Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:39:02.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Philip Pettit
Philip Pettit
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
On the People's Terms
A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy
 , pp. 311 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abizadeh, A. (2008). ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders’. Political Theory 36: 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, J. (1994). We, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2000). ‘The New Separation of Powers’. Harvard Law Review 113: 633–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. (1776). Thoughts on Government Applicable to the Present State of the American Colonies. Philadelphia, John Dunlap.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J. M. (2008). Capabilities and Social Justice: The Political Philosophy of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Aldershot, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Amar, A. R. (1988). ‘Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution outside Article V’. University of Chicago Law Review 55: 1043–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (1999). ‘What is the Point of Equality?’ Ethics 109: 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. (2010). The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen. New York, Notrons.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1973). On Revolution. Harmondsworth, Pelican Books.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1996). The Politics, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (1989). ‘Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare’. Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Atiyah, P. S. (1979). The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bailyn, B. (1967). The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bakan, J. (2004). The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. (1984). ‘MacCallum and the Two Concepts of Freedom’. Ratio 26: 125–42.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1995). Justice as Impartiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. (1989). Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. (2009). The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. (2010). China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (1999). Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2007). Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. (1996). ‘Towards a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’ in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, S.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1843). ‘Anarchical Fallacies’ in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, J.. Edinburgh, W. Tait, vol. II.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969). Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besold, C. (1618). Politicorum Libri duo. Frankfurt, J. A. Cellii.Google Scholar
Besson, S. and Marti, J. L. (2008). Law and Republicanism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodin, J. (1967). Six Books of the Commonwealth, ed. Tooley, M. J.. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy Across Borders: From Demos to Demoi. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (1997). ‘On Speaking Softly and Carrying Big Sticks: Neglected Dimensions of a Republican Separation of Powers’. University of Toronto Law Journal 47: 305–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., Charlesworth, H. and Soares, A. (2012). Networked Governance of Freedom and Tyranny: Peace in East Timor. Canberra, ANU Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Pettit, P. (1990). Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bramhall, J. (1658). ‘The Catching of Leviathan or the Great Whale’ in Castigations of Mr Hobbes . . . Concerning Liberty and Universal Necessity, Bramhall, J.. London, John Crooke.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. (2004). ‘Shared Valuing and Frameworks for Practical Reasoning’ in Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, ed. Wallace, J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S. and Smith, M.. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. (2007). Structures of Agency. New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (1995). ‘Economizing on Virtue’. Constitutional Political Economy 6: 35–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (2006). ‘Against Reviving Republicanism’. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5: 221–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Pettit, P. (2004). The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, J. (2011). The Ethics of Voting. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brett, A. S. (2011). Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettschneider, C. (2007). Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brugger, W. (1999). Republican Theory in Political Thought: Virtuous or Virtual?New York, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2002). ‘Political Legitimacy and Democracy’. Ethics 112: 689–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2004). Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1999). ‘Speech to the Electors of Bristol’ in Select Works of Edmund Burke. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Burnheim, J. (1985). Is Democracy Possible?Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cabot, V. (1751). ‘Quod Non Omnis Status Reipublicae Simplex Est’ in Novus Thesaurus Juirs Civilis et Canonici. Meerman, G.. Amsterdam, Pieter de Hondt. 2: 622–3.Google Scholar
