Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T01:56:10.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 39 - Marine Reptiles

from I - Marine Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

United Nations
Affiliation:
Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Office of Legal Affairs
Get access

Summary

Assessment Frameworks

Although several other frameworks assess marine turtle status at global and sub-global scales, in this chapter we focus on results from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List assessments and the IUCN Marine Turtle Specialist Group's conservation priorities portfolio (Wallace et al., 2011) because these are the most comprehensive and widely recognized assessment frameworks at present. For a comprehensive summary of other assessment frameworks for marine turtles, please see Chapter 35. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the two above-mentioned IUCN assessments with regard to marine turtles, and we also present available information on the conservation status of sea snakes and marine iguanas.

Status Assessments

IUCN Red List

The primary global assessment framework for marine turtle species is the IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM (www.iucnredlist.org). The universally applicable criteria and guidelines of the Red List make it the most widely used and accepted framework for assessing the conservation status of species worldwide.

The IUCN Marine Turtle Specialist Group (MTSG), one of the IUCN/ Species Survival Commission's specialist groups, is responsible for conducting regular Red List assessments of each marine turtle species on a global scale. However, because marine turtle population traits and trajectories can vary geographically, the global extinction risk assessment framework represented by the Red List does not adequately assess the conservation status of spatially and biologically distinct marine turtle populations (see Seminoff and Shanker, 2008 for review).

Subpopulation or regional assessments

To address the challenges presented by the mismatched scales of global Red List assessments and regional/population-level variation in status, the MTSG developed an alternative assessment framework and a new approach to Red List assessments that better characterize variation in status and trends of individual populations (Wallace et al., 2010; Wallace et al., 2011; see next section). This new approach centres on assessing marine turtle subpopulations, as well as the global population (i.e., species), using Red List guidelines, which results in official Red List categories for subpopulations in addition to the single global listing. This working group first developed regional management units (RMUs) (i.e., spatially explicit population segments defined by biogeographical data of marine turtle species) as the framework for defining biologically meaningful population segments for assessments (Wallace et al., 2010). RMUs are functionally equivalent to IUCN subpopulations, thus providing the appropriate demographic unit for Red List assessments.

