Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:55:48.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

49 - Mike Tyson Tattoo

from The Digital Now

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2019

Marie Hadley
Affiliation:
Marie Hadley is a PhD researcher in the Faculty of Law, UNSW Sydney, where she researches cultural appropriation claims, and the protection of indigenous visual imagery by copy right law.
Claudy Op den Kamp
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Dan Hunter
Affiliation:
Swinburne Law School, Australia
Get access

Summary

MIKE TYSON's FACIAL tattoo has been described as one of the most distinctive tattoos in North America. It has attracted controversy as an example of the cultural appropriation of ta moko, the sacred culturally embedded tattooing practice of the Maori people of Aotearoa/New Zealand. It has also attracted much media attention for its place at the heart of Whitmill v. Warner Bros., a rare litigated instance of a tattooist enforcing their copyright in a tattoo design. More than this, though, Tyson's tattoo is an excellent example of the tensions that emerge over the protection of traditional knowledge, and the difhculty of claiming one truth in an intellectual property world that was born in the Western philosophical tradition, and is only now beginning to come to terms with its colonial heritage.

Mike Tyson's “warrior” tattoo was inked by Las Vegas tattooist S. Victor Whitmill in 2003. From the time of Tyson's firstpublic appearance with the tattoo, Maori activists and scholars were critical of it as a cultural appropriation of ta moko. Tyson's tattoo is monochrome, curvilinear, features two spiral shapes, and was placed around his left eye. Whitmill has described the “flow”: of Maori art as a design influence, and he created it after showing Tyson pictures of Maori moko. In Maori culture, facial moko is a privilege reserved for respected cultural insiders, and it represents and embodies the wearer's sacred genealogy and social status. Appropriating an individual's moko is profoundly offensive and akin to identity theft.

But the controversy from the original tattoo wasn't the last of it. In THE HANGOVER PART II an exact copy of Tyson's tattoo was featured on the face of actor Ed Helms as part of a humorous plot device. Whitmill was outraged, and claimed copyright over his tattoo. In 2011 he sued Warner, arguing that they had violated his exclusive right to authorize derivative works. Whitmill's decision to sue stirred lingering resentments in Aotearoa/New Zealand around the tattoo's cultural content: in response to the litigation, Maori politician Tau Henare tweeted that it was a “a bit rich” that Tyson's tattooist was claiming someone had stolen the design, given that he had copied it from Maori without permission.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Mike Tyson Tattoo
    • By Marie Hadley, Marie Hadley is a PhD researcher in the Faculty of Law, UNSW Sydney, where she researches cultural appropriation claims, and the protection of indigenous visual imagery by copy right law.
  • Edited by Claudy Op den Kamp, Bournemouth University, Dan Hunter
  • Book: A History of Intellectual Property in 50 Objects
  • Online publication: 12 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108325806.050
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Mike Tyson Tattoo
    • By Marie Hadley, Marie Hadley is a PhD researcher in the Faculty of Law, UNSW Sydney, where she researches cultural appropriation claims, and the protection of indigenous visual imagery by copy right law.
  • Edited by Claudy Op den Kamp, Bournemouth University, Dan Hunter
  • Book: A History of Intellectual Property in 50 Objects
  • Online publication: 12 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108325806.050
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Mike Tyson Tattoo
    • By Marie Hadley, Marie Hadley is a PhD researcher in the Faculty of Law, UNSW Sydney, where she researches cultural appropriation claims, and the protection of indigenous visual imagery by copy right law.
  • Edited by Claudy Op den Kamp, Bournemouth University, Dan Hunter
  • Book: A History of Intellectual Property in 50 Objects
  • Online publication: 12 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108325806.050
Available formats
×