Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:21:49.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Gaussian maps and generic vanishing I: Subvarieties of abelian varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

G. Pareschi
Affiliation:
Università di Roma
Christopher D. Hacon
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Mircea Mustaţă
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Mihnea Popa
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present an approach to Green–Lazarsfeld'sgeneric vanishing combining Gaussian maps and the Fourier–Mukai transform associated with the Poincaré line bundle. As an application, we prove the generic vanishing theorem for all normal Cohen–Macaulay subvarieties of abelian varieties over an algebraically closed field.

Dedicated to my teacher, Rob Lazarsfeld, on the occasion of his 60th birthday

1 Introduction

We work with irreducible projective varieties on an algebraically closed field of any characteristic, henceforth called varieties. The contents of this paper are:

(1) A general criterion expressing the vanishing of the higher cohomology of aline bundle on a Cohen–Macaulay variety in terms of certain first-order conditions on hyperplane sections (Theorem 2). Such conditions involve Gaussian maps and the criterion is a generalization of well-known results on hyperplane sections of K3 and abelian surfaces.

(2) Using a relative version of the above, we prove the vanishing of higher direct images of Poincaré line bundles of normal Cohen–Macaulay subvarieties of abelian varieties (Theorem 5). As is well known, this is equivalent to Green–Lazarsfeld's generic vanishing, a condition satisfied by all irregular compact Kahler manifolds [5]. This implies in turn a Kodaira-type vanishing for line bundles which are restrictions to normal Cohen–Macaulay subvarieties of abelian varieties, of ample line bundles on the abelian variety (Corollary 6).

Concerning point (2), it should be mentioned that at present we are not able to extend this approach efficiently to the general generic vanishing theorem (GVT), i.e., for varieties mapping to abelian varieties, even for smooth projective varieties over the complex numbers (where it is well known by the work of Green and Lazarsfeld). This will be the object of further research. However, concerning possible extensions of the general GVT to singular varieties and/or to positive characteristic, one should keep in mind the work of Hacon and Kovacs [8] where – by exploiting the relation between GVT and the Grauert–Riemenschneider vanishing theorem – they show examples of failure of the GVT for mildly singular varieties (over C) and even smooth varieties (in characteristic p > 0) of dimension ≥ 3, with a (separable) generically finite map to an abelian variety.

Type
Chapter
Information
Recent Advances in Algebraic Geometry
A Volume in Honor of Rob Lazarsfeld’s 60th Birthday
, pp. 370 - 404
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Banica, C. and Forster, O.Multiplicity structures on space curves. In The Lefschetz Centennial Conference, Proceedings on Algebraic Geometry, AMS (1984), pp. 47–64.Google Scholar
[2] Beauville, A. and Merindol, J.Y.Sections hyperplanes des surfaces K3. Duke Math. J. 55(4) (1987) 873–878.Google Scholar
[3] Colombo, E., Frediani, P., and Pareschi, G.Hyperplane sections of abelian surfaces. J. Alg. Geom. 21 (2012) 183–200.Google Scholar
[4] Ferrand, D.Courbes gauches et fibrés de rang 2. C.R.A.S. 281 (1977) 345–347.Google Scholar
[5] Green, M. and Lazarsfeld, R.Deformation theory, generic vanishing theorems, and some conjectures of Enriques, Catanese and Beauville. Invent. Math. 90 (1987) 389–407.Google Scholar
[6] Green, M. and Lazarsfeld, R.Higher obstructions to deforming cohomology groups of line bundles. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 1(4) (1991) 87–103.Google Scholar
[7] Hacon, C.A derived category approach to generic vanishing. J. Reine Angew. Math. 575 (2004) 173–187.Google Scholar
[8] Hacon, C. and Kovacs, S. Generic vanishing fails for singular varieties and in characteristic p < 0. arXiv:1212.5105.
[9] Hartshorne, R.Residues and Duality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1966.
[10] Kempf, G.Toward the inversion of abelian integrals, I. Ann. Math. 110 (1979) 184–202.Google Scholar
[11] Lazarsfeld, R.Brill–Noether–Petri without degeneration. J. Diff. Geom. (3)23 (1986) 299–307.Google Scholar
[12] MacLane, S.Homology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1963.
[13] Mukai, S.Duality between D(Z)and D(X) with its application to Picard sheaves. Nagoya Math. J. 81 (1981) 153–175.Google Scholar
[14] Mukai, S.Fourier functor and its application to the moduli of bundles on an abelian variety. In: Algebraic Geometry (Sendai 1985). Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 10, 1987, pp. 515–550.Google Scholar
[15] Mumford, D.Abelian Varieties, 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press, 1974.
[16] Pareschi, G. and Popa, M.Strong generic vanishing and a higher dimensional Castelnuovo–de Franchis inequality. Duke Math. J. 150 (2009) 269–285.Google Scholar
[17] Pareschi, G. and Popa, M.GV-sheaves, Fourier–Mukai transform, and generic vanishing. Amer. J. Math. 133 (2011) 235–271.Google Scholar
[18] Pareschi, G. and Popa, M.Regularity on abelian varieties, III. Relationship with generic vanishing and applications. In Grassmannians, Moduli Spaces and Vector Bundles. AMS, 2011, pp. 141–167.
[19] Sernesi, E.Deformations of Algebraic Schemes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
[20] Voisin, C.Sur l'application de Wahl des courbes satisfaisant la condition de Brill-Noether–Petri, Acta Math. 168 (1992) 249–272.Google Scholar
[21] Wahl, J.Introduction to Gaussian maps on an algebraic curve. In Complex Projective Geometry. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, No. 179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 304–323.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×