Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T05:03:53.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Disruptions

from PART II - INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Nii O. Attoh-Okine
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Infrastructure networks can experience both component failures and disruptions. The failure or disruption can be accidental or intentional. These incidents can have both economic and human costs. During large disasters, a large number of critical infrastructures are susceptible to damage and disruption. A disaster is usually referred to as an extreme event if it can disrupt a whole system of interdependent infrastructures such as water supply, transportation, telecommunication, and electric power systems. However, a resilient system has the capacity to adapt to the hazard by resisting or changing in order to reach and maintain an acceptable level of functioning. In most cases, this is determined by the degree to which the social system is capable of organizing itself and its functions, based on the experience and lesson from previous disasters (O'Rourke 2007). During disaster one can identify the following categories of causes: (1) Physical destruction of infrastructure network components, (2) disruption in supporting network infrastructure, and in some cases (3) infrastructure network congestions. Furthermore, most critical infrastructure—for example, telecommunication networks—does not have high degree of redundancy (this will be explained in chapter 4, graphs and networks). Also there are interdependencies between critical infrastructures, and some of them lack acceptable levels of resilience under various conditions. For example, electric outages can cause disruption in transportation systems. Furthermore, depending on how self-healing the interacting systems are, there can be varying degrees of costs involved in restoring appropriate functions and serviceability of each system (Townsend and Moss 2005).

Branscomb (2006) discussed three classes of disasters:

  1. • Natural disasters

  2. • Man-made disasters

  3. • Technogenic disasters resulting from human error and failing infrastructure

Impey (2012) groups hazard into (1) natural and (2) societal. Natural hazards include meteorological, geological, geomophic, and hydrological hazards. The metrological hazards include tropical cyclones and tornadoes; geological hazards include earthquakes and volcanic eruptions; geomorphic hazards include landslides and debris flows; and finally hydrological hazards include river flooding, storm surges, and tsunamis.

Societal hazards include political violence, infectious disease pandemics, industrial and transportation accidents, and fraud catastrophes. A major characteristic of societal hazards is that the community or society tends to be organized to deal with those threats. For example, during the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack and Hurricane Katrina in 2015, the U.S. federal government provided the restoration and recovery.

