Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T07:10:35.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Uncertainties in small-signal equivalent circuit modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

Christian Fager
Affiliation:
Microwave Electronics Laboratory, Chalmers University of Technology
Kristoffer Andersson
Affiliation:
Microwave Electronics Laboratory, Chalmers University of Technology
Matthias Ferndahl
Affiliation:
Microwave Electronics Laboratory, Chalmers University of Technology
Matthias Rudolph
Affiliation:
Brandenburg University of Technology
Christian Fager
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
David E. Root
Affiliation:
Agilent Technologies, Santa Rosa
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Almost all computer-aided RF and microwave circuit design work relies on small-signal equivalent circuit models [1] (see Chapters 3 and 5). These models are used to replicate, as accurately as possible, the linearized electrical characteristics of the device under test. However, despite all efforts spent on deriving physically correct model topologies, surprisingly little research has been reported on how to extract the parameters of these models accurately.

There are several sources of uncertainty in the modeling process that contribute to inaccuracies in the models and their parameter estimates. By using a stochastic approach that acknowledges the fact that microwave and RF measurements are, indeed, associated with uncertainties and incorporating this approach with existing model extraction methods, it becomes possible to quantify the uncertainties in the models obtained. The statistical approach adopted in this chapter will be used as a framework for the application of statistical parameter estimation methods that are often used in other applications but not in the context of microwave and RF small-signal modeling. As a consequence, the accuracy of the models obtained is significantly improved when compared to traditionally used methods.

Different simple modeling examples will be used to illustrate how measurement uncertainties propagate to uncertainties in the models and their parameters when different extraction methods are applied. The application to small-signal transistor models will be of particular focus, since they form the basis for large signal transistor modeling and thus indirectly influence the performance when designing complex active circuits (see Chapter 5).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Maas, S. A., Nonlinear Microwave Circuits. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 1988.Google Scholar
[2] Anholt, R., Worley, R., and Neidhard, R., “Statistical analysis of GaAs MESFET S-parameter equivalent-circuit models,” Int. J. Microw. Millimeter-Wave Comput. Aided Eng., vol. 1, pp. 263–270, Mar., 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] “8510C Network Analyzer Data Sheet,” Agilent Technologies, Tech. Rep., 1999.
[4] Williams, D., Wang, J., and Arz, U., “An optimal vector-network-analyzer calibration algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 2391–2401, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] StatistiCAL VNA calibration software package. [Online]. http://www.nist.gov/eeel/_electromagnetics/related-software.cfm
[6] Dambrine, G., Cappy, A., Heliodore, F., and Playez, E., “A newmethod for determining the FET small-signal equivalent circuit,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 36, pp. 1151–1159, July, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Bandler, J., Zhang, Q., Biernacki, R., Inc, O., and Dundas, O., “A unified theory for frequencydomain simulation and sensitivity analysis of linear and nonlinear circuits,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1661–1669, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Rice, J. A., Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Belmont: Duxbury Press, 1993.Google Scholar
[9] Fager, C., Linnér, P., and Pedro, J., “Optimal parameter extraction and uncertainty estimation in intrinsic FET small-signal models,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 50, pp. 2797–2803, Dec., 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Kay, S. M., Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1993.Google Scholar
[11] Schreurs, D., Hussain, H., Taher, H., and Nauwelaers, B., “Influence of RF measurement uncertainties on model uncertainties: practical case of a SiGe HBT,” in 64th ARFTGMicrow. Measurements Conf., 2004, pp. 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Masood, S., Johansen, T., Vidkjaer, J., and Krozer, V., “Uncertainty estimation in SiGe HBT small-signal modeling,” in Eur. Gallium Arsenide and Other Semiconductor Applicat. Symp. (GAAS), 2005 pp. 393–396.Google Scholar
[13] Rudolph, M., Doerner, R., and Heymann, P., “Direct extraction of HBT equivalent-circuit elements,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 82–84, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Rorsman, N., Garcia, M., Karlsson, C., and Zirath, H., “Accurate small-signal modeling of HFET's for millimeter-wave applications,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 44, pp. 432–437, Mar., 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Berroth, M. and Bosch, R., “Broad-band determination of the FET small-signal equivalent circuit,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 38, pp. 891–895, July, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Kondoh, H., “An accurate FET modelling from measured S-parameters,” in IEEE – MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., 1986, pp. 377–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Patterson, A. D., Fusco, V. F., McKeown, J. J., and Stewart, J. A. C., “A systematic optimization strategy for microwave device modelling,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 41, no. 3, p. 395, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Niekerk, C., Meyer, P., Schreurs, D. P., and Winson, P. B., “A robust integrated multibias parameter-extraction method for MESFET and HEMT models,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 777–786, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Niekerk, C., Preez, J. A. Du, and Schreurs, D. M.-P., “A new hybrid multibias analytical/decomposition-based FET parameter extraction algorithm with intelligent bias point selection,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 893–902, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Vlach, J. and Singhal, K., Computer Methods for Circuit Analysis and Design. Van Nostrand, 1994.Google Scholar
[21] Andersson, K., Fager, C., Linnér, P., and Zirath, H., “Statistical estimation of small signal FET model parameters and their covariance,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp., Fort Worth, USA, 2004, pp. 695–698.
[22] Williams, D. F. and Marks, R. B., “Compensation for substrate permittivity in probe-tip calibration,” in 44th ARFTG Conf. Dig., vol. 26, 1994, pp. 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Koolen, M. C. A. M., Geelen, J. A. M., and Versleijen, M. P. J. G., “An improved de-embedding technique for on-wafer high-frequency characterization,” in Bipolar Circuits and Tech. Meeting, Proc., 1991, pp. 188–191.Google Scholar
[24] Vandamme, E. P., Schreurs, D. P., and Dinther, G., “Improved three-step de-embedding method to accurately account for the influence of pad parasitics in silicon on-wafer RF test-structures,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 737–42, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Ferndahl, M., Fager, C., Andersson, K., Linner, L., Vickes, H.-O., and Zirath, H., “A general statistical equivalent-circuit-based de-embedding procedure for high-frequencymeasurements,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 56, pp. 2692–2700, Dec., 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Spall, J., Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization: Estimation, Simulation, and Control. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Julier, S. and Uhlmann, J., “The scaled unscented transformation,” Proc. American Control Conf. vol. 6, Citeseer, 2002, pp. 4555–4559.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×