Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T18:22:09.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

R. Michael Alvarez
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Election Administration in the United States
The State of Reform after Bush v. Gore
, pp. 223 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, Joel D. 1969. Alienation and Political Behavior. American Political Science Review 63(1): 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 2002. Bush v. Gore: The Question of Legitimacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamany, David W. and Grossman, Joel B.. 1983. Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker. Law and Policy Quarterly 5(4): 405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Lizette. 2011. Republican Legislators Push to Tighten Voting Rules. New York Times, May 28. Available at: .
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections. American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 55–96.CrossRef
Alvarez, R. Michael, Ansolabehere, Stephen, Berinsky, Adam, Lenz, Gabriel, Stewart, Charles III, and Hall, Thad E.. 2009. 2008 Survey of the Performance of American Elections. Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Stewart, Charles III. 2005. Studying Elections: Data Quality and Pitfalls in Measuring of Effects of Voting Technologies. Policy Studies Journal 33(1): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Hall, Thad E.. 2007. The New Mexico Election Administration Report: The 2006 November General Election. University of New Mexico.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Atkeson, Lonna, and Hall, Thad E.. 2012. Evaluating Elections: A Handbook of Methods and Standards. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Beckett, Dustin, and Stewart, Charles III. 2011. Voting Technology, Vote-by-Mail, and Residual Votes in California, 1992–2008: A Preliminary Report.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Hall, Thad E.. 2004. Point, Click and Vote: The Future of Internet Voting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Hall, Thad E. 2005. The Next Big Election Challenge: Developing Electronic Data Transactions Standards for Election Administration. IBM Center for The Business of Government.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Hall, Thad E. 2006. Controlling Democracy: The Principal-agent Problems in Election Administration. Policy Studies Journal 34(4): 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Hall, Thad E. 2008. Electronic Elections: The Perils and Promise of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Hall, Thad E. 2009. Provisional Ballots in the 2008 Ohio General Election. Pew Charitable Trusts, The Center for the States, Provisional Ballots: An Imperfect Solution. Available at: .
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., Ansolabehere, Stephen, Berinksy, Adam, Lenz, Gabriel, and Stewart, Charles III. 2009. 2008 Survey of the Performance of American Elections. Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project. Available at: .
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Hyde, Susan. 2008. Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Llewellyn, Morgan H.. 2007. How Hard Can It Be: Do Citizens Think It Is Difficult to Register to Vote?Stanford Law & Policy Review 18(349): 382–409.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Llewellyn, Morgan. 2008a. Are Americans Confident Their Ballots Are Counted?Journal of Politics 70(3): 754–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Llewellyn, Morgan 2008b. Who Should Run Our Elections?: Public Opinion about Election Governance in the United States. Policy Studies Journal 36(3): 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Llewellyn, Morgan 2009. The Winner’s Effect: Voter Confidence Before and After the 2006 Elections. California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Llewellyn, Morgan H.. 2010. Making Voter Registration Easier: Evaluation of the “Welcome Kit” Voter Registration Pilot Project. Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Kathleen Moore, M.. 2010. 2010 Poll Worker Survey of the Performance of LA County Elections: Spring 2010 Study, Initial Survey Report. Prepared for LA County Clerk’s Office.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., and Moore, M. Kathleen 2011. 2010 Poll Worker Survey of the Performance of LA County Elections: Fall 2010 Study, Initial Survey Report. Prepared for LA County Clerk’s Office.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Jonas, Jeff, Winkler, William E., and Wright, Rebecca N.. 2009. Interstate Voter Registration Database Matching: The Oregon-Washington 2008 Pilot Project. 2009 Electronic Voting Technology Workshop/Workshop on Trustworthy Elections, online proceedings. Available at: .
Alvarez, R. Michael, Atkeson, Lonna Rae and Hall, Thad E.. 2012. Confirming Elections: Creating Confidence and Integrity through Election Auditing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2008. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 5th edition. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. and LoTempio, Andrew J.. 2002. Winning, Losing, and Political Trust in America. British Journal of Political Science 32(2): 335–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. and Tverdova, Yuliya V.. 2003. Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies. International Political Science Review 22(4): 321–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2009. Effects of Identification Requirements on Voting: Evidence from the Experiences of Voters on Election Day. PS: Political Science & Politics 42(1): 127–30.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Hersh, Eitan. 2010. The Quality of Voter Registration Records: A State-by-State Analysis. Department of Government. Harvard University.
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Jones, Phillip Edward. 2010. Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 583–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Persily, Nathaniel. 2010. Measuring Election System Performance. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 13(3).Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Stewart, Charles III. 2005. Residual Votes Attributable to Technology. Journal of Politics 67(2):365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Stewart, Charles 2008. Function Follows Form: Voting Technology and the Law. In America Votes!: A Guide to Modern Election Law and Voting Rights, ed. Griffith, B. E.. Chicago: ABA Publishing.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Alvarez, R. Michael, Adams, Alex N., and Bryant, Lisa. 2011. The 2010 New Mexico Election Administration Report. University of New Mexico. Available at: .