Type
Chapter
Information
Resilience Engineering
Models and Analysis
, pp. 43 - 65
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aas, K.,and D., Berg. 2009. Models for construction of multivariate dependence—a comparison study. The European Journal of Finance, 15(7-8):639–659. doi: 10.1080/13518470802588767.Google Scholar
Aas, K., C., Czado, A., Frigessi, and H., Bakken. 2009. Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44(2):182–198. doi: 10.1016/j. insmatheco.2007.02.001.Google Scholar
Bacigal, T., and M., Komornikova. 2006. Fitting Archimedean copulas to bivariate geodetic data. In Compstat Satellite Meetings, pages 1–8. URL http://www.stat.unipg.it/iasc/Proceedings/2006/COMPSTAT/CD/251.pdf.
Barkun, M. 1997. Religion and the Racist Right:The Origins of the Christian Identity Movement.UNC Press Books.
Bedford, T., and R. M., Cooke. 2002. Vines—A new graphical model for dependent random variables. The Annals of Statistics, 30(4):1031–1068.Google Scholar
Bensalah, Y. 2004. Steps in Applying Extreme Value Theory to Finance: A Review. Technical Report. URL http://www.banqueducanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/wp00-20.pdf.
Bosher, L., P., Carrillo, A., Dainty, J., Glass, and A., Price. 2007. Realising a resilient and sustainable built environment: towards a strategic agenda for the United Kingdom. Disasters, 31(3):236–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01007.x.Google Scholar
Branscomb, L.M. 2006. Sustainable cities: Safety and security. Technology in Society, 28(1–2):225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.004.Google Scholar
Chavez-Demoulin, V., and A., Roehrl. 2004. Extreme Value Theory can save your neck. Technical Report. URL http://www.risknet.de/fileadmin/eLibrary/EVT-Paper-Roehrl-Chavez-Demoulin.pdf.
Chollete, L., A., Valdesogo, and A., Heinen. 2008. Modeling International Financial Returns with a Multivariate Regime Switching Copula. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1102632.
Coles, S., and L., Pericchi. 2003. Anticipating catastrophes through extreme value modelling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 52(4):405–416. doi: 10.1111/1467-9876.00413.Google Scholar
Djehiche, B., B., Djehiche, S., Liv, S., Liv, H., Hult, and H., Hult. 2004. An Introduction to Copulas with Applications.
Embrechts, A. M., Paul, Filip, Lindskog. 2001. Modelling Dependence with Copulas and Applications to Risk Management. Technical Report.
Favre, A.-C., S., El Adlouni, L., Perreault, N., Thiémonge, and B., Bobée. 2004. Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water Resources Research, 40(1). doi: 10.1029/2003WR002456.Google Scholar
FEMA. 2011. Federal Emergency Management Agency. URL https://www.fema.gov/.
Gad-El-Hak, M. 2008. Chapter 3. In Prediction, Control, and Mitigation. URL https://www.sepm.org/jsr/book_revs/2009_revs/br_gadelhak.pdf.
Gençay, R., and F., Selçuk. 2004. Extreme value theory and Value-at-Risk: Relative performance in emerging markets. International Journal of Forecasting, 20(2):287–303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.09.005.Google Scholar
Genest, C., and A.-C., Favre. 2007. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Copula Modeling but Were Afraid to Ask. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12(4):347–368. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(347).Google Scholar
Genest, C., and L.-P., Rivest. 1993. Statistical Inference Procedures for Bivariate Archimedean Copulas. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423).Google Scholar
Hayes, W. 2011. WhatWentWrong: Investigating the Greatest Man-made and Natural Disasters.Hearst Books.
Hsu, C.-C., C.-P., Tseng, and Y.-H., Wang. 2008. Dynamic Hedging with Futures:Acopula-based GARCH model. Journal of Futures Markets, 28(11), 1095–1116.Google Scholar
Huang, N.E.,and N.O., Attoh-Okine. 2005. TheHilbert-Huang Transform inEngineering. CRC Press.
Huard, D., G., Évin, and A.-C., Favre. 2006. Bayesian copula selection. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(2):809–822. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2005.08.010.Google Scholar
Impey, C. 2012. Calculating Catastrophe by Gordon Woo. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 34(2):76–76. doi: 10.1007/s00283-012-9278-z.Google Scholar
I. P. o. I. Issues. 2009. Natural disaster mitigation: a scientific and practical approach.Science Press.
Joe, H. 1996. Families of m-variate distributions with given margins and (m-1)/2 bivariate dependence parameters. In Lecture Notes–Monograph Series, volume 28, pages 120–141. Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
Lechat, M. F. 1990. The international decade for natural disaster reduction: background and objectives. Disasters, 14(1):1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1990.tb00967.x.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. G. 2006. Critical Infrastructure Protection in Homeland Security: Defending a Networked Nation.Wiley-Interscience.
Nelsen, R. B. 1999. An Introduction to Copulas.Springer Science & Business Media.
Nikoloulopoulos, A. K., and D., Karlis. 2008. Fitting copulas to bivariate earthquake data: the seismic gap hypothesis revisited. Environmetrics, 19(3):251–269. doi: 10.1002/env.869.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, T. 2007. Critical Infrastructure, Interdependencies, and Resilience. Bridge- Washington-National Academy of Engineering, 37(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
Pickands, J. 1975. Statistical Inference Using Extreme Order Statistics. The Annals of Statistics, 3(1):119–131.Google Scholar
Purcaru, O., and Y., Goegebeur. 2003. Modelling dependence through copulas.University of Leuven.
Salvadori, G. 2007. Extremes in Nature: An Approach Using Copulas. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. E. A. 2005. The modeling of extreme events. British Actuarial Journal, 11(3):519–572.Google Scholar
Savu, C., and M., Trede. 2006. Hierarchical Archimedean Copulas. In International Conference on High Frequency Finance.
Schneider, U. 2004. An Introduction to Statistical Extreme Value Theory.
Sohn, H., H. W., Park, K. H., Law, and C. R., Farrar. 2004. Minimizing Misclassification of Damage using Extreme Value Statistics. Technical Report.URL http://minoe.stanford.edu/publications/Hyunwoo_Park/US_Korea_Paper_Sohn.pdf.
Son, S.-W., G., Bizhani, C., Christensen, P., Grassberger, and M., Paczuski. 2012. Percolation theory on interdependent networks based on epidemic spreading. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 97(1):16006. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/97/16006.Google Scholar
Tamura, M. 2001. Multi-agent utility theory for ethical conflict resolution. In 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat. No. 01CH37236), volume 3, pages 1779–1782. IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ ICSMC.2001.973559.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. M., and M. L., Moss. 2005. Telecommunications Infrastructure in Disasters: Preparing Cities for Crisis Communications. Technical Report. URL http://hurricane.wagner.nyu.edu.
UNEP. 2011. State of the Environment and Policy Retrospective 1972–2002 UNEP Publication 2011. Technical Report. URL http://www.unep.org/geo/geo3/english/pdfs/chapter2-9_disasters.pdf.
Volik, B.G. 2002. Technogenic Safety: Problems in Analysis. Automation and Remote Control, 63(12):2020–2025. doi: 10.1023/A:1021655718341.Google Scholar
Watchtower. 2011. Coping with Natural Disasters. URL http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2011883.
Yan, J. 2005. Multivariate Modeling with Copulas and Engineering Applications. In Springer Handbook of Engineering Statistics, pages 973–990.Google Scholar
Yu, B. A. 2010. Infrastructure Disruptions and Interdependencies during Flood Events. Technical Report 2.
Yu, L., and E. O., Voit. 2006. Construction of bivariate S-distributions with copulas. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(3):1822–1839. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2005.11.021.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., and V. P., Singh. 2006. Bivariate Flood Frequency Analysis Using the Copula Method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(2):150–164.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Disruptions
  • Nii O. Attoh-Okine, University of Delaware
  • Book: Resilience Engineering
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026772.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Disruptions
  • Nii O. Attoh-Okine, University of Delaware
  • Book: Resilience Engineering
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026772.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Disruptions
  • Nii O. Attoh-Okine, University of Delaware
  • Book: Resilience Engineering
  • Online publication: 05 March 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026772.004
Available formats
×