschungen Band 6. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1994.

Klinkenberg, H.M. “Artes liberales/artes mechanicae.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, edited by Ritter, Joachim, 13 vols. Basel: Schwabe, 1971–2007, vol. 1, pp. 531–3.Google Scholar

Korff, Hermann August. Geist der Goethezeit: Versuch einer ideellen Entwicklung der klassisch-romantischen Literaturgeschichte, 4 vols. Leipzig: Weber and Koehler & Amelang, 1923–53.Google Scholar

Korsmeyer, Carolyn. “Hume and the Foundations of Taste.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (1976): 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramnick, Isaac. The Rage of Edmund Burke: Portrait of an Ambivalent Conservative. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Kristeller, Paul Oskar. “The Modern System of the Arts.” Journal of the History of Ideas 12 (1951): 496–527 and 13 (1952): 17–46, reprinted in his Renaissance Thought and the Arts: Collected Essays. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980, pp. 163–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruft, Hanno-Walter. A History of Architectural Theory from Vitruvius to the Present, translated by Taylor, Ronald, Callander, Elsie, and Wood, Antony. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lear, Jonathan. “Katharsis.” In Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg, editor, Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992, pp. 315–40.Google Scholar

Lehmann, William C.Henry Home, Lord Kames and the Scottish Enlightenment: A Study in National Character and the History of Ideas. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehrer, Keith. Thomas Reid. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Liessmann, Konrad Paul. Reiz und Rührung: Über ästhetische Empfindungen. Vienna: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandlung, 2004.Google Scholar

Liessmann, Konrad PaulÄsthetische Empfindungen Eine Einführung. Vienna: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandlung, 2009.Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg. Goethe and His Age, translated by Anchor, Robert. London: Merlin Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Lühe, Astrid von der. David Humes ästhetische Kritik. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar

McPherson, C.B.Burke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Macintyre, Gordon. Dugald Stewart: The Pride and Ornament of Scotland. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Mahoney, John L. “Reynolds’s ‘Discourses on Art’: The Delicate Balance of Neoclassic Aesthetics.” British Journal of Aesthetics 18 (1978): 126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf A.Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Marchand, Suzanne L. “Becoming Greek.” In Wellbery, David E., editor, A New History of German Literature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004, pp. 376–81.Google Scholar

Mattick, Paul. Art in its Time: Theories and Practices of Modern Aesthetics. London: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menninghaus, Winfried. Das Versprechen der Schönheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003.Google Scholar

Menzer, Paul. Kants Ästhetik in ihrer Entwicklung, Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Klasse für Gesellschaftswissenschaften Jahrgang 1950 Nummer 2. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1952.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Katharina. Kein Rettungsmittel als die Leibe: Schillers und Goethes Bündnis im Spiegel ihrer Dichtungen. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2010.Google Scholar

Monk, Samuel H.The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England (originally 1935), with a new preface by the author. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Morrison, Jeffrey. Winckelmann and the Notion of Aesthetic Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mortonsen, Prebend. Art in the Social Order: The Making of the Modern Conception of Art. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Mossner, Ernest C.The Life of David Hume. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Murray, Patrick T.The Development of German Aesthetic Theory from Kant to Schiller: A Philosophical Commentary on Schiller’s Aesthetic Education of Man. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander. “Pity and Fear in the Rhetoric and the Poetics.” In Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg, editor, Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992, pp. 291–314.Google Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander. Virtues of Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Nivelle, Armand. Kunst- und Dichtungstheorien zwischen Aufklärung und Klassik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1960.Google Scholar

Norton, Robert E.Herder’s Aesthetics and the European Enlightenment. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Conor Cruise. The Great Melody: A Thematic Biography of Edmund Burke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

O’Dea, Michael. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Music, Illusion, and Desire. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborne, Harold. “Hume’s Standard and the Diversity of Aesthetic Taste.” British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (1967): 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parret, Herman, editor. Kants Ästhetik – Kant’s Aesthetics – L’esthétique de Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1998.CrossRef

Paulson, Ronald. Hogarth, 3. vols. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1991–93.Google Scholar

Phillipson, Nicholas. Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Pimpinella, Pietro. “L’Æsthetic di Baumgarten: Gnoseologia leibnizian e retorica antica.” Lexicon Philosophicum 4 (1989): 101–12.Google Scholar

