Aguiló Regla, Josep 1995: Sobre la derogación (México D.F.: Fontamara).Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos 1969: “Logic of Norm and Logic of Normative Propositions,” Logique et Analyse 12, 47: 242–268.Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos 1982: “Normative Order and Derogation,” in Martino, A. (ed.), Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems, Vol. II (Dordrecht: North Holland Publishing Company, 51–60).Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos 1986: “Conditionality and the Representation of Legal Norms,” in Martino, A. et al. (eds.), Automated Analysis of Legal Texts (North-Holland: Elsevier, 175–186).Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos 1991: “Conflicts of Norms and the Revision of Normative Systems,” Law and Philosophy 10(4): 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos 1993: “Philosophical Foundations of Deontic Logic and the Logic of Defeasible Conditionals,” in Meyer and Wieringa 1993: 43–84.

Alchourrón, Carlos 1995: “Concepciones de la lógica,” in Alchourrón, C. et al. (eds.), Lógica. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, 7 (Madrid: Trotta, 11–48).Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos 1996: “Detachment and Defeasibility in Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 57: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1971: Normative Systems (Wein, New York: Springer Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1979: Sobre la existencia de las normas jurídicas (Venezuela: Universidad de Carabobo).Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1981: “The Expressive Conception of Norms,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 95–124.

Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1984: “Pragmatic Foundations for a Logic of Norms,” Rechtstheorie 15: 453–464.Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1988: “Perils of Level Confusion in Normative Discourse,” Rechtstheorie 19: 230–237.Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1989: “Von Wright on Deontic Logic and the Philosophy of Law,” in Schilpp, P. et al. (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (Illinois: Open Court, 665–693).Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Bulygin, Eugenio 1991: Análisis lógico y derecho (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos, Gärdenfors, Peter, and Makinson, David 1985: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50: 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David 1981: “Hierarchies of Regulations and their Logic,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 125–148.

Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David 1982: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Contraction Functions and Their Associated Revision Functions,” Theoria 48(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David 1985: “On the Logic of Theory Change: Safe Contraction,” Studia Logica 44: 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Makinson, David 1986: “Maps between Some Different Kinds of Contraction Function: The Finite Case,” Studia Logica 45: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchourrón, Carlos and Martino, Antonio 1990: “Logic without Truth,” Ratio Iuris 3(1): 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Larry and Sherwin, Emily 2008: Demystifying Legal Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, Robert 1986: Theorie der Grundrechte (Suhrkamp-Verlag).Google Scholar

Anderson, Alan Ross 1956: “The Formal Analysis of Normative Systems,” in Rescher, N. (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 147–213).Google Scholar

Anderson, Alan Ross 1958: “A Reduction of Deontic Logic to Alethic Modal logic,” Mind 67, 265: 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret 1957: Intention (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar

Åqvist, Lennart 1967: “Good Samaritans, contrary-to-duty imperatives and epistemic obligations,” Nôus 1: 361–379.Google Scholar

Åqvist, Lennart 1984: “Deontic Logic,” in Gabbay, D. and Guethner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume II: Extentions of Classical Logic (Dordrecht: Reidel, 605–714), citations are to the 2002 second edition, volume 8 (The Netherlands: Kluwer, 147–264).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Åqvist, Lennart 1987: Introduction to Deontic Logic and the Theory of Normative Systems (Napoli; Bibliopolis).Google Scholar

Atienza, Manuel and Manero, Juan Ruiz 1998: A Theory of Legal Sentences (Dordrecht: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atria, Fernando 2001: On Law and Legal Reasoning (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1984: Scepticism, Rules & Language (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Bayón, Juan Carlos 1991: La normatividad del derecho. Deber jurídico y razones para la acción (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar

Beirlaen, Mathieu and Straßer, Christian 2013: “Two Adaptive Logics of Norm-propositions,” Journal of Applied Logic 11(2): 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belnap, D. N. 1962: “Tonk, Plonk, and Plink,” Analysis 22 (6): 130–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belzer, Marvin and Loewer, Barry 1997: “Deontic Logics of Defeasibility,” in Nute 1997: 45–58.

Bentham, Jeremy 1872: Of Laws in General, citations are to the 1970 edition by Hart, H. L. A. (London: Athlone Press).Google Scholar

Bix, Brian 1993: Law, Language and Legal Determinacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon 1984: Spreading the Word (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert 1994: Making it Explicit, Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment (Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio 1982: “Time and Validity,” in Martino, A. (ed.), Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems (Amsterdam, New York: North Holland Publishing Company, 51–63).Google Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio 1985: “Norms and Logic,” Law and Philosophy 4 (2): 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio 1986: “Legal Dogmatics and the Systematization of Law,” in Eckhoff, Torstein et al. (eds.), Vernunft und Erfahrung im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart, Rechtstheorie 10: 193–210.Google Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio 1991: “Algunas consideraciones sobre los sistemas jurídicos,” Doxa 9: 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio 1994: “Lógica y normas,” Isonomía 1: 28–36.Google Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio 1995: “Lógica deóntica,” in Alchourrón, C. et al. (eds.), Lógica. Enciclopedia Iberoamericana de Filosofía, volumen 7 (Madrid: Trotta, 129–142).Google Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio 2003: “On Legal Gaps,” Analisi e Diritto: 21–28.

Canale, Damiano and Tuzet, Giovanni 2007: “On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?”, Ratio Juris 20, N° 1: 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caracciolo, Ricardo 1988: El sistema jurídico. Problemas actuales (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar

Caracciolo, Ricardo 1996: “Sistema jurídico,” in Garzón Valdés, E. and Laporta, F. (eds.), El derecho y la justicia (Madrid: Trotta, 161–176).Google Scholar

Carmo, José and Jones, Andrew J.I. 2002: “Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties,” in Gabbay, Dov M. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 8, 2nd edition (Netherlands: Kluwer, 265–343).

Carnota, Raúl and Rodríguez, Ricardo 2011: “AGM Theory and Artificial Intelligence,” in Olsson, E. et al. (eds.), Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Springer, 1–42).Google Scholar

Castañeda, Héctor Neri 1981: “The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic: The Simplest Solution to All of Them in one Fell Swoop,” in Hilpinen 1981a: 37–85.

Castañeda, Héctor Neri 1986: “Obligations, Aspectual Actions and Circumstances,” Philosophical Papers 15: 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Celano, Bruno 1999: La teoria del diritto di Hans Kelsen. Una introduzione critica (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar

Chellas, Brian F. 1980: Modal Logic. An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chisholm, Roderick 1963: “Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic,” Analysis 34, 2: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, Alonzo 1956: Introduction to Mathematical Logic (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Church, Alonzo 1965: “The History of the Question of Existential Import for Categorical Propositions,” in Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Sciences. Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 417–424).Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules 2000: “Constraints on the Criteria of Legality,” Legal Theory 6(2): 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, Jules 2001: The Practice of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules and Leiter, Brian 1993: “Determinacy, Objectivity and Authority,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142(2): 549–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duarte d’Almeida, Luís 2011: “Legal Statements and Normative Language,” Law and Philosophy 30: 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, Michael 1973: Frege. Philosphy of Language (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the 1981 second edition.Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael 1991: The Logical Basis of Metaphysics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald 1977: Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald 1985: A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald 1986: Law’s Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald 2006: Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart 1980: Democracy and Distrust (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Endicott, Timothy 2000: Vagueness in Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endicott, Timothy 2003: “Raz on Gaps: the Surprising Part,” in Paulson, S. L. et al. (eds.), Rights, Culture, and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–118).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, Pascal 1989: La norme du vrai (Paris: Gallimard), citations are to the 1991 English edition, The Norm of Truth (New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar

Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi and Rodríguez, Jorge 2011: Jerarquías normativas y dinámica de los sistemas jurídicos (Madrid-Barcelona, Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons).Google Scholar

Feys, Richard 1937: “Les Logiques Nouvelles des Modalités,” Revue Néoscolastique de Philosophie 40: 517–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, George P. 1996: Basic Concepts of Legal Thought (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Dagfinn and Hilpinen, Risto 1971: “Deontic Logic: An Introduction,” in Hilpinen 1971: 1–35.

Forrester, James William 1984: “Gentle Murder, or the Adverbial Samaritan,” The Journal of Philosophy 81, Num 4: 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frege, Friedrich Ludwig Gotlob 1919: “Die Verneinung. Eine Logische Untersuchung,” Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I: 143–157, citations are to the 1977 English translation by Geach, P. and Stoothoff, R., “Negation,” in Logical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Gamut, L. T. F. 1991: Logic, Language, and Meaning. Volume 1: Introduction to Logic (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter 1990: “The Dynamics of Belief Systems: Foundations vs. Coherence Theories,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 1: 24–46.Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter 1992a: (ed.) Belief Revision (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter 1992b: “The Dynamics of Normative Systems,” in Martino, A. (ed.), Expert Systems in Law (North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 293–299).Google Scholar

Gardner, John 2004: “The Legality of Law,” Ratio Juris 17(2): 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geach, Peter T. 1965: “Assertion,” Philosophical Review 74: 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentzen, Gerhard 1934: “Untersuchungen über das Logische Schliessen,” Mathematische Zeitschrift 39: 176–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gianformaggio, Leticia 1991: (ed.) Sistemi Normativi Statici e Dinamici. Analisi di una Tipologia Kelseniana (Torino: Giapichelli).

Gibbard, Allan 2003: Thinking How to Live (Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Golding, Martin 1961: “Kelsen and the Concept of ‘Legal System,’ ” Archiv für Rechts und Sozialphilosophie 47: 355–364.Google Scholar

Grayling, A. C. 1997: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic, 3rd edition (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Green, Leslie 1999: “Positivism and Conventionalism,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenspan, Patricia 1975: “Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives,” Journal of Philosophy 72: 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guastini, Riccardo 1995: “Normas Supremas,” Doxa 17–18: 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haack, Susan 1978: Philosophy of Logics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, Bengt 1969: “An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics,” Nous 3: 373–398; reprinted in Hilpinen 1971: 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, Sven Ove 1988: “Deontic Logic without Misleading Alethic Analogies,” Logique et Analyse 31: 337–370.Google Scholar

Hansson, Bengt 1992: “A Dyadic Representation of Belief,” in Gärdenfors, 1992a: 89–121.

Hansson, Bengt 1999: A Textbook of Belief Dynamics. Theory Change and Database Updating (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, Bengt 2001: The Structure of Values and Norms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, Bengt 2004: “A New Representation Theorem for Contranegative Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 77: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, Bengt 2006, “Ideal Worlds – Wishful Thinking in Deontic Logic,” Studia Logica 82: 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, Sven Ove and Makinson, David 1997: “Applying Normative Rules with Restraint,” in Dalla Chiara, M. et al. (eds.) Logic and Scientific Method (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 313–332).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, J. W. 1979: Law and Legal Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 1948: “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49, reprinted in Flew, A. G. N. (ed.), Logic and Language (First Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 145–166).Google Scholar

Harris, J. W. 1961: The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), citations are to the 1994 2nd edition, Raz, J. and Bullock, P (eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Harris, J. W. 1962: “Kelsen Visited,” UCLA Law Review 10: 709–728.Google Scholar

Harris, J. W. 1982: Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Harris, J. W. 1983: Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hartney, Michael 1991: “Introduction. The Final Form of the Pure Theory of Law,” in Kelsen, H., General Theory of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, ix–liii).Google Scholar

Hedenius, Ingmar 1941: Om rätt och moral (Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand).Google Scholar

Hilpinen, Risto 1971: (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel).CrossRef

Hilpinen, Risto 1981a: (ed.) New Studies in Deontic Logic (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel).CrossRef

Hilpinen, Risto 1981b: “On Normative Change,” in Morscher, E. et al. (eds.), Ethics: Foundations, Problems and Applications (Wein: Hölder-Pichier-Tempsky, 155–164).

Hilpinen, Risto 1987: “Conflict and Change in Norm Systems,” in Frändberg, A. et al. (eds.), The Structure of Law (Uppsala: Iustus Forlag, 37–49).

Hilpinen, Risto 2001: “Deontic Logic,” in Globe, Lou (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic (Oxford: Blackwell, 159–182).

Hintikka, Jaakko 1957: “Quantifiers in Deontic Logic,” Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Literarum XXIII, 4: 1–23.Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko 1971: “Some Main Problems in Deontic Logic,” in Hilpinen 1971: 59–104.

Hofstadter, Albert and McKinsey, J. C. C. 1939: “On the Logic of Imperatives,” Philosophy of Science 6, Num. 4: 446–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell 1881: The Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown & Co), citations are to the 2005 edition (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar

Hughes, George Edward and Cresswell, Maxwell John 1996: A New Introduction to Modal Logic (London, New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Susan 1989: Natural Reasons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Jakson, Frank 1985: “On the Semantics and Logic of Obligation,” Mind 94: 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakson, Frank and Pargetter, Robert 1986: “Oughts, Options, and Actualism,” Philosophical Review 95: 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jørgensen, Jørgen 1937–1938: “Imperatives and Logic,” Erkenntnis 7: 288–296.Google Scholar

Kalinowski, George 1967: Le probleme de la vérité en morale et en droit (Lyon: Emmanuel Vitte).Google Scholar

Kanger, Stig 1957: New Foundations for Ethical Theory (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell), reprinted in Hilpinen 1971: 36–58.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 1781: “Preface to the Second Edition” to The Critique of Pure Reason (Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch), citations are to The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, translated and edited in 1998 by Guyer, P. and Wood, A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans 1945: General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans 1960: Pure Theory of Law, 2nd edition, citations are to the 1989 English version (Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans 1979: Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (Wien: Manzsche Verlags und Universitätsbuchhandlung) citations are to the 1991 English edition General Theory of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans and Klug, Ulrich 1981: Rechtsnormen und logische Analyse (Wien: Verlag Franz Deuticke).Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul 1959: “A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 24(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kripke, Saul 1963: “Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I: Normal Propositional Calculi,” Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9: 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kripke, Saul 1982: Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1672: Elementa iuris naturalis, citations are to the 1930 edition (Darmstadt: Otto Reichl Verlag).Google Scholar

Lewis, David 1973: Counterfactuals (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar

Lewis, David 1974: “Semantical Analysis for Dyadic Deontic Logic,” in Stanlund, S. (ed.), Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, Synthese Library, (Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel, 1–14).Google Scholar

Lewis, David 1979: “A Problem about Permission,” in Saarinen, E. et al. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka (Dordrecht: Reidel, 163–175).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David 1986: On the Plurality of Worlds (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Lindahl, Lars 1992: “Conflicts in Systems of Legal Norms: A Logical Point of View,” in Brouwer, P. et al. (eds.), Coherence and Conflict in Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 39–64).Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Karl N. 1930: The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study (Oceana: New York).Google Scholar

MacCallum, Gerald 1993: Legislative Intent and Other Essays on Law, Politics, and Morality (Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil 1978: Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press), citations are to the 1994 new edition with revised foreword (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil 1995: “Defeasibility in Law and Logic,” in Bankowski, Z. et al. (eds.), Informatics and the Foundation of Legal Reasoning (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 99–117).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makinson, David 1993: “Five Faces of Minimality,” Studia Logica 52: 339–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makinson, David 1996: “In Memoriam Carlos Eduardo Alchourrón,” Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 1(1): 3–10.Google Scholar

Makinson, David 1999: “On a Fundamental Problem of Deontic Logic,” in McNamara and Prakken 1999: 29–54.

Makinson, David 2005: Bridges from Classical to Non-monotonic Logic (London: King’s College Publications).Google Scholar

Makinson, David 2008: Sets, Logic and Maths for Computing (London: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makinson, David and van der Torre, Leendert 2000: “Input-output Logics,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 29: 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makinson, David and van der Torre, Leendert 2001: “Constraints for Input-output Logics,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (2): 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makinson, David and van der Torre, Leendert 2003: “Permission from an Input-output Perspective,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 32: 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmor, Andrei 1992: Interpretation and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Marmor, Andrei 2001: Positive Law and Objective Values (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmor, Andrei 2009: Social Conventions: From Language to Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, R. N. 1955: “Further Problems of Derived Obligations,” Mind 64: 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, Paul 2006: “Deontic Logic,” in Gabbay, D. et al. (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 7 (The Neatherlands: Elsevier).Google Scholar

McNamara, Paul and Prakken, Henry 1999: (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems (Amsterdan; Berlin; Oxford; Tokyo; Washington, DC: IOS Press).

Meyer, John Jules Charles and Wieringa, Roel 1993: (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification (Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: Wiley & Sons).

Montague, Richard 1960: “Logical Necessity, Physical Necessity, Ethics, and Quantifiers,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosphy, vol. 3: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1903: Principia Ethica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Moreso, José Juan 1998: Legal Indeterminacy and Constitutional Interpretation (Dordrecht: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreso, José Juan and Navarro, Pablo 1993: Orden jurídico y sistema jurídico. Una investigación sobre la identidad y la dinámica de los sistemas jurídicos (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar

Moreso, José Juan and Navarro, Pablo 1997: “Applicability and Effectiveness of Legal Norms,” Law and Philosophy 16(2): 201–219.Google Scholar

Moreso, José Juan and Navarro, Pablo 1998: “The Reception of Norms and Open Legal Systems,” in Paulson, S. L. and Litschewesky, B. (eds.), Normativity and Norms. Critical perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273–291).Google Scholar

Moreso, José Juan, Navarro, Pablo and Redondo, María Cristina 2001: “Sobre la lógica de las lagunas en el derecho,” Crítica 33(99): 47–73.Google Scholar

Munzer, Stephen 1973: “Validity and Legal Conflicts,” The Yale Law Journal, 82: 1140–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Navarro, Pablo, Orunesu, Claudina, Rodríguez, Jorge, and Sucar, Germán 2004: “Applicability of Legal Norms,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence XVII (2): 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nino, Carlos 1984: Introducción al análisis del derecho (Buenos Aires: Astrea).Google Scholar

Nute, Donald 1997: (ed.) Defeasible Deontic Logic (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRef

Nute, Donald and Yu, Xiaochang 1997: “Introduction,” in Nute 1997: 1–16.

Paulson, Stanley L. 1992: “Kelsen’s Legal Theory: The Final Round,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12: 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Postema, Gerald 1982: “Coordination and Convention at the Foundations of Law,” Journal of Legal Studies 11(1): 165–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prakken, Henry and Sergot, Marek 1996: “Contrary-to-duty Obligations,” Studia Logica 57, 1: 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. 1954: “The Paradoxes of Derived Obligation,” Mind 63: 64–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. 1955: Formal Logic (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Prior, Arthur N. 1958: “Escapism: The Logical Basis of Ethics,” in Melden, A. (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosphy (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 135–146).Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman 1950: Methods of Logic (New York: Holt), citations are to the 1982 fourth edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman 1953: “On What There Is,” in From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the fourteenth printing, 2003 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman 1970: Philosophy of Logic (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman 1990: Pursuit of Truth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Ratti, Giovanni Battista 2008: Sistema giuridico e sistemazione del diritto (Torino: Giappichelli).Google Scholar

Rawls, John 1971: A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), citations are to the 1999 revised edition.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph 1970: The Concept of a Legal System. An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System (Oxford: Clarendon Press), citations are to the 1980 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph 1972: “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law,” The Yale Law Journal, 81(5): 823–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph 1975: Practical Reason and Norms (London: Hutchinson), citations are to the 1990 second edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph 1976: “Kelsen’s General Theory of Norms. Critical Study,” Philosophia 6: 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph 1979: The Authority of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph 1986: The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph 1994: Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph 2009: Between Authority and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas 1966: The Logic of Commands (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Rodríguez, Jorge 2002: Lógica de los sistemas normativos (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales).Google Scholar

Rodríguez, Jorge 2003: “Naturaleza y lógica de las proposiciones normativas. Contribución en homenaje a G. H. von Wright,” Doxa 26: 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodríguez, Jorge 2013: “Norms, Truth, and Legal Statements,” in Beltrán, Jordi Ferrer, Juan, JoséPapayanis, Moreso y Diego (eds.), Neutrality and Theory of Law (The Netherlands, Springer, 127–146).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodríguez, Jorge and Sucar, Germán 1998: “Las trampas de la derrotabilidad. Niveles de análisis de la indeterminación del derecho,” Analisi e Diritto. Ricerche di Giurisprudenza Analítica: 277–305.

Rönnedal, Daniel 2010: An Introduction to Deontic Logic (Stockholm: CreateSpace).Google Scholar

Ross, Alf 1941, “Imperatives and Logic,” Theoria 7: 53–71.Google Scholar

Ross, Alf 1958: On Law and Justice (London: Stevens & Sons Ltd.).Google Scholar

Ross, Alf 1962: “Review: H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law,” The Yale Law Journal 71: 1185–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Alf 1968: Directives and Norms (London: Routledge and Keang Paul).Google Scholar

Ross, Alf 1998: “Validity and the Conflict between Legal Positivism and Natural Law,” in Paulson, S. L. and Litschewski, B. (eds.), Norms and Normativity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147–164).Google Scholar

Ross, David 1930: The Right and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Royyakers, L. M. M. 1998: Extending Deontic Logic for the Formalisation of Legal Rules (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Bertrand 1905: “On Denoting,” Mind XIV (4): 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Bertrand and Whitehead, Alfred North 1910: Principia Mathematica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), citations are to the 1999 edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Sainsbury, R. M. 1987: Paradoxes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), citations are to the 1995 second edition.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick 1991: Playing by the Rules. A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick 1998: “On the Supposed Defeasibility of Legal Rules,” in Freeman, M. D. A. (ed.), Current Legal Problems 51 (1): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schreiber, Rupert 1962: Logik des Rechts (Berlin, Göttingen, Heilderberg: Springer Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Mark 2004: “The Scope of Instrumental Reason,” Philosophical Perspectives 18(1): 337–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Scott J. 1998: “The Difference that Rules Make,” in Bix, B. (ed.), Analyzing Law. New Essays in Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–62).Google Scholar

Shiner, Roger 1992: Norm and Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter 1985: “A Solution to Forrester’s Paradox of Gentle Murder,” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (3): 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soeteman, Arend 1989: Logic in Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soeteman, Arend 1997: “On Legal Gaps,” in Garzón Valdés, E. et al. (eds.), Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin, (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 323–332).Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert C. 2003: Ways a World Might Be. Metaphysical and Antimetaphysical Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenius, Erik 1963: “The Principles of a Logic of Normative Systems,” Acta Philosophica Fennica 16: 247–260.Google Scholar

Suppes, Patrick 1957: Introduction to Logic (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold), citations are to the 1999 edition (New York: Dover).Google Scholar

Tarski, Alfred 1931: “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” citations are to the 1956 version included in Tarski 1956: 152–278.