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Alvarez, R. Michael, and Hall, Thad E.. 2009a. Are They the Same or Different? An Examination of Trust in Government, External Efficacy and Voter Confidence. Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting, Chicago Illinois, April 1–4.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Alvarez, R. Michael, and Hall, Thad E.. 2009b. Assessing Electoral Performance in New Mexico Using an Ecosystem Approach: Combined Report.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Alvarez, R. Michael, and Hall, Thad E. 2009c. Provisional Voting in New Mexico. Pew Charitable Trusts. The Center for the States. Provisional Ballots: An Imperfect Solution. Available at: .
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Alvarez, R. Michael, and Hall, Thad E. 2010. The 2008 New Mexico Election Administration Report. University of New Mexico. Available at: .
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Alvarez, R. Michael, Hall, Thad E., Bryant, Lisa A., Kereval, Yann, Llewyllen, Morgan, and Odegaard, David. 2008. The 2008 New Mexico Post Election Audit Report. University of New Mexico.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Bryant, Lisa A., Adams, Alex N., Zilberman, Luciana, and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2011. Considering Mixed Mode Surveys for Questions in Political Behavior: Using the Internet and Mail to Get Quality Data at Reasonable Costs. Political Behavior 33: 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, Bryant, Lisa A., Hall, Thad E., Saunders, Kyle L., and Alvarez, R. Michael. 2010. A New Barrier to Participation: Heterogeneous Application of Voter Identification Policies. Electoral Studies 29(1): 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae and Carrillo, Nancy. 2007. More is Better: The Impact of Female Representation on Citizen Attitudes Toward Government Responsiveness. Gender and Politics 3(1): 79–101.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2007. Election Administration and Voter Confidence: A Local Matter?PS: Political Science & Politics 40: 655–60.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae and Tafoya, Lorraine. 2008a. Close, but Not Close Enough: Democrats Lose Again by the Slimmest of Margins in New Mexico’s First Congressional District. In The Battle for Congress: Iraq, Scandal, and Campaign Finance in the 2006 Election, eds. Magleby, D. and Patterson, K.. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae and Tafoya, Lorraine 2008b. Surveying Political Activists: An Examination of the Effectiveness of a Mixed Mode (Internet and Mail) Survey Design. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18(4): 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, James M. 2007. Race, Partisanship, and Political Trust Following Bush v. Gore. Political Behavior 29(3): 327–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbie, Earl. 2010. The Practice of Social Research, 12th edition. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 2001. Bush v. Gore and the Boundary between Law and Politics. Yale Law Journal 110: 1407–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltimore Sun. “Reclaiming ‘One Man, One Vote’” April 27, 2010. .
Banducci, Susan A. and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2003. How Elections Change the Way Citizens View the Political System: Campaigns, Media Effects and Electoral Outcomes in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 33(3): 433–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Christopher P., Cohen, David B., and Green, John C.. 2005. The Final Arbiter: The Consequences of Bush v. Gore for Law and Politics. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matt A., Glaser, Bonnie, MacDonald, Karin, Collingwood, Loren, Pedraza, Francisco, and Pump, Barry. 2010. Online Voter Registration (OLVR) Systems in Arizona and Washington: Evaluating Usage, Public Confidence and Implementation Processes. Pew Center on the States.
Behrens, Angela, Uggen, Christopher, and Manza, Jeff. 2003. Ballot Manipulation and the “Menace of Negro Domination”: Racial Threat and Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 1850–2002. American Journal of Sociology 109(3) (November): 559–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Edward N. 1972. Lawyers Judge the Warren Court. Law and Society Review 7(1): 133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensel, Richard Franklin. 2004. The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2005. The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States. American Politics Research 33(4): 471–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Burns, Nancy, and Traugott, Michael W.. 2001. Who Votes By Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems. Public Opinion Quarterly 65(2): 18–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, Henry E. 2000. Trust the People: Political Party Coalitions and the 2000 Election. In The Unfinished Election of 2000, ed. Rakove, J. N.. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brickman, Danette and Peterson, David A. M.. 2006. Public Opinion Reaction to Repeated Events: Citizen Response to Multiple Supreme Court Abortion Decisions. Political Behavior 28(1): 87–112.Google Scholar
Brown-Dean, Khalilah L. Forthcoming. Once Convicted, Forever Doomed: Punishment, Citizenship, and Civil Death. Yale University Press.
