Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T21:56:17.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The polar regions: Antarctica and the Arctic

from Part II - Principles and rules establishing standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Philippe Sands
Affiliation:
University College London
Jacqueline Peel
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Adriana Fabra
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona
Ruth MacKenzie
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Antarctic and the Arctic polar regions are subject to special regional rules of environmental protection. These rules reflect the unique physical conditions of these areas and the important role they play in maintaining regional and global environmental conditions. They also provide useful models for the development of international environmental law in other regions and globally. For the Antarctic, the environmental rules have developed in the context of complex legal issues arising from claims made by some states to sovereign rights over Antarctic territory, and the opposing view of most other states that the Antarctic is part of the global commons and not subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of any state. These differences have not prevented the adoption of innovative and potentially far-reaching rules for the protection of the Antarctic environment and its ecosystem. The Arctic region, on the other hand, is subject to the undisputed jurisdiction of certain states, and for the most part environmental protection in that area is based on national environment laws, although these may implement international environmental obligations. In 1991, Arctic states recognised the need for international co-operation to address threats to the Arctic environment and its ecosystem in the knowledge that it too plays an important role in maintaining the global environmental balance. In 1996, they established the Arctic Council, a high-level intergovernmental forum designed to provide a mechanism to address the common concerns and challenges faced by the Arctic governments and the peoples of the Arctic.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hayton, R. D.‘The Antarctic Settlement of 1959’American Journal of International Law 349 1960Google Scholar
Boczek, B.‘The Protection of the Antarctic Ecosystem: A Study in International Environmental Law’Ocean Development and International Law 347 1983Google Scholar
Carroll, J. E.‘Of Icebergs, Oil Wells, and Treaties: Hydrocarbon Exploitation Offshore Antarctica’Stanford Journal of International Law 207 1983Google Scholar
Joyner, C. C.‘Protection of the Antarctic Environment: Rethinking the Problems and Prospects’Cornell International Law Journal 259 1986Google Scholar
Bush, W.Antarctica and International Law 3 1982
Spectar, J. M.‘Saving the Ice Princess: NGOs, Antarctica and International Law in the New Millennium’Suffolk Transnational Law Review 57 1999Google Scholar
Molenaar, E. J.‘Sea-Borne Tourism in Antarctica: Avenues for Further Intergovernmental Regulation’International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 247 2005Google Scholar
Baird, R.‘The Antarctic Treaty System and Japan's Scientific Whaling in the Southern Ocean: Is There an Obligation to Protect the Antarctic Marine Ecosystem?’ 11 Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law193 2008Google Scholar
le Bris, C.‘Le Degel en Arctique: Briser la Glace entre Etats dans l'Intêret de l'Humanité’Revue Générale de Droit International Public 329 2008Google Scholar
Lyster, S.International Wildlife Law 2010 346
Beck, P.‘The United Nations and Antarctica, 2005: The End of the “Question of Antarctica”?’ 42 Polar Record217 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, C. C.‘Recommended Measures under the Antarctic Treaty: Hardening Compliance with Soft International Law’Michigan Journal of International Law 401 1998Google Scholar
Vignes, D‘La Convention sur la Conservation de la Faune et de la Flore Marines de l'Antarctique’Annuaire Français de Droit International 741 1980Google Scholar
Joyner, C. C.‘The Antarctic Minerals Negotiating Process’ 81 American Journal of International Law888 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, M. P.‘Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resources’Harvard International Law Journal 237 1989Google Scholar
Watts, A.‘The Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 169 1990Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R.The Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities 1991CrossRef
Puissochet, J. P.‘Le Protocole au Traité sur l'Antarctique Relatif à la Protection de l'Environnement’Annuaire Français de Droit International 755 1991Google Scholar
Joyner, C. C.‘The 1991 Madrid Environmental Protocol: Rethinking the World Park Status for Antarctica’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 328 1992Google Scholar
Francioni, F.‘The Madrid Protocol on the Protection of the Antarctic Environment’Texas International Law Journal 47 1993Google Scholar
Redgwell, C.‘Environmental Protection in Antarctica: The 1991 Protocol’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 599 1994Google Scholar
Cordonnery, L.‘Area Protection and Management in Antarctica: A Proposed Strategy for the Implementation of Annex V of the Madrid Protocol Based on Information Management’Environmental and Planning Law Journal 38 1997Google Scholar
French, D.‘Sustainable Development and the 1991 Madrid Protocol to the 1959 Antarctic Treaty: The Primacy of Protection of the Particularly Sensitive Environment’Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 291 1999Google Scholar
Peterson, M.‘Antarctic Implications of the New Law of the Sea’Ocean Development and International Law 137 1986Google Scholar
M'Gonigle, R.‘Unilateralism and International Law: The Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act’University of Toronto Faculty Law Review 180 1976Google Scholar
Feder, B.‘Legal Regime for the Arctic’Ecology Law Quarterly 785 1978Google Scholar
McRae, D.Goundrey, D.‘Environmental Jurisdiction in Arctic Waters: The Extent of Article 234’University of British Columbia Law Review 197 1982Google Scholar
Bederman, D. J.‘High Stakes in the High Arctic: Jurisdiction and Compensation for Oil Pollution from Offshore Operations in the Beaufort Sea’Alaska Law Review 37 1987Google Scholar
Rothwell, D.‘The Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy and International Environmental Co-operation in the Far North’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 65 1995Google Scholar
Ansson, R. J.‘The North American Agreement on Environmental Protection and the Arctic Council Agreement: Will These Multinational Agreements Adequately Protect the Environment?’California Western International Law Journal 101 1998Google Scholar
Bloom, E. T.‘Establishment of the Arctic Council’American Journal of International Law 712 1999Google Scholar
Koivurova, T.‘Alternatives for an Arctic Treaty – Evaluation and a New Proposal’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 14 2008Google Scholar
Joyner, C. C.‘The Legal Regime for the Arctic Ocean’Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 195 2009Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S.‘A Legal Regime for the Arctic? Interplay with the Law of the Sea Convention’Marine Policy 402 2007Google Scholar
de la Fayette, L. A.‘Oceans Governance in the Arctic’International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 531 2008Google Scholar
Holmes, S.‘Breaking the Ice: Emerging Legal Issues in Arctic Sovereignty’Chicago Journal of International Law 323 2008Google Scholar
Molenaar, E. J.‘Arctic Marine Shipping: Overview of the International Legal Framework, Gaps, and Options’Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 289 2009Google Scholar
VanderZwaag, D.‘Arctic’Yearbook International Environmental Law 375 2009Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×