Canning, J. P. (1983). ‘Ideas of the State in Thirteenth and Fourteenth Century Commentators on the Roman Law’. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 33: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, L. (1895). ‘What the Tortoise said to Achilles’. Mind 4: 278–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, I. (1999). A Measure of Freedom. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, I. (2008). ‘How are Power and Unfreedom Related?’ in Republicanism and Political Theory, ed. Laborde, C. and Maynor, J.. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Christiano, T. (2008). The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, J. (2009). The Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-historical Selves. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, M. T. (1998). The Republic and the Laws. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1979). ‘Capitalism, Freedom and the Proletariat’ in The Idea of Freedom, ed. Ryan, A.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1993). ‘Equality of What? On Welfare, Goods, and Capabilities’ in The Quality of Life, ed. Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, A.. Oxford University Press, pp. 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1989). ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’ in The Good Polity, ed. Hamlin, A. and Pettit, P.. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2004). ‘Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For’. Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2010). Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. (1933). ‘The Basis of Contract’. Harvard Law Review 4: 553–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. (1974). Power and the Structure of Society. New York, Norton.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (1990). ‘The Emergence of Norms’ in Social Institutions: Their Emergence, Maintenance, and Effects, ed. Hechter, M., Opp, K.-D. and Wippler, R., Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 35–59.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E. (1969). The Bias of Pluralism. New York, Atherton.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E. (1993). The Terms of Political Discourse. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Constant, B. (1988). Constant: Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Constant, B. (2003). Principles of Politics Applicable to All Governments. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Cornish, W. R. and Clark, G. d. N. (1989). Law and Society in England 1750–1950. London, Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Costa, M. V. (2007). ‘Freedom as Non-Domination, Normativity and Indeterminacy’. Journal of Value Inquiry 41: 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagger, R. (1997). Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demosthenes, (1939). Against Meidias, trans. Murray, A. T.. London, Heinemann.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1992). Consciousness Explained. New York, Penguin.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1996). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Dietrich, F. and List, C. (2007). ‘Arrow’s Theorem in Judgment Aggregation’. Social Choice and Welfare 29: 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, F. and List, C. (2008). ‘A Liberal Paradox for Judgment Aggregation’. Social Choice and Welfare 31: 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowlen, O. (2008). The Political Potential of Sortition. Exeter, Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. (2003). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (2005). Democracy: A History. New York, Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2006). Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political Debate. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, C. L. (2001). Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, C. L. (2002). ‘Constitutional Self-Government and Judicial Review: A Reply to Five Critics’. University of San Francisco Law Review 37: 115–90.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1983). Sour Grapes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1986). ‘The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory’ in Foundations of Social Choice Theory, ed. Elser, J. and Hillard, A.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ely, J. H. (1981). Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, W. N. and Ferejohn, J. (2010). A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Espejo, P. O. (2011). The Time of Popular Sovereignty: Process and the Democratic State. University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Estlund, D. (2007). Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. (1767). An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Edinburgh, Millar and Caddel (reprinted New York, Garland, 1971).Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. (1997). The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. (2008). Fairness, Responsibility and Welfare. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, R. (2002). Contexts of Justice: Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1969). ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’. Journal of Philosophy 66: 829–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1987). ‘Equality as a Moral Ideal’. Ethics 98: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1988). The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. (1991). ‘Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and his Critics’ in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2011). The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. (1971). The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Garsten, B. (2006). Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G. (1983). The Modern Liberal Theory of Man. London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2011). The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. (1981). The Idea of Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2001). ‘Collective Preferences, Obligations, and Rational Choice’. Economics and Philosophy 17: 109–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2006). A Theory of Political Obligation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. and Kahneman, D., eds. (2002). Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Goldberg, J. (2005–6). ‘The Constitutional Status of Tort Law: Due Process and the Right to a Law for the Redress of Wrongs’. Yale Law Journal 115: 524–627.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (1999). ‘Why Citizens Should Vote: A Causal Responsibility Approach’. Social Philosophy and Policy 16: 201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, J. (1999). The Sovereignty of Parliament. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1996). ‘Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond’. American Political Science Review 90: 331–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E. and Jackson, F. (2007). ‘Freedom from Fear’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35: 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. E. (2004). ‘Apathy: The Democratic Disease’. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30: 745–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, A. (2010). ‘The Paradox of Voting and the Ethics of Political Representation’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 38: 272–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, L. (1994). Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gwyn, W. B. (1965). The Meaning of the Separation of Powers. Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1984–9). A Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, Polity Press, vols. I and II.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1994). ‘Three Normative Models of Democracy’. Constellations 1: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. (1991). The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1986). Change in View. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. (1992). The Commonwealth of Oceana and a System of Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1955). ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’ Philosophical Review 64: 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1973). ‘Rawls on Liberty and its Priority’. University of Chicago Law Review 40: 534–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, C. (2011). ‘What Can Political Freedom Mean in a Multicultural Democracy? On Deliberation, Difference and Democratic Government’. Political Theory 39: 468–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, A. W.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy, 3rd edn. Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar
Herreros, F. (2006). ‘Screening Before Sanctioning: Elections and the Republican Tradition’. European Journal of Political Theory 5: 415–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. (2000). ‘Compulsory Voting, Political Shyness and Welfare Outcomes’. Journal of Sociology 36: 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1994a). Human Nature and De Corpore Politico: The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1994b). Leviathan, ed. Curley, E.. Indianapolis, Hackett.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1998). On the Citizen, ed. and trans. Tuck, R. and Silverthorne, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. and Bramhall, J. (1999). Hobbes and Bramhall on Freedom and Necessity, ed. Chappell, Vere. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, K. (2001). ‘Tyrannus Rex vs. Leviathan’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82: 420–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, K. (2006). ‘A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy’ in Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. Brett, A. S. and Tully, J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. (1995). Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Honig, B. (2001). Democracy and the Foreigner. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honohan, I. (2002). Civic Republicanism. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honohan, I. and Jennings, J., eds. (2006). Republicanism in Theory and Practice. London, Routledge.
Hont, I. (1995). ‘The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: “Contemporary Crisis of the National State” in Historical Perspective’ in The Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State?, ed. Dunn, J.. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 166–231.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1875). Of the Independence of Parliament. Hume’s Philosophical Works, ed. Green, T. H. and Grose, T. H.. London, vol. III.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1994). Political Essays. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D. (2008). Overcriminalization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. (1987). ‘Group Morality’ in Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J. J. C. Smart, ed. Pettit, P., Sylvan, R. and Norman, J.. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 91–110.Google Scholar
James, S. (1997). Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. M. (1999). The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, A. (2005). ‘Popular Sovereignty, Democracy and the Constituent Power’. Constellations 12: 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, A. and Katznelson, I. (2008). Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). Practical Philosophy, trans. Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2005). Notes and Fragments, ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A. (2006). Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Kelly, E. (2009). ‘Criminal Justice without Retribution’. Journal of Philosophy 106: 440–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1961). General Theory of Law and State. New York, Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1970). The Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, N. O. (1980). Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketcham, R., ed. (2003). The Anti-Federalist Papers. New York, Signet Classic.
Kharkhordin, O. and Alipuro, R., eds. (2011). Political Theory and Community Building in Post-Soviet Russia. London, Routledge.
Knights, M. (2005). Representation and Misrepresentation in Later Stuart Britain: Partisanship and Political Culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A. (1992a). ‘Modelling Collegial Courts. I. Path-Dependence’. International Review of Law and Economics 12: 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A. (1992b). ‘Modelling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine’. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 8: 441–70.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A. and Sager, L. G. (1993). ‘The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts’. California Law Review 81: 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2003). The Quality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2008). ‘Liberty and Domination’ in Republicanism and Political Theory, ed. Laborde, C. and Maynor, J.. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C. (1989). Hayek and Modern Liberalism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laborde, C. (2008). Critical Republicanism: The Hijab Controversy and Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. and Maynor, J., eds. (2007). Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford, Blackwell.