Podro, Michael. The Manifold in Perception: Theories of Art from Kant to Hildebrand. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Pollok, Anne. Facetten des Menschen: Zur Anthropologie Moses Mendelssohns. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2010.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. “Is Art Modern? Kristeller’s ‘Modern System of the Arts’ Reconsidered.” British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2009): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, James I.The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Potts, Alex. Flesh and the Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History. New Haven, Conn,: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Randall, Helen Whitcomb. The Critical Theory of Lord Kames. Northampton, Mass.: Smith College, 1941.Google Scholar

Recki, Birgit. Ästhetik der Sitten: Die Affinität vom ästhetischem Gefühl und praktischer Vernunft bei Kant, Philosophische Abhandlungen Band 81. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2001.Google Scholar

Reed, T.J.Schiller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Reed, T.J. “Weimar Classicism: Goethe’s Alliance with Schiller.” In Sharpe, Lesley, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 101–15.Google Scholar

Richards, Robert J.The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Simon. Laocoon’s Body and the Aesthetics of Pain: Winckelmann, Lessing, Herder, Goethe, Moritz. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Richter, Simon. “Winckelmann, Johann Joachim.” In Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred, editors, Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. London: Continuum, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 1276–9.Google Scholar

Rivers, Isabel. Reason, Grace, and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England 1660–1780, vol. II, Shaftesbury to Hume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Ian Simpson. The Life of Adam Smith, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ross, Ian SimpsonLord Kames and the Scotland of His Day. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Safranksi, Rüdiger. Goethe und Schiller: Geschichte einer Freundschaft. Munich: Hanser, 2009.Google Scholar

Saine, Thomas P.Die ästhetische Theodizee: Karl Philipp Moritz und die Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1971.Google Scholar

Saint Girons, Baldine. Esthétiques du XVIIIe siècle: Le Modèle Français. Paris: Philippe Sers éditeur, 1990.Google Scholar

Saisselin, Rémy G.The Rule of Reason and the Ruses of the Heart: A Philosophical Dictionary of Classical French Criticism, Critics, and Aesthetic Issues. Cleveland: Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1970.Google Scholar

Sartwell, Crispin. “Art for Art’s Sake.” In Kelly, Michael, editor, Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, 4 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, vol. I, pp. 118–21.Google Scholar

Savile, Anthony. Aesthetic Reconstructions: The Seminal Writings of Lessing, Kant and Schiller, Aristotelian Society Series Volume 8. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. Art of the Modern Age: Philosophy of Art from Kant to Heidegger, translated by Randall, Steven. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000,Google Scholar

Schaper, Eva. Studies in Kant’s Aesthetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Schenk, Günter. Leben und Werk des halleschen Aufklärers Georg Friedrich Meier. Halle: Hallesches Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Claudia W.David Hume: Reason in History. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schneewind, J.B.The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Scholar, Richard. The Je-Ne-Sais-Quoi in Early Modern Europe: Encounters with a Certain Something. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrimpf, Hans Joachim. Karl Philipp Moritz. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulte-Sasse, Jochen. “Aesthetic Orientation in a Decentered World.” In Wellbery, David E.. A New History of German Literature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004, pp. 350–5.Google Scholar

Schulze, Sabine, editor. Goethe und die Kunst. Stuttgart: Hatje, 1994.

Scott, William Robert. Francis Hutcheson: His Life, Teaching and Position in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900.Google Scholar

Sekora, John. Luxury: The Concept in Western Thought, Eden to Smollett. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Shelley, James R. “Hume and the Nature of Taste.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (1998): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shiner, Larry. The Invention of Art: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sikka, Sonia. Herder on Humanity and Cultural Difference: Enlightened Relativism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sloan, Douglas. The Scottish Enlightenment and the American College Ideal. New York: Teachers College Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Solms, Friedhelm. Disciplina aesthetica: zur Frühgeschichte der ästhetischen Theorie bei Baumgarten und Herder. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1990.Google Scholar

Sommer, Robert. Grundzüge einer Geschichte der deutschen Psychologie und Aesthetik von Wolff-Baumgarten bis Kant-Schiller. Würzburg: Stahel, 1892.Google Scholar

Sorkin, David. Moses Mendelssohn and the Religious Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Sorkin, DavidThe Religious Enlightenment: Protestant, Jew, and Catholic from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Sparshott, Francis. The Theory of the Arts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spranger, Eduard. Wilhelm von Humboldt und die Humanitätsidee. Berlin: Reuter & Reichardt, 1909.Google Scholar