Bryant, Lisa A. 2010. Voter Confidence and the Use of Absentee Ballots and Voter Assist Terminals: An Experimental Study. University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S., III and Hood, M. V. III. 2002. One Person – No Vote; One Vote; Two Votes: Voting Methods, Ballot Types, and Undervote Frequency in the 2000 Presidential Election. Social Science Quarterly 83(4): 981–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, Charles III, Hood, M. V. III, and Clark, Richard. 2005. Punch Cards, Jim Crow, and Al Gore: Explaining Voter Trust in the Electoral System in Georgia, 2000. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 5(3): 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traci, Burch. 2013. Trading Democracy for Justice: Criminal Convictions and the Decline of Neighborhood Political Participation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1986. Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 80(4): 1209–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Gibson, James L.. 1992. The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 635–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project. 2001a. Residual Votes Attributable to Technology: An Assessment of the Reliability of Existing Voting Equipment. Pasadena, CA and Cambridge, MA: California Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project 2001b. Voting: What Is, What Could Be. Pasadena, CA and Cambridge, MA: California Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Carter, James and Ford, Gerald. 2002. To Assure Pride and Confidence in the Electoral Process. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Gregory. 1974. The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation. Law & Society Review 8(3): 385–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cemenska, Nathan, Leighley, Jan E., Nagler, Jonathan, and Tokaji, Daniel P.. 2009. Report on the 1972–2008 Early and Absentee Voting Dataset. The Pew Charitable Trusts.
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2001. Bush v. Gore Was Not Justiciable. Notre Dame Law Review 76: 1093–112.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack and Luks, Samantha. 2001. Political Trust Revisited: Déjà Vu All Over Again? In What Is It about Government that Americans Dislike?, eds. Hibbing, J. R. and Theiss-Morse, E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claassen, Ryan L., Magelby, David B., Monson, J. Quin, and Patterson, Kelly D.. 2008. At Your Service: Voter Evaluations of Poll Worker Performance. American Politics Research 36(4): 612–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D. and Acock, Alan C.. 1989. National Elections and Political Attitudes: The Case of Political Efficacy. British Journal of Political Science 19(4): 551–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., Kegler, Elizabeth R., and Waltenburg, Eric N.. 2001. The Legitimacy – Conferring Authority of the United States Supreme Court: An Experimental Design. American Politics Research 29(6): 566–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., Kegler, Elizabeth R., and Waltenburg, Eric N. 2003. Supreme Court Legitimacy and Group – Centric Forces: Black Support for Capital Punishment and Affirmative Action. Political Behavior 25(4): 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Cornell. 2002. The Supply and Demand Sides of Judicial Policymaking (Or, Why Be So Positive About the Judicialization of Politics?). Law & Contemporary Problems 65: 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Rachael V., James Greiner, D., Quinn, Kevin M., Nickelsburg, Jerry, Timmons, Jeffrey F., Groh, Matthew, Rothschild, Casey, and Ross, Michael L.. 2012. “Can Voter ID Laws Be Administered in a Race-Neutral Manner? Evidence from the City of Boston in 2008.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1972. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colvin, Nathan L. and Foley, Edward B.. 2010. The Twelfth Amendment: A Constitutional Ticking Time Bomb. University of Miami Law Review 64: 475.Google Scholar
Commission on Federal Election Reform. 2005. Building Confidence in U.S. Elections. Center for Democracy and Election Management. American University. Available at: .
Conrad, Frederick G., Bederson, Benjamin B., Lewis, Brian, Peytcheva, Emilia, Traugott, Michael W., Hanmer, Michael J., Herrnson, Paul S., and Niemi, Richard G.. 2009. Electronic Voting Eliminates Hanging Chads But Introduces New Usability Challenges. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67: 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Timothy E. and Gronke, Paul. 2005. The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions. Journal of Politics 67(3): 784–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Michael. 2000. Contesting the Vote: Seminole County; Democrats Look to Another Trial. New York Times, December 6, 2000, A29.
Couper, Mick P. 2008. Designing Effective Web Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Steven C., Niemi, Richard C., and Silver, G. E.. 1990. Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items. Political Behavior 12(3): 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, Jake and Jessen, Edward W.. 2007. “Followed Rates” and Leading State Cases 1940–2005. UC Davis Law Review 41: 683–711.Google Scholar
Democratic National Committee. 2005. Democracy at Risk.
Dershowitz, Alan M. 2003. Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, Don A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dolbeare, Kenneth M. and Hammond, Phillip E.. 1968. The Political Party Basis of Attitudes toward the Supreme Court. Public Opinion Quarterly 32(1): 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, Jay K. and Enderby, James W.. 2004. Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models in Voting Research. Electoral Studies 23(1): 106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesen, David M. 2008. Firing U.S. Attorneys: An Essay. Administrative Law Review 60(3): 707–27.Google Scholar
Dugger, Ronnie. 1988. Annals of Democracy: Counting Votes. New Yorker, November 7, 1988, 31.
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Easton, David 1975. A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 435–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, Alec C. 2009. The Way We Vote: The Local Dimensions of American Suffrage. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Eversley, Melanie. 2012. Voter ID Laws are Growing; so are Challenges. USA TODAY (February 20).
Ferejohn, John. 2002. Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law. 65 Law & Contemp. Probs. 41.
File, Thom. 2008. Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2006. U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Reports. P20–557.
Flanders, Chad. 2006. Please Don’t Cite This Case! The Precedential Value of Bush v. Gore 116 Yale L.J. Pocket Part 141, 144.