Langton, R. (1997). ‘Disenfranchised Silence’ in Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit, ed. Brennan, H. G., Goodin, R. E., Jackson, F. C. and Smith, M.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Languet, H. (1994). Vindiciae, Contra Tyrannos. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larmore, C. (2003). ‘Public Reason’ in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Freeman, S.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 368–93.Google Scholar
Larmore, C. (2012). ‘What is Political Philosophy?’ Journal of Moral Philosophy 9.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (2011). Republic, Lost: How Monday Corrupts Congress – And a Plan to Stop it. New York, Hachette.Google Scholar
Levin, M. (1984). ‘Negative Liberty’. Social Philosophy and Policy 2: 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Libourne, J. (1646). The Legal Fundamental Liberties of the People of England, Asserted, Revived, and Vindicated. London.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D. (2006). ‘The Mixed Constitution and the Common Law’ in The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, ed. Goldie, M. and Wokler, R.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, J. (1776). Three Letters to Dr Price. London, T. Payne.Google Scholar
Lindahl, H. (2007). ‘The Paradox of Constituent Power: The Ambiguous Self-Constitution of the European Union’. Ratio Juris 20: 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York, Doubleday.Google Scholar
List, C. (2004). ‘The Impossibility of a Paretian Republican? Some Comments on Pettit and Sen’. Economics and Philosophy 20: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. (2006a). ‘The Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason’. Ethics 116: 362–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. (2006b). ‘Republican Freedom and the Rule of Law’. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5: 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. and Pettit, P. (2002). ‘Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result’. Economics and Philosophy 18: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. and Pettit, P. (2004). ‘Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared’. Synthese 140: 207–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. and Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. and Polak, B. (2010). ‘Symposium on Judgment Aggregation’. Journal of Economic Theory 145 (2): 441–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lively, J. (1975). Democracy. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lively, J. and Rees, J., eds. (1978). Utilitarian Logic and Politics: James Mill’s ‘Essay on Government’, Macaulay’s Critique, and the Ensuing Debate. Oxford University Press.
Locke, J. (1960). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, D. C. (1977). Bentham on Liberty. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2001). ‘Domination: A Preliminary Analysis’. Monist 84: 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, F. (2010). Justice as Non-domination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lovett, F. and Pettit, P. (2009). ‘Neo-Republicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program’. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on Self-Reference. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
MacCallum, G. C. (1967). ‘Negative and Positive Freedom’. Philosophical Review 74: 312–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, J. P. (2011). Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonagh, O. (1958). ‘The 19th Century Revolution in Government: A Reappraisal’. Historical Journal 1: 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonagh, O. (1961). A Pattern of Government Growth 1800–60. London, MacGibbon and Kee.Google Scholar
MacDonagh, O. (1977). Early Victorian Government. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
McGeer, V. and Pettit, P. (2009). ‘Sticky Judgment and the Role of Rhetoric’ in Political Judgment: Essays in Honour of John Dunn, ed. Bourke, R. and Geuss, R.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–73.Google Scholar
McGilvray, E. (2011). The Invention of Market Freedom. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1965). The Complete Works and Others. Durham, NC, Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, G. (2003). Democracy Defended. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. (2004). ‘Government to State: Globalization, Regulation, and Governments as Legal Persons’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10: 173–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, C. (2005). ‘The Indeterminacy of Republican Policy’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, J., Hamilton, A. and Jay, J. (1987). The Federalist Papers. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Mandeville, B. (1731). Free Thoughts on Religion, the Church and National Happiness. London.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2009). ‘A “Selection Model” of Political Representation’. Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, A. (2010). On Compromise and Rotten Compromises. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Markell, P. (2008). ‘The Insufficiency of Non-Domination’. Political Theory 36: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, D. (2005). ‘Democratic Disobedience’. Yale Law Journal 114: 1897–952.Google Scholar