Spranger, EduardWilhelm von Humboldt und die Reform des Bildungswesens. Berlin: Reuter & Reichardt, 1910.Google Scholar

Stolnitz, Jerome. “On the Origins of ‘Aesthetic Disinterestedness.’” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (1961): 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stolnitz, Jerome “On the Significance of Lord Shaftesbury in Modern Aesthetic Theory.” Philosophical Quarterly 11 (1961): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tatarkiewicz, Władysław. History of Aesthetics, vol. 3, Modern Aesthetics, edited by Petsch, D., translated by Kisiel, Chester A. and Besemeres, John F.. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers, 1974; reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Tedesco, Salvatore. “Baumgartens Ästhetik im Kontext der Aufklärung.” Aufklärung 20 (2008): 137–50.Google Scholar

Tonelli, Giorgio. “La formazione del testo della Kritik der Urteilskraft.” Revue internationale de Philosophie 8 (1954): 423–48.Google Scholar

Tonelli, GiorgioKant, dall’estetica metafisica all’estetica psicoempirica, Memorie dell’Accademia della Scienze di Torino, ser. 3, vol. 3, pt. 2. Turin: Accademia della Scienze, 1955.Google Scholar

Townsend, Dabney. Hume’s Aesthetic Theory: Taste and Sentiment. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Townsend, Dabney “Shaftesbury’s Aesthetic Theory.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 41 (1982): 205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tumarkin, Anna. Der Ästhetiker Johann Georg Sulzer. Fraunfeld: Huber, 1933.Google Scholar

Ullrich, Wolfgang. “Kunst/Künste/System der Künste.” In Ästhetische Grundbegriffe, edited by Barck, Karlheinz, Frontius, Martin, Schlenstedt, Dieter, Steinwachs, Burkhart, and Wolfzettel, Friedrich, 7 vols. Stuttgart: Verlag J.B. Metzler, 2000–5, vol. 3, pp. 556–616.Google Scholar

Voitle, Robert. The Third Earl of Shaftesbury 1671–1713. Baton Rouge: Louisiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Vorländer, Karl. Immanuel Kant: Der Mann und das Werk, 2 vols. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1924.Google Scholar

Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Wellbery, David E.Lessing’s Laocoon: Semiotics and Aesthetics in the Age of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Werlen, Hansjakob. “The Universal and the Particular.” In Wellbery, David E., editor, A New History of German Literature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004, pp. 414–18.Google Scholar

Wessel, Leonard P., Jr. “A.G. Baumgarten’s Contribution to the Development of Aesthetics.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 30 (1972): 333–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (1929), corrected edition, edited by Griffin, David Ray and Sherburne, Donald W.. New York: Free Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Elizabeth M., and Willoughby, L.A.. Models of Wholeness: Some Attitudes to Language, Art and Life in the Age of Goethe, edited by Adler, Jeremy, Swales, Martin, and Weaver, Ann. New York: Peter Lang, 2002.Google Scholar

Wilson, Arthur M.Diderot. New York: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Wind, Edgar. Heilige Furcht und andere Schriften zum Verhälthnis von Kunst und Philosophie, edited by Krois, John Michael and Ohrt, Roberto. Hamburg: Philo Fine Arts, 2009.Google Scholar

Witte, Egbert. Logik ohne Dornen: Die rezeption von A.G. Baumgartens Ästhetik im Spannungsfeld von logischen Begriff und ästhetischer Anschauung. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar

Wokler, Robert. Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Wokler, RobertRousseau on Society, Politics, Music and Language: An Historical Interpretation of His Early Writings. New York: Garland, 1987.Google Scholar

Woodmansee, Martha. The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Zammito, John H.The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Zammito, John H.Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Zande, Johan van der. “Orpheus in Berlin: A Reappraisal of Johann Georg Sulzer’s Theory of the Polite Arts.” Central European History 28 (1995): 175–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeller, Rosemarie. “Literary Developments in Switzerland from Bodmer, Breitinger, and Haller to Gessner, Rousseau, and Pestalozzi.” In Becker-Cantarino, Barbara, editor, German Literature of the Eighteenth Century: Enlightenment and Sensibility. Rochester: Camden House, 2005, pp. 131–53.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar