Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T23:58:20.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Evolution: Charles Darwin and Homo sapiens as a work in progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Bruce K. Alexander
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Curtis P. Shelton
Affiliation:
British Columbia Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

“Another curious aspect of the theory of evolution is that everybody thinks he understands it.”

Jacques Monod (1975, p. 12)

The best-known statement of the evolutionary perspective on psychology was written by Charles Darwin (1809–1882). Other evolutionary thinkers are easy to overlook today because Darwin’s well-deserved fame so greatly outshines those who preceded him – as well as those who followed him. Yet, the core of evolution – the idea that change is the basic fact of nature – is as old as scholarly history itself. Leahey (2001, p. 155) described the rise of Darwin’s influence in modern times with the phrase “Heraclitus triumphant,” referring to Heraclitus of Ephesus, a Greek philosopher who lived about a hundred years before Plato. In his theory of flux, Heraclitus proposed that everything on earth is constantly changing. We know of Heraclitus today only from short quotations in other ancient scholars’ works, but he wrote at least one book that was taken very seriously in the ancient world, particularly by Plato and by the Stoics.

Aristotle (384 BC–322 BC), who was a great naturalist and classifier of plant and animal species, also had a deep connection with evolution. Although Aristotle could not actually be labeled an evolutionist, historians of biology have recognized that he provided essential ideas that made the later development of evolutionary theory possible. First, he emphasized the principle of continuity. After examining many specimens of animals, he saw that they did not fall into completely distinct types, but varied along a continuum so that the border separating one type from another was somewhat arbitrary. This principle later proved essential to understanding the origin of species in evolutionary terms (Lovejoy, 1936, pp. 56–58). Second, Aristotle recognized that each maturing individual creature developed in a way that was largely predictable.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, B.K. (2010). The globalization of addiction: A study in poverty of the spirit. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfred, T. (1999). Peace, power, righteousness: An indigenous manifesto. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allee, W.C. (1951). Cooperation among animals with human implications. New York: Schwan.Google Scholar
Allen, F.L. (1931). Only yesterday: An informal history of the 1920s. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Allen, R.S. (1992). His Majesty’s Indian allies: British Indian policy in the defense of Canada, 1774–1815. Toronto, ON: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.L., and Crawford, C.B. (1992). Modeling costs and benefits of adolescent weight control as a mechanism for reproductive suppression. Human Nature, 3, 299–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennour, M., and Vonèche, J. (2009). The historical context of Piaget’s ideas. In Müller, U., Carpendale, J.I.M., and Smith, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 45–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, M. (1988). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bonner, J.T., and May, R.M. (1981). Introduction. In Darwin, C. (1871/1981), The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (pp. vii–xxxiv). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boom, J. (2009). Piaget on equilibration. In Müller, U., Carpendale, J.I.M., and Smith, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 132–149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, E.G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd edn.). New York: Appleton Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Carlson, K.T. (Ed.) (1997). You are asked to witness: The Stó:lo in Canada’s Pacific coast history. Chilliwack, BC: Stó:lo Heritage Trust.Google Scholar
Carroll, W.E. (2000). Creation, evolution, and Thomas Aquinas. Revue des Questions Scientifique, 171, 319–347.Google Scholar
Cloud, J. (2010, January 6). Why your DNA isn’t your destiny. Time Magazine. Retrieved July 17, 2012, from
Clutesi, G. (1969). Potlatch. Sydney, BC: Gray’s Publishing.Google Scholar
Crawford, C. (2013). Reflections on Edward O. Wilson’s The Social Conquest of Earth: Legitimizing group selection or “a book too far?PsycCRITIQUES, 58(11), article 2.Google Scholar
Crawford, C.B., and Krebs, D. (1997). Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1877). A biographical sketch of an infant. Mind, 2, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1958). The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. New York: New American Library of World Literature. (Original work published 1859)Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1965). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1872)Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1981). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1871)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (rev. edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2012, May 24). The descent of Edward Wilson: A new book by a great biologist makes a slew of mistakes. Prospect. Retrieved July 5, 2012, from
Desmond, A., and Moore, J. (1991). Darwin: The life of a tormented evolutionist. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Desmond, A., and Moore, J. (2009) Darwin’s sacred cause: How a hatred of slavery shaped Darwin’s views on human evolution. New York: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt.Google Scholar
Dumouchel, P., and Dupuy, J.-P. (1979). L’enfer des choses: René Girard et la logique de l’économie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Erikson, E.H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd edn., revised and enlarged). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Erikson, E.H. (1997). The life cycle completed: Extended version with new chapters on the ninth stage of development by Joan M. Erikson. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., and Friedman, R. (1979). Free to choose: A personal statement. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Gall, J., and Weisfeld, G. (1998, August 20). Sibling and offspring recognition by olfaction. Paper presented at the 14th biennial conference of the International Society for Human Ethology, Burnaby, BC.Google Scholar
Gilmcher, P.W. (2005). Indeterminacy in brain and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (1999). Darwin on Aristotle. Journal of the History of Biology, 30, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudge, T.A. (1967). Darwin, Charles Robert. In Edwards, P. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. II, pp. 294–295). New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
Gould, S.J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gruber, H.E., and Barrett, P.H. (1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity together with Darwin’s early and unpublished notebooks. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (2013, March 2). Maverick anthropologist’s memoir sparks fresh row over ancient Yanomami tribe. The Observer. Retrieved March 15, 2013, from
Hawking, S., and Mlodinow, L. (2011). The grand design: New answers to the ultimate questions of life. London, UK: Transworld Publishers.Google Scholar
Herman, A. (2001). How the Scots invented the modern world. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1962). The age of revolution: 1789–1848. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1975). The age of capital: 1848–1875. London, UK: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1989). The age of empire: 1874–1914. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1994). The age of extremes: The short 20th century, 1914–1991. London, UK: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. (1987). The fatal shore. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books (MIT Press).Google Scholar
Kohl, J. (1998, August 21). Human pheromones and the neuroendocrinology of behaviour. Paper presented at the 14th biennial conference of the International Society for Human Ethology, Burnaby, BC.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, P. (1914). Mutual aid (3rd edn.). Montreal, QC: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Laing, R.D. (1967). The politics of experience and the bird of paradise. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Laing, R.D. (1969). The politics of the family. Toronto, ON: Canadian Broadcasting Company.Google Scholar
Leahey, T.H. (2001). A history of modern psychology (3rd edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lennox, J.G. (1993). Darwin was a teleologist. Biology and Philosophy, 8, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, A.O. (1936). The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Malthus, T.R. (1983). An essay on the principle of population. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1798)Google Scholar
Margulis, L., and Hinkle, G. (1991). The biota and Gaia: 150 years of support for environmental sciences. In Schneider, S.H. and Boston, P.J. (Eds.), Scientists on Gaia (pp. 11–18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1948). Manifesto of the Communist Party. New York: International Publishers. (Original work published 1848)Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology: Observations of an evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Messerly, J.G. (2009). Piaget’s biology. In Müller, U., Carpendale, J.I.M., and Smith, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 94–109). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, J.L. (1975). On the molecular theory of evolution. In Harré, R. (Ed.), Problems of scientific revolution: Progress and obstacles to progress in the sciences: The Herbert Spenser Lectures 1973 (pp. 11–24). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Morris, W. (1891). The news from nowhere. London, UK: Reeves and Turner.Google Scholar
Müller, U., Carpendale, J.I.M., and Smith, L. (Eds.) (2009a), The Cambridge companion to PiagetCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, U., Carpendale, J.I.M., and Smith, L. (2009b). Introduction. In Müller, Carpendale, and Smith (2009a), pp. 1–44.
Neese, R.M. (1994). An evolutionary perspective on substance abuse. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, D.F. (1995). Progress without people: New technology, unemployment, and the message of resistance. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Noble, D.F. (1997). The religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Passer, M.W., and Smith, R.E. (2011). Psychology: The science of mind and behavior (5th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Peck, J. (2008). Re-making laissez faire. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pembrey, M.E., Bygren, L.O., Kaati, G., Edvinsson, S., Northstone, K., Sjöström, M., Golding, J., and the ALSPAC Study Team. (2006). Sex-specific, male-line generational responses in humans. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, S. (2009). 1688: The first modern revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Richer, J. (1998, August 20). Attachment, autism and holding in mind. Paper presented at the 14th biennial conference of the International Society for Human Ethology, Burnaby, BC.Google Scholar
Rose, L.T., and Fischer, K.W. (2009). Dynamic development: A neo-Piagetian approach. In Müller, Carpendale, and Smith (2009a), pp. 400–421.CrossRef
Rossano, M.J. (2011, July 18). Thomas Aquinas: Saint of evolutionary psychologists? The Biologos Forum. Retrieved June 15, 2012, from
Schwartz, J.M., Stapp, H.P., and Beauregard, M. (2005). Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: A neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 360, 1309–1327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, B.F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. (1991). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1776)Google Scholar
Smith, Alfred. (2012). In defence of the Lords: Reinstating heredity and continuity to Britain’s constitution. Quarterly Review (Quidnunc). Retrieved August 10, 2012, from
Smith, J.M. (1989). Did Darwin get it right? Essays on games, sex, and evolution. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Smith, L. (2009). Piaget’s developmental epistemology. In Müller, Carpendale, and Smith (2009a), pp. 64–93.CrossRef
Sober, E., and Wilson, D.S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1851). Social statics: Or, the conditions essential to human happiness specified, and the first of them developed. London, UK: John Chapman.Google Scholar
Sproat, G.M. (1987). The Nootka: Scenes and studies of savage life. Victoria, BC: Sono Nis Press. (Original work published 1868)Google Scholar
Stokes, M.C. (1967). Heraclitus of Ephesus. In Edwards, P. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 477–481). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tennant, P. (1990). Aboriginal people and politics: The Indian land question in British Columbia, 1849–1989. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, N. (2005). Becoming animal: Contemporary art in the animal kingdom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thorpe, V. (2012, June 24). Richard Dawkins in furious row with E.O. Wilson over theory of evolution. The Observer. Retrieved July 18, 2012, from
Waters, R.H., Rethlingshafer, D.A., and Caldwell, W.E. (Eds.). (1960). Principles of comparative psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J.B. (1930). Behaviorism (Rev. edn.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Whye, J. van (2009). Charles Darwin’s Cambridge life 1828–1831. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 4, 2–13.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.S. (2012, May). Richard Dawkins, Edward O. Wilson, and the consensus of the many. Evolution: This View of Life. Retrieved 5 July, 2012, from
Wilson, D.S., and Sober, E. (1994). Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 585–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (2012). The social conquest of earth. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Wrightson, K. (2000). Earthly necessities: Economic lives in early modern Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zinn, H. (1980). A people’s history of the United States. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×