Marti, J. L. and Pettit, P. (2010). A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the Modern World. Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. (2011). ‘Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory’. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 34: 57–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michelman, F. I. (1999). Brennan on Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1964). Considerations on Representative Government. London, Everyman Books.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1978). On Liberty. Indianapolis, Hackett.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1998). The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (1984). ‘Constraints on Freedom’. Ethics 94: 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, J. (1953–82). Complete Prose Works of John Milton. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, vols. I–VIII.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. d. S. (1989). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, I. (2010). Why the West Rules – For Now: The Patterns of History, and What they Reveal about the Future. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. W. (2007). Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. and Nagel, T. (2004). The Myth of Ownership. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1987). ‘Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 16: 215–40.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and Partiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nathan, G. (2010). Social Freedom in a Multicultural State: Towards a Theory for Intercultural Justice. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, A. (1999). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. (2004). The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niederberger, A. and Schink, P., eds. (2012). Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics. Edinburgh University Press.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1992). ‘Human Functioning and Social Justice’. Political Theory 20: 202–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (2004). ‘Why the Rule of Law Matters’. Journal of Democracy 15: 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, M. (2008). ‘What Should Egalitarians Believe?’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 36: 119–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. (1979–80). ‘The Most Extensive Liberty’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, J. (1996). The Athenian Revolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Olsaretti, S. (2004). Liberty, Desert and the Market. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, M. (2003). Libertarianism without Inequality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paley, W. (2002). The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (2000). ‘Equality or Priority?’ in The Ideal of Equality, ed. Clayton, M. and Williams, A.. New York, St Martin’s Press, pp. 81–125.Google Scholar
Patten, A. (2002). Hegel’s Idea of Freedom. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1986). ‘Free Riding and Foul Dealing’. Journal of Philosophy 83: 361–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1990). ‘Virtus Normativa: A Rational Choice Perspective’. Ethics 100: 725–55; reprinted in P. Pettit (2002) Rules, Reasons, and Norms. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1991). ‘Decision Theory and Folk Psychology’ in Essays in the Foundations of Decision Theory, ed. Bacharach, M. and Hurley, S.. Oxford, Blackwell; reprinted in P. Pettit (2002) Rules, Reasons, and Norms. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1993). The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics, paperback edition 1996. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1994). ‘Enfranchising Silence: An Argument for Freedom of Speech’ in Freedom of Communication, ed. Campbell, T. and Sadurksi, W.. Aldershot, Dartmouth, pp. 45–56.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1996a). ‘Freedom and Antipower’. Ethics 106: 576–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1996b). ‘Institutional Design and Rational Choice’ in The Theory of Institutional Design, ed. Goodin, R. E.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997a). ‘A Consequentialist Perspective on Ethics’ in Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate. Baron, M., Slote, M. and Pettit, P.. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997b). ‘Republican Theory and Criminal Punishment’. Utilitas 9: 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997c). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1998). ‘Reworking Sandel’s Republicanism’. Journal of Philosophy 95: 73–96.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1999). ‘Republican Liberty, Contestatory Democracy’ in Democracy’s Value, ed. Hacker-Cordon, C. and Shapiro, I.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2000a). ‘Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory’. Nomos 42: 105–44.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2000b). ‘Minority Claims under Two Conceptions of Democracy’ in Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ed. Ivison, D., Patton, P. and Sanders, W.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–215.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2001a). ‘Capability and Freedom: A Defence of Sen’, Economics and Philosophy 17: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2001b). ‘The Capacity to Have Done Otherwise’ in Relating to Responsibility: Essays in Honour of Tony Honore on his 80th Birthday, ed. Cane, P. and Gardner, J.. Oxford, Hart, pp. 21–35; reprinted in P. Pettit (2002) Rules, Reasons, and Norms. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2001c). ‘Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma’. Philosophical Issues (supp. to Nous) 11: 268–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2001d). ‘Non-Consequentialism and Political Philosophy’ in Robert Nozick, ed. Schidmtz, D.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2001e). A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Cambridge and New York, Polity and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2002a). ‘Is Criminal Justice Politically Feasible?’ Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Special Issue ed. Pablo de Greiff, 5(2): 427–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2002b). ‘Keeping Republican Freedom Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner’. Political Theory 30: 339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2003a). ‘Akrasia, Collective and Individual’ in Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, ed. Stroud, S. and Tappolet, C.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2003b). ‘Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma, and Republican Theory’ in Philosophy, Politics and Society Vol. 7: Debating Deliberative Democracy, ed. Fishkin, J. and Laslett, P.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2004a). ‘The Common Good’ in Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry, ed. Dowding, K., Goodin, R. E. and Pateman, C.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 150–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2004b). ‘Depoliticizing Democracy’. Ratio Juris 17: 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2005a). ‘The Domination Complaint’. Nomos 86: 87–117.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2005b). ‘The Elements of Responsibility’. Philosophical Books 46: 210–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2005c). ‘On Rule-Following, Folk Psychology, and the Economy of Esteem: Reply to Boghossian, Dreier and Smith’: contribution to Symposium on P. Pettit’s Rules, Reasons, and Norms. Philosophical Studies 124: 233–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2006a). ‘The Determinacy of Republican Policy’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 34: 275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2006b). ‘Rawls’s Peoples’ in Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia, ed. Martin, R. and Reidy, D.. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2007a). ‘Joining the Dots’ in Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit, ed. Brennan, H. G., Goodin, R. E., Jackson, F. C. and Smith, M.. Oxford University Press, pp. 215–344.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2007b). ‘Rationality, Reasoning and Group Agency’. Dialectica 61: 495–519.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2007c). ‘Resilience as an Explanandum of Social Theory’ in Contingency, ed. Shapiro, I. and Bedi, S.. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2007d). ‘Responsibility Incorporated’. Ethics117: 171–201.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2007e). ‘Free Persons and Free Choices’. History of Political Thought, Special Issue on ‘Liberty and Sovereignty’, 28: 709–18.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008a). ‘The Basic Liberties’ in Essays on H. L. A. Hart, ed. Kramer, M.. Oxford University Press, pp. 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008b). ‘Freedom and Probability: A Comment on Goodin and Jackson’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 36: 206–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008c). Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind and Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008d). ‘Republican Liberty: Three Axioms, Four Theorems’ in Republicanism and Political Theory, ed. Laborde, C. and Manor, J.. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2008e). ‘Value-mistaken and Virtue-mistaken Norms’ in Political Legitimization without Morality?, ed. Kuehnelt, J.. New York, Springer, pp. 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2009a). ‘Corporate Responsibility Revisited’. Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie, Special Issue on ‘Philip Pettit and the Incorporation of Responsibility’, 38: 159–76.
Pettit, P. (2009b). ‘Varieties of Public Representation’ in Representation and Popular Rule, ed. Shapiro, I., Stokes, S. and Wood, E. J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2010a). ‘Legitimate International Institutions: A Neorepublican Perspective’ in The Philosophy of International Law, ed. Tasioulas, J. and Besson, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2010b). ‘Representation, Responsive and Indicative’. Constellations 3: 426–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2010c). ‘A Republican Law of Peoples’. European Journal of Political Theory, Special Issue on ‘Republicanism and International Relations’, 9: 70–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2011a). ‘The Hedgehog’s Fantasies’: review of Ronald Dworkin, ‘Justice for Hedgehogs’. Times Literary Supplement. London, News International.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2011b). ‘The Instability of Freedom as Non-Interference: The Case of Isaiah Berlin’. Ethics 121: 693–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2012a). ‘The Inescapability of Consequentialism’ in Luck, Value and Commitment: Themes from the Ethics of Bernard Williams, ed. Heuer, U. and Lang, G.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2012b). ‘Two Republican Traditions’ in Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics, ed. Niederberger, A. and Schink, P.. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (in press). Just Freedom. New York, W.W. Norton and Co.