Foley, Edward N. 2007. The Future of Bush v. Gore. Ohio State Law Journal 68. Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 92.
Fortier, John C. 2006. Absentee and Early Voting: Trends, Promises, and Perils. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
Fountain, John W. 2000. The 2000 Elections: Missouri; Senator Refuses to Challenge Loss. New York Times, Nov. 9, 2000.
Franklin, Charles H. and Kosaki, Liane C.. 1989. Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion and Abortion. American Political Science Review 83(3): 751–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, J. Leiper. 1955. The Political Process: Executive Bureau-Legislative Committee Relations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Frisina, Laurin, Herron, Michael C., Honaker, James, Lewis, Jeffrey B.. 2008. Ballot Formats, Touchscreens, and Undervotes: A Study of the 2006 Midterm Elections in Florida. Election Law Journal 7(1): 25–47.Google Scholar
Garner, Phillip and Spolaore, Enrico. 2005. Why Chads? Determinants of Voting Equipment Use in the United States. Public Choice 123(3):363–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Elizabeth. 2001. Leaving the Decision to Congress. In The Vote: Bush, Gore, and the Supreme Court, eds. Sunstein, C. and Epstein, R., 38–54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gerken, Heather K. 2009. The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System is Failing and How to Fix It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2007. The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (November): 507–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 2009a. Confirmation Politics and the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination. American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 139–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A. 2009b. Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court. Journal of Politics 71(2): 429–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta. 2003a. Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 47(2): 354–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta 2003b. The Supreme Court and the Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?British Journal of Political Science 33(4): 535–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2001. The Votes That Counted: How the Supreme Court Decided the 2000 Presidential Election. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin and Weissberg, Robert. 1978. Elections and the Mobilization of Popular Support. American Journal of Political Science 22(1): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Governor’s Select Task Force on Election Procedures, Standards, and Technology. 2001. Revitalizing Democracy in Florida. Miami: Collins Center for Public Policy.
Greene, Jamal, Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Persily, Nathaniel. 2011. Profiling Originalism. Columbia Law Review 111(2): 356.Google Scholar
Griffin, Drew and Johnston, Kathleen. 2008. Thousands of voter registration forms faked, officials say. CNN, October 9. Available at: .
Gronke, Paul. 2005. Ballot Integrity and Voting By Mail: The Oregon Experience. Reed College. The Early Voting Information Center.
Gronke, Paul 2008. Early Voting Reforms and American Elections. William and Mary Law Review 17(2): 423–51.Google Scholar
Gronke, Paul and Galanes-Rosenbaum, Eva. 2008. The Growth of Early and Non-Precinct Place Balloting: When, Why, and Prospects for the Future. In America Votes! A Guide to Election Law and Voting Rights, ed. Griffith, B.. American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Gronke, Paul and Hicks, James. 2009a. N=1? The Anomalous 2008 Election and Lessons for Reform. Presented to the 2009 meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Gronke, Paul and Hicks, James 2009b. Reexamining Voter Confidence as a Metric for Election Performance. Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, April 1–4.
Gronke, Paul and Stewart, Charles III. 2008. Basic Principles of Data Collection. In Data for Democracy: Improving Elections through Metrics and Measurements. The Pew Center on the States.
Gronke, Paul and Toffey, Daniel. 2008. The Psychological and Institutional Determinants of Early Voting. Journal of Social Issues 64(3): 503–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosskopf, Anke and Mondak, Jeffrey L.. 1998. Do Attitudes toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Thad E., Quin Monson, J., and Patterson, Kelly D.. 2007. Poll Workers in American Democracy: An Early Assessment. P.S.: Political Science and Politics 40(4): 647–54.Google Scholar
Hall, Thad E., Monson, J. Quin, and Patterson, Kelly D. 2008. Poll Workers and American Democracy. In Democracy in the States: Experiments in Election Reform, eds. Cain, B., Donovan, T., and Tolbert, C., 35–54. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Thad E., Quin Monson, J., and Patterson, Kelly D. 2009. The Human Dimension of Elections: How Poll Workers Shape Public Confidence in Elections. Political Research Quarterly 62(2): 507–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Thad E. and Stewart, Charles III. 2011. Voter Attitudes toward Poll Workers in the 2008 Election. University of Utah.
Harris, Joseph P. 1929. Registration of Voters in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2001. Bush v. Gore and the Future of Equal Protection Law in Elections. Florida State University Law Review 29: 377–406.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2004. A Critical Guide to Bush v. Gore Scholarship. Annual Review of Political Science 7: 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2005. Beyond the Margin of Litigation: Reforming U.S. Election Administration to Avoid Electoral Meltdown. Washington and Lee Law Review 6: 937–99.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard L. 2006. No Exit? The Roberts Court and the Future of Election Law. 57 S.C. L. Rev: 669, 685.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard. 2007. The Untimely Death of Bush v. Gore. Stanford Law Review 60(1): 1–44.Google Scholar
Hasen, Rick. 2009. Felon Disenfranchisement Issue Heading to the Supreme Court? Election Law Blog. August 2. .