Type
Chapter
Information
The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment
World Ocean Assessment I
, pp. 773 - 780
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abreu-Grobois, FA, Plotkin, PT, (assessors) (2007) IUCN Red List Status Assessment of the olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) IUCN/SSC-Marine Turtle Specialist Group. 39 p.
Auliya, M (2011) Lapemis curtus (SERPENTES: ELAPIDAE) harvested in West Malaysia. IUCN/SSC Sea Snake Specialist Group Newsletter, 1, 6-8
Courtney, AJ, Schemel, BL, Wallace, R, Campbell, MJ, Mayer, DG, Young, B. (2009) Reducing the impact of Queensland's trawl fisheries on protected sea snakes, pp. 1-123. Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane.
Dutton, P.H. and Squires, D. (2011). A Holistic Strategy for Pacific Sea Turtle Conservation, in Dutton, P.H., Squires, D. and Mahfuzuddin, A., (Eds), Conservation and Sustainable Management of Sea Turtles in the Pacific Ocean, University of Hawaii Press, 481 pp.
Elfes, C, Livingstone, SR, Lane, A, Lukoschek, V, Sanders, KL, Courtney, AJ, et al. (2013). Fascinating and forgotten: the conservation status of the world's sea snakes. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 8: 37-52.Google Scholar
French, S.S., DeNardo, D.F., Greives, T.J., Strand, C.R., and Demas, G.E. (2010). Human disturbance alters endocrine and immune responses in the Galapagos marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus). Hormones and Behavior 58: 792-798.Google Scholar
Goiran, C, Shine, R (2013) Decline in sea snake abundance on a protected coral reef system in the New Caledonian Lagoon. Coral Reefs, 32, 281-284.Google Scholar
Guinea, ML, Whiting, SD (2005) Insights into the distribution and abundance of sea snakes at Ashmore Reef. The Beagle, Supplement 1, 199-205.Google Scholar
Hamann, M. et al. (2013). Climate change and marine turtles. pp 353-397. in Wyneken, J. et al eds. The Biology of Sea Turtles Volume III, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, LA, Broderick, AC, Godfrey, MH, and Godley, BJ (2009) Climate change and marine turtles. Endangered Species Research, 7: 137-154.Google Scholar
Humber, F, Godley, BJ, Broderick, AC (2014) So excellent a fishe: a global overview of legal marine turtle fisheries. Diversity and Distributions 20(5): 579-590. DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12183.
Lewison, RL, Wallace, BP, Alfaro-Shigueto, J, Mangel, J, Maxwell, S, Hazen, E. (2013) Fisheries by-catch of marine turtles: lessons learned from decades of research and conservation. In:J., Wyneken, J.A., Musick (eds). The Biology of Sea Turtles, Vol 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp 329-352.
Lukoschek, V, Keogh, JS. (2006) Molecular phylogeny of sea snakes reveals a rapidly diverged adaptive radiation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89: 523-39.
Lukoschek, V, Heatwole, H, Grech, A, Burns, G, Marsh, H (2007a) Distribution of two species of sea snakes, Aipysurus laevis and Emydocephalus annulatus, in the southern Great Barrier Reef: metapopulation dynamics, marine protected areas and conservation. Coral Reefs, 26, 291-307.
Lukoschek, V, Waycott, M, Marsh, H (2007b) Phylogeographic structure of the olive sea snake, Aipysurus laevis (Hydrophiinae) indicates recent Pleistocene range expansion but low contemporary gene flow. Molecular Ecology, 16, 3406-3422.Google Scholar
Lukoschek, V, Waycott, M, Keogh, JS (2008) Relative information content of polymorphic microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA for inferring dispersal and population genetic structure in the olive sea snake, Aipysurus laevis. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3062-3077.Google Scholar
Lukoschek, V, Shine, R (2012) Sea snakes rarely venture far from home. Ecology and Evolution, 2, 1113-1121.Google Scholar
Lukoschek, V, Beger, M, Ceccarelli, DM, Richards, Z, Pratchett, MS. (2013) Enigmatic declines of Australia's sea snakes from a biodiversity hotspot. Biological Conservation, 166: 191-202.Google Scholar
Mortimer, JA, Donnelly, M, (assessors) (2008) Marine Turtle Specialist Group 2007 IUCN Red List Status Assessment, Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), 121 pages.
National Research Council (NRC) (2010) Assessment of Sea-Turtle Status and Trends: Integrating Demography and Abundance. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Nelson K., Snell, and Wikelski, M. (2004). Amblyrhynchus cristatus. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. www.redlist.org. Downloaded on 15 April 2015.
Seminoff, J., Shanker, K. (2008) Marine turtles and IUCN Red Listing: A review of the process, the pitfalls, and novel assessment approaches. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 356:52-68Google Scholar
Seminoff, J.A., Wallace, B.P. (2012) Sea Turtles of the Eastern Pacific: Advances in Research and Conservation. University of Arizona Press.
Vitousek, M.N., Rubenstein, D.R., and Wikelski, M. (2007). The evolution of foraging behavior in the Galapagos marine iguana: natural and sexual selection on body size drives ecological, morphological, and behavioral specialization. In: Lizard Ecology: The Evolutionary Consequences of Foraging Mode. S.M., Reilly, L.D., Mc-Brayer, and D.P., Miles (eds.). Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, B.P., DiMatteo, A.D., Hurley, B.J., Finkbeiner, E.M., Bolten, B.A., et al. (2010) Regional Management Units for marine turtles: A novel framework for prioritizing conservation and research across multiple scales. PLoS ONE 5(12): e15465. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015465.
Wallace, B.P., DiMatteo, A.D., Bolten, A.B., Chaloupka, M.Y., Hutchinson, B.J. (2011) Global conservation priorities for marine turtles. PLoS ONE 6(9): e24510. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0024510.Google Scholar
Wallace, B.P., Tiwari, M. and Girondot, M. (2013a). Dermochelys coriacea. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 30 April 2014. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 30 April 2014.
Wallace, B.P., Kot, C.Y., DiMatteo, A.D., Lee, T., Crowder, L.B., and Lewison, R.L.. (2013b). Impacts of fisheries by-catch on marine turtle populations worldwide: toward conservation and research priorities. Ecosphere 4(3):40. doi.org/10.1890/ ES12-00388.1

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Marine Reptiles
  • Edited by United Nations
  • Book: The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment
  • Online publication: 18 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108186148.049
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Marine Reptiles
  • Edited by United Nations
  • Book: The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment
  • Online publication: 18 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108186148.049
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Marine Reptiles
  • Edited by United Nations
  • Book: The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment
  • Online publication: 18 May 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108186148.049
Available formats
×