Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T19:01:18.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Uncle Tom Today: 1976–Present

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Brando Simeo Starkey
Affiliation:
University of San Diego School of Law
Get access

Summary

Where Is Uncle Tom?

Writing with certainty is hard here. Nevertheless, I feel confident in claiming that Uncle Tom surfaces now far less than previously. Before the mid-1970s, Uncle Tom was ubiquitous. A welcome guest sometimes, and sometimes anything but. On good days, Uncle Tom helped boost black solidarity, on bad days, the opposite. Constructive or destructive, one never knew which Uncle Tom would appear.

But Uncle Tom is not missing. We can still document its footprint on American culture, especially when searching twenty-first-century media – Twitter, comments sections to online articles, blogs, and the like. Uncle Tom has found society’s new venues. Increasingly larger shares of black folk, however, have stopped giving breath to Uncle Tom. Well-to-do blacks more so than the man on the street, I think, have developed an unmistakable hesitancy in resuscitating the slur.

Also noteworthy is that average blacks are now much less likely to be accused of racial treachery than are more famous blacks. That is not to say that the common man is never terrii ed that the specter of Uncle Tom will be directed toward him. He is. But inl uential blacks are much more concerned. The link between treachery and power has strengthened.

Type
Chapter
Information
In Defense of Uncle Tom
Why Blacks Must Police Racial Loyalty
, pp. 232 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schmidt, Benno C. Jr., Principle and Prejudice: The Supreme Court and Race in the Progressive Era. Part 3: Black Disfranchisement from the KKK to the Grandfather Clause, 82 Columbia Law Review835 (1982)Google Scholar
Nunn, Kenneth B., The “Darden Dilemma”: Should African Americans Prosecute Crimes?, 68 Fordham Law Review1473, 1478 (2000)Google Scholar
Russell, Margaret, Beyond “Sellouts” and “Race Cards”: Black Attorneys and the Straitjacket of Legal Practice, 95 Michigan Law Review766 (1997)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×