Pettit, P. and Schweikard, D. (2006). ‘Joint Action and Group Agency’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 18–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. and Smith, M. (1996). ‘Freedom in Belief and Desire’. Journal of Philosophy 93: 429–49; reprinted in F. Jackson, P. Pettit and M. Smith (2004) Mind, Morality and Explanation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The Better Angels of our Nature: Why Violence has Declined. New York, Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1972). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. F., ed. (1969). Representation. New York, Atherton Press.
Pocock, J. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Theory and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (1990). Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Polybius, (1954). The Histories. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Prentice, D. A. and Miller, D. T. (1993). ‘Pluralistic Ignorance and Alcohol Use on Campus’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 243–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, R. (1991). Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (1993). Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworksi, A. (1999). ‘A Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense’ in Democracy’s Value, ed. Hacker-Cordon, C. and Shapiro, I.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (2011). Zombie Economics: How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raab, F. (1965). The English Face of Machiavelli: A Changing Interpretation 1500–1700. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Raventos, D. (2007). Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom. London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1955). ‘Two Concepts of Rules’. Philosophical Review 64: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1995). ‘Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas’. Journal of Philosophy 92: 132–80.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rehfield, A. (2005). The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfield, A. (2006). ‘Towards a General Theory of Political Representation’. Journal of Politics 68: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. P. (1988). The Concept of Liberty in the Age of the American Revolution. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Reidy, D. (2007). ‘Reciprocity and Reasonable Disagreement: From Liberal to Democratic Legitimacy’. Philosophical Studies 132: 243–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, H. (2002). Democratic Autonomy. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richter, M. (1977). The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, W. (1982). Liberalism against Populism. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, M. (2004). ‘Arguing for Majority Rule’. Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, C. (1959). The Eighteenth Century Commonwealthman. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, H. M., Robert, III H. M., Honemann, D. H., Balch, T. J., Seabold, D. E. and Gerber, S. (2011). Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th edn. Cambridge, MA, Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2006). Democracy, Past and Future. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997). Rousseau: ‘The Social Contract’ and Other Later Political Writings, trans. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, J. (2001). Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. (1999). ‘Bartolus of Sassoferrato and Free Cities’. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 6: 65–89.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1996). Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sanyal, S. (forthcoming). ‘A Defence of Democratic Egalitarianism’.
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2005). ‘Choice, Circumstance and the Value of Equality’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtz, D. and Brennan, J. (2010). A Brief History of Liberty. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2005). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1984). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, M. (2007). Democracy and Legal Change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Sellers, M. N. S. (1995). American Republicanism: Roman Ideology in the United States Constitution. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1970). ‘The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal’. Journal of Political Economy 78: 152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1983a). ‘Liberty and Social Choice’. Journal of Philosophy 80: 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1983b). ‘Poor, Relatively Speaking’. Oxford Economic Papers 35: 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. (2003). The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2011). Legality. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, A., ed. (1998). The English Levellers. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Shiffrin, S. (2000). ‘Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29: 205–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidney, A. (1990). Discourses Concerning Government. Indianapolis, Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Sieyes, E. J. (2003). Political Writings. Indianapolis, Hackett.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J. (1976). ‘Tacit Consent and Political Obligation’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5(3): 274–91.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J. (1979). Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J. (1999). ‘Justification and Legitimacy’. Ethics 109: 739–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintomer, Y. (2007). Le Pouvoir au Peuple: Jurys citoyens, tirage au sort et democratie participative. Paris, Edition la Decouverte.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1974). ‘The Principles and Practice of Opposition: The Case of Bolingbroke versus Walpole’ in Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honour of J.H. Plumb, ed. McKendrick, N.. London, Europa Publications.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1996). Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2005). ‘Hobbes on Representation’. European Journal of Philosophy 13: 155–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2008a). ‘Freedom as the Absence of Arbitrary Power’ in Republicanism and Political Theory, ed. Maynor, J. and Laborde, C.. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2008b). Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2009). ‘A Genealogy of the Modern State’. Proceedings of the British Academy 162: 325–70.Google Scholar