Tarski, Alfred 1956: Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Van Fraassen, Bass C. 1972: “The Logic of Conditional Obligation,” Journal of Philosphical Logic 1: 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vernengo, Roberto 1986: “Sobre algunos criterios de verdad normativa,” Doxa – Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho 3: 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1951a: “Deontic Logic,” Mind 60: 1–15.Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1951b: An Essay in Modal Logic (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1956: “A Note on Deontic Logic and Derived Obligation,” Mind 65: 507–9.Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1957: Logical Studies (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1963a: Norm and Action. A Logical Inquiry (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1963b: The Logic of Preference: an Essay (Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1964: “A New System of Deontic Logic,” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 1: 173–182.Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1965: “A Correction to a New System of Deontic Logic,” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 2: 103–107.Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1967: “The Logic of Action – A Sketch,” in Rescher, N. (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 121–136).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1968: An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1969: “On the Logic and Ontology of Norms,” in Davis, J. W. (ed.), Philosophical logic (Dordrecht: Reidel, 89–107).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1971: “Deontic Logic and the Theory of Conditions,” in Hilpinen 1971: 159–177.

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1980: “Problems and Prospects of Deontic Logic,” in Agazzi, E. (ed.), Modern Logic – A Survey (Dordrecht: Reidel, 399–423).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1983: Practical Reason. Philosophical Papers, vol. I (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1984: Truth, Knowledge and Modality (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1985: “Is and Ought,” in Bulygin, E. et al. (eds.), Man, Law and Modern Forms of Life (Dordrecht: Reidel, 31–48).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1989: “Intellectual Autobiography,” in Schilpp, P. et al. (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright (Illinois: Open Court, 1–55).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1993: The Tree of Knowledge and Other Essays (New York: E. J. Brill).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1996: Six Essays in Philosophical Logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 60 (Helsinki: North-Holland Publishers).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1997: “Epilogue, ” in Garzón Valdés, E. et al. (eds.), Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 1999: “Deontic Logic – As I See It,” in McNamara and Prakken 1999: 15–25.

Von, Wright, Henrik, Georg 2000: “On Norms and Norm-Propositions. A Sketch,” in Krawietz, W. et al. (eds.), The Reasonable as Rational? On Legal Argumentation and Justification. Festschrift for Aulis Aarnio (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 173–178).Google Scholar

Waluchow, Wilfrid J. 1994: Inclusive Legal Positivism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wedberg, Anders 1951: “Some Problems in the Logical Analysis of Legal Science,” Theoria 17: 246–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberger, Ota 1981: Normentheorie als Grudlage der Jurisprudenz und Ethik (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar

Weinberger, Ota 1984: “On the Meaning of Norm Sentences, Normative Inconsistency, and Normative Entailment,” Rechtstheorie 15: 465–475.Google Scholar

Weinberger, Ota 1985: “The Expressive Conception of Norms – An Impasse for the Logic of Norms,” Law and Philosophy 4(2): 165–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberger, Ota 1986: “Logic and the Pure Theory of Law,” in Tur, R. and Twining, W. (eds.), Essays on Kelsen (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Weinberger, Ota 1991: Law, Institutions and Legal Politics (Dordrecht: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberger, Ota 1995: “Normological Inferences and the Generation of Legal Norms,” Ratio Iuris 8(3): 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberger, Ota 2001: “A Philosophical Approach to Norm Logic,” Ratio Iuris 14(1): 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1921: “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus,” first published as “Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung,” in Annalen der Naturphilosophische XIV (3/4), citations are to the 1922 English version (London: Routledge & Kegal Paul).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1953: Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar

Woleński, Jan 1990: “Deontic Logic and Possible Worlds Semantics: A Historical Sketch,” Studia Logica 49 (2): 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, Michael 1996: The Concept of Moral Obligation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuleta, Hugo 2008: Normas y justificación (Madrid, Barcelona, Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons).Google Scholar