Heilke, Thomas, Joslyn, Mark R., and Aguado, Alex. 2003. The Changing Readability of Introductory Political Science Textbooks: A Case Study of Burns and Peltason, Government by the People. PS: Political Science and Politics 36: 229–32.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S., Hanmer, Michael J. and Niemi, Richard G.. 2012. The Impact of Ballot Type on Voter Errors. American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 716–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S., Hanmer, Michael J. and Niemi, Richard G.. 2012. The Impact of Ballot Type on Voter Errors. American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 716–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S., Niemi, Richard G., Hanmer, Michael J., Bederson, Benjamin B., Conrad, Frederick G., and Traugott, Michael. 2008a. Voting Technology: The Not-So-Simple Act of Casting a Ballot. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S., Niemi, Richard G., Hanmer, Michael J., Francia, Peter L., Bederson, Benjamin B., Conrad, Frederick G., and Traugott, Michael W.. 2008b. Voter Reactions to Electronic Voting Systems: Results from a Usability Field Test. American Politics Research 36: 580–611.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 1998. The Political Relevance of Political Trust. American Political Science Review 92(4): 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiaasen, Scott, Kane, Gary, and Jaspin, Elliot. 2001. Felon Purge Sacrificed Innocent Voters. Palm Beach Post. May 27. .
Hirschl, Ran. 2002. Resituating the Judicialization of Politics: Bush v. Gore as a Global Trend. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15: 191–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1965. The Paranoid Style of American Politics, and Other Essays. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2007. The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics 60(1): 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2002. International Electoral Standards: Guidelines for Reviewing the Legal Framework of Elections. Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Cleo R. and Dillman, Don A.. 1997. Towards a Theory of Self-Administered Questionnaire Design. In Survey Measurement and Process Quality, eds. Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., deLeeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N., and Trewin, D., 165–96. New York: Wiley Inter-Science.Google Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R. and Martin, Andrew D.. 1998. The Public’s Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions. American Political Science Review 92(2): 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Douglas W. 2000. Jones’s Chad Page. Available at: .
Kam, Dara and Keller, Larry. 2004. Early Vote Sites Report Intimidation. Palm Beach Post, October 25.
Kennedy, Robert F., Jr. 2006. Was the 2004 Election Stolen? Rolling Stone 8, June 15. Available at: .
Kessel, John H. 1966. Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court. Midwest Journal of Political Science 10(2): 167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O., Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 2000. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kimball, David C. and Foley, Edward B.. 2009. Unsuccessful Provisional Voting in the 2008 General Election. Pew Charitable Trusts. The Center for the States. Provisional Ballots: An Imperfect Solution. Available at: .
Kimball, David C. and Kropf, Martha. 2005. Ballot Design and Unrecorded Votes on Paper-Based Ballots. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(4): 508–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, David C. and Kropf, Martha 2008. Voting Technology, Ballot Measures, and Residual Votes. American Politics Research 36(4): 479–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, David C. and Kropf, Martha 2011. “Cumulative Voting: The Case of Port Chester, NY.” Paper Presented at the 2011 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, IL.
Kimball, David C., Kropf, Martha, and Battles, Lindsay. 2006. Helping America Vote? Election Administration, Partisanship, and Provisional Voting in the 2004 Election. Election Law Journal 5(4): 447–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Ryan. 2006. A Decade of Reform: Felony Disenfranchisement Policy in the United States. The Sentencing Project. Available at: .
Knack, Stephen. 1995. Does Motor Voter Work? Evidence from State-Level Data. Journal of Politics 57(3): 796–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen and Kropf, Martha. 2003a. Roll-Off at the Top of the Ballot: Intentional Undervoting in American Presidential Elections. Politics & Policy 31(4): 575–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen and Kropf, Martha 2003b. Voided Ballots in the 1996 Presidential Election: A County-Level Analysis. Journal of Politics 65(3): 881–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohno, Tadayoski, Stubblefield, Adam, Rubin, Aviel, and Wallach, Dan. 2004. Analysis of an Electronic Voting System. IIE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2004. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Society Press.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Alex. 2010. Election Fraud Charges Swirl Even Before Election Day. ABC News, November 1. Available at: .
Kritzer, Howard M. 2001. The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Public Perceptions and Knowledge of the Supreme Court. Judicature 85(1): 32–38.Google Scholar
Kropf, Martha. 2005. “Dogs and Dead People: Incremental Election Reform in Missouri,” in Election Reform: Politics and Policy (pp. 157–173), eds Palazzollo, Daniel J. and Ceaser, James W.. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kropf, Martha and Kimball, David. 2012. Helping America Vote: The Limits of Election Reform. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kruse, Douglas L., Schriner, Kay, Schur, Lisa, and Shields, Todd. 1999. Empowerment through Civic Participation: A Study of the Political Behavior of People with Disabilities. Disability Research Consortium, Bureau of Economic Research, Rutgers University and New Jersey Developmental Disabilities Council.
Lausen, Marcia. 2007. Design for Democracy: Ballot and Election Design. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. and Nagler, Jonathan. 1992. Socioeconomic Class Bias in Turnout: 1964–1988: The Voters Remain the Same. American Political Science Review 86(3): 725–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. and Nagler, Jonathan 2007. Unions, Voter Turnout, and Class Bias in the U.S. Electorate, 1964–2004. Journal of Politics 69(2): 430–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. and Nagler, Jonathan 2009. Electoral Laws and Turnout, 1972–2008. Presented at Fourth Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, November. SSRN eLibrary 1443556.
Leighley, Jan E. and Nagler, Jonathan 2014. Who Votes Now: Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Levinson, Sanford. 2002. Bush v. Gore and the French Revolution: A Tentative List of Some Early Lessons. Law & Contemporary Problems 65: 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Justin, Weiser, Wendy R., and Munoz, Ana. 2006. Making the List: Database Matching and Verification Processes for Voter Registration. New York: Brennan Center for Justice.Google Scholar
Liebschutz, Sarah and Palazzolo, Daniel J.. 2005. HAVA and the State. Publius Fall: 497–514.Google Scholar
Litwin, Nathan P. 2003. Defending an Unjust System: How Johnson v. Bush Upheld Felon Disenfranchisement and Perpetuated Voter Inequality in Florida. Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal. Paper 8. .Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Morgan, Alvarez, R. Michael, and Hall, Thad E.. 2007. How Hard Can It Be: Do Citizens Think It Is Difficult to Register to Vote?Stanford Law and Policy Review 18(2): 282–409.Google Scholar
Long, William F., Garzia, Ralph P., Wingert, Timothy, and Garzia, Sylvia R.. 1996. The Ergonomics of Reading. In Vision and Reading, ed. Garzia, R. P., 71–110. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Daniel H. 2007. The Meaning of Bush v. Gore. Ohio State Law Journal 68. UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 07–09.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Daniel, Hasen, Richard L., and Tokaji, Daniel P.. 2008. Election Law: Cases and Materials. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. Review: American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16(4): 677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magleby, David B., Quin Monson, J., and Patterson, Kelly D.. 2008. Evaluating the Quality of the Voting Experience: A Cross Panel Pilot Study of the November 7 2006 Election in Franklin County OH, Summit County, OH, and the State of Utah. Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy. Brigham Young University.
Manza, Jeff and Uggen, Christopher. 2004. Punishment and Democracy: Disenfranchisement of Nonincarcerated Felons in the United States. Perspectives on Politics 2(03): 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mate, Manoj and Wright, Matthew. 2008. The 2000 Presidential Election Controversy. In Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy, eds. Persily, N., Citrin, J., and Egan, P. J., 333–52. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCormack, Conny. 2008. Florida’s Transition from Touch Screens to OpScan Paper Ballots for Early Voting. Pew Center on the States. Available at: .
McDonald, Michael P. 2008. Portable Voter Registration. Political Behavior 20(4): 491–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. 2007. The True Electorate: A Cross-Validation of Voter File and Election Poll Demographics. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(4): 588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mebane, Walter R., Jr. 2004. The Wrong Man is President! Overvotes in the 2000 Presidential Election in Florida. Perspectives on Politics 2(3): 525–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mebane, Walter R., 2006. Election Forensics: The Second-Digit Benford’s Law Test and Recent American Presidential Elections. Election Fraud Conference. Salt Lake City, Utah.
Miller, Arthur H. 1974. Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review 68: 989–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Geralyn M. 2005. Methodology, Statistics, and Voting Error: An Exploration of 2000 Presidential Election data in Two States. Policy Studies Journal 33(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Thomas. 2004. Felon Disenfranchisement and Voter Turnout. Journal of Legal Studies 33 University of Chicago (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mockabee, Stephen T., Quin Monson, J., and Patterson, Kelly D.. 2009. Evaluating On-line Training. Center for the Study of Democracy and Elections. Brigham Young University.
Mondak, Jeffrey J. and Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama. 1997. The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court. Journal of Politics 59(4): 1114–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monson, J. Quin, Patterson, Kelly D., and Warren, Tracy. 2006. DRE Analysis for May 2006 Primary: Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Election Science Institute.
Montjoy, Robert. 2005. HAVA and the States. In Election Reform: Politics and Policy, eds. Palazzolo, Daniel J. and Ceaser, James W., 16–34. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Murphy, Chad, Johnson, Martin, and Bowler, Shaun. 2011. Partisan Bias in Evaluating U.S. Elections during the HAVA Decade: A Natural Experiment. University of California Riverside.
Murphy, Walter F. and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1968. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court: The Goldwater Campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly 32(1): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., Tanenhaus, Joseph, and Kastner, Daniel. 1973. Public Evaluations of Constitutional Courts: Alternative Explanations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Nagler, Jonathan. 1991. The Effect of Registration Laws and Education on United States Voter Turnout. American Political Science Review 85(4): 1393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Commission on Federal Election Reform. 2001a. Task Force Reports to Accompany the Report of the National Commission on Election Reform. Charlottesville, VA and New York: Miller Center for Public Affairs and the Century Foundation.Google Scholar
National Commission on Federal Election Reform 2001b. To Assure Price and Confidence in the Electoral Process. Charlottesville, VA and New York: Miller Center of Public Affairs and The Century Foundation.Google Scholar
Navarro, Mireya. 1998. Fraud Ruling Invalidates Miami Mayoral Election. New York Times. March 5.
Neely, Francis and Cook, Corey. 2008. Whose Votes Count? Undervotes, Overvotes, and Ranking in San Francisco’s Instant-Runoff Elections. American Politics Research 36(4): 530–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times Editorial. 2008. Expanding Democracy in Florida. June 30. .
New York Times Editorial. 2010a. Ex Offenders and the Vote. March 21. .
New York Times Editorial. 2010b. Their Debt Is Paid. October 19. .
Ngo, Nhu-Y. 2011. Delaware Inspires Maryland to Modernize its Voter Registration System. Brennan Center for Justice, March 28. Available at: .
Nicholson, Stephen P. and Howard, Robert M.. 2003. Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore. Journal of Politics 65(3): 676–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G. and Herrnson, Paul S.. 2003. Beyond the Butterfly: The Complexity of U.S. Ballots. Perspectives on Politics 1(2): 317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norden, Lawrence, Kimball, David, Quesenbery, Whitney, and Chen, Margaret. 2008. Better Ballots. New York: Brennan Center for Justice.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1999. The Growth of Critical Citizens and Its Consequences. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Pippa Norris, 257–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palast, Gregory. 2000. Florida’s Flawed “Voter-Cleansing” Program. Salon.com, December 4. Available at: .
Palm Beach Post. 2004. Voting Early and Uniformly. January 27.
Pew Center on the States. 2007. HAVA at Five. Washington, DC. Available at: .
Pildes, Richard H. 2004. The Constitutionalization of Democratic Politics. Harvard Law Review 118: 28–154.Google Scholar
Pitts, Michael J. and Neumann, Matthew D.. Documenting Disfranchisement: Voter Identification at Indiana’s 2008 General Election. Pew Charitable Trusts, The Center for the States, Provisional Ballots: An Imperfect Solution. Available at: .
Posner, Richard A. 2001. Breaking the Deadlock: The 2000 Election, the Constitution and the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Vincent and Romantan, Anca. 2004. Confidence in Institutions before, during, and after Indecision 2000. Journal of Politics 66(3): 939–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prison Policy Initiative “Census treatment of incarcerated felons unfairly dilutes voting strength of non – prison communities.” June 22, 2005. (Policy Initiative site also has the text of the three bills related to counting felons where they live).
Rattner, Benjamin. “Kentucky’s Disturbing Disenfranchisement Numbers.” Brennan Center at the NYU School of Law. .
Rhine, Staci L. 1995. Registration Reform and Turnout Change in the American States. American Politics Quarterly 23(4): 409–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Jennifer, with Chen, Margaret. 2009. Expanding Democracy: Voter Registration around the World. New York: Brennan Center for Justice.Google Scholar
Roth, Susan King. 1998. Disenfranchised by Design. Information Design Journal 9: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltman, Roy G. 1975. Effective Use of Computing Technology in Vote-Tallying. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltman, Roy G. 1988. Accuracy, Integrity, and Security in Computerized Vote-Tallying. Gaithersburg, MD: Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology. National Institute of Standards.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Mark S. and McCormick, Ernest J.. 1993. Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Saphire, Richard B. and Moke, Paul. 2006. Litigating Bush v. Gore in the States: Dual Voting Systems and the Fourteenth Amendment. Villanova Law Review 51: 229–98.Google Scholar
Schachter, Jason P. 2004. Geographic Mobility: 2002 to 2003, Population Characteristics. U.S. Census Bureau. P20–549.
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
The Sentencing Project Report. “Felon Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States.” March 2011.
Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1992. Congress Is a “They,” Not an “It”: Legislative Intent as Oxymoron. International Review of Law and Economics 12(2): 239–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Betsy and Alvarez, R. Michael. 2004. Who Overvotes, Who Undervotes, Using Punchcards? Evidence from Los Angeles County. Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Charles A. and Shortell, Christopher. 2007. The Suits That Counted: The Judicialization of Presidential Elections after Bush v. Gore Election Law Journal Aug 6(3): 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spriggs, II, James F. and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2000. Measuring Legal Change: The Reliability and Validity of Shepard’s Citations. Political Research Quarterly 53(2): 327–41.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M. 1998. Introduction: Early Voting. Public Opinion Quarterly 62(1): 57–69.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M. and García-Monet, P. A.. 1997. Voting Early but Not Often. Social Science Quarterly 78(3): 657–71.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M. and Vonnahme, Greg. 2010. Early, Absentee, and Mail-In Voting. In The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, ed. Jan Leighley. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M., Vonnahme, Greg, Byrne, Michael, and Wallach, Daniel. 2008. Voting Technology, Election Administration, and Voter Performance. Election Law Journal 7(2): 123–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Charles, III. 2004. The Reliability of Electronic Voting Machines in Georgia. Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project.
Stewart, Charles, 2006. Residual vote in the 2004 election. Election Law Journal 5(2): 158–69.Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles, 2008a. Get a Grip on Elections. Los Angeles Times, October 27, 2008.
Stewart, Charles, 2008b. Improving the Measurement of Election System Performance in the United States. In Mobilizing Democracy: A Comparative Perspective on Institutional Barriers and Political Obstacles, eds. Levi, M., Johnson, J., Knight, J., and Stokes, S., 288–312. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles, 2009. Early- and Late-Adopters of Provisional Ballots. Washington, DC: Pew Center on the States.Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles, 2010. Losing Votes by Mail. Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 13(3): 573–602.Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles, 2011a. Voting Technologies. Annual Review of Political Science 14: 355–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Charles, 2011b. What Hath HAVA Wrought? Consequences, Intended and Not, of the Post–Bush v. Gore Reforms. In the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore: Ten Years Later. University of California, Irvine.
Stimson, James. 1985. Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay. American Journal of Political Science 29(4): 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Guy. 2004. Databases, Felons, and Voting: Bias and Partisanship of the Florida Felons List in the 2000 Elections. Political Science Quarterly 119(3): 453–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, Ray. 2004a. Florida Again. In Lehrer News Hour, PBS, October 26, 2004.
Suarez, Ray 2004b. Voting Early. In Lehrer News Hour, PBS, October 18, 2004.
Sunstein, Cass R. and Epstein, Richard A., eds. 2001. The Vote: Bush, Gore, and the Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal and Vallinder, Torbjorn, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Tefki, Chafai. 1987. Readability Formulas: An Overview. Journal of Documentation 43: 261–73.Google Scholar
Tokaji, Daniel P. 2005. Early Returns on Election Reform: Discretion, Disenfranchisement, and the Help America Vote Act. George Washington Law Review 73: 1206–54.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael and Houweling, Robert P. Van. 2003. How Does Voting Equipment Affect the Racial Gap in Voided Ballots?American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2001. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, June 1. Available at: .
Tourangeau, Roger, Couper, Mick P., and Conrad, Frederick. 2004. Spacing, Position, and Order: Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions. Public Opinion Quarterly 68(3): 368–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Michael W. and Conrad, Federick G.. 2012. “Confidence in the ELectoral System: Why We Do Auditing,” in Confirming Elections: Creating Confidence and Integrity through Election Auditing, eds Alvarez, R. Michael, Atkeson, Lonna Rae and Hall, Thad E., New York: Palgrave and Macmillan.Google Scholar
Uggen, Christopher, Behrens, Angela, and Manza, Jeff. 2005. Criminal Disenfranchisement. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 1: 307–22.Google Scholar
Uggen, Christopher and Manza, Jeff, 2002. Democratic Contraction? Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review 67(6) (Dec.): 777–803. Available at: .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbina, Ian. 2007. Panel Said to Alter Finding on Voter Fraud. New York Times, April 11, 2007.
U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey. 2002. Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2000. P20–542. Available at: .
U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey 2010. Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2008. P20–562. Available at: .
U.S. General Accounting Office. 2001. Voters with Disabilities: Access to Polling Places and Alternative Voting Methods. ed. U. S. GAO. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Wand, Jonathan N., Shotts, Kenneth W., Sekhon, Jasjet S., Mebane, Walter R. Jr., Herron, Michael C., and Brady, Henry E.. 2001. The Butterfly Did It: The Aberrant Vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida. American Political Science Review 95(4): 793–810.Google Scholar
Wang, Tova and Serebrov, Job. 2007. Voting Fraud and Voter Intimidation, [Draft] Report to the U. S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) on Preliminary Research and Recommendations (2006). Election Law Journal 6(3): 330–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Jay. 2010. This is Not Florida: How Al Franken Won the Minnesota Senate Recount. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Weiser, Wendy, Waldman, Michael, and Paradis, Renee. 2009. Voter Registration Modernization: Policy Summary. New York: Brennan Center for Justice.Google Scholar
Whitaker, L. Paige and Traldi, Arthur. 2009. State Election Laws: Overview of Statutes Providing for Provisional Ballot Tabulation. Congressional Research Service. The Library of Congress.
Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Rosenstone, Stephen J.. 1980. Who Votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Word, Ron. 2004. New Duval Elections Supervisor Quickly Adds Early Voting Sites. Associated Press.Google Scholar
Yates, Jeffrey L. and Whitford, Andrew B.. 2002. The Presidency and the Supreme Court after Bush v. Gore: Implications for Institutional Legitimacy and Effectiveness. Stanford Law and Policy Review 13(1): 101–18.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Technology, Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Election Administration in the United States
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107264199.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Technology, Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Election Administration in the United States
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107264199.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Technology, Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Election Administration in the United States
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107264199.018
Available formats
×