Slaughter, S. (2005). Liberty beyond Neo-Liberalism: A Republican Critique of Liberal Government in a Globalising Age. London, Macmillan Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1976). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1982). The Theory of the Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis, Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1994). The Moral Problem. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sober, E. and Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitz, J.-F. (1995). La Liberte Politique. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. (1994). An Essay on Rights. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. T. Q. (1993). A Deeper Silence: The Hidden Roots of the United Irish Movement. London, Faber.Google Scholar
Stilz, A. (2009). Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, J. (2004). Democracy and Tradition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (2000). On Tyranny. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. (1962). Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1998). ‘The Metric of Opportunity’. Economics and Philosophy 14: 307–37.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Talisse, R. B. (2007). A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Talisse, R. B. (2009). Democracy and Moral Conflict. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K.-C. (2008). ‘A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism’. Journal of Philosophy 105: 665–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985a). Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985b). Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. (1996). Inequality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1975). ‘Reflections on the History of European State-Making’ in The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. Tilly, C.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasi, J. (2012). Free Market Fairness. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenchard, J. and Gordon, T. (1971). Cato’s Letters. New York, Da Capo.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. (2006). ‘Hobbes and Democracy’ in Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. Brett, A. S. and Tully, J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. (2008). Free Riding. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, J. (2009). Public Philosophy in a New Key. Cambridge University Press, vols. I and II.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. (1995). The Importance of Us. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H., eds. (2000a). Left-Libertarianism and its Critics. New York, Palgrave.
Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H., eds. (2000b). The Origins of Left-Libertarianism. New York, Palgrave.
Van der Rijt, J.-W. (2012). The Importance of Assent: A Theory of Coercion and Dignity. New York, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gelderen, M. and Skinner, Q. (2002). Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (1995). Real Freedom for All. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vatter, M. (2011). ‘Natural Right and States of Exception in Leo Strauss’ in Crediting God: Sovereignty and Religion in the Age of Global Capitalism, ed. Vatter, M.. New York, Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, M. B. and Runciman, D. (2008). Representation. Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. (1967). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viroli, M. (1995). For Love of Country. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viroli, M. (2002). Republicanism. New York, Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999a). The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999b). Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2006). ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’. Yale Law Journal 115: 1346–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2007). ‘Pettit’s Molecule’ in Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit, ed. Brennan, G., Goodin, R. E., Jackson, F. and Smith, M.. Oxford University Press, pp. 143–60.Google Scholar
Waley, D. (1988). The Italian City-Republics, 3rd edn. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1981). ‘Philosophy and Democracy’. Political Theory 9: 379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice. Oxford, Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2011). ‘Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory’. American Political Science Review 105: 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. E. and Pearse, H., eds. (2008). Designing Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, A. (1985). The Digest of Justinian, Four Volumes. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (2003). ‘Free Agency’ in Free Will, 2nd edn, ed. Watson, G.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (2005). Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. London, William Hodge.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. (1997). ‘The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law’. American Political Science Review 91: 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, D. and Nadeau, C., eds. (2004). Republicanism: History, Theory and Practice. London, Frank Cass.
White, S. and Leighton, D., eds. (2008). Building a Citizen Society: The Emerging Politics of Republican Democracy. London, Lawrence and Wishart.
Whitehead, A. N. (1997). Science and the Modern World. New York, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2005). In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, D. (1978). Adam Smith’s Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, P. (1963). The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1968). Libertas as a Political Ideal at Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. (2010). Meaning in Life and Why it Matters. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, C. N. S. (1913). Bartolus of Sassoferrato. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, I. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, I. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zucca, L. (2007). Constitutional Dilemmas: Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights in Europe and the USA. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Philip Pettit, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: On the People's Terms
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017428.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Philip Pettit, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: On the People's Terms
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017428.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Philip Pettit, Princeton University, New Jersey
  • Book: On the People's Terms
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017428.008
Available formats
×